Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
685, Construct new SFR, grading req, Resolutions & Approval Conditions
This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD 20071230798 a o3s i i N 1111 i i 1111 1111 i i i u Reco ded/F1ed in Offcial Records Fees: $12.00 R.,nrdersOffce,-Los Angeles_County California axes: $0.00 Other: $9.00 05/21/07 AT 02:40PM Paid: $21.00 0000699445 200705210620041 Counter TITLE(S) : LEAD j -I E E T FEE CODE 20 CODE 19 CODE 9 D.T.T. Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. Number of AIN's Shown E321953 THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Cl !:] County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Building and Safety - Drainage and Grading Section Land Development - Drainage and Grading Section Land Development - Road/Sewer & Water Section P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Space above this tine is for Recorder's use 3. ACCEPTANCE OF DRAINAGE BY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNF,R DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE COVENANT TR/PM 1-4.2Q41 D. e DoR07 ,' M. DEL/ /7 as owner (name of owner of affected property) of .45 .5 DD[.Er3gc/C RP, iQdGL/A)cihi/GG5 Ce. 9027¢ . hereby agrees (description of property) 0 (as shown on attached map) to accept the surface waters emanating from 3 EuCAL 4r>rus 4,4A)E.l2ocz..//)//z.es (property description of development) as provided by drainage plans dated No,! 7, 2 00o and filed with the Office of the Director of Public Works, County of Los Angeles, and examined by the undersigned, with full knowledge of any alteration in drainage patterns from the natural condition provided by said plans, and hereby agrees for himself, his heirs, successors, and assigns to indemnify, defend and save harmless the County, its agents, officers and employees from and against any and all liability, expense, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damage of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage arising from or connect ;with said alterations. ame if other than an individual) (Name if an inbivial) (Title if other than an individual) Isl (Title if other than an individual) 10/03 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT r r r r'r r�r•r r r r.rr-�I+�rr State of C: o,\:ct c <- c. County of Los X.c\des or On DATE ...Gees* r.r.sr -cec' +cc before me, Cc-vc\no ra vr-N (\AL\ INN M { P b t NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE*DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" No. 5907 a 1 t personally appeared Qbt--t- NA 1\" �\ �� ,Qr� ` Q be_\n,� of NAME(S) OF SIGNERtS) 1--- -personally-known--to--me---OR---❑ proved -to -me -on -the -basis --of satisfactory -evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she the executed the same in his/her e authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her thej signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. BARBARA ANN ODOM Commission # 1499342 Nosy Public - California j Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Jul 6.2008I WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT El TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) rri�.,r• TITLE(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL . r ........r.r.r.r r.r DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT N\aacec\t Cc_r s cvx,rr co.\ s_ bv(p p TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-14 AND APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 685 AT 3 EUCALYPTUS LANE (LOT 53-RH), (PIEPER). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Pieper, property owners, with respect to real property located at 3 Eucalyptus Lane, (Lot 53- RH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a two-year time extension for a previously approved zoning case. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on June 14, 2005 at which time information was presented indicating that additional time is needed to process the development application. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 2004-14, dated May 18, 2004, to read as follows: "A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within three years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code". Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of Resolution No. 2004-14 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF JUNE 2005. ROLE SOMMER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: N . k A,„ MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-17 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-14 AND APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 685 AT 3 EUCALYPTUS LANE (LOT 53-RH), (PIEPER). was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 14, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner DeRoy, Hankins, Witte and Chairman Sommer. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CI �LERK RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT O F ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 685 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • 04 2261188 I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 3 EUCALYPTUS LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 53-RH) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 685 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) certify e) under salt of perjury that the foregoing ue and correct. Si natce�/le p, Si Name pe or prit}ted b I Addr /1/ . .1,°lJ( c4 902 City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary oublic. Addr City/State XX XX $ Recorder's Use Only State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On JOW 16, 9(04 before me,&LC O kit El-1 IJI h&t. j S, 0-iliO4 Pu �L.I G ' personally appeared P EPE-i2._ DIA%)i L I' le?ez.- e (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person° whose names) -i 1are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hefsite they executed the same in his4►er/their authorized capacity ies and that by hishher/their signaturet;) on the instrument the person), or the entity upon behalf of which the person'() acted, executed the instrument. SALOUMEH DIGGIS Witness by hand a iI seal. . -IT* _' Comm. No. 1427259 < -49 _ �, '� je NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA p ^ ' �' LOS ANGELES COUNTY S6nU of Notary My Comm. Exp. June 29, 2007 ' ' 4.0.4.1_4.u_1 SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF 64 2261188 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-14 • '-1l6i A- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 685 AT 3 EUCALYPTUS LANE (LOT 53-RH), (PIEPER). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Pieper with respect to real property located at 3 Eucalyptus Lane, (Lot 53-RH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading and construction for a new 5,530 square foot single family residence, 973 square foot garage, 800 square foot swimming pool/spa, service yard and 450 square foot future stable. A 2,640 square foot basement is also proposed. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on March 16, and April 20, 2004 and at a field trip visit on April 20, 2004. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant and his representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and is 2.06 acres (gross) in size and 1.7 acres net. The existing residence will be demolished. A new driveway to the residence is proposed to be constructed off Eucalyptus Lane. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the new house, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning • 04 2.1188 Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 72,744 square feet, (1.7 acres). The proposed residence (5,530 sq.ft.), garage (973 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.), swimming pool (800 sq.ft.) and future stable (450 sq.ft.) will have 7,849 square feet of structures, which constitutes 10.8% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. A 2,640 square foot basement is proposed for this development The total lot coverage including all structures, paved areas and driveway will be 13,529 square feet, which constitutes 18.6% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot will be 39.5%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the stable. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the new house will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves dense brush and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 1,935 cubic yards of cut and 1,935 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site. Most of the soil will be generated by excavation for the pool and basement. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because access will remain from Eucalyptus Lane. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 685 for grading and for Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper 2 • 0W261i88 construction of a new residence, as shown on the Development Plan dated March 10, 2004, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated March 10, 2004 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed 1,935 cubic yards of cut and 1,935 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,849 square feet or 10.8%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 13,529 square feet or 18.6% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 28,720 square feet or 39.5% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 26,580 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 7,849 square feet or 29.5%. K. The proposed basement shall not exceed 2,640 square feet and shall meet all requirements of the Los Angeles County Building Code and City Zoning Ordinance for basements, including exit door and provision for light and ventilation. L. The ridge height of the project shall not exceed 19.5' from the finished grade. Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper 3 04 1261188 M. The disturbed and graded areas shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall at full maturity not exceed the ridge height of the residence. N. Access to the development shall be taken from a new driveway. The driveway approach shall not be greter than 24 feet in width and the driveway, before it flares out for access to the garage, shall not exceed 20 feet in width. O. The existing driveway shall be closed off and the area landscaped. P. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. R. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. S. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper 4 • 04 2261188 X. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, roofing material requirements, and all other requirements of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. A drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department and County District Engineer. Such plan shall include any water from any site irrigation systems and shall ensure that all drainage from the site is conveyed in an approved manner. Z. If an above ground drainage system is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. AA. All utility lines shall be placed underground. AB. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AC. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of grading or building permit. AD. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including, but not be limited to school fees and City's Parks and Recreation Fees for a new residence. AE. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. AF. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, as required by Section 17.42.070, the approval shall not be effective. AG. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper 5 40 04 2261188 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADS D THIS 18TH DAY OF MAY 2004. ARVWIrTE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: �,4K MARILYN KE4ZN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper 6 04 2261188 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-14 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 685 AT 3 EUCALYPTUS LANE (LOT 53-RH), (PIEPER). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on May 18, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at Administrative Offices. Resolution No. 2004-14 Pieper DEPUTY CITY CLERK 7