256, Construct a SFR within the fro, Applicationa..
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
APPLICATION FOR:
The undersigned
a) Change of Zoning
b) Variance from Zoning Ordinance
c) Conditional Use Permit
Martin Goldberg, c/o Neil Stanton Palmer, Architect
NAME
672 Silver Spur Road. Rol l i na Hills F s,q,.--224 .6
SrRh 1' ADDRESS 1 .�. �It3NE U1FSEP�
1) is/ are the owner(s) of
2) has permission of the owner
3) plaintiff
Legal description of property situated at
Lot south of #4 Pine Tree Lane
STREETEADDRESS
#2
Lar
Petitions for (1) 30 foot. front setback
X. Such charge is warranted because (State reasons)..
A. The subdivision that created the lot i'n T97T was approved; based
on the ability to create a 1 2 .00lLs-,f_ . bu ] d i ng, at: b : Q :Los)
_front setback. •
Without this 30 foot setback the.. 1.-2„..,000 , .. .f „ .c xln1ot ,b.A.Lcrr_;� ted
and furthermore. the development of__ Tie_ property worti.. ,_rat...b_ _leAsibie.
• C. The proposed house.is •actually 60 feet from Pine Tree Lane at 'its.
closest point. while its floor 1in. is_,,2 y.,a„rtica1 fe ,_..bes1�, .:'Pi.le Tree
Lane at that point.
II. Such Change is based upon the following •descr:tbecl exceptional or extra.ordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property ar;
class of use in the same vicinity and zone. (State circumstarrces)L.w, �..,_
A. Future widening of Pine Tree Lane .is highly improbabledue to its:
low traffic volume, the steep topography__to, either side and the row
ofwpine trees along its edge adjacent to the property.,__....
B. The proposed house would be unobtrusive since its roof ridge at the
highest point would be 8 feet below. the road. .
C. The proposed house would vary from 74 • feet to 100 feet
line Tree Lane at its ends.
#28` 94'
. TRACT
B.
Iil ,Such. change is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone.
(State reasons) .
A. In order to develop. -:the property in a mariner that is •j n •con.form,ance .
to Rolling Hills architectural guidelines: it _i.s. necea.s.a_r„ o._.,b.ave• • •
a 30 foot setback. Without this varianc.e,_d.evelopmen .t.:h,i.. : '
property is not feasible whiles. retaining the architectural character
Of one-story ranch houses indicative of Rolling Hills.
IV. Such change will not be materially detritn ntal ' to the public welfare nor injur-
ious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property
is i.ocated because .
A. The house will actually be 60 feet from the road • an(1 t `' ridge line
will be 8 feet below the road, which y,ii 1 1 allow .views from the road
over the house.
B. The.proposed house location will not affect views from the
neighbors' homes. . •• . .
C._ The_.proposed l andscani u.g,_hetweek .J,he house and PineTree I a_ne will
give additional .privacy.. .
(If additional space is needed, use reverse side of sheet)