91, Addition to family room to exc, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
of
Mr, William N. Hahn
Lot 16EF
ZONING CASE NO. 91
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Mr. William N. Hahn, Lot 16EF, Eastfield
Tract, for a variance of side yard requirements under Article III,
Section 3.07 of Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 19th day
of August, 1969 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Build-
ing of the City of Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having
submitted evidence in support of his application, the Planning Com-
mission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as
required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
Is
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. William N. Hahn, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 16EF, East -
field Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and
that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application
was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No, 33 of
the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and
that no evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III.
The Commission further finds that in order to enclose and enlarge
an existing breezeway to be used as the family room it will be necessary
to extend '._the. construction 18" into the side yard; otherwise, an exten-
sive roof modification would be necessary, and interior changes would
then be necessary. The owner stated that this would present sufficient
hardship to discourage the entire remodelling project, and stated, fur-
ther, that the addition cannot be seen from the road and the nearest
part of any residence is the garage on the adjacent property. The
Commission finds, therefore, that the variance of side yard require-
ments to allow the family room to project 18" into the side yard
should be granted to the applicant in order to preserve substantial
property rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and that the granting of such variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the
same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance of side yard
requirements should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rolling Hills to Mr. William No Hahn, Lot 16EF, Eastfield Tract,
in accordance with the plot plan marked Exhibit 1 on file in these
proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
October 20, 1969.
Chairman, Planning Commission
retary, Planning C •L' mission