Loading...
810, New, outdoor grill and paved p, ApplicationThis page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD i 11 20120808071 i i i i i i Recorded/F ed in Offic a Records Recorder's Off"ce, Los Angeles County, California 00005892609 0 i 004033010 EQ: 01 05/31/12 AT 08:59AM i i u DAR - Counter (Upfront Scan) 111 Dail iu 1111 III 1101 11 iu mou 111011 1111 0 iu THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED P0011: FEES: 45.00 TAXES: 0.00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 45.00 E407026 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 1 �1 20- *20120808071* + RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 810 XX SITE PLAN REVIEW; XX VARIANCES I (We) the undersigned state c P.t_ A T A (A-1 r. f) e r H .I IJ 1 V A I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 0 CHESTNUT ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 241-A-1-MS) This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 810 XX SITE PLAN REIVEW XX VARIANCES I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Signature P ki —FAkofh,sh; Name typed or printed Name typed or printed Address 0 r hr°sttir44- i..-a 11 se . Address 12-01 I�h� H:IIs . ()A 962741- City/State City/State • • Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 2012-02 State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On 5 -�3 _12 MLlC Sur )tlei, before me, fYo4-41 Pu61; C Personally IA appeared 11IC1 �cakall(tSl11 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person) whose name(a') is/ a�e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that !lel she/ tl)4y executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(i and that by h)/ her /tlbir signature(%) on the instrument the person), or the entity upon beh If of which the person, 'j acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary - ( Seal) NICK SARTINI COMM. #1973389 NOTARY PUBLIC • CAUFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY Comrtliasion Expires NA www 201.10120111 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2012-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE ON A PROPERTY WITH A CONDITION THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SWIMMING POOL, TRELLIS, AND OUTDOOR KITCHEN IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE PROPERTY AND TO EXCEED THE DISTURBED NET LOT AREA OF THE LOT, AT 0 CHESTNUT LANE, (LOT 241-A-1-MS), (TAKAHASHI). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Takahashi with respect to real property located at 0 Chestnut Lane (Lot 241-A-1-MS), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review and Variance to construct a 324.5 square foot addition to the existing house, 896 square foot swimming pool and spa, pool equipment area, 312 square foot detached trellis and outdoor kitchen. A Site Plan Review is required for over 800 square foot swimming pool, as well as the other structures and addition because a condition exists on the property that any further development must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Variances are also requested to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot caused by the infinity feature of the proposed pool, and for location of the trellis, outdoor kitchen and pool in the front yard area of the lot. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on January 17, 2012 and at a field trip visit on January 17, 2012. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. In 2007, the Planning Commission approved a 4,320 square foot new residence with 885 square foot garage with a Variance to construct a 466 square foot swimming pool/spa in the front yard area of the lot. Also a sewer system was approved for this residence, which is an extension of the sewer system on Johns Canyon Drive and Morgan Lane. The house was completed in 2009 but the swimming pool was not constructed. Section 4. In 1992 a Site Plan Review application for a new 1,674 square foot pre -fabricated residence was approved with grading. A Variance for a 5-foot high wall Reso. 2012-02 1 in the side setback was approved in 1994. The applicant filed an application in 1996 for a Lot Line Adjustment between subject property and the adjacent lot, which were under the same ownership. With the approval of the lot line adjustment, the size of the subject lot was enlarged from 2.0 acres gross to 2.35 acres gross. In 1996, the applicant completed grading of the site and constructed the driveway. However, the residence was not constructed. 55% of the lot was disturbed at that time. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval for the construction of a pool that exceeds 800 square feet. In addition, pursuant to Section 17.46.040 the Planning Commission may condition an approval to require Site Plan Review for any future construction or grading on a property, regardless of whether site plan review would ordinarily be applicable to such construction. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, due to the restriction placed on this property in 2007 by the Planning Commission on any future development, the proposed project must be reviewed by the Planning Commission. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the addition, pool and trellis, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 89,940 square feet, (2.05 acres). The proposed residence (4,645 sq.ft.), existing garage (885 sq.ft.), covered porches/entryway (512 sq.ft.), trellis (252 sq.ft.) service yard (96 sq.ft.), proposed swimming pool (896 sq.ft.), and future stable, which constitutes 9.1% of the net lot • which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including all structures, paved areas and driveway will be 20,757 square feet, which constitutes 23.2% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The existing shrubs and trees on the southern portion on the parcel will remain and will screen the house from the rear. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the proposed structures will not adversely affect or be materially Reso. 2012-02 2 detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structures will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structures will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximums set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded. The proposed construction is compatible in scale and mass with adjacent properties. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and is screened from other properties and the road by existing mature vegetation, which will be preserved. As part of this approval, the applicants are required to screen the infinity edge walls from the roadway. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 145 cubic yards of cut and fill, total and will be balanced on site. The grading will be generated from the construction of the pool and the excavation for the infinity edge walls. The disturbance or grading will take place within the existing building pad area, which was previously disturbed, except that 480 square feet of the slope will be disturbed for the construction of the infinity edge. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the applicants will utilize an existing driveway, which was previously approved by the Traffic Commission and the Fire Department. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 7. Section 17.16.200I prohibits the construction of a swimming pool or other structures in the front yard area of a lot, except where a Variance is approved. The applicants are requesting to construct an 896 square foot swimming pool, spa trellis and barbeque area in the front yard. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The lot was graded in a manner that the construction of a pool and outdoor living amenities lend itself to the front location. The topography of the lot Reso. 2012-02 3 together with the fact that the pad has been already created, cause difficulty in constructing the new improvements elsewhere on the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the new construction elsewhere on the property. The lot is unique in that it is on a knoll and any different configuration of structures on the lot would require additional grading. The pool would be located in an area least obtrusive to adjacent properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed construction will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed construction will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed pool, spa, trellis and outdoor barbeque area will not encroach into the existing or potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable area for a future stable and corral has been set aside. E. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 6, and 7, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application and Variance in Zoning Case No. 810 for construction of an addition, swimming pool with spa, trellis and outdoor kitchen in the front yard area of a lot as shown on the Development Plan dated December 11, 2011, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to Reso. 2012-02 4 • cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated December 11, 2011, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed that which is necessary to excavate for the swimming pool and the infinity edge, and shall not exceed 145 cubic yards total. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 8,126 square feet or 9.1%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 20,757 square feet or 23.2% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 55.5% of the net lot area, and no more than 480 square feet of the slope area may be disturbed for the infinity pool edge. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 19,440 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 7,316 square feet or 37.6% (not including the trellis and outdoor kitchen). The 1,800 square foot stable pad will have coverage of 25.0%. K. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. L. A drainage plan for the pool and the additional hardscape shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department for review and Building and Safety Department approval. M. The north face of the infinity edge walls shall be screened. N. Prior to the issuance of any building permit a landscaping plan shall be submitted for review by the Planning Department for the pool and screening of the lower wall. Native trees and other native plants shall be utilized, and which are consistent with the rural character of the community. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the wall. Reso. 2012-02 5 O. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards. P. The property on which the project is located shall contain a set aside area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access thereto. Q. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. R. During and after construction perimeter easements and trails shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, fences - including construction fences, grading (both cut and fill), landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment, except that the Rolling Hills Community Association may approve certain encroachments. S. A minimum of 50% of the demolition and construction material shall be recycled, pursuant to the City's Construction and Demolition Ordinance requirements. A C & D Permit shall be obtained. Final inspection shall be granted until the contractor provides all necessary documents and forms to the City. T. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and.6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMPs) related to solid waste. X. Prior to the submittal of a final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. Reso. 2012-02 6 • Y. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permit. Z. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, disturbance or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AA. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no -smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: httn://www.wrh.noaa.aov/loxlmain.nhq?suite=safety&oaae=hazard definitions#FI RE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. AB. These conditions of approval shall be printed on plans submitted for plan check and permits and be available at all times at the site. AC. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variance approvals, as required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective. AD. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variance approvals, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit from the County of Los Angeles. AE. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012. JEFF NEM AIRMAN ATTEST: coduhub HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2012-02 7 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2012-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE ON A PROPERTY WITH A CONDITION THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SWIMMING POOL, TRELLIS, AND OUTDOOR KITCHEN IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE PROPERTY AND TO EXCEED THE DISTURBED NET LOT AREA OF THE LOT, AT 0 CHESTNUT LANE, (LOT 241-A-1-MS), (TAKAHASHI). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 21, 2012 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Smith, Henke, Mirsch, Chelf and Chairman Pieper. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2012-02 8 VARIANCE REQUEST FOR HEARING, NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No, 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. Mrs. Miki Takahashi PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENTS NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: 00 Chestnut 310-770-4880 00 Chestnut EMAIL: miki@fc2.co.ip LOT NO. Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Tract 29408 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 808 PAGE 27 & 28 PARCEL Matthew R. Jones , Peninsula Engineering Company 715 Silver Spur Road, Suite 206 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Tel. 310-377-5720, Fax. 310-377-5715 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. ^ Proposed plan indicates a new pool with minimum lenght for swimming laps. — A proposed outdoor grill with associated counter occupies an area between an existing paved patio and the new pool. This area is covered with a shade structure / trellis. Additional square footage is for the provision of a dinning room. -12- • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance, Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The home is completely absent of rear or • side yard areas suitable for those outdoor activities associated with the proposed improvements. •-- The existing backyard is narrow and bound by retaining wall and ascending slope on one side and structure on the other. The area is better understood and described as a side yard. The front yard area is associated with the house floor plan so the front yard was intentionally and effectively designed to function as the only yard area usable for entertainment and enjoyment. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because -- The front yard area where the proposed improvements are located is relatively isolated from the . view of adjacent homes and are perched on the building pad well above the street. — Relatively little visual impact is created with the proposed improvements. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. this Executed at lc day of /!o✓C.w+he✓►. By: By: , California ,20 !( . Address � � � 2., � 1?- 1�5 t(( CA City -21- OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at , California, this / day of ti o `' Eivt is ti-1-11--- , 20 tl By: By: Do ek4-.1 +- Address lye I(tn� l4,' City C I- at o 2 "l NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: i 't It k e w 1L' c° n e S FEE: COMPANY NAME: 17 e I `ti 4 I IN cALcer1''�j RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: �J BY: l i gi S a v e e• � u i' tZel, , Id f ire 1.0(... ZONING CASE NO o t t k � M-t l r {- C.+ 1 o Z1 4-- TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. () 311 51 Z' D PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 0 O V% 4 4-t .) t -20- REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee, Mrs. Miki Takahashi OWNER'S ADDRESS: 00 Chestnut, Rolling Hills CA TELEPHONE NO: 310-770-4880 EMAIL: miki@fc2.co.ip PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 00 Chestnut, Rolling Hills CA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Tract 29408 PROPERTY OWNER: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 808 PAGE 27 & 28 PARCEL Matthew R. Jones 715 Silver Spur Road, Suite 206, Rolling Hills Estates CA 90274 Tel. (310) 377-5720, Fax. (310) 377-5715 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: Condition of initial approval was for future improvements to require a site plan review. Proposed pool water surface footprint is over 800 sq. ft. Project includes an infinity edge pool with associated pool perimeter paving, trellis, outdoor paved dinning area under trellis, outdoor counter and cook top and dining room add under existing roof. -12- 1 E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of thelot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Building coverage is not effectively increased as the proposed dinning room add occurs under an existing roof. Other improvement were on the existing pad with the exception of the portion of the terraced pool projecting over the slope F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The project is small in magnitude relative to the lot site size. Please note the total coverage of structue at 9.5% and the lot is 89000 sq. ft. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The project has no impact on pedestrian or vehicle traffic. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. Applicable? -14- Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage N / A SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The new trellis, adjacent to the house and existing covered porch is the only portion of the project(structure) readily visible. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The infinity edge pool interrupts natural contours for the length of the pool as it projects over the slope. The projected portion of the pool is terraced with no more than 3 feet of natural stone visible from the street well below the pool. Drainage and vegetation are not altered as the pool generally occupies the existing pad / lawn area. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The only grading is foundation excavation required for the entire project is for pool construction. The terraced infinity edge follows the slope to some degree and will help minimise visual impact. The improvement have no impact on existing drainage courses. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The proposed improvements only displace existing yard lawn area and some natural vegetation at the pool projection over the slope. -13- Addition partially diming, attached covered porch TAKRo-o-SHI 00 Chestnut DATE ZONING CASE NO. __ ADDRESS ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING NET LOT AREA 89440 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 4320 sq.ft. GARAGE 885 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 30 sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. CABANA sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included 450 in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 837 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS PROPOSED sq.ft. 324.5 sq.ft. sq.ft. 896 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL 89440 4644.5 885 896 30 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. -324.5 sq.ft. 512.5 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES 252 sq.ft. sq.ft. 252 sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 312+48=360 (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, sq.ft. 312_ sq.ft. 312` sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, sq.ft. _ 48 sq.ft. 48 _ sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE tom' `Ito sq.ft. % sq.ft. -14- sq.ft. sq.ft. 8126 sq.ft. 9.1 % 8126+360=8486 8486i � �4 sq.ft. " 9e5 % ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS 10085 sq.ft. sq.ft. 10085 sq.ft. 2065 sq.ft. sq.ft. 2065 sq.ft. sq.ft. 841 sq.ft. 841 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. 12991 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK 14.5 COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE 21081 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 23.5 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & 20757 FLATWORK COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft, structures from previous page. 23.2 % TOTAL COVERAGE Area of pool extending over existing slope TOTAL. DISTURBED 49192 AREA sq.ft. 480 sq.ft. 49672 sq.ft. % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) 55 55.5 145 — cubic yards All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. -15- DATE Z.C. NO. 00 Chestnut ADDRESS CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGJ PAD NO. 1 TIT TTT,T)A'RT.E PAD AREA RYISTTIV(t PROPOSED TOTAT, ANT) STR T WTI TR ES . BUILDING PAD 19440 sq ft. sq.ft. 19440 sq ft RESIDENCE 4320 sq.ft. 324.5 ,q.ft. 4644.5 cq.ft. GARAGE 885 sq.ft. stilt.885 sq.ft. POOL/SPA sq ft 896 Cq.ft. 896 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq ft 30 sq.ft. 30 sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE 450 Qq.ft. sq.ft. 450 q ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 837 -324.5 '512.5 Primary residence sq.ft. .q.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 373 AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq ft sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED xo% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sift, sq.ft. cq.ft. (from 1 page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.& sq.ft. sq.ft. '(from 1' page not including allowed deductions) OTHER 252 360 sq.ft. sq ft sq ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 6858 sq.ft. sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 35.3 % �o TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 6172 sq.ft. Not.incL attached trellises, Not inrl allowed deductions, and inri the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. 8403 sq.ft. 43.2 go sq.ft. gq.ft. 8403-464-252-48=7639 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE -16- 837-464==i';3 7. r