44, SFR addition, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
COUNTY OF LOS'ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
)
of )
) ZONING CASE NO. 44
ROBERT F. EARLE )
)
Lot 13, Chesterfield, R.S. 73, 1.2/1.4 )
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Mr. Robert F. Earle, Lot 13, Chesterfield,
for a side yard variance, came on for hearing on the 26th day of May,
1964 at the hour of 8:00 P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Rolling
Hills, California, and the applicanthaving submitted evidence in support
of his application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its
Findings and Formal Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Robert F. Earle,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 13, Chesterfield,
located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and that notice of the
public hearing in connection with said application was given as required
by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33, of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said public
hearing in opposition to the application for a variance and that no evidence
was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III.
The Commission further finds that the proposed residence addition
will extend an existing nonconforming use as defined in Article V, Section
5.05 of Ordinance No. 33, and further finds that the variance should be
L
granted to the applicant in order to preserve substantial property rights
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the
granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which applicants° property is located, and that there are exceptional
and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by reason of the location
of the existing residence on said Lot 13 which do not apply generally to
other property in the same vicinity and zone.
I'V.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be
granted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills to Mr.
Robert F. Earle of Lot 13, Chesterfield, in accordance with the plot plan
marked Exhibit I on file in these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so
ordered.
Dated: May 29, 1964.
Secretary, Planning Commission
Chairman, Planning Commission