Loading...
513, Construction for new SFR, Application• RECORDING REQUEST BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO NA MAIL ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE 1 �, GIs 95 339990 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 10:41 AM MAR 031995 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE TITLE(S) I FEE $ t/ of p j NCPF Codo 19 ,$ 300 APR 0 4 1995 CITY OF ROLUNG HILLS R428 6/94 State of County of RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 U�1 Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss ZONING CASE NO. 94-11 (Case No. 513) SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 94-11 SITE PLAN REVIEW X (Case No. 513) VARIANCE X [SEE EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ATTACHED HERETO] I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Owner Ripllgb.r Name ( ,t/ Signature Address--.h City/State 11 /7 Print Owner N-me Signature C T t-/' Address City/State l ,4 Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. CARLA R. WI1T COMM. #959717 Notary PubliaCattornta LOS ANGELES Rut ► I comm. cxpl SS. to bethep within instrument, an WITNESS my hand and officia On this the day of '%YLAA'al.) 19 93 , before me, CtAA )4) •(AIL the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ,.,e�,, 95 339990 a ❑ personally known to me Loved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence rsonci4whose name(,$) .44-) subscribed to the d acknowledged that executed it. eal. C,e4 J g • UW, Notary's Signature '.aarece�r' See Exhibit °A" attached hereto and made a part hereof • • 3 • EXHIBIT A All that certain real property in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California described as: Lot 1, Tract No. 29408, in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Map Book 808, Pages 27 to 29 inclusive, of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Lot 2, Tract No. 29408, in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Map Book 808, Pages 27 to 29 inclusive, of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. 95 339990 3\M\Z072974W.LMF 030195 -1- • EXHIBIT "B" • RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SE1"BACK TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL, AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IN ZONING CASE NO. 513, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: ' Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Richard Colyear with respect to real property located at 0 Chestnut Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 241-A-1-MS) requesting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct a retaining wall, requesting a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to construct a retaining wall, and requesting Site Plan Review for a new single family residence. Section 2, On March 28, 1992, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 92-15 granting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct a retaining wall and granting Site Plan Review approval of a new residential structure in Zoning Case No. 458. Those approvals were extended for one year by approval of Resolution No. 93-14 on March 16, 1993. Pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 17.46.080(BX3) of the Zoning Code, no extension period shall be granted beyond the second anniversary of the original project approval unless a new public hearing is held. And, any extension granted beyond the second anniversary of original approval may only be granted or denied in the same manner and based upon the same criteria as required for approval of the original project. The applicant has submitted this request for a further extension of theVariance and Site Plan Review and has requested an additional Variance to construct a retaining wall in the side yard setback. Section 3., The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on April 18, 1994. The applicant was notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. The applicant's representative, Mr. Douglas McHattie of South Bay Engineering, was in attendance at the hearing. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15303 (a)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard setback for every residential parcel to be fifty (50) feet. The applicant is requesting to construct a retaining wall with a maximum height of five (5) feet above the downslope grade, a maximum length of 296 feet, which will encroach a maximum of fifty (50) feet into the fifty (50) foot front yard setback. as follows: Section 6. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds 95 339990 • RESOLUTION NO.94-11 • PAGE 2 • A. 'There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because there exists topographical constraints on the property that necessitate the construction of a retaining wall in order to construct a vehicular driveway onto the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because of the steep slope on the lot which necessitates a retaining wall to support the slope bank next to the proposed driveway. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially, detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed project will be compatible with surrounding properties and will be comparable to the height and nature of an existing retaining wall along the northern edge of the property. Section 7s Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 513 to permit the encroachment of a retaining wall into the front yard setback, to a maximum height of five feet (5), a maximum length of 296 feet and with a maximum encroachment of fifty feet (50) into the front yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 16 of this Resolution. Section 8, Section 17.16.12O(BX1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RA-S-2 residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct a retaining wall with a maximum height of five (5) feet above the downslope grade, a maximum length of 155 feet, which will encroach a maximum of sixteen (16) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot side yard setback. Section 9. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission fords as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because there exists topographical constraints on the property that necessitate the construction of a retaining wall in order to construct a vehicular driveway onto the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because of the steep slope on the lot which necessitates a retaining wall to support the slope bank next to the proposed driveway. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed project will be compatible with surrounding properties and will be comparable to the height and nature of an existing retaining wall along the northern edge of the property. Section 10. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 513 to permit the encroachment of a retaining wall into the side yard setback, to a maximum height of five feet (5'), a maximum length of 155 feet and with a maximum encroachment of sixteen feet (16) into the thirty-five foot (35) side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 16 of this Resolution. 95 339990 RESOLUTION NO.94-11 PAGE 3 • • Section (.1,, Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. Section 12., With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 87,120 square feet. The proposed residence (1,674 sq. ft.), garage (350 sq. ft.), and future stable (450 sq.ft.) will have 2,510 square feet which constitutes 2.9% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 11,470 square feet which equals 13.2% of the lot, which is within, the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the northwest side of this lot. D. The development plan will, in compliance with the conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a buildable pad of 12,000 square feet and a building pad coverage of 17.7%. F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph E, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. Modifications have been made to reduce the prominence of the house on the lot by moving the structure away from the edge of the building pad. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to or less than the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because conditions have been imposed to place the driveway so as to intersect with Chestnut Lane at a point which is farther away from the corner of Chestnut Lane and Johns Canyon Road than as originally shown on the proposed Site Plan. 95 339990 RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 PAGE 4 i H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 13. The Commission finds that it has authority to impose conditions of approval on this discretionary land use decision pursuant to the City's police power, the State Planning and Zoning Law, City ordinances and California Government Code Section 66499.34. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66499.34, the City is precluded from granting any approval necessary to develop any real property which has been divided, or which has resulted from a division, in violation of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act or of the provisions of Local ordinances enacted by the City if it finds that developrnent of such real property is contrary to the public health or the public safety. California Government Code Section 66499.34 also authorizes the City, with respect to parcels of real property created in violation of the Subdivision Map Act or local ordinances that are under the ownership of the same person who was the record owner of the property at the time the violation occurred, to impose such conditions as would be applicable to a current division of the property, except that a conditional certificate of -compliance has been filed for record, then the City may only impose such conditions stipulated in that certificate. Section 14, With respect to the requirements of California Government Section 66499.34, and for purposes of showing a nexus between the provisions of condition "K" of Section 16 and the need for that condition, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. Richard Colyear was a record owner of the subject property at the time of its subdivision in 1970. B. In 1970, as a condition of tentative map approval of the tract, certain perimeter easements were imposed for bridle trails, road and public utilities to be reserved for the benefit of the Rolling Hills Community Association in documents to be recorded. The parcel that is the subject of this application is a part of that tract. The requirement that these perimeter easements be reserved by document was denoted by the applicant on the final map approved and recorded for the tract. However, the applicant has never recorded any of the easements imposed by his conditional subdivision approval. C. The City's Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study, prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers on February 9, 1988, recommends the installation of future sewer lines to service the immediate vicinity of parcel to be constructed along the westerly property line of Parcel 2 (Lot 2), along the boundary line of proposed Parcels 1 and 2 and then along the easterly property line of Parcel 1 (Lot 1) (See Map 13 of 22 to the ASL Study). Based upon this Study and the need to provide for the future installation of sewers to serve the property which is the subject of this application and to serve properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, conditions have been attached to require the applicant to record an easement to the City (to be immediately transferred to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for ingress and egress purposes to construct underground utilities along those portions of the properties described above. D. The Planning Commission further finds that the required easements will serve and benefit the subject property by providing an accessway for the installation and maintenance of underground utilities to serve the site. The easement will allow the construction of underground sewer lines along the side of the property to serve the property and provide an alternative to the use of septic systems on this lot and on surrounding lots. This alternative method of sewage disposal is preferable from a geologic standpoint since this lot is on a slope and the use of septic systems in the City have occasionally resulted in slope stability problems and have occasionally failed E. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.34, only by the imposition of condition "K" of Section 16 to address the applicant's original violation of subdivision approval can the Planning Commission properly approve the application for Site Plan Review. 95 339990 RESOLUTION NO. 94.11 PAGE 5 • • Section 15, Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 513 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 16 of this Resolution. Section 16, The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 7, the Variance to the side yard setback approved in Section 10, and the Site Plan Review for residential development approved in Section 15 of this Resolution are subject to the following conditions: A. The Variances and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined, in Section 17.38.070. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated March 24, 1994 and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must include a 550 square foot corral and must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall be limited so that the amount of soil displaced to construct the building pad shall not exceed 4000 cubic yards of soil. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. The grading plan shall utilize land form or contour grading techniques in its design so as to create a building pad and slopes that blend with the horizontal and vertical contours of the natural terrain. G. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 17.7%. H. The driveway from the street to the building pad of the subject property, as shown on the plans dated March 24, 1994 shall be at least seventy-five (75) feet from the center of the radius curve of the intersection of Chestnut Lane and Johns Canyon Road. I. To obscure the building on the pad, the structures, driveway, graded slopes and retaining walls shall be screened and shielded from view with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. J. A landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of any grading and building permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, And shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of the community. A bond in the amount of the costs estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and building permit and 95 339990 RESOLUTION NO.94-11 PAGE 6 • • • shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. K. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66499.34, the City's police power, State Planning and Zoning law, the City's ordinances and other applicable powers and authority available to the City, and based upon the findings contained in Section 14 of this Resolution relating to violations of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances at the time the parcel was created, the applicant shall prepare and, upon approval and acceptance by the City, record prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit for the subject parcel, an easement in gross, in favor of the City of Rolling Hills(with the intention that the City convey it immediately to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for ingress, egress and the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and removal of sewer lines and other underground utilities over that certain real property described as (i) the westerly ten (10) feet of Parcel 2, (ii) ten (10) feet on either side of the boundary line between Parcels 1 and 2, and (iii) the easterly ten (10) feet of Parcel 1. The easement deed shall prohibit Grantor or any successor to Grantor from constructing or erecting any improvements or altering the contours of the surface of the easement areas other than installation of shallow rooted landscaping and necessary irrigation systems. L. The property that is the subject of this approval is also the subject of pending litigation entitled Richard C. Colyear v. City of Rolling Hills, etc., et al, and City of Rolling Hilts v. Richard C. Colyear (Case No. YC005965) regarding conditions of approval of a lot line adjustment involving Parcel 1 (Lot 1), and Richard C. Colyear v. City of Rolling Hills (Case No. SB91C00317) involving the processing fees for the lot line adjustment. The approval of this Site Plan Review shall not limit, impair or otherwise prejudice the City's position with respect to the pending litigation mentioned above. M. This Site Plan Review approval shall not in any way constitute a representation that Parcel 1 (Lot 1) was subdivided in compliance with the State Subdivision laws, the City's ordinances or conditions imposed pursuant thereto. N. The retaining wall in the front yard setback shall not exceed five (5) feet in height measured from the downslope side of the wall to the surface of the ground, shall not exceed 296 feet in length and shall be permitted to encroach the maximum fifty (50) feet into the front yard setback. The retaining wall shall be constructed in accordance with the approved Site Plan, identified as Exhibit "A". O. The retaining wall in the side yard setback shall not exceed five (5) feet in height measured from the downslope side of the wall to the surface of the ground, shall not exceed 155 feet in length and shall be permitted to encroach up to a maximum 16 feet into the side yard setback. The retaining wall shall be constructed in accordance with the approved Site Plan, identified as Exhibit "A". P. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. • Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. 95 339990 RESOLUTION NO.94-11 PAGE 7 • • 4 R. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional development shall, require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. S. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review, or the approval shall not be effective. T. Conditions C, D,F, G, H, I, J, K, 0, P, Q, and S of these Variance and Site Plan Review approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED and ADO dacof May, 1994. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN MARILYN KE , D1?UTY CITY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) SS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-11 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL, AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IN ZONING CASE NO. 513, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIED CONDmONS. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on May 7, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost,. Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. ,arm k DEPUTY CITY CLE K 95 3399.90 FEBgE@NOWFE 03 1997 EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND THE INSTALLATIOl(uay Of Rolling Hills MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF SEWER LINES AND By OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Two strips of land 10 feet wide in Lot 2, Tract No. 29408, in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Map Book 808 Pages 27 to 29, inclusive in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. The sideline of said strips to be 10 feet measured at right angles to that portion of the boundary of said Lot 2 described as follows: Beginning at the westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 06 Degrees 49 Minutes 48 distance of 453.00 feet; thence North 54 Degrees 03 Minutes 48 distance of 199.62 feet; South 11 Degrees 49 Minutes 44 distance of 251.47 feet; thence South 78 Degrees 05 Minutes 10 distance of 295.29 feet; thence Seconds East a Seconds East a Seconds West a Seconds East a Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 78 Degrees 05 Minutes 10 Seconds West a distance of 295.29 feet; thence North 11 Degrees 49 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 251.47 feet. Said 10 foot strips shall terminate in the Northerly line of said Lot 2. ease/ami PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW / /C/—/.�/2%� CO �- YlA A-5 4.3 a �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1_6 j 2 911-D8 ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7 j6 9 PAGE 73 PARCEL Z 9 AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: 3d %AtZ 27 (/) 3 7 S- 2- SSA NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. fi(,)(7,c_r- f=r'rILtr) CL I( 71-uG -Z Z 5LZ , os 6.713,4CKS DF 170eis5s /JAI€Y IA/ TN/.S A.eEA B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. 7/lE (SITE is APPROACHED BY A ..2)rl/EWAY 6:"/A/, /JO TNE 5L©PE' 7V ,4 PAD, -7/F Pi2MZeiJ ,PFSS/DE1►/('V .z L SS ABOUT —�� F 2', -/e/rV R T//E /l/JosE /3�hW/iV/' T/f/s Lox 1hA7-4/F l�PA.SSE's CDy, )e T.4/6- . S/T F T//ERA' AeE /i/D D,e/VA/, 5 ez9ZAP. S.S C°O/A/s THRDL/&// Ti/E' P,e'PE,TV. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. 7747 PAO , 7ZT /A/7- 7 /5 ///LLs/.7t v//T,y 4.e,4,Dliv4. TQ .c"/T W1777' EXIST/NC CDIVTD/1pP.t' . THE �,(2D/A1 DCC1/ S AT Thin' ..?9,?'///'F A/Y/2 T//tf PAD TO ,°)POI//D5 ACC6'Ss ,4/t/h A zeve/._ Aiem A'R Th/ ' RiI/LOJfLl PiEkrioA11 DZSTU,PBAWCE ,2P AA/Y M47z/PAL ZeA///A6E 40) ,VE/'Y SL P6s ARE" /'/eiaTF' TED ii//T l» P/WED SPYALgs .a OleA/N AWY ki//iVeAc D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. ,YZH/ L. ,,e5e7 LAAOSCAPED 7-0 Pit'C.S'E VE THE Ra PAL el/ARAC. eR T/,IF AFA'A A/M �9/77L0AT/ 5/L/TY /rY/TN T2/F /1/ 16//sBe,P//4(1,U . E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. 7-NE PP,9P2.s&D ,8U/LP/A/eC 'Dv6iee9/ r /s Did/. Y THE Lai F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. 77 AU/GZ7i4 // A r z_e_. &4 ©F" 72// SET l'K ‘ /4/6-5 . AGL A(21/SEs S//xP,ei/1/V /)//Vl' 72-/e5 PP. 9PER.. TY ,42 ©v�R 226- .c6cE T .4Gf/,4 / ,C'eaW 1V51 / P 9 Js�0 PEcS/pEA//'� .9fi/l> , r rRA)& ,Zi/STAA//F. S 1k41 Y G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. /2e/iIPV4y /s L©64 iEL /ik/ A cLJL. 2 / �A c 72! RE A//cL .?5 1/ERY L/TTLE //v.27,7 ,75v6- Api A H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. 77/ERk— -i/vfpbA/M 7 ETA /AIPr4cr, , I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: `�jl�t�5�, Z 4 l 9 9 4 4/L • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA sq.ft. 87, /20 sq.ft. sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) sq.ft. ) I, 60 sq.ft. sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. I (o 7 ¢ sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. 3 5 O sq.ft. sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. 4-5 (> sq.ft. sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES sq.ft. 5 sq.ft. sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL % 3 % % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE % 2 Z % DRIVEWAY sq.ft. 8 900 sq.ft. sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. 8 900 sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE % 10, 7 % % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE sq.ft. i (, `3 -7 4. sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE % 13 , 2 % % • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA \ \ , (p 0 sq.ft. RESIDENCE . to —7 4— sq.ft. GARAGE 3 h 0 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) '5 O sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER (o sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 2 7 0 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 2. 2 % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( ) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % • • EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF SEWER LINES AND OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES A strip of land 10 feet wide in Lot 1, Tract No. 29408 in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Map Book 808 Pages 27 to 29 inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. The side line of said strip to be 10 feet measured at right angles to that portion of the boundary of said Lot 1 described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South 19 Degrees 54 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 311.31 feet; thence North 78 Degrees 05 Minutes 10 Seconds West a distance of 295.29 feet; thence North 11 Degrees 49 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 251.47 feet; thence Said strip to be shortened so as to terminate in the north line of said Lot 1. OWNER'S DECLARATION • I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at p AG this 2 4-- day of /%I/- C67r /'C ti A ,2 / Ef> G /V (address) , California, ,19 9 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: Date Filed • • Ci //2//1 .With INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) 3�2444 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant ,59'Zi ? ! )7 Address 2. Legal Owner Address 3. Project A J _6. 30z ;%crJ 7 /as k/Wes Zdak.s. Rf ,4 C/Vi w,91- ,16- Cies d. /.1),,?5,' Address C ..CiL NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Zoning Case No. Te1(f/4)375-2'S56 Tel. Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. 756 9 - 4 - to9 Lot No. L)/' / 7 229108 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district kA ,S"` 2 / LL 6. Proposed project/use of site: � 57 iq p, /�a/77/ll1 ReS rkfi c7/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 8. Net lot area 2 ACvn7,/27 Sy��. 6' 7 /26 9. Total square footage of structures /4 7� 10. Number of floors of construction /f)/%e- 11. Basement square footage %V4 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage /, q, % h 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? • • 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? —� 17. Will cut and fill be balanced? Amount cut /707,/ e. Y. Amount fill 4%1 G'. y . 18. Area of disturbance. Square feet /744J 9/(7 . Percentage of lot 6:�j J,s 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet (,(o 7 4- 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N,4 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. /1/! 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. /V A 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. /l/ 4 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. • (s.57I4 /lai) ee06u) (i/adina Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or 28. roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. -2- LEI 1 .� 29. ._ 30. 31. _ - 32. _ X 34. _ - 35. - .4.- 36. - ,25.- 37. 33. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. rva¢ura/ land dorm Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. CWi ra / /is���-ice o� S�e,7�G as,4ec 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. /%G/ SuYirr c ce/A i7 /7 r ()per d`e 57. yte 1dm/ // /,� S 7Ler /7 orr7e S . �� e. r� ii�/ • /-nv //, Si 7 f- rrn /iryPy-P4/ 5 / 5 / A cte., -3- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Please explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers on separate sheets.) 40. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 41. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 42. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? u. X X x x — .i -4- • • f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g• Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? J• Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 43. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including tress, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 44. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 45. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 4b. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 47. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NQ X. — X_ -5- 48. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? - b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 49. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 50. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 51. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 52. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? 53. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, .including roads? f. Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO X_ -6- • • 54. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 55. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? NG4t) 5-cP7?c Sf.'s ram sA5 ,QG sivd/RE/, e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 56. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard excluding mental health? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 58. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 59. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? YES MAYBE NO X -7- • • 60. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or more separate resources where the impact is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES MAYBE Nam( X- -8- • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: DULY 1992 Date Signature For Applicant -9- i • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date „Le() / Sj / % 94- i�� ignature (/ For ,'/C,L/, 2,2/7 C D L- 17)C� ,e Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date / 9 d � r7�C1� 7154ae' Signature For forms\environm.app �i c`/ARO Co Applicant -10-