58, Increase the over hang of the , Resolutions & Approval Conditions5
8
9
In
.BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
COUNTY'OF`LOS ANGELES,.STATE
the Matter of the Application)''
)
Ramstead )
'Lot'.36-GF, Tract No.19040
FINDINGSAND FORMAL 'REPORT '
The application of Mr..James B. Ramstead; Lot 36,
Georgeff Tract, for' a' Side yard variance, came on; for hearing
OF ROLLING HILLS,
of
James B.
OF CAL IF ORNIA
ZONING CASE NO. 58
on the 27th day of July, 1965 at the hour. of 8:00 P.M.
at.
the City Hall of ',the City ofRolling Hills; California;:and the,
13
applicant, having submitted evidence in support
14
cation, the PlanningCoituuission, being advised, now makes its
15.
of his appli
15 , .Findings' arid Formal .Report as required by the ordinances of the
17
18
19
20
21'
22
City of . Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant
James B.
Ramstead, is the owner of that certain real, property described
as Lot 36, Georgeff Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills
California,,an:d that notice of the public hearing in connection
with said application was given as required by Sections 8.0
25 and 8.07. of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
The Commission further, finds that no person appeared
at said public hearing in opposition
the application for
•.variance,' and that 'no evidence was received` by the Commission
,in opposition thereto.
.5
6
8
The Commission further finds that the proposed.
residence of-the:applicant,is, to.be located so that the roof..
overhang on each side of the house will extend 48 inches into..
the 'side .yar'd .rather' than the 25' inches rovided .in nance No. '
p Ordi
33, Section 5.01, and further finds that by reason of the'=terrain`
of. said Lot 36-GF, the variance should be'granted'to applicant
9, in order to preservesubstantial property rights possessed
10by
.other property in the
11 granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental
the publicinjurious to welfare or '.to propertyor improvements
p oveme
nts
in the vicinity and zone in which :applicant'.s property is located,'
and there are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and;.
I, conditions by reason of physical location and terrain of said
171 Lot 36-GF which do not apply generally to other property in the
18 same vicinity 'and zone.
12
13
14
15
16
19.
20
21
22 ..
same
vicinity and zone,; and that the_ .
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance
should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rolling Hills. to James B. Ramstead for Lot 36, Georgeff Tract,
in accordance with the Plot Plan marked Exhibit I on file in
these proceedings, and it is therefore so ordered.
Dated: August 5
Margaret Shafer,_ Secretary
Planning Commission
Raymond I. Mahan, Chairman.
Planning Commission