Loading...
4, Decrease setback from 30 ft to, Resolutions & Approval Conditions�b� Bi�FO1�U THE FLANNI%SG COMMISSION OF" THE CFIY OF ROLLING HILLS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE' or�" CALIFORNIA . 4 In 'the; Matter' of the Ap.plicati'on 5 i of: 6 DONALD ECK.DAHL 7, Lot .9, . Tract 19040 (Georgeff Ranchos) 9. PTO 11 `,,12' ) ZONING 'CASE NO..4 FINDINGS AND FORMAe� RE'POR ' .' f'he application of Donald Eckdahl, Lot.9, Tract 19040, for a front yaxd variance, 'came on for hearing on the 2,3rd day of February, 1961,. at the hour of .7:30„ p. m. , at they City. Hall of the Gity of Rolling .Hills, California, 13 _., and the 'applicant. having .€submitted evidence in support of his 'application, nd 14 the Planning Commission being advised, now makes its Findings` and Formal' 15 . Report as required by the Ordinances 'of the City `of` Rollins Hi1lc California. 16� 17 The' Commission' finds that the applicant, Donald Eckdahl, is 18 the owner cf th�:.at certain' real property described as Lot 9, .Tract 19040 19 ff Ranchos), .locate'd in the. City of Rollin r �Geor a n�; Hills, Califo nia, and ;that 20 notice, of the public hearing in connection `with said application was given as 21 re'quired .by Sections 8. 06 and' 8. 07 of Ordinance No.;' 33', of the City of Rolling' 22; Hills, `Ca'lifornia: :24 25 26 That; no person appeared at .paid public .hea ring in opposition to t application f and that no evi he oz; a variance � ., deuce, �aac� ,raceived by the Commission in op p osition ,.er p .. p. th erto. . ?8 ! The .Commission further :finds that.the.proposed;residence of '9, applicant is to be located vzlthin twenty (20) feet of the, front yard line of said 30 31 of instead of s rdinance, and re uired,b :. thirty (30) feeet ate, .., � y''..; er �, raid Zonin.� O furtli find that by' reason of ;the terraine of said Lot 9, 'the variance shouid'be grant . 32 tom . pplicant in•orde:r to;precerve; rubstantia.l property rigYits pozsoecced by other propertyin the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such variance, will not be mat really detrimental to the public welfare or',injurious '.t© 3property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which applicant'c. property is located and that there are exceptional and extraordinary cir- 5 cumstanccs and conditions by reason of physical location and terratne` of said 6. Lot 9, which. do not apply generally to other propertyin the same .vicinity and 7 zone. 10 11 12. 13: 15 17, 21 23.' 2.4 25 2 6.: 27, 28 29 30. 31 32. From the foregoing it isconcluded that a variance should be granted by the Planning Corninissi.on of the City of Rolling Hills to Donald cldahl`of Lot 9 of Tract No. 1 040 (Gcor eff.Ranchos)in accordance with. the Plot 'Plan :.marked Exhibit 1 on file in theca proceedings, . and it is, therefore, so ordered.. Dated:: March 3, ;1, 96 • T. rya)7710 . Chairman,.,planning. Secretary, Planning. Commission