The URL can be used to link to this page

450, Subdivide 6.07 acre existing l, Correspondence(310) 544-6222 ioLLL,f LfL £ommwziLj c A.i.ocLalion of Jecznafio PaCos (14¢cLes NO. 1 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. • ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 ROLLING HILLS --3ra NOTI February 8, 2016 Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Property Address: 7 Pine Tree Lane Lot: 86 Tract: RH Dear Ms. Talbot: CALIFORNIA OLATION -- (310) 544-6766 FAX This letter is in follow up to the violation we have on record for the unpermitted trellis on your property. Understanding that the City is requiring you obtain a Building and Safety building permit by February 29, 2016 or they will refer your matter to their legal counsel, I want to reiterate that Association approval is required prior to submitting to Building and Safety for a permit. To submit for Association approval, please submit photos and a survey for Architectural Committee approval no later than Monday February 15, 2016. Architectural Committee meetings are held on the first and third Tuesday of the month. If we do not obtain plans by February 15th, any review or approval of plans will held until March. Please contact me if you have questions regarding this letter or if you need assistance with the approval processes. Thank you in adv Sincerely, r your prompt attention regarding this matter. cc: Yolanta Schwartz, City Planning Director . • ai Ra qe1 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 February 4, 2016 Ms. Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90277 Subject: Permit required for trellis at 7 Pine Tree Lane - FINAL NOTICE Dear Ms. Talbot: I am writing as a follow-up to 2 prior letters sent from the City to you regarding a trellis structure that was built on your property without required approvals and building permit (see attached). In October, 2015 you obtained approvals from the City Planning staff, of an as -built plan of the subject trellis structure (copy attached), subject to obtaining approval also from the RHCA and then obtaining a building permit. However, the City has no record of that zoning approved plan ever having been taken to the County Permit Office in Lomita and a building permit subsequently being issued. It is requested that you obtain the required building permit from the LA County Building and Safety Permit office no later than February 29, 2016. Should you fail to obtain the required building permit by this date, the City will have no option other than to refer this matter to the City Attorney for enforcement. If you wish to further,cl' cuss this matter, I can be reached at 310 377-1521. Sincer Rosemary I..(ackow, Planning Assistant Attachment: Approved plot plan cc: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Wayne Chatman, LA County Building Inspector Rolling Hills Community Association • • go* al Ra gad INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, i957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 January 5, 2016 Ms. Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90277 Subject: Permit for trellis at 7 Pine Tree Lane Dear Ms. Talbot: I am writing as a follow-up to a letter sent from the City to you in 2015 regarding a trellis structure that was built on your property without required approvals and building permit (see attached). On October 6, 2015 your pool contractor submitted a plan that was approved by Rolling Hills planning, however a building permit is still required. It is requested that you obtain the required building permit from the LA County Building and Safety Permit office in Lomita no later than January 31 2016. Attached is a copy of a plot plan approved by the City (as meeting applicable zoning regulations). You will also need sign off on the plot plan by the Rolling Hills Community Association before the County issues a permit. If you wish to further discuss this matter, I can be reached at 310 377-1521. Sinc Imo/ RosemaryL ckow, PlanningAssistant Attachment: Plot plan approved by City of Rolling Hills cc: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Wayne Chatman, LA County Building Inspector Rolling Hills Community Association • • City oileolling August 14, 2015 Ms. Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Property inquiry Dear Ms. Talbot: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Thank you for meeting me with your contractor on your property on Wednesday, August 12, 2015. The City received an inquiry regarding construction on your property and conversion of a riding ring into a rock garden. Upon review of the City file it was determined that you have an approval for the pool and deck and that you obtained a building permit for the pool. Construction of the deck does not require a building permit. The field inspection confirmed that the construction is proceeding per the approved plans. While constructing the deck, please assure that the deck is constructed on grade or if necessary to be elevated that it is less than 12", at any one point, above the natural grade. It was noted in the field that a previously existing grassy meadow/corral was converted to a passive rock and path like garden. Said construction does not require building permits and may remain. However, this area cannot be paved without further review by the City. It shall remain pervious for easy conversion to an equestrian use, should one be desired in the future. I also observed a trellis, which has not been previously approved. Please submit a site plan for the trellis for City's review and approval and obtain a building permit for its construction by 'September 30, 2015. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (310) 377-1521 or email at ys@cityofrh.net. Thank you for your cooperation. Sin erely Y anta Schwartz Pl ing Director Printed on Recycled Paper _-ee rail fence grass J 4 I • &9 Rai&if qetei INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 January 5, 2016 Ms. Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90277 Subject: Permit for trellis at 7 Pine Tree Lane Dear Ms. Talbot: I am writing as a follow-up to a letter sent from the City to you in 2015 regarding a trellis structure that was built on your property without required approvals and building permit (see attached). On October 6, 2015 your pool contractor submitted a plan that was approved by Rolling Hills planning, however a building permit is still required. It is requested that you obtain the required building permit from the LA County Building and Safety Permit office in Lomita no later than January 30, 2016. Attached is a copy of a plot plan approved by the City (as meeting applicable zoning regulations). You will also need sign off on the plot plan by the Rolling Hills Community Association before the County issues a permit. If you wish to further discuss this matter, I can be reached at 310 377-1521. Sinc Rosemary Lackow, Planning Assistant Attachment: Plot plan approved by City of Rolling Hills cc: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Wayne Chatman, LA County Building Inspector Rolling Hills Community Association • • City apeoelitt9Ja1ee August 14, 2015 Ms. Fernanda Talbot 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Property inquiry Dear Ms. Talbot: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Thank you for meeting me with your contractor on your property on Wednesday, August 12, 2015. The City received an inquiry regarding construction on your property and conversion of a riding ring into a rock garden. Upon review of the City file it was determined that you have an approval for the pool and deck and that you obtained a building permit for the pool. Construction of the deck does not require a building permit. The field inspection confirmed that the construction is proceeding per the approved plans. While constructing the deck, please assure that the deck is constructed on grade or if necessary to be elevated that it is less than 12", at any one point, above the natural grade. It was noted in the field that a previously existing grassy meadow/corral was converted to a passive rock and path like garden. Said construction does not require building permits and may remain. However, this area cannot be paved without further review by the City. It shall remain pervious for easy conversion to an equestrian use, should one be desired in the future. I also observed a trellis, which has not been previously approved. Please submit a site plan for the trellis for City's review and approval and obtain a building permit for its construction by September 30, 2015. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (310) 377-1521 or email at ys@cityofrh.net. Thank you for your cooperation. Sinlerely Y nta Sc wartz PI ing Director Printed on Recycled Paper thr roll fence • Cay a`eo ltnq Jul16 GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S. Mayor JODY MURDOCK. Mayor Pro Tern THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember FRANK E. HILL Councilmember B. ALLEN LAY Councilmember June 27, 2000 Mr. and Mrs. Robert N. Ruth 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ruth: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Thank you for your correspondence dated June 16, 2000 regarding the proposed. improvements for 7 Pine Tree Lane. In reviewing the plans that were submitted to this office for the roadway connection improvements of the recently widened Pine Tree Lane to the newly extended portion of Pine Tree Lane submitted by Bolton Engineering, it appears that there is a small portion (13.5 square feet) of the roadway widening improvements within the easement -on your property located at 7 Pine Tree Lane. This plan has several dates on it, one of which you have referenced as May 30, 2000. However, the official typed date is February 18, 1999 and a handwritten date of June 2, 2000 with a signature from Ross Bolton. It is our understanding that this plan was forwarded to you by representatives of Bolton Engineering Corporation. In comparing this plan to previous roadway improvement plan submitted to the City of Rolling Hills for the subdivision at 16 Pine Tree Lane, the specifics of how the improved portion of Pine Tree Lane would interconnect to the extension of Pine Tree Lane were not delineated in the detail that they are on the map we have referenced above. Therefore, at that time, information was not available to us that would have shown that the plan actually proposed to encroach on your property. If you have any questions regarding the rights and uses of the property that has been dedicated as a private easement within the City of Rolling Hills, you should contact the Rolling Hills Community Association. Printed on Recycled Paper. • • Mr. and Mrs. Robert Ruth June 27, 2000 Page 2 Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. We have enclosed a copy of the plan that was submitted by Bolton Engineering Corporation as a reference to this letter. Thank you for your correspondence. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk 06/27/00ruth.ttr cc; City Council City Attorney Ms. Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager ,Ms. Lola Ungar, Planning Director Dr. Ray Cukingnan Mr. Ross, Bolton rCity 0/ Roffiny GODFFEY PERNELL Mayor JODY MURDOCK Mayor Pro Tern THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember FRANK E. HILL Councilmember B.ALLEN LAY Councilmember April 25, 1995 Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 r INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 REQUEST FOR A TWO (2) LOT SUBDIVISION OF LAND Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith, 7 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 86-RH) Dear Dr. and Mrs. Smith: As you are no doubt aware, members of the Rolling Hills City Council have continued the public hearing relative to the above referenced case to Monday, May 1, 1995, beginning at 8:00 a.m. at 7 Pine Tree Lane. The purpose of this adjourned public hearing will be to conduct a field trip on the proposed site. Your representative, Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering, indicated that proper staking will be completed prior to that time. Should you have any questions prior to that meeting, please feel free to let us know. Thank you for all of your cooperation in this process. Sincerely, 5'144 Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk smith.ltr cc: Lola Ungar, Principal Planner Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Mr. John Resich @PrintF J ryn Rnm✓r lnri Rio r • • ROBERT NELSON RUTH 11150 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025 Hand Delivered June 16, 2000 Ms. Lola Ungar City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Re: Proposed Improvements 7 Pine Tree Lane. Rolling Hills Dear Lola, J U Ni 1 5. 2000 CITY OF ROLLING l�4!LLS Rv This letter is a follow up to the letter that we received last Friday from Ross Bolton of Bolton Engineering Corporation, dated June 5, 2000. It references the connection of the temporary cul de sac that is scheduled to take place at the end of Pine Tree Lane. We are interested in supporting the proposed improvements that are scheduled to take place on Pine Tree Lane, subject to our interpretation of the improvements. As a matter of reference, in early August of 1998, Doug McHattie of Bolton Engineering did ask me to review a proposed plan on behalf of the Cukingnan's that would encroach into a portion of the easement line on #7 Pine Tree Lane. I asked Doug McHattie if the proposed plan would eliminate any significant trees and or fence area, and the reply was "no way". After further review and a site visit, I realized that the plans did not reflect our discussion. I therefore called Bolton Engineering and asked them to please survey and stake the proposed improvements. It was quite clear that after the improvements were staked the information that was delivered to me earlier was not correct and therefore the request was denied. I did not sign the request and explained to Doug McHattie that it was not acceptable. -/ I then had a brief meeting with you in June of 1999 to review the revised plans at City Hall. Both of us determined that from the plans we reviewed that there would not be any improvements made on my property and or within my easement lines. Therefore, I would like to again receive a confirmation from City Hall that the proposed plan (dated May 30, 2000 from Bolton Engineering Corporation), that has been approved by the City of Rolling Hills, does not encroach on my easement and or property line. I have not approved any such action and have not received any notice of such proposed plan. We look forward to working with our neighbors to support their requests. Thanks in advance for your understanding to this request and timely response. Please call me with any questions at 310 377-8289 home, and 310 630-8816 office. Since Robert N. Ruth 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 CC: Mr. Ross Bolton, Bolton Engineering Corporation (via US Mail) Dr. Ray Cukingnan, 16 Pine Tree Lane (hand delivered) /Ms. Peggy Minor, Rolling Hills Community Association (hand delivered) V Mr. Craig Nealis, City of Rolling Hills (hand delivered) • aBoltEngineering Corporation 707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310) 544-0458 June 5, 2000 William and Judy Hassoldt #10 Pinetree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Robert Ruth # 7 Pinetree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Road extension for Parcel Map 21486 Ray Cukingnan's Project at #16 Pinetree Lane Dear Hassoldts and Ruths: Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed connection to the temporary cul de sac at the current end of Pinetree Lane. We will be making this connection in the near future. If you .have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 President Copy: Craig Nealis, City of Rolling Hills Peggy Minor, Rolling Hills Community Association M\6141.0.3%!,Akk6i,o6MI‘TIMAkra\MA6661144}-,6A60 A.M166\0.61WAI6M1160M66aty(t6M60.61616.6% 1\111.W6M6,1W666t6MA6k 1.61\116.1616‘6.6.6W6Ot trA1.60n6AIMMI6n,, 4606 ,6'66 ?6161q6666,66, 664V,0 66,7,1 ‘k6 61r...\ ,66 ‘. n 6v.66, 66 V" 66166v. 6 01 v16 1 4 '" • • v..1: • ••••••••• Q • City (" Ro llins JII/Id GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S. Mayor JODY MURDOCK Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember FRANK E. HILL Councilmember B. ALLEN LAY Councilmember May 9,1995 Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Smith: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh @ aol.com Thank you for attending the meeting of the City Council held Monday, May 8, 1995. As you are no doubt aware, at that meeting, the City Councilmembers directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334, related to Zoning Case No. 449A, Subdivision No. 83. A staff report and draft Resolution will be mailed to you after May 18, 1995, or you may pick one up at our offices on Friday, May 19, 1995. This Resolution will be scheduled before the City Council at their regular meeting to be held on Monday, May 22, 1995 beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the Rolling Hills City Council Chambers. Should you wish to discuss your case prior to that date, please do not hesitate to call. Again, thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 9444 Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk smi th2.1 tr '-A Printed on Recycled Paner • • William and Judith Hassoldt Business Investments February 28, 1994 Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Rolling Hills, Ca. 90274 RE: SUBDIVISION OF TEN PINE TREE LANE, ROLLING HILLS HASSOLDT Dear Commissioners, Ten Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 310-532-3000 310-377-4114 In July of 1993, we requested our subdivision, 10 Pine Tree Lane be put in abeyance for eleven months. We request that our project return to your agenda - April of 1994. Thank you for your attention to this project. Sincerely, L-Xff/adZi61'61 William & Judith Hassoldt W&JH/nj cc: Rolling Hills City Council Craig Nealis - City Manager Lola Ungar City Planner Michael Jenkins - City Attorney Dr. Robert A. Smith and Paula Smith Seven Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, California 90274 January 20, 1994 Mr. Craig Nealis City Manager City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Reference: Application for Proposed Subdivision of SevQ.q.._Eine Tree Lane. Roiling Hills, Zonina Case 449, Tentative Parcel. Man 22331. Dear Mr. Nealis: By this letter, we consent to an extension of time for. the City Council to act on the above -mentioned application to June 30, 1994. This extension is made pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.140 and California Government Code Sections 66451.1 and extends the time periods specified in Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.120 until June 30, 1994. Any further extension beyond this time period will require our further consent. Thank you for your consideration of our request. very truly yours, Dr. Robert A. Smith Paula Smith 940120 164I477 I JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH January 18, 1994 Mr. Craig R. Nealis City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • Bran D JANI201994 CITY OF ROLLING HILL! By..................... Re: Resolution #723: A resolution of the city council of the city of Rolling Hills authorizing the issuance of a certificate of compliance for lot line adjustment. Subject to the conditions of planning commission resolution No. 93-32 in zoning case No. 502. Dear Mr. Nealis, As stated by my representative Mr. Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering, vehicular access from Parcel 1 across the property line to the guest house on Parcel 2 was temporarily opened due to the moving of the Kouri's . The driveway access had to be reactivated to allow for the moving of furnishings from the guest house and as of today has been reinstalled. Your understanding in this matter is most appreciated. Thank you Sincerely, John Z. Blazevich JZB/trb 222 WEST SIXTH STREET, EIGHTH FLOOR, SAN PEDRO, CALIFORNIA 90731-3316 310 . 832 . 800o FAX 310 . 548 . 1484 ROBERT A. SMITH, M.D., INC. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY 1350 WEST 6TH STREET SUITE 7 SAN PEDRO. CALIFORNIA 90732 833,5203 29 September, 1993 Rolling Hills City Hall Mayor and Council- #2 Portuguese Bend Rolling Hills, CA 90274 IFIg/EaVir OCT 0 4 1993 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Re: Subdivisions on Pine Tree Lane Dear Sirs: My wife and I have been in the process of obtaining permission to subdivide the six acres we own into two parcels. We engaged the services of Doug McHattie and South Bay Engineering who have diligently pursued this for us and at present we are cleared by the County and the Rolling Hills Community Association for this subdivision. The Planning Committee has held up authorization based on the fact that the subdividers have not agreed on how the road extension and turn -around bulb is to be designed on Pine Tree Lane. Specific- ally, the Hassoldts and Cukingnans are unable to come to an agreement. Dr. Cukingnan has graciously offered to pay for the extensions in the Easement between his parcel and the Hassoldt's, and to put the cul-de-sac bulb on his property entirely. The Hassoldts have objected to this on the basis that some of the grading (in the Easement) would be on their half of the Easement! It is my contention that the Easement is not the property of any one property owner, but rather an Easement for the Community Association of the City of Rolling Hills to do with as is best for the City and for the residents of the Community. It is for the ROBERT A. SMITH. M.D. 29 September, 1993 Page 2 Re: Subdivisions on Pine Tree Lane pleasure of the City and Community Association to do with as they see fit; i.e. as a bridle trail, or for the widening of a road, or for the installation of a water main. This applies to both halves of the Easement. The road (Pine Tree Lane) wanders back and forth from side to side in the Easement as is most appropriate for the situation. I would like the City of Rolling Hills to give some direction to it's Planning Committee and use it's authority to pick the best proposal for the road extension and turn -around bulb plan that it feels appropriate, and put an end to this impasse. All parties may never agree, and I feel the City should therefore do what it feels is proper. Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering has submitted several proposals as to where the road might be located, and would be happy to provide maps and drawings in detail for your evaluation. I am enclosing my suggestion for a solution. Sincerely, 0 ,_t53 lz - Robert A. Smith, M.D. ROBERT A. SMITH. M.D.. INC. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY 1350 WEST 6TH STREET SUITE 7 SAN PEDRO. CALIFORNIA 90732 833 5203 September 29, 1993 Re: Resolution Regarding Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills and the Subdivision of Properties Belonging To: 1.) Dr. and Mrs. Smith, 7 Pine Tree 2.) Dr. and Mrs. Cukingnan, 16 Pine Tree 3.) Dr. and Mrs. Ulirich, 5 Pine Tree 4.) Mr. and Mrs. Hassoldt, 10 Pine Tree In conjunction with the splitting of these properties the city of Rolling Hills has asked that Pine Tree Lane be widened and a bridal trail be created. In addition, there is to be an extension of the road, at it's present dead end, in the Easement, to a bulb turn-' around on Dr. and Mrs. Cukingnan's property. These improvements to Pine Tree Lane will be paid for by the group, based on the number of parcels being subdivided: 1/5 Smith, 1/5 Cukingnan, 1/5 Ullrich and 2/5 Hassoldt, if all proceed with their subdivisions. In the future, subdividers on Pine Tree Lane will reimburse the original subdividers according to the number of new lots subdivi- ded, so that all share equally according to the total number of lots subdivided. The City of Rolling Hills will collect and dis- tribute the money back to the original subdividers. SIGNED: ROBERT SMITH RAYMOND CUKINGNAN REINHOLD ULLRICH BILL HASSOLDT ROLLING HILLS PAULA SMITH BERNADETTE CUKINGNAN NORA ULLRICH JUDY HASSOLDT HEARING DATE: TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: City .1) AGENDA ITEM 3A MAY 1,1995 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 REQUEST FOR A TWO (2) LOT SUBDIVISION OF LAND Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith, 7 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 86-RH) Attached is a matrix comparing the previous and proposed subdivision project, letter from City Manager Craig Nealis to the Smiths, signed 30 day extension consent form, and the April 24, 1995 staff report. Staff will have plans available at the meeting. Pnnted on Ref ,clad Paper DATE: TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Cit `a elin9 APRIL 24,1995 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 COMPARISON OF PREVIOUS/PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PROJECT Area of disturbance Grading quantities Depth of Cut Pad Size County Engineer Position Planning Commission PARCEL 2 PARCEL 2 OF PREVIOUS PROTECT OF PROPOSED PROTECT RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL 2ECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nearly 80% 2,730 cu. yds.cut soil 2,730 cu. yds. fill soil More than 70 feet 13,600 square feet Unwilling to provide written assurances that proposed measures to grade & buttress site will be sufficient to eliminate landslide hazard to potential structures. Remedial 50.7% Permanently disturbed 40% 3,730 cu.yds.cut soil 3,730 cu.yds.fill soil 29 feet 13,600 square feet Proposed grading Sr buttressing plans approved for feasibility. Recommended for Denial by Recommended for Approval Planning Commission (5-0) by Planning Commission (5-0) Panted on Recycled Paoer Cay o`a Rollin, Jh//J INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING MILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 ()QOFFI:YPEL FAX: (310) 377-7288 Mayor JODY MURCOCK Mayor Pro Tern TFIOMAS F. I-ENSFEI(►ER Counc nember FRANK E. FILL Councirember B. ALLEN LAY Couna7member April 25,1995 Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith 7 Pine Tree Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 REQUEST FOR A TWO (2) LOT SUBDIVISION OF LAND Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith, 7 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 86-RH) Dear Dr. and Mrs. Smith: As you are no doubt aware, members of the Rolling Hills City Council have continued the public hearing relative to the above referenced case to Monday, May 1, 1995, beginning at 8:00 a.m. at 7 Pine Tree Lane. The purpose of this adjourned public hearing will be to conduct a field trip on the proposed site. Your representative, Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering, indicated that proper staking will be completed prior to that time. Should you have any questions prior to that meeting, please feel free to let us know. Thank you for all of your cooperation in this process. Sincerely, 5744 Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk smith.ltr cc Lola Ungar, Principal Planner Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Mr. John Resich ®Panted on Recycled Paper APR ' 9 13: S9 ROLL ING-rIILLS P.c/c^ City RA" .11tfL INCOR►ORATW JANUAR', 24, I431 NO ! POATUGULSE 9ENO OW. ROLLING MILL$ CALIF •0174 (7101771.1621 VAX m0) 371.7211 LETTER OF CONSENT TO SUBDIVISION EXTENSION OF TIME (Government Code Section 65937) Application No. 449A Department of Planning City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Attn: Lola Ungar Dear Lola: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65957 and Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.140, Dr. and Mrs. Robert A. Smith request and consent to a thirty (30) clay mtensioji to the time periods specified in Government Code Sections 65950, 65950.1 and 65952 and Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.120 for the for the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills to take action on the above referenced application. .lw$ a. • f -LA 4a p1 9 n D . ROBERT A. SMITH Date .444.eu.c. Receivtd y /2lAejlf Date Ci4, `l2 !! y JJ,•fL AGENDA ITEM 10A HEARING DATE: APRIL 24,1995 TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 REQUEST FOR A TWO (2) LOT SUBDIVISION OF LAND Dr. and Mrs. Robert Smith, 7 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 86-RH) APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: LOCATION & SIZE: APPLICANTS: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 7 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 86-RH) RAS-2, 6.16 ACRES DR. AND MRS. ROBERT A. SMITH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING APRIL 13, 1995 Request for a two (2) lot subdivision of land at Lot 86-RH, and currently 7 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills, CA, an existing lot that has one residential unit. Lot 86-RH consists of 6.16 acres gross to be divided into two parcels as follows: Lot 1 - 2.97 acres gross, 2.71 acres net; and Lot 2 - 3.15 acres gross, 2.62 acres net. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE BACKGROUND 1. Resolution No. 95-8 was approved unanimously on March 21, 1995. At a Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission and Traffic Commission on March 25, 1995, Councilmember Lay requested that more information about Planning Commission deliberations be included in future resolutions. Consequently, staff added further information to the resolution Panted on Recycled Pape! and returned it to the Planning Commission. On April 18, 1995, the amended Resolution No. 95-8 was reapproved by Commissioners Hankins, Raine, and Chairman Roberts. Commissioners Frost and Witte were absent as they were on vacation. 2. On January 24, 1994, the City Council remanded the subject case back to the Planning Commission when the applicants proposed a modification of the lot lines. The Planning Commission as the Advisory Agency previously recommended denial of the Tentative Parcel Map on December 21, 1993, Resolution No. 93-37, because it did not comply with the General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission found that the creation of Parcel 2 (then 2.10 acres net) is largely underlain by an ancient landslide and would require nearly 80% of the lot to be excavated to a maximum depth of 70 feet to provide a buildable lot, according to geological documents provided by the applicants at that time. The Commission asked the applicant to obtain written assurances from the County Engineer that the proposed measures to grade and buttress the site will be sufficient to eliminate the geological hazard but, the County Engineer was unwilling to provide written assurance. The proposal would also conflict with the Zoning Ordinance provisions (1) that the amount of grading disturbance on a lot not exceed 40% and (2) the required finding for site plan review that the amount of grading required to create a building pad be minimized. 3. During the Planning Commission's hearing process on remand, revised plans were presented showing that the net size of Parcel 2 was increased by 0.52 acres and the net size of Parcel 1 was decreased by 0.35 acres. In addition, the plans show that grading and buttressing of the site was reduced and revised. The revised plans indicate that the permanent disturbed area of Parcel 2 to be 40%. Los Angeles County Geology and Soils completed their review and provided approval for feasibility of the tentative parcel map. The review requires that the limits of all geologic/geotechnical corrective grading (Shear Keys, Overexcavations of Landslide Debris, Back Cuts, etc.) be shown on the Tentative Parcel Map to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. The consultants have prepared a map to satisfy the County requirements showing the limits of the remedial repair. Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-8 includes the Geology and Soils recommendations [See Page 8, Condition 15 (y) and (z); and Page 14, Conditions 60, 61, 62, and 63 of the resolution]. 4. The applicants' plans indicate a 13,600 square foot building pad on Parcel 2 that is located at the southwest portion of the lot. The western portion of that ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 PAGE 2 OF 4 pad is in the front setback area and could require a Variance for future construction. Grading quantities will require 3,730 cubic yards of cut soil and 3,730 cubic yards of fill soil. 5. Plans show 25 foot easements at all lot boundaries, except for a 30 foot wide easement on the west side of the properties at the driveway access off Pine Tree Lane. Pine Tree Lane will be improved and extended. The future Pine Tree Lane has been reconfigured and consists of 20 feet of paving and 4 feet of decomposed granite for the bridle trail. The slope for the future street will vary from 14 to 17%. In addition, the curves on the future street will be less than 250 degrees. The cul-de-sac bulb at the end of Pine Tree Lane is proposed to be compatible with this subdivision and the related parcel maps for the adjacent properties of 10 and 16 Pine Tree Lane, respectively, Zoning Case No. 512, Subdivision No. 82, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 21400 (Mr. and Mrs. William Hassoldt); Zoning Case No. 450, Subdivision No. 84, Tentative Parcel Map No. 21486 (Mr. and Mrs. Ramon Cukingnan). The Cukingnan subdivision was approved by the City Council on March 28, 1994 and the Hassoldt subdivision was approved by the City Council on August 22, 1994. 6. The existing 3,779 square foot residence, attached garage, and stable on Parcel 1 were built in 1941. 7. The existing house on Parcel 1 encroaches 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. 8. There is sufficient area on the proposed Parcel 2 to provide a 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral. 9. The driveway leading to the proposed building pad on Parcel 2 will have a 15' wide driveway and shows approximately 10% slope. 10. After reviewing the Initial Study for the project, Staff has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project. Accordingly, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared (attached). REOUIRED CITY COUNCIL ACTION The City Council may concur with the Planning Commission's findings and recommendation of approval of the subdivision. If the City Council were to approve ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 PAGE 3 OF 4 the subdivision, the Council will have to show affirmative findings that the tentative parcel map complies with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and General Plan and specifying that it does not require rejection pursuant to Section 16.12.150 of the Municipal Code. That section specifies that a tentative map shall be rejected if it is found that: "1. The proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans; 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans; 3. The site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed; 4. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat; 6. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause serious public health or safety problems; 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the subdivision. In this connection, the City Council may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access of for use, will be provided, and that these shall be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public." RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the proposed 2-lot subdivision, Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-8, the Negative Declaration, and take public testimony. (NOTE: The Council has 30 days from the adoption of the Negative Declaration to approve/deny the case. The Council could take action on both the Negative Declaration and the case itself, or at the least on the Negative Declaration). ZONING CASE NO. 449A, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 PAGE 4 OF 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.16 ACRE EXISTING LOT THAT HAS ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT INTO 2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS FRONTING THE EAST SIDE OF PINE TREE LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 449A. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Robert A. Smith with respect to real property at Lot 86-RH, and currently, 7 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills, requesting a two (2) lot subdivision of land on an existing lot that has, one residential unit. Section 2. An application was filed for this project beginning on January 21, 1991. The Planning Commission reviewed the case at subsequent meetings beginning in September, 1992 and concluding with a recommendation of denial to the City Council on December 21, 1993. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on January 24, 1994 at which time new evidence was heard and presented, and the applicant proposed a modification of the lot lines, whereupon, the City Council remanded the case back to the Planning Commission for further review. During the Planning Commission's hearing process on remand, revised plans were presented showing that the net size of Parcel 2 was increased by 0.52 acres and the net size of Parcel 1 was decreased by 0.35 acres. In addition, the plans showed that grading and buttressing plans of the site were reduced and revised. The revised plans indicate that the permanent disturbed area of Parcel 2 to be 40%. Section 3. The application applies to Lot 86-RH which consists of 6.16 acres gross. This lot is proposed to be ,divided into two parcels as follows: Parcel 1 - 2.97 acres gross, 2.71 acres net; and Parcel 2 - 3.15 acres gross, 2.62 acres net. Lot 86-RH is within the RA-S-2 zone district (2-acre minimum zone), and referred to as Assessor's Book, Page, and Parcel No. 7569-013-005. The General Plan Land Use designation for this property is Very Low Density Residential 2+ Net Acres per Dwelling Unit. Section 4. The subject site is presently occupied by one residential structure at the southern portion of the property, surrounded by landscaping. The existing residential structure would be located on Parcel 1. The remainder of the lot is presently vacant with natural vegetation in a semidisturbed state. The site is surrounded by other single family dwellings on 2+ acre size lots. The zone designation for the subject site is RA-S-2 and the zone designation on adjacent properties is RA-S-2. Section 5. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a 2-lot subdivision of land on February 15, 1994, March 15, 1994, April 18, 1994, May 17, 1994, June 21, 1994, July 19, 1994, August 16, 1994, September 20,1994, October 18, 1994, November 22, 1994, December 10, 1994, January 17, 1995, February 21, 1995, and March 21, 1995, and at a field trip visit on May 7, 1994. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's Resolution No. 95-8 Page 1 of 19 newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said. proposal, from all persons protesting the same, and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants were in attendance at the hearings. Section 6. According to Section 16.12.110 of Title 16, Subdivisions, of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is the advisory agency for review of a tentative parcel map and the Commission is to make its recommendations to the City Council upon completing evaluation of all environmental proceedings pursuant to the local guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 7. The Planning staff prepared an initial study for the project. The initial study found that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment if certain measures were included in the project. The Negative Declaration was prepared with those mitigation measures and was circulated to the applicant and other interested parties in accordance with State of California CEQA Guidelines. The public notice of the Planning Commission's intent to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration was published. Copies of the Negative Declaration were sent to adjacent cities and other government agencies. No comments on the Negative Declaration were received. Section 8. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Negative Declaration and finds that it represents the independent judgment of the City and that it was prepared in compliance with CEQA. Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project, and are incorporated herein by reference. Based upon these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 9. Pursuant to Section 16.12.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code a tentative map shall be rejected under certain conditions. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills during the public hearing referenced in Section 5, including public testimony, and written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The proposed subdivision map and the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the applicable General Plan, including but not limited to, the following goals and policies of the General Plan: 1. Maintain Rolling Hills' distinctive rural residential character. (Land Use Element, p. 15.) 2. Accommodate development which is compatible with and complements existing land uses. (Land Use Element, p. 15.) 3. Accommodate development that is sensitive to the natural environment and accounts for environmental hazards. (Land Use Element, p. 16.) Resolution No. 95-8 Page 2 of 19 4. Provide for housing which meets the needs of existing and future Rolling Hills residents. (Housing Element, p. 44) 5. Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills. (Housing Element, p. 44) 6. Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin or color. (Housing Element, p. 45.) 7. Conserve and enhance the City's natural resources, facilitating development in a manner which reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of these resources. (Open Space and Conservation Element, p. 15.) B. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density and type of development. The proposed use, density, and proposed subdivision improvements are permitted in the RA-S-2 zone. Parcel 1 is 2.71 acres net and Parcel 2 is 2.62 acres net which exceeds the minimum 2-acre lot size of the RA-S-2 zone. C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage; or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the property is within an area of the City, designated for development. The initial study prepared for the project did not identify the site as containing unique or sensitive environmental qualities and no threatened, rare or endangered plant or animal species were identified during review of the project. D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because conditions of approval have been applied to the project to require compliance with applicable codes and ordinances designed to protect public health and safety. E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. This is because existing roadway easements will be maintained or expanded by this project and adequate access will be provided to these parcels and adjacent parcels. In addition, the parcels will contain perimeter easements providing access for roads, trails, and public utilities. As a condition of approval, these easements will be recorded in deeds prior to approval of the final map. F. The proposed subdivision will not adversely affect the housing needs of the region. G. The proposed use will be in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Residential Development Standards in the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance. H. The proposed subdivision, as revised, is in compliance with the 40% maximum disturbed area requirement contained in Section 17.16.070(B) of the Zoning Ordinance. Although 50.7% of the lot will be remediated through grading and recompaction, only 40% Resolution No. 95-8 Page 3of19 of the lot area will not be returned to its original state. Thus, the portion of the lot, that, will be disturbed in a permanent manner satisfies the requirement of Section 17.16.070(B). ' I. The proposed use will be compatible with other existing residential development in the immediate area. J. The tentative map design provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible because the project is designed with lots of adequate dimensions to maximize the opportunities for passive and natural heating and cooling. K. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, because the property in question has not been included in any such contract. L. Pursuant to Section 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act, the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into proposed, septic systems will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, because the applicant is required to comply with all Conditions of Approval regarding waste disposal contained in Section 12 of this Resolution. M. Pursuant to the Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.155, this Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with and does not impact the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Section 10. Pursuant to the Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.12.130, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council grant the following modifications to the Subdivision Ordinance for this project which are determined to be warranted because of the size and shape of the proposed division of land and the unusual physical conditions thereon: A. Sideline Angles. Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.16.020 requires that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles to or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The sidelines on the most northerly and southerly property lines are not at right angles to the street, Pine Tree Lane. The alteration of the most northerly and southerly lot lines would not be practicable because they are the boundaries of the existing lot. B. Street Grades. The Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 16.16.150 requires that no street shall have a grade of more than six (6) percent except for short distances where the topography makes it impracticable to keep within such grades, and in that event, the grade shall not exceed ten (10) percent except where evidence which is satisfactory to the Advisory Agency is given that a lower grade is not possible. However, the maximum permissible grade shall not exceed seventeen percent for a distance of more than one hundred fifty feet. Proposed Pine Tree Lane has a grade beginning at Portuguese Bend Road that varies from 5.3% for 190 feet, 10.0% for 50 feet, 12.5% for 185 feet, 10.0% for 50 feet, 8.3% for 220 feet, 10.0% for 100 feet, 7.4% for 135 feet, 8.3% for 120 feet, 12.5% for 81 feet, 10.0% for 95 feet, 14.7% for 170 feet, 12.5% for 130 feet, 15.6% for 115 feet, 12.5% for 133 feet, 14.3% for 524 feet, 10% for 90 feet, 17.0% for 70 feet, 9.0% for 50 feet, and 2.7% for 50 feet Resolution No. 95-8 Page 4 of 19 at the cul-de-sac end of Pine Tree Lane. Based upon the evidence submitted, the Planning Commission finds that the existing topography and road makes it impossible to construct a roadway with a maximum 10% grade unless a switchback design is incorporated which would traverse and render undevelopable at least one lot in the proposed subdivision. The alteration of the road to meet the minimum guidelines would also cause large amounts of grading and would require retaining walls exceeding 5 feet along portions of Pine Tree Lane. Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334 Subdivision No. 83 in Zoning Case No. 449A, a request for a three (3) lot subdivision of land (attached hereto as Exhibit A) subject to the modifications to the subdivision ordinance specified in Section 10 and subject to the conditions contained in Section 12 of this resolution. Section 12. Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334, Subdivision No. 83 in Zoning Case No. 449A (attached hereto as Exhibit A) is subject to the following conditions: * * * GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. This Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two (2) years from the date of City Council approval. The Tentative Parcel Map was approved on and will expire on the following dates: APPROVAL DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: This approval shall become null and void if a final map has not been timely filed prior to the expiration date in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. 2. An extension of time to the expiration date may be granted by or upon submittal of a formal application and required exhibits at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration. A letter indicating an intent to file an extension should be filed at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. 3. This Tentative Parcel Map is granted for all boundary lines, easements, rights -of - way, and construction of off -site improvements as shown on the map labeled Exhibit A, dated ,1995 as modified by the Conditions of Approval. . 4. This Tentative Parcel Map approval is subject to all applicable requirements of the State of California, the County of Los Angeles, the City of Rolling Hills, any other affected governmental entities, and the requirements of the Rolling Hills Community Association. The duty of inquiry as to such requirements shall be upon the applicant. 5. The subdivider shall comply with all the requirements of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, and all requirements of the City of Rolling Hills ordinances, resolutions, engineering standards and other applicable standards, that are in effect at the time that subdivision improvement permits are issued for the development. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 5 of 19 6. The subdivider shall obtain approval of, and all required permits from, the, Rolling Hills Community Association for all of the following: (a) subdivision improvements affecting easements, roads, and trails; and (b) the location of, and the improvements to, Pine Tree Lane, including but not limited to the extension of Pine Tree Lane and the proposed cul-de-sac bulb. In the event the location of the roadway extension cul-de-sac built is modified by the Community Association, the tentative map shall be resubmitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for modification approval. 7. In accordance with Chapter 1706 of the California State Statutes of 1990, the applicant shall pay any required fee, along with the required processing fee, to the City of Rolling Hills and County Clerk for remittance to the State Department of Fish and Game. This approval shall not be valid and effective unless and until the fee(s) have been paid and the Notice of Determination has been filed. 8. The applicant shall pay all fees at the time fees are determined to be applicable and comply with all requirements of the applicable Federal, State and Local agencies, including, but not limited to the following as applicable: Los Angeles County Sanitation District Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire District California Water Service Company Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District United States Army Corps of Engineers 9. The subdivider shall dedicate land or pay a fee in lieu thereof for purposes of park and recreational facilities (Quimby Act) in accordance with the proportional standards set forth in Section 16.18.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 10. Coordination with utility companies by the subdividcr's engineer during design shall be required in order to ensure that required public improvements are not in conflict with existing or proposed utilities. 11. The subdivider shall comply with all requirements of the Congestion Management Plan for the County of Los Angeles and any related City of Rolling Hills requirements. 12. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills and its officers, employees and agents from and against any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Rolling Hills, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Rolling Hills concerning this subdivision, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission or Planning Director, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the subdivision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees and agents in the defense of the matter. 13. When exhibits and written conditions of approval are in conflict, the written conditions shall prevail. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 6 of 19 * * * THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO THE STAMPING OF THE TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDITION COMPLIANCE: Planning 14. The Tentative Parcel Map shall be drawn to a scale of one inch to one hundred feet unless otherwise required and approved by the City Engineer. 15. The Tentative Parcel Map shall, at a minimum, show: a. The tract number; b. Sufficient legal description of the land as to define the boundaries of the proposed tract; c. Name and address of the subdivider and of the registered engineer or licensed surveyor who has done or will do the survey work required to be done by this title; d. Locations, names and existing widths of all adjoining streets or roads and a statement as to their character as being public or private; e. The width and grades of all existing and proposed roads within such proposed subdivision, and the direction of drainage and proposed disposition of water; f. The widths and locations of all existing and proposed roads and easements, whether public or private, for drainage, bridle trails, sanitary and storm sewers, or public utility purposes; g. The radii of all curves on streets or other easements; h. The lot layout and the dimensions of each lot; i. The location of a building pad that has a minimum 12,000 and maximum 15,000 square foot graded area and the location of a four hundred -fifty square foot stable area, and a five hundred -fifty square foot corral area. The grade of access to the building pad shall not be greater than twenty percent, and to the stable area not greater than twenty- five percent; j. The approximate locations of all areas subject to inundation of stormwater overflow, or geological hazard, which areas shall be marked "Subject to Flooding" or "Subject to Geological Hazard" and the locations, widths and directions of flow of all watercourses and/or swales. k. The approximate location and size of all existing and proposed water mains within and adjacent to such proposed tract; Resolution No. 95-8 Page 7 of 19 1. The approximate location and size of all existing and proposed fire hydrants within the proposed tract which shall be placed at intervals of not more than eight hundred feet; m. Proposed method of sewage disposal; n. Proposed use of each lot; o. Approximate contours at five-foot vertical intervals, except where the slope is in excess of thirty degrees, in which case the vertical interval between approximate contours shall be twenty feet, and where grading is proposed, engineering data shall show the approximate finish grading p. Proposed balanced cut and fill grading amounts. q. Proposed public areas, if any; r. Date, north point and scale; s. Number for each proposed lot; t. Statement of existing groundcover; u. Approximate location of each tree within the proposed subdivision area, and an indication as to which trees are to be removed; v. Approximate location and outline to scale of each existing building or structure within the proposed tract which will not be removed or demolished in the development of the subdivision; w. A designation by letter or actual name, for purposes of identification, of any street within the proposed subdivision; x. Existing zoning both as to land use and area requirements; y. Note on the map, "Geotechnical Note Potential Building Site: For grading and corrective work requirements for access and building area for Lot No. 2 refer to the Geotechnical Reports by AGI, Dated 5/21/94, 10/14, 94, 2✓2/95 & 3/3/95." z. Show on the map the limits of all geologic/geotechnical corrective grading such as Shear Keys, Overexcavations of Landslide Debris, Back Cuts, etc., to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. aa. If it is impossible or impracticable to place upon the tentative map any matter required in this section, such matter or information shall be furnished in a written statement which shall be appended to and submitted with such map. (Ordinance 161, Section 11-2.105, 1980). Resolution No. 95-8 Page 8 of 19 •16. Where public sewers are not available, and where private sewage systems will be utilized, the results of percolation tests shall be submitted in accordance with the recommendations of the City Health Officer; 17. There shall be filed with the tentative map a geological report prepared by a registered engineering geologist, as required by the Business and Professions Code of the State, showing the geological characteristics of each lot in the proposed subdivision, and that on each lot a building site can be developed which is free of geological hazard. Said report and the conclusions contained therein shall be approved by the City Engineer, and may be subject to the provisions of Chapter 16.36. 18. The Tentative Parcel Map shall comply with the City Subdivisions Code and Zoning Ordinance, the area requirements and subdivision development standards of the RA-S-2 Zone requiring a minimum parcel standard of 2 net acres per lot. 19. The Tentative Parcel Map shall delineate the location of a minimum 450 square foot stable and a minimum 550 square foot corral on each parcel of the subdivision. 20. The applicants shall submit evidence that they are the owners of the property shown on the Tentative Parcel Map as proposed for subdivision. 21. The Tentative Parcel Map shall show Pine Tree Lane as a private paved street with a right-of-way of 30 feet for the proposed roadway including all necessary slope easements to the City's satisfaction and shall comply with all provisions of Section 16.16.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 22. The Tentative Parcel Map shall include an extension of Pine Tree Lane and accompanying easements along the northerly property line of the applicant's property and the southerly property line of the property located at 10 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 85-RH). The roadway extension shall culminate in a cul-de-sac bulb and shall have a 32-foot radius and a 10 foot perimeter easement. The bulb of the cul-de-sac street shall be shown entirely within the property lines on the property at 16 Pine Tree Lane in conformance with Section 16.16.050 of the City of Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance. The cul-de-sac bulb must be compatible with Tentative Tracts 21486 and 21400. The location of the roadway extension and cul-de-sac bulb shall be as shown on Exhibit A to this Resolution. 23. The Tentative Parcel Map shall show 30 foot street easements along Pine Tree Lane, 10 foot street easements around the cul-de-sac bulb on the property at 16 Pine Tree Lane, and 25 foot easements at the remaining perimeters of each parcel. The cul-de-sac bulb shall be compatible with Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 21486 (Cukingnan) and 21400 (Hassoldt). 24. The Tentative Parcel Map shall show the location of a 4 foot bridle trail on Pine Tree Lane within Community Association easements. The bridle trail shall be continuous in nature and connect to existing trails within the trails system. 25. The Tentative Parcel Map shall show all grades on Pine Tree Lane. 26. The Tentative Map shall show individual driveways that are 20 feet wide. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 9 of 19 27. Fire Department "Information only" maps showing a "typical section" of Pine . ' Tree Lane, complying with the above conditions shall be submitted to the Fire Department. 28. The map shall show that parcel lines extend to the center of private and future streets. 29. The Tentative Parcel Map shall provide a new centerline and cul-de-sac bulb of Pine Tree Lane to the satisfaction of these conditions and the City Engineer/Superintendent of Streets. 30. All utility lines, including but not limited to electrical, telephone and cable television, which serve or are proposed to serve the 2 parcels created by this Tentative Parcel Map and the parcels created by Tentative Parcel Maps 21486 and 21400 and other subdivisions along Pine Tree Lane shall be placed underground. The underground utility lines shall be located within the roadway easement of Pine Tree Lane from Portuguese Bend Road at the south to the cul-de-sac at 16 Pine Tree Lane to the north with underground stems leading from Pine Tree Lane to each parcel of this subdivision and other subdivisions along Pine Tree Lane. The utility undergrounding required by this condition includes the removal of Utility Numbered Poles 1300642E and 567919E; and the removal of overhead utility lines connecting Utility Numbered Poles 4192388E, 567919E, 567920E, and 1300642E along Pine Tree Lane that are to be placed underground. There shall be no overhead utility lines across Pine Tree Lane. The underground utility lines shall be located within the roadway easement of Pine Tree Lane wherever possible. * * * THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OR IN CONNECTION WITH RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP OF ANY PHASE: Planning City Engineer/Superintendent Of Streets Land Development Division - Road Department Fire Department 31. Easements for the construction of the roadway extension and the cul-de-sac bulb and the terms for payment of construction costs of such improvements shall be provided in an agreement between the applicant and surrounding property owners which shall be recorded against each parcel which is the subject of the agreement. This agreement shall be approved by the City prior to recordation and shall contain the following minimum terms: a. The grant of all roadway, access, grading and other necessary easements to the Rolling Hills Community Association and to the applicant which are required to construct the roadway extension and cul-de-sac bulb as specified in Condition 22 of this Resolution; b. The deposit by the applicant, the owner of property at 10 Pine Tree Lane, or by a combination thereof, within 90 days after Tentative Map approval is obtained, of the Resolution No. 95-8 Page 10 of 19 dollar' a 'mount of a City approved estimate of the work to construct the improvements specified in Condition 22 of this Resolution; c. Completion of construction of the improvements specified in Condition 22 of this Resolution by the applicant or by the owner of property at 16 Pine Tree Lane, or by a combination thereof, within a reasonable period of time but not later than one year from the date this Tentative Map is approved; 32. Street improvements on Pine Tree Lane shall be engineered and designed to match that required for any approved neighboring subdivision map. Further, paving shall properly coincide with neighboring properties to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. The street improvements shall be constructed with rolled curbs and shoulders, to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Community Association. The paving shall include gutters and flow lines, unless otherwise required by the Rolling Hills Community Association. 33. Reconstruct base and pavement on Pine Tree Lane to Portuguese Bend Road providing 20 feet of pavement and 4 feet for bridle trail. Construct inverted shoulder pavement 10 feet (lane -width) with 2" minimum Asphalt Cement (A C.) over a 6N crushed aggregate base. The 4 foot bridle trail on Pine Tree Lane shall be composed of decomposed granite and constructed to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Fire Protection Engineering all weather access standards. The paving and bridle trail area shall be separated by a 2" x 3" redwood header. There shall be no rail or fence separating the trail and road. 34. Easements shall be granted to the Rolling Hills Community Association for the purpose of ingress, egress, construction and maintenance of all infrastructure constructed as roadways, trails, and utility access to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. City Engineer/Superintendent of Streets and Development Division 35. Details and notes shown on the tentative map are not necessarily approved. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirements of ordinances, general conditions, of approval, or City policies must be specifically approved by the City. Otherwise all such inconsistent details and notes or ordinance requirements shall be corrected to conform to these conditions and ordinance requirements that were in effect at the time that this tentative map was approved by the City of Rolling Hills. 36. The distances from the proposed lot/parcel lines to the buildings which are to remain must be shown. If such distances will create nonconforming conditions under Building Code Chapters 5, 18, 19 and 21 or Zoning Ordinance requirements, such lot/parcel lines shall be relocated or the non -complying conditions of the buildings shall be corrected prior to the division of land. 37. The relationship of existing sewage disposal components to the new parcel lines may create conditions that do not comply with the Building Code/Plumbing Code/Zoning Ordinance. These non -complying conditions shall be corrected or the lot/parcel lines relocated prior to the division of land. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 11 of 19 38. Easements are tentatively required, subject to review by the City Engineer to. " determine the final locations and requirements. 39. Easements shall not be granted or recorded within areas proposed to be granted, dedicated, or offered for dedication for public streets, highways, access rights, building restriction rights, or other easements until after the final map is filed with the County Recorder. If easements are granted after the date of tentative approval a subordination must be executed by the easement holder prior to the filing of the final map. 40. In lieu of establishing the final specific locations of structures on each parcel at this time, the owner, at the time of issuance of a grading or building permit agrees to develop the property in conformance with the City Code and other appropriate ordinances such as the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Grading Ordinance, Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Zoning Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Water Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Electrical Code, and Fire Code. Improvements and other requirements may be imposed pursuant to such codes and ordinances. 41. All easements existing at the time of final map approval must be accounted for on the approved tentative map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its location. If all easements have not been accounted for, submit a corrected tentative map to the Planning Department for approval. 42. Label the 20 foot access easement on Parcels 2 as "Private Driveway and Fire Lane" and delineate on the final map to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. 43. Provide proof of access prior to final approval and delineate on the final map. 44. A final parcel map must be processed through the City Engineer prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 45. Prior to submitting the tentative parcel map to the City Engineer for examination pursuant to Section 66450 of the Government Code, obtain clearances from all affected Departments and Divisions, including a clearance from the Subdivision Section of the Land Development Division of the Department of Public Works for the following mapping items: mathematical accuracy; survey analysis; and correctness of certificates, signatures, etc. 46. A preliminary guarantee is needed if signatures of record title interests appear on the final map. A final guarantee will be required. If said signatures do not appear on the final map, a title report/guarantee is needed showing all fee owners and interest holders and this account must remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County Recorder. 47. Grant ingress/egress and utility easements to the public over the private and future street on the final map. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 12 of 19 City Erieineer /Superintendent of Streets Land Development Division - Subdivision Section, 48. All easements existing at the time of final map approval must be accounted for on the approved tentative map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its location. If all easements have not been accounted for, submit a corrected tentative map to the Planning Department for approval. 49. All easements shown on the corrected Tentative Parcel Map, that are found to be in compliance with these conditions by the City and the Rolling Hills Community Association shall be described and provided for in written deeds to the Rolling Hills Community Association. The form and content of the deeds must be approved by the City and the Rolling Hills Community Association prior to recordation. All such deeds of easement shall be recorded prior to the recordation of the final map. Planning 50. A preliminary guarantee is needed if signatures of record title interests appear on the final map. A final guarantee will be required. If said signatures do not appear on the final map, a title report/guarantee is needed showing all fee owners and interest holders and this account must remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County Recorder. 51. The final parcel map must be processed through the County Engineer prior to being filed with the County Recorder. 52. The subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the City franchise cable TV operator to permit the installation of cable in a common utility trench. 53. A drainage statement/letter shall be provided to the City Engineer because an offer of a private street or an extension of an existing street has been made. 54. In accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the County's Subdivision Ordinance a deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance. City Engineer/Superintendent of Streets Land Development Division - Water Ordinance Subunit Fire Department 55. Provide water mains, fire hydrants, and fire flows as required by County Forester and Fire Warden for all land shown on the map to be recorded. 56. Water mains shall be designed to meet or exceed the total flow requirements determined for domestic flow and fire flow for this development. Required domestic flow shall be calculated by the subdivider's engineer. Fire flow shall be determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department as follows: Resolution No. 95-8 Page 13 of 19 a. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this location is 750 gallons . per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 2 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic' demand. b. Upgrade one public/private fire hydrant unless fire flow meets Fire Department requirement. c. All hydrants shall measure 6" x 4" x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour fire wall as per map on file with .the Fire Department. 57. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 58. The plans and specifications for the water delivery system shall be submitted for approval to the responsible water purveyor prior to final approval of this development by the City Engineer. In all cases where water system facilities have not been installed prior to filing this development with the City Engineer for final approval, the applicant shall submit a Labor and Materials bond in addition to one of the following: a. An agreement and Faithful Performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer to be sufficient to guarantee installation of the improvements; or b. An agreement and evidence satisfactory to the City Engineer showing that the applicant has entered into a contract with the serving water utility for establishing a security guaranteeing payment for the installation of the improvements. 59. The applicant shall file with the City Engineer a statement from the water purveyor indicating that the water system will be operated by the purveyor and that under normal operating conditions, the system will meet the requirements for the land division, and that water service will be provided to each parcel. Public Works Materials Engineering Division - Geology Review 60. The final map must be approved by the Geology and Soils Section to assure that all geologic factors have been properly evaluated. 61. Specific recommendations will be required from the consultant(s) regarding the suitability for development of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. However, in no event shall the geologic mitigation require the grading of more than 40% of any parcel. In the event proper mitigation requires more than 40% mitigation, then this map shall be brought back for consideration before the Planning Commission and the City Council. 62. The final map shall show the limits of all geologic/geotechnical corrective grading such as Shear Keys, Overexcavations of Landslide Debris, Back Cuts, etc., to, the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 14 of 19 .63. The final map must include the following statement, "Geotechnical Note Potential Building Site: For grading and corrective work requirements for access and building area for Lot No. 2 refer to the Geotechnical Reports by AGI, Dated 5/21/94, 10/14, 94, 2/2/95 & 3/3/95." * * * THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO GRANTING A GRADING PERMIT FOR ROAD RECONSTRUCTION AND EXTENSION ON PINE TREE LANE: Fire Department 64. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to the reconstruction of Pine Tree Lane. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 65. All existing fire hydrants on Pine Tree Lane shall be retrofitted to comply with conditions (a) and (b) Fire Department requirements above. Fire Department 66. All hydrants shall be installed in conformance with Title 20, Los Angeles County Government Code or appropriate City regulations. This shall include minimum six-inch diameter mains. Arrangements to meet these requirements must be made with the water purveyor serving the area. * * * THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Planning 67. All previous conditions of this approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the City. 68. No building or grading permits shall be issued for construction until Site Plan Review approval has been granted by the Planning Commission for the construction of single family residences on the proposed parcels. 69. No septic tanks or other similar structures, except boundary fences, shall be constructed within 150 feet of the centerline of the intermittent blue line stream at the eastern portion of Parcels 1 and 2. 70. A biological assessment for each lot in the subdivision shall be prepared by a City approved qualified biologist prior to commencement of project grading and construction. The biological assessment shall include a description of all significant plant and animal life on the lot along with recommendations for preservation, mitigation or relocation of such Resolution No. 95-8 Page 15 of 19 resources. The developer shall incur the cost for preparation of the biological assessment .' and shall comply with mitigation measures recommended in the biological assessment as approved by the City. 71. Pine Tree Lane shall be kept open for vehicular access at all times during future grading and construction for each lot of the subdivision. 72. In the event that subsurface material of an archaeological, paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during project grading or development, all grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area, and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever is appropriate, is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition, mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition, mitigation or salvage of such material. 73. The applicants shall obtain a "will serve" letter from the California Water Service. Domestic water will be supplied to the subject property. 74. If, because of future grading, or for any other reason, it is found that the requirements of the Plumbing Code cannot be met on any of the proposed lots, the Department of Health Services will recommend that no building permit be issued for the construction of homes on such parcels. Health Department 75. A private sewage disposal system shall be designed in compliance with the Los Angeles County Health Codes and Building and Safety Codes. 76. Approval of the method of sewage disposal is contingent upon the approval by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. 77. The size of the dwelling may be limited by the size of the private sewage disposal system that can legally be installed in each lot. City Eneineer/Superintendent of Streets, Land Development Division - Drainage and Grading 78. Grading and development plans shall include: a. Methods to eliminate sheet overflow in order to protect the parcels from high velocity scouring action; b. Provision for contributory drainage from adjoining properties; and c. Provision for the proper distribution of drainage beyond the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 95-8 Page 16 of 19 '79. The grading plan shall utilize land form or contour grading techniques in its design so as to create slopes that blend with the natural horizontal and vertical contours of the existing terrain and in no case shall cut and fill slopes be steeper than the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. 80 The State Department of Fish and Game shall be notified prior to commencement of work within any natural drainage course. Fire Department 81. All proposed residences shall be constructed with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 82. The building pad areas shall be capable of providing parking for excess vehicles. 83. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 84. Fire department access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any portion of structure to be built. 85. Access shall comply with Section 10.207 of the Fire Code which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 86. Where driveways extend further than 300 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the site plan for the proposed residential structure. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways , which extend over 150 feet. 87. The private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as "Fire Lane" and shall be maintained in accordance with the Los Angeles County Fire Code. 88. Additional fire protection systems shall be installed in lieu of suitable access and/or fire protection water. Materials Engineering Division - Geoloev Review 89. All geologic hazards associated with this proposed development must be eliminated or be delineated as restricted use areas, approved by the consultant geologist, to the satisfaction of the Geology and Soils Section, and dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within the restricted use areas. 90. A geology and soils engineering report shall be required prior to approval of building or grading plans. * * * Resolution No. 95-8 Page 17 of 19 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH FINAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION: 91. Repair any broken or damaged pavement on streets within or abutting the subdivision. 92. Postal delivery receptacles shall be located and installed in groups to serve two or more residential units. Fire Department 93 Provide City, Fire Department and Rolling Hills Community Association approved street signs and building address numbers prior to occupancy. ** 94. Conditions 1 through 30 shall be met prior to the stamping of the tentative map for condition compliance. 95. Conditions 31 through 63 shall be completed prior to or in conjunction with recordation of the final map of any phase. 96. Conditions 64 through 66 shall be completed prior to granting a grading permit for road reconstruction and extension of Pine Tree Lane. construction. 97. Conditions 67 through 90 shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits. 98. Conditions 91 through 93 shall be completed in conjunction with final building construction. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF APRIL;1.,„� ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN A'l'l'EST: MARILYN L. KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 95-8 Page 18 of 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95-8 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.16 ACRE EXISTING LOT THAT HAS ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT INTO 2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS FRONTING THE EAST SIDE OF PINE TREE LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 449A. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hawkins, Raine and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Frost and Witte. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices V\zNa k ..o ".) DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 95-8 Page 19 of 19 Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning Diroclor of Planning. James E. Hull. AICP March 23, 1995 Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 MAR 21, 1995 City Of Rolling Hills BY SUBJECT: Revised Public Works Report TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 Map dated 3-17-94 Attached, please find a revised report from the Department of Public Works, Materials Engineering Division dated March 9, 1995. This report supersedes the previous report from the Materials Engineering Division dated June 27, 1994. All other findings and conditions remain as previously recommended by the Los Angeles County Subdivision Committee in our July 6, 1994 letter to you. Respectfully submitted, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE qiati Cap4;-60, John Hartman, AICP, Chairman JH•jac c: Doug McHattie, South Bay Subdivision Committee Engineers 320 West Temple Street Los Angeles CA 90012 213 974 6411 FAX 213 626 04?4 Poet -It ' orana ?sz transmittal memo i . a ••e•s ' DiPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P :;TRIALS ENGINEERING IMAM CONTI( GEOLOG CITY Of Rolling Hills L1891901 i EP TA1 IVE TI T/PARCEL MAP NO. SUBDIVIDER Or . Robert Smith CONSULTANT ISI AG! Ehlert and SWN x 22334 LA ee. LAGOrw - 6r E Les 000. Phone • Fait• Psi • TIBISIMPARCEL MAP DATED Rev. 3 / 17 / 9 4 ENGINEER South Day REPORTIS) 10/14/94,3/3/95,2/2/95 3-20-90,3-5-92,3-22-92,5-12-90, 5-21-94 TENTATIVE MAP IS APPROVED FOR FEASIBILITY. PRIOR TO FILING THE ANAL LAND DIVISION MAP. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE FULFILLED: The final map must be approved by the Geology and Sols Section to assure that all geologic factors have beer properly evaluated. O A grading plan must be approved by the Geology and Sok Section. This grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geology report and/or geotechnical engineer and show all recommendations submitted by them. It must also agree with the tentative map and conditions as approved by the Planning Corrrrission. O A detailed engineering geologic report and soh engineering report must be approved. X Revte x All geologic hazards essociated with this proposed development must be eliminated, or delineate restricted use areas, approved by the consultant geologist, to the satisfaction of the Geology and Soils Section, and dedicate to the County the right to prohibit the erection of buidings or other structwes within the restricted use areas. Specific recommendations will be required from the consultant Is) regarding the suitability for development of all lots designed essentially as ungraded site lots. A Final Parcel Map is recommended for recordation of this Minor Land Subdivision. The Geotechnical Engineering Units conditions of approval are attached (dated 3/7/95). TENTATIVE MAP IS APPROVED FOR FEASIBILITY. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS APPLICABLE TO THIS DIVISION OF LAND: 0 The subdivider is advised that approval of this division of land Is contingent upon the installation and use a' a sewer system. 11( soils A geology and/or engineering report may be required prior to approval of budding or grading plans. O Approved without conditions. 0 FORMS:GEOL. FORM NO. 3 8r30/93 Date 3/9/95 LOR MOMS COMM DITARTIMMT Of POOL.. MOMS R.O. / 1 i . MA?UZALS i1GIRISMIMO DIVISION Sheet „Z of OIOLoo*C mug SMUT PM 22334 Me+ar�- Lots Site Address Parent Tract Location City of Rolljfle gill* Additional Review Consists/Requirements lore duildinq P.C. (/ ) ' Cradinq P.C. (/ ) :12t7 Tentative Subdivision Final Subdivision Map Other The limits of ell geologic/geoteehnical corrective grading (Shear Keys, everexcavations of Landslide Debris, Back Cuts etc.) should be shown on the Tentative Parcel Map to the sat- isfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. South Bay Engineering an': AGI should work together to come up with these limits. Prepared Date 3/9/95 P-MS: torai17 9/14/94 7 010 'C1JJICAL UOIM=EDIWO REVIEV 'MEET COUNTY OP LOS A GELIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MORES • MATERIALS INGI$EERI$G DIVISION Address: 900 S. Fremont Ave. Alhambra, CA 91803 Telephone: (818) 458-4925 Ungraded Site Lots Tentative Parcel 22334 Location 7 Pine Tree Lane. Rolling Hi11, Developer/Owner Dr— Robert A. Smith Engineer Seuth_Bav Engineering Geotechnical Engineer AGI_Geotsch. (P.11. 4-1S1i-011 Geologist Same as above District Office i2.O Job NO. L1891901 Sheet 1 of 1 Review of: Geotechnical Addenda Dated 2/2/95. 3/3/95 Geologic Addendum Dated 2/2/9S Refer to references in review sheet dated 1/9/95 ACTION: From a Geotechnical Engineering Standpoint, Plans are approved for feasibility sub)e;: :e conditions below: REMARKS: Prior to approval of the Final Hap for recordation, the following must be sh.;wn e: :.-: Final Hap: A statement entitled: "geotechnical Note Potential Building Sites For grads; corrective work requirements for access and building area for Lot No. 2, refer :: ..._ Geotechnical Reports by ?iGL, Dated S/21/94. 10/14194, 2/2/95 e_ 313/95.' Prepared by Scott T. Ezell Date 3/7/95 h2TEL pubic safety. relative to ,, .. ! >.al sub.uAao..uploration. shall be provided in .cco d.nos with currant cod.* ro...c•v. Of t1w Los Ang.I« County Cods, Chapter 11.4S. and tw State of c . Tres S. Construction Safety Orders. a.::.r:.it Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning DINO°, of Planning. James E. HvNI. AICP July 6, 1994 Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 _IFSPY JUL 1 1 1994 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 Map dated 3-17-94 At its last meeting, the Los Angeles County Subdivision Committee reviewed Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334 in accordance with the contractual agreement with your City to provide planning, zoning and subdivision services. Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334 proposes to create 2 single-family lots on 6.2 acres of land located at No. 7 Pine Tree Lane between Tally Hand Road and Blackwater Canyon Road in your city. If the City wishes to approve the tentative map, the Committee recommends imposition of the following conditions and findings: 1. This tentative approval will expire 18 months from the date of approval by the City Council. This time limit may be extended by the City Council for a period of not to exceed 2 years. 2. The tentative map must comply with the City Subdivision Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and the area requirements and development standards of the'RA-S-2 zone. 3. Permission is granted to adjust lot lines to the City's satisfaction provided such adjustment is shown on the final map. Adjust the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 so as to be radial with Pine Tree Lane, to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. 4. The existing residence situated on Lot 1 will encroach approximately 25 feet into the required 50 foot front yard setback as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The Subdivision Committee recommends that the Planning Commission modify the setback requirements since the residence presently exists. 7)4t 320 West Temple Street Los Angeles. A 90012 213 974 6411 FAX 213 626 0434 •-s Planning Commission July 6, 1994 Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334 Page 2 5. Offer Pine Tree Lane as a private street with a right-of-way of 30 feet from centerline, including a cul-de-sac turnaround off -site to the north1 in an alignment satisfactory to the City. The cul-de-sac bulb shall be compatible with Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 21486 and 21400. Further, comply with all provisions of Section. 16.12.130 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 6. Section 16.16.020 of the City Code requires that the sidelines of all lots shall be at right angles or radial to the street upon which the lot fronts. The sidelines on the most northerly and southerly property lines are not at right angles to said street. Accordingly, the Subdivision Committee recommends a modification of the lot sideline angles on the most northerly and southerly property lines, pursuant to Section 16.12.130 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 7. Street improvements are required. Construct paving on Pine Tree Lane with curbs and/or inverted shoulders to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. Further, said paving shall properly coincide with the neighboring property to the satisfaction of the City of Rolling Hills. 8. This minor land division must be found in conformance with the City of Rolling Hills General Plan, the State Subdivision Map Act as provided by Section 66473.5 of the Government Code, and items A through G of Section 66474 of said code. 9. Your Commission must find that this proposed division of land will not violate sewer discharge provisions per Section 66474.6 of the State Subdivision Map Act. 10. It also must be found that the proposed land division is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Proper documentation must be prepared by the City of Rolling Hills. We further recommend that the Advisory Agency determine that the division of land and development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject tentative map will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of the public entity and/pr public utility rights -of -way and/or easements within the subject property. The following attached reports and the conditions contained therein were also recommended for inclusion by the Subdivision Committee: Planning Commission July 6, 1994 Tentative Parcel Map No. 22334 Page 3 - Department of Public Works, Land Development Division, Subdivision Section, dated April 11, 1994 Road Unit, dated April 12, 1994 Sanitary Sewer Unit, dated March 30, 1994 Drainage and Grading Section, dated March 30, 1994 Water Ordinance Subunit, dated March 30, 1994 Materials Engineering Division, dated June 27, 1994 - Fire Department, dated April 14, 1994 - Department of Parks and Recreation, dated April 11, 1994 (exempt) - Department of Health Services, dated April 11, 1994 Respectfully submitted, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE John Hartman, AICP, JH:jac c: Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineers Subdivision Committee Chairman CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDE. OF STREETS LAXD DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO. 22 3 3 d- TENTATIVE MAP DATED 3 -11-9¢ E ev, The following report consisting of 11 pages are the recommendations to the City of Q.bLLI Kc, . The following comments/requirements for this tentative map are in- dicated by an X in the appropriate box along the left margin of the page. z Details and notes shown on the tentative map are not necessarily approved. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirements of ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically approved in other con- ditions, or ordinance requirements are modified to those shown on the tentative map upon approval by the Advisory agency. 0 The distances from.the proposed lot/parcel lines to the buildings which are to remain must be shown. If such distances will create nonconforming conditions under Building Code Chapters 5, 18, 19 and 21 or Zoning Ordinance requirements, such lot/parcel lines shall be relocated or the non -complying conditions of the buildings shall be corrected prior to the division of land. O The relationship of existing buildings/sewage disposal component to the new lot/ parcel lines will create conditions that do not comply with the Building Code/Plumb- ing Code/Zoning Ordinance. These non -complying conditions shall be corrected or the lot/parcel lines relocated prior to the division of land. l Easements are tentatively required, subject to review by the City Engineer to deter- mine the final locations and requirements. I .. Easements shall not be granted or recorded within areas proposed to be granted, dedi- cated, or offered for dedication for public streets, highways, access rights, build- ing restriction rights, or other easements until after the final map is filed with the County Recorder. If easements are granted after the date of tentative approval, a subordination must be executed by the easement holder prior to the filing, of the final map. In lieu of establishing the final specific locations of structures on each lot/parcel at this time, the owner, at the time of issuance of a grading or building permit, agrees to develop the property in conformance with the City Code and other appropri- ate ordinances such as the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Grading Ordinance, Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Zoning Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Or- dinance, Water Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Electrical Code, and Fire Code. Improvements and other requirements may be imposed pursuant to such codes and ordinances. O Prior to final approval, arrangements will be made fo_r the City to accept as offered on filed in 'CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 'LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - SUBDIVISION SECTION TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO: 2 2-3 3 A - TENTATIVE MAP DATED 3 -1 / - 9 4 Q, av, .D Thirty days prior to requesting final approval of the tract/parcel map submit gummed mailing labels for each tenant in the structure to be converted, a notarized af- fidavit signed by all of the owners listing all vacant units, a minimum deposit of twenty-five ($25) dollars for each occupied unit, and recorded copies of all cove- nants and agreements applicable to this conversion project to the City Engineer. Copies of the covenants and agreements must be mailed to all tenants by the applicant at least thirty days prior to final approval. D Prior to final approval of the tract/parcel map submit a notarized affidavit to the City Engineer, signed by all owners of record at the time of filing of the map with the County Recorder, stating that any proposed condominium building has not been con- structed or that all buildings have not been occupied or rented and that said build- ing will notbe occupied or rented until after the filing of the map with the County Recorder; ;HO All easements existing at the time of final map approval must be accounted for on the approved tentative map. This includes the location, owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing easements. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the tentative map in lieu of its :-: location. If all easements have not been accounted for, submit a corrected tentative map to the Planning Department for approval. D Furnish this Department's Street Name Unit with a list of street names acceptable to the subdivider. These names must not be duplicated within a radius of 20 miles. CD A Mapping and Property Management Division house numbering clearance is required prior to approval of the final map. D The following note shall be placed on all parcel maps with parcel sizes of five acres or more: "Further division of this property to parcel sizes less than five acres will require improvements." U Place standard condominium/residential planned development/commercial planned development notes on the final map to the satisfaction of the Department. LO Place standard lease purpose only/division of land for lease purpose only notes on the final map to the satisfaction of the Department. D Label driveways as "Private Driveway and Fire Lane" and delineate on the final map to the satisfaction of the Department. D Dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the construction of structures within open space/common lots. E.7.7 Place a note on the final map to the satisfaction of the Department to convey as a unit both portions of ownership within lot/parcel , separated by , and connect said portions with a standard land hook. D Remove existing structures prior to final approval. D Provide proof of access prior to final approval and delineate on the final map. CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDEt. OF STREETS LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - SUBDIVISION SECTION -i'*ACTYPARCEL MAP N0: 2 2 3 3 4- TENTATIVE MAP DATED 3 -1 7 - 414. t.R.r , O Quitclaim or relocate easements running through proposed structures. A final ae-t--aed-Aer parcel map must be processed through the City Engineer prior to being filed with the County Recorder. Q Prior to submitting the parcel map to the City Engineer for his examina- tion pursuant to Sections 66442--an4/'or-66450 of the Government Code, obtain clearanc- es from all affected Departments and Divisions, including a clearance from the Sub- division Section.of the Land Development Division of this Department for the follow- ing mapping items: mathematical accuracy; survey analysis; and correctness of cer- tificates, signatures, etc. 0 If the subdivider intends to file multiple final maps, he must so inform the Advisory Agency at the time the tentative map is filed. The boundaries of the unit final maps shallbe designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Planning Department. Show the remainder of the last legally created parcel as a "Remainder Parcel" on any final map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 0. Extend lot/parcel lines to the center of private and future streets. gga If signatures of record title interests appear on the final map, a preliminary guarantee is needed. A final guarantee will be required. .If said signatures do not appear on the final map,.a title report/guarantee is needed showing all fee owners and interest holders and this account must remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the County Recorder. tJ ($1 Additional Comments/Requirements: CO 9-A.1.1 T 11,4 G 12.•ESS / E. C2 it_ ss A 1.10 t Sr T l t- t T"t S M i 4 Th u e, x_ % c. QV�� T 1•-1 F ?Xi T. A w D Pi o- • S T—S . G N T H E F) AlA 1 Yr) A.? Name V t ) Phone tt 1 6) 4-5'6-415'3 Date 1. -11-9 c}- _a CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS Page 1/2 BUILDING AND SAFETY/LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - ROAD UNIT CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 (Rev.) TENTATIVE MAP DATED 03-17-94 The subdivision shall conform to the design standards and policies of the City, In particular, but not limited to the following Items: - Design local streets to have minimum centerline curve radii which will provide centerline curves of 100 feet minimum length. Reversing curves need not exceed a radius of 1,500 feet and any curve need not exceed a radius of 3,000 feet. The length of curve outside of the BCR Is used to satisfy the 100-foot minimum requirement. Compound curves are preferred over broken -back curves. Broken -back curves must be separated by a minimum of 200 feet of tangent (1,000 feet for multi -lane highway). Repair any broken or damaged pavement on streets within or abutting the subdivision. - Off site Improvements are tentatively required. It shall be the sole responsibility of the developer to acquire the necessary right-of-way and/or easements. Postal delivery receptacles shall be Installed serve two or more residential units. In groups to - Prior to final approval, the subdivider shall enter Into an agreement with the City franchised cable TV operator to permit the installation of cable In a common utility trench. - Whenever the centerline of the existing pavement does not coincide with the road centerline, provide a new centerline to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Streets. - Offer private and future right-of-way 30 feet from centerline on Plne Tree Lane on an alignment to the satisfaction of the City. Whenever there Is an offer of future street or a private future street, provide a drainage statement/letter. Re -construct base and pavement on Pine Tree satisfaction of the City. and Lane to the - Construct Inverted shoulder pavement 14 feet (lane width) and 4 feet (shoulder width) with concrete flow lines on Pine Tree Lane to the satisfaction of the City. -f%GJ/for TWN Rey. o4./2-94 CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS Page 2/2 BUILDING AND SAFETY/LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - ROAD UNIT CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 (Rev.) TENTATIVE MAP DATED 03-17-94 Comments/Additional Requirements: (1) The minimum centerline radius Is 350 ft. or to the satisfaction of the City on Pine Tree Lane where grades exceed 10%. (2) The minimum centerline radius Is 250 ft. or to the satisfaction of the City on Pine Tree Lane where grades are less than 10%. (3) Show grades on Pine Tree Lane. (4) Construct a cul-de-sac bulb on Plne Tree Lane to the satisfaction of the City. The cul-de-sac bulb must be compatible with Tracts 21486 and 21400. Name Tom Hoagland Phone (818) 458-4910 Date Rev. 04-12-94 CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT STREETS BUILDING AND SAFETY/LAND DEVEWPMENT DIVISION CITY OF £//ihp �///a SANITARY SEWER UNIT j TRAM/PARCEL MAP NO. 247334 b' TENTATIVE MAP DATED 5- /7. 9,4 [! The distances from all sewage disposal components to the proposed lot/parcel lines must be shown. If any such sewage disposal component is not on the same lot/parcel as the building it serves, or if it does not meet the horizontal clearance require- ment of the Plumbing Code (Table Il-1), the proposed lot/parcel line shall be relocated to so provide, or a replacement sewage disposal system complying with Plumbing Code requirements shall be provided prior to division of land. [] The subdivider shall install and dedicate main line sewers and serve each lot/parcel with a separate house lateral or have approved and bonded sewer plans on file with the Department of Public Works. [] The subdivider shall install separate house laterals to serve each building/lot/parcel in the land division. Installation and dedication of main line sewers may be necessary to meet this requirement. [] The subdivider shall submit an area study to the Director of Public Works to determine whether capacity is available in the sewerage system to be used as the outlet for the sewers in this land division. If the system is found to have insufficient capacity, the problem must be resolved to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. [] The subdivider shall send a print of the land division map to the County Sanitation District, with a request for annexation. Such annexation must be assured in writing. [] Sewer reimbursement charges as determined by the Director of Public Works shall be paid to the County of Los Angeles before the filing of this land division map. [] The subdivider shall determine from the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District where the connection to the trunk server system and disposal facilities of the District shall be made, and shall meet the requirements of the Water District for the use of the sewerace facilities. Acceptance by the District must be assured in writing. [] Off -site improvements are tentatively required. [] Easements are tentatively required, subject to review by the Director of Public Works to determine the final locations and requirements. [] A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance in accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance. [] The discharge of sewage from this land division into the public sewer system will not violate the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code. Dd Approved without conditions. [] Comments/Additional Requirements: `ame Tom Hoagland 4494fo r Phone Nol,..(818) 458-4909 Date: 03 - 30 - 94 CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - DRAINAGE AND GRADING SECTION iVeTIPARCEL MAP NO. .. L ?S 3 4 (REVISED) TENTATIVE MAP DATED Eci The existing property is reasonably free of flood hazard. Portions of the existing property lying In and adjacent to the natural drainage courses are subject to flood hazard. Portions of the existing property lying in and adjacent to are subject to flood hazard because of (tidal and wave action), (overflow, inundation, and debris flows). Portions of the existing property are subject to sheet overflow,.poadi-mg, and high velocity scouring action. Comply with the following requirements to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works prior to the filing of the final map: 17 Provide drainage facilities to remove the flood hazard and dedicate and show necessary easements and/or right of way on the final map. , Xi Place a note of flood hazard on the final map and delineate the areas subject to flood • hazard. Dedicate to the City the right to restrict the erection of buildings in the flood hazard area: This note will be allowed on all /07$ . FT Place a note of flood hazard on the final map and show and label all natural drainage courses. This note will be allowed on CK If a Grant of Waiver is.allowed, the flood hazard note (and area) shall be shown on (a plat which is made part of) the waiver. n Show the City's/Flood Control District's right of way for on the final map. A permit will be required for any construction affecting the right of way or facilities. Prior to issuance of building permits plans must be approved to: Eliminate the sheet overflow,.pond4ng, and protect the lots from high velocity scouring action. rgl Provide for contributory drainage from adjoining properties. f Provide for the proper distribution of drainage. Notify the State Department of Fish and Game prior to commencement of work within any natural drainage course. Contact the Corps of Engineers to determine if a 404 Permit is required for any proposed work within the major watercourse. Provide a copy of the 404 Permit upon processing of the drainage plans. Conditions of this permit must be compatible with the Department of Public Works main tenance criteria. CITY ENGINEER/SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - DRAINAGE AND GRADING SECTION 4RAeffPARCEL MAP NO. 224344 (REVISED) TENTATIVE MAP DATED 3•/7• �q Ei This site is located in Zone "A" per the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map. The Department of Public Works, Planning Division (818)458-4322, should be contacted to obtain procedures for revising the flood insurance rate map once the storm drain facilities are constructed. A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance in accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance. n Comply with the requirements of the drainage concept approved to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. n A• pproval of this map pertaining to drainage is recommended. n C• omments/Additional Requirements: ===z========== ==s===============z zs=a=====s=======s=====s z=z===s ===z=== [n A • grading plan and soils report must be submitted and approved prior to approval of the final map. The tentative map shows that proposed slopes will cross lot/parcel lines. For approval of grading plans, these slopes or lot/parcel lines shall be adjusted so that lot/parcel lines are located at the top of the slopes, along the outside edge of the drainage terraces, or at similar locations acceptable for establishment of slope maintenance responsibilities. rn A • deposit is required to review.documents and plans for final map clearance in accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance. tgl Approval of this map pertaining to grading is recommended. n Comments/Additional Requirements: Name Date 3.3b . 4 Phone (818) 458-4921 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOI CITY OF / "//09 /1/14 BUILDING AND SAFETY/LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION • WATER ORDINANCE1SUBUNIT TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO, 22 J '4 TENTATIVE MAP DATED REVISION MAP DATED -3 " / 7- 94 I Provide all materials necessary to substantiate that there is an adequate water supply and a firm commitment from the water purveyor that the necessary quantities of water will be available to the proposed development. From the information available to this office, there are only limited water supplies available to the area. A water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division must be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as determined by the Forester and Fire Warden. The water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows. [ I Construct the necessary improvements to the existing water system to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows. According to our records, the water mains serving this proposed land division do not have adequate capacity. IXI There shall be filed with this Department a statement from the water purveyor indicating that the water system will be operated by the purveyor and that under normal operating conditions, the system will meet the requirements for the land division, and that water service will be provided to each lot/parcel. [) This proposed land division is not within the service area of a water utility. A water utility to provide service to all lots/parcels within the land division must be formed and registered. [ I A Water Utility Certificate of Registration shall be filed with this Department. [ ) A warning note shall be placed on the final map and/or in the CC & R's indicating that the area has a limited ground water supply and water may not be available during periods of severe drought. I Off -site improvements are tentatively required. p() Easements shall be granted to the County, appropriate agency or entity for the purpose of ingress, egress, construction and maintenance of all infrastructure constructed for this land division to the satisfaction of this Department. [XI A deposit is required to review documents and plans for final map clearance in accordance with Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance. [ 1 Water service to existing building must be within the same lot as the building it serves, otherwise it shall be relocated to same. [ ] Approved without conditions. f 1 Comments/Additional Requirements: 3/30/94 Name Tom Hoagland Phone (81$) 458-4909 Date 0"-19-19i.. 0 :1.1PtI FFOth ti4TEPIK: EtGIKEEP ItiG TO TENTATIVE TfaR'TIPARCEL MAP NO. SUBDIVIDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION r' GEOLOGIC REVIEW 22334 Dr. Robert Smith • T/PARCEL MAP DATED 91.1103777288 P.01 DISTRIBUTION _Geologist _Geotechnicat Ens .Processing Cent( 1 City of Re ling Hills 3/17/94 LOCATION City of Rolling Hills ENGINEER South Bay CONSULTANT IS) ACl/Ehlert/SNN REPORTS) 3-20-90.3-5-92.1-22-92 5-12-90,5-21-94 In comparing the Tentative Parcel Map dated •3-21-91, 8-3-92 and 3-17-94 and the submitted Geotechnical Reports (dated 3-20-90, 3-5-92, 3-22-92, 5-12-90 and 5-21-94) it appears as if the aerial extent of remedial grading recommended is unchanged. Remedial grad- ing includes the complete removal of the mapped landslide. It should be noted that'the feasibility of completing the recommended grad- ing within the lot boundaries has not been established. Post -It' brand fax transmittal memo 7671�I • or papa To t _�a froen t PNA oeco. L4Cop, - 6E0 * GCS 'Phono • fix • oopt 'U• OEM JUL ? 91994 F ROLLING "1LLs Date 7-$-94 MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION JN L1 t91901 GEOLOGIC REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DISTRIBUTION 1 Geotechnical Eng Processing Center TENTATIVE RUT/PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 T/PARCEL MAP DATED 3/17/94 LOCATION Rolling Hills (City) SUBDIVIDER Dr. Robert Smith ENGINEER South Jay CONSULTANT (S) AGI/Ehlert /SWN REPORT (S13-20-90, 3-5-92, 3-22-92, 5-12-90,51.21..94 Sit TENTATIVE MAP IS APPROVED FOR FEASIBILITY. PRIOR TO FILING THE FINAL LAND DIVISION MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE FULFILLED: 30, The final map must be approved by the Geology and Soils Section to assure that all geologic factors have been properly evaluated. O A grading plan must be approved by the Geology and Soils Section. This grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geology report and/or geotechnical engineer and show all recommendations submitted by them. It must also agree with the tentative map and conditions as approved by the Planning Commission. O A detailed engineering geologic report and sods engineering report must be approved. ❑ All geologic hazards associated with this proposed development must be eliminated. or delineate restricted use areas, approved by the consultant geologist, to the satisfaction of the Geology and Soils Section, and dedicate to the County the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within the restricted use areas. to Specific recommendations will be required from the consultant (s) regarding the suitability for':evelopirient of all lots designed essentially as ungraded site lots. YrforP roelaa�irova�m nSte�iefof e grlaVeR of ?IMAMdT#ic�equired on the ggin Map:'For graaing and c rrec lye wo k re uirements for c e5s n i1�i ln.g aromas, refer tQ Engineer ng Geology iepQrts by Keith' shier • - -and AG.I dated 3 20-9CL,3-5-9? and 5-21-94.See Geotechnical Enzineerin>z. Units review . -- ._ -d F,/27/g4. 1:Ir TENTATIVE MAP IS APPROVED FOR FEASIBILITY. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS APPLICABLE TO THIS DIVISION OF LAND: O The subdivider is advised that approval of this division of land is contingent upon the installation and use o. a sewer system. O A geology and/or geotechnical engineering report may be required prior to approval of building or gradins plans. O AmovedAnent onfit giona°fs?lannin o onthe tteg g :Although grading is shown Rev. e Tent. Parcel Map the developer does not intend_ to do any grading. 'rne parse_ map (ioti 2) is Luide: _dl:. ;;; Id1,�5..1�_ igacea prior to approval ui 17uilaingF;aa• Reviewe FORMS:GEOL.REV FORM NO. 2 8.30-93 Date 6/27/94 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW SHEET COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION Address: 900 S. Fremont Ave. Alhambra, CA 91803 Telephone: (818) 458-4925 Ungraded Site Lots Tentative Parcel 22334 Location Pine Tree Lane, Rollina Hills Developer/Owner Dr. Robert A. Smith Engineer South Bav Engineerina Geotechnical Engineer AGI Geotech. (P.N. 4-1575-001 Geologist Same as above Review of: District Office 12.02 Sheet 1 of 1 Tentative Parcel Map Dated By Regional Planning 3/17/94 Geotechnical Report Dated 5/21/94 Geologic Report Dated 5/21/94 Report by SWN Soiltech dated 5/12/90 Refer to references in review sheet dated 9/1/92 ACTION: From a Geotechnical Engineering Standpoint, Plans are approved for feasibility subject to conditions below: REMARKS: Prior to approval of the development for recordation of the Final Map, the following is required on the Final Map: A note that reads: "For grading and corrective work requirements for the access and building areas, refer to the geotechnical reports by SWN Soiltech and AGI Geotechnical dated 5/12/90 and 5/21/94, respectively." Prepared by Rcssana:Q'Antonio Date 6/27/94 'ORM 266 L2/90 COUNTY l LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTNE1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISIONS INCORPORATED CITIES DP' TRACT MAP NO . PARCEL MAP NO. 2 2 331_I • CITY P3- TENTATIVE MAP DATE 3 / . / 1 T- REV SED • t 3 This property is looted within the areas described by the Forester and fire Warden as fire Zone 4 and future construction must comply with applicable Code requirements. "14.41,6 Provide water mains, fire hydrants. and fire floes as required by Canty Forester and fire Warden for all land shorn on the map to be recorded. I The final concept sop tibich has been submitted to this Department for review has fulfilled the conditions of approval ....... ded by this Department for access only. '1"114%, provide fire Department and City approved street -signs, building address timbers prior to ..., r „. . 44044. Fire Department access *At be e:merded to within 150 feet distance of any portion of to be built. • 3 The Canty Forester and Fire Darden is rot setting requirements for -water mains, fin hydrants and fire flow as a condition of approval for this division land as presently zoned and submitted. Access - shall comply with Section 10.207 of the fire Code •hide requires ail weather • access. All weather access may require paving. +iy Where driveways exterd further than 300 feet and are of single access design, turn curds suitable for fire protection equipment use shalt be provided and shorn on the final map. Tnraarouds shalt be designed, constructed and maintained -to insure their integrity for fire Department use. there. • topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways abide extend over 150 feet. "1r4. The private driveways shalt be Indicated al the -final map as `FIRE LME• and shall beessintained in accordance with the Las Mgetes County Fire Code. [ 3 There are no additional fire hydrants or fire flows required for this division of lard. Requirements for fire protection water and access will be determined st the time of building permit issuance. 1.114, Alt required fire hydrants shalt be installed tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access list be provided and maintained serviceable throughout eostruction. • [ 3 Additional fire protection systems shall be installed in lieu of suitable access and/or fire protection water. %SQ. Comments: Pg • BY: DATE: APR 1 4 • Page 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISIONS UNINCORPORATED AREAS 4/Parcel # 22334 Tentative Map Date 3/17/94 REVISED 1. 20' paving on Pine Tree Lane. 2. The 4' bridal trail shall be composed of decomposed granite and constructed to the L.A. County Fire Dept. Fire Prevention Engineering all weather access standard. 3. The paving and bridal trail shall be separated by a 2' X 3" redwood header. There shall be no rail or fence separating the trail and road. 4. Pine Tree Lane shall be shown as a 24' "Firelane" on final map. 5. All individual driveways shall be 20' width. 6. All proposed residences shall be constructed with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 7. Pad area shall be capable of providing parking for excess vehicles. BY:Cf) DATE: APR 14 1994 FIRE P1 VENTION ENGINEERING SECTION- (213 890-4125 LOS ANGELS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AID RECREATION PARK OBLIGATION REPORT SCM AGENDA. I. Tentative Map # as 331 Project i Map Date 3"I7' 7q Park Planning Area I Units Lots Sections 21.24.340, 21.24.350, 21.28.130, and 21.28.140 ,the County of Los Angeles Code, Title 21, Subdivision Ordinance provides that the County will determine whether the development's park obligation is to be met by: 1) the dedication of land for public or private park purposes or, 2) the payment of in -lieu fees or, 3) the provision of amenities or any combination of the above. The specific determination of the how the park obligation will be satisfied will be made by the Department of Parks and Recreation. ********************************************************************** ACRES -- The obligation ranges from the ordinance standard of acres to the General Plan standard of acres. IN LIEU FEE ---- The obligation ranges from the ordinance standard of $ to the General Plan standard of $ . ********************************************************************** THE MAP IS DENIED AT THIS TIME. THE MAP IS DENIED PENDING DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW OF EIR. REVISED MAP REQUIRED ********************************************************************** The park obligation for this development will be met by: The dedication of acres for public/private park purposes. The payment of the in -lieu fee stated above. The provision of amenities. PARK SITE OK AS SHOWN ON MAP. ******************************************************************* 77 Thproject is exempt from park obligation requirements because: The subdivision is not in an in orpora ed area of the County Contact theCityCity of 1/�t�� Other�lQhU * See also separate trail report. ********************************************************************** For further information contact Joan A. Rupert, Department of Parks and Recreation, 433 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90020, (213) 738-2960. For information on Hiking and Equestrian Trail requirements contact Cynthia D'Agosta, Landscape Architect Associate at (213) 738-2973. By: partmentaj/ Facilities Planner I 12/29/93 Date I/ - - 1994 PARCE; PAP NO. z Z,1 / • VICINITY 114 • 11111( TE �TIVE MAP CATE: �7�,‘ The Los geles (/t.ounty Department of Health Services recommends that sanitary sewers be installed to serve proposed Parcel Map No. The owner's statement Les • that domestic water will be supplied by 'CWi /d tu- ;,11 r ilt,c t. o i Althoucn sanitary sewers are rot available and the tract will be deoendent upon the use of individual sewace disposal systems, the County of Los Angeles Department of Heal Services has no objection to the approval of proposed Parcel Map No. i' t on condition that: The private sewage disposal systems will be installed in ocmaliance with Los Angeles County Health Codes and Building and Safety Codes. that the si at because of future crading.or the requirements of the Plumbing building proplots, the Dew no permit be issued for lots. for any other reason, it is found Cede cannot be met on any 'of of Health Services' will the construction of homes on The usage of the lots may be limited by the size and type of sewage systems that can legally be installed. Domestic water will be supplied by The installation and location of private sewage disposal systems will be ccntincent on the reauirem:ents of the Engineering Geology Division of the Los Angeles County Depa tment of Public Works. The Los Angeles Countyt* Decarient of Health Services will pulp,,, .. and permit . t." installation bf septic tanks with the effluent discharging into seeoage pits cr leacnina lines to be used as the method of sewage disposal on all Tors of Parcel Map No. . We have been advised by Ccuncy. Public Works Sanitary- Sewer Unit that sanitary sewers are available andtreat their use will be required for this Parcel Rap. Domestic water will not be supplied, but will be developed by the individual buyers of the lots. This roc= will not necessarily be applicable to any smaller parcels which r:av be created by future suodivision of the lots shown an the tentative map under con"side_rat_cn at this time. The Lcs Angeles County Deca_ rent of Health Services has no objection to the tentative aparoval of t i Parcel Map. However, it must be understood that the meeti,.od of sewage disposal has not yet been et amine or ...„ . Amprc:al of the method of sewace disposal is cantina `y California Regional Water Qua11ry Control Beard a.+ti.ivval ? SC a Region. Until we have attroved the method of sewage disposal, we shall be unable to approve the anal 7a.rmlMac. s hd rider shall obtain a permit and approval from the Los Anceles Cc;:: tY Department ant of Health - r ces for the destruction or ccnsrsv iicn c: airy wat`r well on this rroce-rrv. Inthe event tree well is to be .:pint, _.ned for future use, the well shall be protected from floaiina or contamination or such protection whit. the Health Officer determines fo be adequate. Canrents : ` - 2 i Otvr ltb:, !rP G' .�Zs' e,t, tee a et;z1 Lt a (" 0,74i1�,r el elf "69 g(- e 4 hZ4,4,11 (2/) W-v c/4 DATE: /// eity P.M" NEGATIVE DECLARATION INCORPORAT;O JANUARY 24, I437 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE SENO ROAD 11OLLINO MILLS, CALIF. 80271 1310, 377.1521 FAX 13101377.72/8 PROJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 449, Subdivision No. 83, and Tentative Tract Map No. 22334 Application has been filed with the City of Rolling Hills for approval of the project known as Zoning Case No. 449, Subdivision No. 83, and Tentative Tract Map No. 22334 to be located at Lot 86- RH and currently, 7 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills, CA and to be implemented by Dr. and Mrs. Robert A. Smith. The request is briefly described as: A two (2) lot subdivision of land. Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines of the City of Rolling Hills, the Lead Agency has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Lead Agency prepared this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. ,FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: BASED ON THE ATTACHED INITIAL STUDY, AND CONDITIONS) (IF APPLICABLE), IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. A period of at least 21 days from the date of publication of the notice of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project specifications, the Initial Study and this document prior to the final adoption of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. A copy of the project specifications is on file in the offices of The City of Rolling Hills. 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274. Date: August 21, 1992 By: Lola Ung= , Principal Planner utasu ww110NnZM'!AL IMPOARAPICta AMD tStcttltt mmo (Initial $tety) Data fub$itteds 1/414/ 1o. CtstML ;MI *M?ICS 2. Rase end address of developer or project sponsors EGINEWr !ASP M/ ¢ 131 Sr. 417 SAN rCPR 2. Address of projects 7 P)A E TkisAL Assessor's 11oet and Lot issOoe 3. Rasa. address. and telephoto umber at parses to to contacted coneersisg this projects 75 -Ora.-ec.. I. List and describe any ethic related persits sad *that peblie approvals regeital tot this project. inclsdtag tbess regeited city. teflonal, state and federal egenciess )..LOU. S. tsisting losing districts - Z 4. Proposed ens st site (Project toe otitis this tors is ti1N)s 5 riibt.E F 5L V D E I L_1 AJ6 . W1CP Dt$CMIflIC* P. sits sis*t G. L.O AC E a s. Square footages 2.7P_ cs7 r Jr !. twain sit !loots •t coastsocthsi awl= s 1e. Moos% et •tt•Ktoot potttos ptstil•is 11. tattotb piss.$ 13. pt(opesed schel,ltaga A 'CAP 11. ltssecteted projects, 141. 14. lu►ttelpsted tseresental devslepsestt IS. It tesidestial, levitate the snsbet et volts, sNelel• at sett sites, Canoe et sale prices or tests. seed type •t bossebeld Ilse • espected: !wG►�•.1iY 2 1- Offezia((A' ld. It commercial, !Wrote the type, vhetbec ssip bertood. city •c te9ionaliy (oriented, squats footage Of sales &tee, and loediq facilities: M (A 17. It indostti&1, abdicate type, 'attested esploytasst pet Hitt. and loadie taeillttes:.__.l.�d 1$. It lsstitotiesal, ladicate the owlet rosettes. estimated esploysest pet shift, estlsated occupeacy, leadis, faciiitles, • and community benefits to be derived trio the prejects w1♦ : ._. e1,tA •116 • 19. If the p(a3eet isrelres $ variance, eanditieasl ens Or resee1M applieaties, state this and lndieste clearly vey the sppllesties is requited* 144s DWI 1OXNt thl.:t't?jg 24. Os a separate page. describe the project site as it islets bofsto the project, including istoreatios os topography. soil stability, pleats and animals, and any craters:, historical ee scenic aspects. Describe any *sliming struttetes es tbo tits. led the use of the stricture,. Attach pbotogrepbs of the site. 21. Oe a separate page, describe the surrounding properties. including inforsatios ea plants and anisals and any eeltatal. historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of lsM 'se (residential, eossetcia , etc.), latensity land es', sad scale of de•elopoent (height. frontage, sat -bad. real yard, etc.). Attecb photographs of the vicinity. pry/ 1rOIn t1?AL 1N?M (tzplanatlons of e11 'yes' and •maybe' snorers are required es attached sheets.) 22. Catch. 'ill the proposal result les a. unstable earth condittoes sr le changes in geologic 'obstrvetstes? b. Disruptions, dlsspplaeesests. toes pactios of overcororieg of the soil, e. tlaage to topograpby or grimed surface relief features 4. The destrostios. covering et aoeitieatioe of say unite* geologic or physics: features/ e. hay tam ase le vied et .stet 'restos ed soils, offset so et s1! the etta? 10 __ !4 X. t. Changes 10 daposlt1N •t •tests et Nash seals. or easels* !a eilesel's, laposlttos of *stoles viler say bodily the cassia of • Cher or striae et the bet of the swam or sat bay. islet •t late! g. !spoilers 0t people or property to while bassets e*e* es earths �ostse. sndslilos. sotalites• woad tellers. of Mils, Warta! 21. hii. till the proposal reselt las a. tobstasttsl sic satseitns toe detttlersttes of habitat sit quality? b. !*e treat!** of obj.etionabls stets! e. &ltaratiea of sic aovesast, aoisteco or tesperstvre, or say Osage 1s eltaats. *Mies locally of cesienallyt gi. ttatec. till tbs proposal reselt ias a. Changes is cutouts. es the coarse et liceetios of rates so*ss*nts, is *War 'still" of tteib voters/ b. Chang's !a absorptlea rates, Islas,* pattecu. sc t*s cats and sanest of suttee* vatot resoftt e. aitatations to tUo course of flaw .f !loot saws? 4. Change to Om saoost of suttee stet is any voter both o. otscnatlfo into aortae* raters. in is say alteratios et outface vatic liattto lselotisg but set lisitel to teanpapoorates, fissolood emss et tetbldityt t. alteratise of the tirsettoa se cats of flaw et ground esters! g. Ong* is too quantity of vomit raters. sabot t*tougt Chett add!• tlesa se withdrawals, es throeg* lnt.teettiea et ss aquifer by eats or esestettesst • 12111 12 A b. /•bsteatlel t./uetles is tM asetat of voter •tb•evtw avttla►lo f•t public voter supplies, 1. trposeee •t people •t ptepetty to voter -related bestial soca as floodtM •t tidal vies, j. /lgatfieaat {binges la the teaperatat•. flew. •t diodes: contest •t settee, thecae' spikiest 2S. Plant Litt. 11i11 the proposal tessit ins a. Change is th• diversity et sp.etas. •r 'limber of say owl's •t plants ttael•diaq tteos. abtuM, grass, crops, afefetloes sad of pleats: b. 11 rodoct1N of the owners •t any statue. rate or eadenpetM species et pleats: e. introducti•s •t nee species Si plants late as area, •r la s barrier to the actual repplesisb- *eat et **toting species: • 4. !eduction la bete/age of map egrtceltsral trap: Anise) Litt. Will the pteposal reselt 1st s. :bang• is tb• diversity of epeeist, •r aosbers of arty species of aaisals (birds. lend salads iselsdis, reptiles, fi•b sal sbelltlib, ►enthte organises, insects of atetofaoaa : b. teduetios et th• awbts et any pp.ciieess et•an laate ls2 endangered •. Tsttodoetloi et art speeiss M entails late as WAS, •r teeth is s battler t• tb• *Otitis* ei Settee le la taieal• I. Wterioratios to exhale, el* •t wildlife labttatt 31. Wig. Sill the proposal remelt las- s. Teemses is on stay esie levels: 24. •s• Ittr 1-1L• b. lsppe.eure et people to severe noise ie.eis► 20. ;lobe `M flirt. Will the proposal produce now light et Vacs? 30. Lan.lag. sill lb. proposal (*suit la a subataat al situ• atlas of cite 'resist or pleased land ese of se► etas, 30. faEerslfesoolee1. s121 ebe propose resat r a. Increase is the rate K ass of any asters' resonate? b. iubstastial Npleties of asp aontenevable natural tesostgt 31. pint of Oise%. Will the proposal evolves a. ' A rist of sa missies er the release et bassrfoss sobstancos (inciadlsg. bat tat Halted to, all. pesticides, [besleals sr raesatiost is the •meat of Oh aceideat et up - sot conditions? b. Possible iatertetenco •itb ss esorgancy respoaaa pies et as eser• gency emsevatios ►lss3 32. topulatiod. sill tie proposal alter the locates. dtsttibstios, deaaity, 'or grovtb rate .t the bnsaa popelatl.s of as area, 33. loosing. sill the proposal at. toot e:lstiag boasts►, or crests a dewed for additional boss's.? 34. ?ransp0Elgtortttrgelit t. sill the proposaltesut ass a. Ceosraties of substantial ad11• tional .ehteal u samosa? b. ttteets a osistiag pacllsg facilities. or deaaad for new palsy? e. lobstsetial ispeet apse existing ttanapottattas systems? 4. I:tarot:efts to resat Nttn as of eitevlstias is saver oast it people sad/it goods/ ♦. altitatis*i ii vatetaatss, tail at ail prattle/ t. tames* is traffic basards to sites vsbielos. bicyclists of psdestrisas/ /S. lvblie p.vieet. trill tbo propose haws as street spas, it resale is a said tot sew it shared •erasaatal services In any it eke tillovlat arias. a. tits pcit.etios/ b. Pollee prot.etiia/ e. lebiils/ 1. Parts of attar recreational facilities/ O. *atatsaascs if pblle taeilltlss. lsclodlsg toads/ t. Otsat to.etassntal soniess/ 31. 12Ltux. 1111 tie proposal fault Is: a. Ose•at ssbstantial asooats it teal it saato/ b. Substantial lacrosse is daaaad epos s:istlapst sources at osatq, of cogairs ibs de•alopsast at nav sources et own/ 31. 0til 11lt. sill tba proposal molt is a seta for new armies, or subitastlsl alterations to tbs following stilitioss a. Power it aateral gas/ b. tossasicatloss vistas/ S. Vatet/ d. laws it sepsis Isabel o. Stars vats: Itaisate/ t. Sa111 waste as1 disposal/ .7.. Ut U OMM L S r PtkKIKt<k 3$. Italy. 1111 the proposal result ilos a. Crests*• it sky health base N or poteatlsl b olth baser. tesclydisp seats' health)! b. tsposrre et people to poles• tial health hasardst 3!. Sest_hstaeq. Will the preposai es crlt a the *hatrstt os if say scenic vista or via otos to the relate, et .ill the proposal ',- suit is the treatise et so aesth.t. Dolly offensive sits epos to Nell( view? 41. Docreattot. till the proposal result its as impact epos the quality or quantity of eoliths, reereatioeal epportositieap al. tultutsl tasevtee(. s. will the proposal result is the .iterstlos of es the deatcueties of a prehistoric or historic sceheolo!'esl sit.t b. will the proposal result is sdverae physical sr aastlst• le effects to a pcebistsrie or historic ballets', streeteres or object? e. Does tie proposal have the poteatlal to eats* a physical chimp vbitb weld effect unique ethnic cultural •eels's? 4. will the proposal restrict existing Willies's Sc sacred uses vithis the poteatiai lspae! areal tt. rendotory Flatfoot of fisaitieaaeq. Does the project haws Oapetostlal to S. rees the goalie/ of the svvireeaeat, aubstasttally reduce the habitat of a flab ee wildlife a, cause a fish se wildlife meiotic. to *rep below silt sostalaiap :.vela, Orestes to elisions $ plant it atlas' cosmos* it7• reduce the sestet at esatsist -s- the rents •t • tat• of endangered plast Si *slut et olisisat• leper* ?sat etasplss of the sayer periods if Califotsls history Sr prehistory, h. Does the project Wore the potential to achieve shott•ters, to the disedvsntete of lend -tens •avirsa- statal 'eclat is 'here tors !spout os the esvirensest is oat v11st octets is • relatively brief' lofts. Sties period of tie* while losg-ten Isparta will enders well 1st* the fetus.) c. pots the project have Septets which are individeslly 11sited, het cvssletively eoas1dore►1et to prefect say aspect is two or sere separate re- sources where the !upset N oath resource is relatively *sell. het where the et* feet of the total of those !sports ee the esvirossest is sieaifieaat.l d. pots the project have eaviree- sotto! effects ',bleb will cause sib - 'cantle! adverse effect is hoses W- ines, either directly of indirectly? Ig 116111 R ..imm.OMM r ttlrliptcAllop# 1 Wetly certify that the statesoots furnished ove and la the attached es►Spits pietist the tots and !stet• satins required for this leftist evalsaties to the best of sy ability. sad that the facts. statesests, and inforsatios resented are Itee III decent to the best of ay knowledge sad belief. Date JJa/4/ i rite) ref QO fcaaa 1714 .f. f L City Roffinv INCOSPOI ATEC JANUART 24, N37 NO I PORTUGUESE SEND AGL ROILING HILL& CALIF Seam 3 1 0) 1114) 377.1u, • MAx M)) 377.72U ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM (IN.ITIAL STUDY) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PRELIMINARY DRAFT DATE: AUGUST 21, 1992 APPLICANT: DR. ROBERT A. SMITH REPRRESENTATIVE: MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 86-RH) ZONING AND AREA: RAS-2, 6.20 ACRES, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT CASE NO.: ZONING CASE NO. 449 SUBDIVISION NO. 83 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22334 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A 2-LOT SUBDIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, 20. The project site is a large 6.20 acre parcel consisting of undulating hillsides and knolls covered by mature shrubs and trees, with some areas being heavily wooded and an intermittent blue line stream at the southwest boundary. Currently, there is a large one- story single family residence, garage, stable, and shed on proposed Parcel 1. Landscaped lawns, shrubs and trees surround the existing residence, with native plants, grasses, shrubs, and trees beyond the residential area. Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows, raccoons, possum, skunks, gophers and an occasional fox. 21. The site is located within a one unit per 2-acre zone designation and is surrounded by similar development of the one- story ranch style with agricultural outbuildings. As described in Paragraph 20, native birds and animals frequent the area. The following analysis is a description of the findings contained in the Environmental Information and Checklist Form which preceded this page. A detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" or "Maybe" is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 449 PAGE 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Item 22. Earth. a-d. Although approval of the subdivision of land will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures, it should be noted that portions of the City exhibit unstable earth conditions, including active landslides and soil creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading, excessive irrigation, and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active southern California, additional development will be exposed to potential groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The Palos Verdes fault, considered potentially active, is located approximately one mile northeast of the City. Although approval of the subdivision of land will not result in disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcrowding of the soil, during future construction these will occur in order to prepare a 12,000 square foot building pad for the additional building site. One building site currently exists. The displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced cut and fill and should not cause a significant environmental impact. e-g. Also, during future construction, there will be removal of natural vegetative cover, potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and the increased runoff associated with development may cause a slight increase in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As additional development is limited to one (1) single-family dwelling unit, related erosion impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures 1.. The applicant shalll prepare and submit to the City a preliminary grading plan showing proposed drainage facilities, driveways, building pad(s), stable, corral, and blue line streams, for each lot of the subdivision at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the subdivision application. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 449 PAGE 3 Item 23. Air. a-c. The proposed subdivision provides for a total net increase in development of 1 single-family dwelling unit. While increased development will generate slight increases in vehicle trips during and after construction and, objectionable odors during construction, the resultant impact on air quality will be less than significant. Item 24. Water. a. Future development of 1 residential unit on a two acre minimum parcel will not alter fresh or marine water currents. b. The proposed subdivision may alter drainage patterns, increase surface runoff and reduce water absorption by the placement of structures, the introduction of impervious surface materials and irrigation systems. However, due to the nominal increase in development proposed and permitted by the General Plan, the impacts are not expected to be substantial. c. No major floodplains exist in the City. Flood waters generally flow through the canyon areas. The General Plan does not.permit development in the canyons, and so changes in the course or flow of floodwaters is not anticipated. d. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development in the project area is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water bodies located in the vicinity. e. The applicants propose a septic tank system for the new parcel. As septic tank leach field effluent percolate into the watershed, some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. The impact generated from an increase of 1 additional dwelling unit, however, will be less than significant. Mitiaation Measures, 2. No septic tanks or other similar structures, except boundary fences, shall be constructed within 150 feet of the centerline of the intermittent blue line stream at the eastern portion of Parcels 1 and 2. i. No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of water occur within the City, thus nc such hazard exists. The subdivision is located high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do not exist. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 449 PAGE 4 j. Because the applicants propose a septic tank system, some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. See Mitigation Measure 2. Item 25. Plant Life a-d. Any additional development within the City will reduce the amount of native vegetation which will be replaced, in some instances, by non-native species. But, due to the limited growth proposed, this impact will be less than significant. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the City. Item 26. Animal Life a. As further development occurs in Rolling Hills, the natural habitat of the area will be slightly reduced. But, the impact of the current proposal is expected to be less than significant. b. Large lot, estate density development proposed for this subdivision provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. The only animal listed by the Federal Government is the Palos Verdes Blue, a butterfly which was last seen in the Rolling Hills area in May, 1986. Several other animals do occur, however, that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal Government or the State Government. The Tiger Beetle, while not considered to be endangered or threatened, does maintain a sensitivity to humans, exists to an extent that may be cause for concern. The Rolling Hills General Plan shows animals that are either listed or considered for listing in the Rolling Hills area. The impact of the proposed future development may be less than significant and could be controlled through on -site location management. Mitiaation Measures 3. A biological assessment for each lot in the subdivision shall be prepared by a City approved qualified biologist prior to commencement of project grading and construction. The biological assessment shall include a description of all significant plant and animal life on the lot along with recommendations for preservation, mitigation or relocation of such resources. The developer shall incur the cost for preparation of the biological assessment and shall comply with mitigation measures recommended in the biological assessment as approved by the City. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 449 PAGE 5 c. Potential development can be expected to introduce additional household pets to the area (dogs, cats, birds, etc.), including horses and farm animals. Residential development is not expected to result in a barrier to native species migration.. d. Some minor disruption of existing wildlife could occur when future development occurs. Large lot, estate density development proposed provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. See Mitigation Measure No. 1 and 2 above. This impact will be less than significant. Item 27. Noise a. The future development of 1 single-family residence will not result in a significant increase in ambient noise levels. Construction noise may, however, reach high levels in the short term. Item 28. Light and Glare Residential building materials are carefully regulated by the Zoning Ordinance and the Community Association. Buildings are limited to one story in height. Light and glare impacts are therefore expected to be less than significant. Item 34. Transportation/Circulation a. Pine Tree Lane is a narrow 12 to 15-foot wide road that is overburdened and substandard and will require widening. During construction, there will be a daily increase of vehicle trips for construction purposes. But, when construction is completed, the incremental increase of one additional dwelling unit will generate an estimated 10 daily vehicle trips. This is considered less than significant. Mitiaation Measures 4. Pine Tree Lane shall be kept open for vehicular access at all times during future grading and construction for each lot of the subdivision. Item 41. Cultural Resources a. While prior tilling and dry farming practices may have disrupted potential remains, grading a 12,000 square foot pad may uncover a cultural resource. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 449 PAGE 6 Mitigation Measures, 5. in the event that subsurface material of an archaeological, paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during project grading or development, al: grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area, and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever is appropriate, is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition, mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition, mitigation or salvage of such material. On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date "/4- (1711Y11— LOLA M. UNGAR For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency) STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 Oct 30, 1992 LOLA UNGAR CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ET E" ILSON, Gotirmor ils4aN NOV 0 2 1992 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By....., Subject: ZONING CASE NO. 449, SUBDIVISION NO. 83, TPM NO. 22334 SCH # 92101001 Dear LOLA UNGAR: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call Tom Loftus at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight -digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, • Christine Kinne Acting Deputy Director, Permit Assistance