85, Construct a cabana 24 ft into , Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Dr. R. H. Runciman
Lot 48SF
ZONING CASE NO, 85
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Dr. . R. H. Runciman, Lot 48 SF, Southfield Tract,
for a variance of front yard requirements under Article III, Section
3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 came onfor hearing on the 18thday of February,
1969 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building of the City
of Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having submitted evi-
dence in support of his application, the Planning Commission, being
advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by the
Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. Ronald H. Runciman, is
the owner of that certain realproperty described as Lot 48SF, Southfield
Tract, located in the City of Roiling Hills, California, and that notice
of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as
required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling 'Hills, California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said public
hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and that no
evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III .
The Commission further finds that the proposed pool shelter would
be located 24 feet from the easement line of Flying Mane Road, and that
the location. was chosenin order to have the pool shelter compatible
with the residence, which is located on a triangular lot bordered by
Flying Mane Road and Southfield Drive, and further finds that a variance
of six feet should be granted to allow for building a pool shelter no
closer than 24 feet to the easement line of Flying Mane Road, and
further, that no construction between the structure and the road extend
more than three feet above the ground.
The Commission finds that granting of a variance of front yard re-
quirements under Section 3.06 of Article III, Ordinance No. 33 will not
be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to pro-
perty in the same vicinity and zone and the variance should be granted
to applicant in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be granted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills to Dr. R. H.
Runciman, Lot 48SF, Southfield Tract, in accordance with the plot plan
marked Exhibit I on file in these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so
ordered.
March 11, 1969.
Chairman, Planning Commission
liecretary, Planning C'imission