526, Constructl a hard surface in a, Staff ReportsCity OfieliIty INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Agenda Item No.: 4A
Mtg. Date: 8/14/95
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 14,1995
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 95-11: A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DENYING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE ENCROACHMENT
OF A BEDROOM ADDITION INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK
AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE USED
FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AT A SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 526.
Mrs. Frances A. Johnson, 4 Buckboard Lane (Lot 34-A-GF)
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission approved the attached resolution on August 5,
1995 denying the requested Variance to permit the encroachment of a 387
square foot bedroom addition 15 feet into the west side yard setback and
approving a Conditional Use Permit for a 3,096 square foot hard -surfaced area
to be used for recreational purposes. During the hearing process, the original
size of the proposed play area was reduced from 5,361 square feet to 3,096
square feet.
2. The Commission denied the Variance because the residential building pad
coverage would be excessive at 72.7%, additional encroachments would
worsen the amount of residential structure within setback areas, does not
minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaves little open space between
property lines, would further restrict vehicular and pedestrian traffic, would
further overdevelopment of the building pad and far exceeds the
recommended coverage of 30%.
Two tables that summarize the Criteria Sr Major Impacts and Code
Requirements for the proposed project are attached.
®Punted on Recycled Paper.
3. The existinghouse and attached garage was constructePin 1965 alongwith
g g
retaining walls and a swimming pool. In 1979, a remodel of a master
bedroom and bath included an addition of 150 square feet.
4. Grading for the hard -surfaced area will not be required as the pad is a
relatively flat and sand -covered.
5. The total lot disturbance will be 29.2% (40% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 14.2% (20% maximum permitted) and
the total lot coverage proposed is 29.2% (35% maximum permitted).
7. The existing building pad coverage for the residential pad is 68.4%. Coverage
on the second building pad will be 60.6%. Total building pad coverage for both
building pads will be 65.5%.
8. Other issues that the Planning Commission discussed were: the retention of
existing topography, plants and animals, natural features; landscape
screening, views, and the imposition of conditions when necessary to ensure
that noise does not constitute a nuisance to surrounding properties.
9. The Planning Commission found that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment and adopted a Negative Declaration in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act.
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-2 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 35 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
Grading
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 2 OF 4
Garage encroaches 31 feet into front
setback
Residence encroaches 4 feet into side
yard on west side
Residence encroaches 7 feet into east
side yard
Variety of garden walls encroach
into east side yard setback
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool
Service Yard
PROPOSED
Residential addition denied
4,123 Residence 4,123
1,154 Garage 1,154
744 Swimming Pool 744
96 Service Yard 96
Recreational Court 3,096
Future Stable (min.) 450
Future Corral (min.550)
TOTAL 6,117 sq.ft.
N/A
23.98%
TOTAL 9,663 sq.ft.
None
29.2%
•
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30 to 35% recommended)
Second Building Pad Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
Access to Stable and Corral
(Accessibility and maximum 4:1 slope
required ONLY for new residence or
additions that require Site Plan
Review).
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL
• PURPOSES
a. Requires minimum 450 square foot
stable and minimum 550 square
foot corral area
b. Prohibited in front yard
c. Prohibited within 50 feet of any
paved road or street easements
9.0% (6,117 sq.ft.)
23.98%(16,303 sq.ft.)
14.2% (9,663 sq.ft..)
29.2% (19,849 sq.ft.)
68.4%( of 8,943 sq.ft. building pad)) 68.4% (of 8,943 sq.ft. building pad))
Vacant, sand covered 5,800 sq.ft. 60.6% (of 5,800 sq.ft. building pad)
building pad
41.5%
65.5%
Existing driveway from south side of Existing
property at Buckboard Lane
d. Retaining walls shall not exceed 4
feet nor be exposed to the exterior Existing
e. Conform to lot coverage
limitations (maximum 20%
structural lot coverage and
maximum 35% total lot coverage)
f. Prohibited on slopes exceeding 2:1
and on the sides or bottoms of
canyons or natural drainage
courses
g. Requires balanced cut and fill 'EA
to exceed 750 cubic yards.
EXISTING
9.0% structural lot coverage
23.98% total lot coverage
Existing relatively flat
sand covered area
Not required but, access area does
not exceed maximum slope
Addressed in resolution
Addressed in resolution
PROPOSED
Area proposed for 450 sq.ft. stable
and 550 sq.ft. corral
Not proposed for front yard
Not within 50 feet of any paved road
or street easements
Existing
14.2% structural lot coverage
29.2% total lot coverage
3,069 sq.ft. hard -surfaced area
No grading proposed
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 3 OF 4
h. Requires that graded area na to
exceed 10,000 square feet.
i. Requires retention of existing
topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent
possible
j. Requires City/County approved
drainage system
k. Requires screening on all four
sides
1. Requires that landscape screening
not interfere with viewscape of
surrounding properties or
easements
m. Prohibits court lighting
n. Allows the imposition of
conditions when necessary to
ensure that noise does not
constitute a nuisance to
surrounding properties.
RECOMMENDATION
No grading proposed
Addressed in resolution
Addressed in resolution
Screened by existing landscaping and
addressed in resolution
Screened by existing landscaping and
addressed in resolution
Addressed in resolution
Addressed in resolution
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 95-11.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 4 OF 4
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
ENCROACHMENT OF A BEDROOM ADDITION INTO THE SIDE
YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AT A SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 526.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mrs. Frances A. Johnson with
respect to real property located at 4 Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 34-A-GF)
requesting a Variance to permit encroachment into the side yard setback to construct
a bedroom addition and requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of
a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes at an existing single family
residence. During the hearing process, the hard -surfaced area to be used for
recreational purposes was reduced in size from 5,361 square feet to 3,096 square feet.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on June 20, 1995 and July 18, 1995, and at a field
trip visit on July 8, 1995.
Section 3. On May 24, 1995, Planning staff prepared an initial study for the
project. The initial study found that the project would not have a significant effect
on the environment. The Negative Declaration was prepared and was circulated to
the applicant and other interested parties in accordance with State of California
CEQA Guidelines. The public notice of the Planning Commission's intent to
recommend approval of the Negative Declaration was published on May 27, 1995.
Copies of the Negative Declaration were sent to adjacent cities and other
government agencies. No comments on the Negative Declaration were received.
The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on
the environment and adopted a Negative Declaration in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.120(B) requires a side yard setback for every residential parcel in the
RA-S-2 zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is requesting to construct a 387
square foot bedroom addition which will encroach a maximum of fifteen (15) feet
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 1 OF 6
• •
into the thirty-five (35) foot west side yard setback. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is not necessary because
the building pad coverage for this project on the upper residential pad would be
72.7% which the Commission finds excessive and exceeds the building pad coverage
of most properties in the vicinity so that the proposed expansion is not appropriate
for the property.
B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question because both the garage and pool
encroach into the front yard setback, a portion of the residence encroaches into the
east side yard setback and additional encroachments would exacerbate the amount of
residential structure within setback areas.
C. The granting of the Variance will be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and
zone in which the property is located because the proposed project does not
minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaves little open space between property
lines, would further restrict vehicular and pedestrian traffic, would result in further
overdevelopment of the building pad and far exceeds the recommended coverage of
30%. This would make the proposed bedroom addition more visually prominent
on the building pad than appropriate for the existing development pattern of the
City.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby denies the request for a Variance approval for the construction of a 387
square foot bedroom addition into the west side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 526.
Section 6. Section 17.16.210(A)(7) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
allows for the construction of a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes provided a Conditional Use Permit for such use is approved by the Rolling
Hills Planning Commission.
Section 7. With respect to the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
3,096 square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes, the
Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes would be consistent with the purposes and objectives
of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public
convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar recreational uses
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 2 OF 6
• •
in the community and the court will be located in an area of the property where
such use will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties.
B. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with
the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the
hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes will comply with the low
profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 2.1
acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to
accommodate such use.
C. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the
hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes will not impact the view or
the privacy of neighbors. The hard -surfaced area will not require grading, will
replace a sand -covered play area and will be screened by landscaping.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the request for a Conditional Use Permit in Zoning Case No. 526
for a proposed 3,096 square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes, as shown on the Development Plan dated August 1, 1995, and marked
REVISED Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 9.
Section 9. The Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 3,096
square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes approved in
Section 8 as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated
herein as REVISED Exhibit A dated August 1, 1995, is subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.42.070(A).
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit
approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended
and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has
been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period
of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise approved by Variance.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked REVISED Exhibit A dated August 1, 1995, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 3 OF 6
• •
E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of
sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a stable and corral
with vehicular access thereto.
F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 9,663 square feet or 14.2% and
total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 19,849 square feet or
29.2%.
G. Grading shall not be required for the construction of the hard -surfaced
area to be used for recreational purposes.
H. Any preparations of soil for the hard -surfaced area to be used for
recreational purposes shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural
features to the greatest extent possible.
I. A drainage system approved by the City Engineer shall be incorporated
into the overall plan of the hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes
and the surrounding landscaped areas.
J. Landscape screening shall continue to be maintained so as not to
obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes.
K. Lighting for the hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes
shall not be permitted.
L. All retaining walls incorporated into the court shall not be greater than
four feet in height at any point. Exposed exterior retaining walls shall not be
permitted.
M. Any screening fences for the hard -surfaced area to be used for
recreational purposes shall be landscaped and not exceed 8 feet in height.
N. No structures (i.e., skateboard ramps, slides, etc.) shall be incorporated
in the hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
O. Noise from the hard -surfaced area use shall not create a nuisance to
owners of surrounding properties.
P. Review and approval of a site drainage plan by the City Engineer shall
be obtained for the hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
Q. A plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department
staff for their review prior to the submittal of an applicable site drainage plan to the
County of Los Angeles for plan check.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 4 OF 6
• •
R. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to approval of the
drainage plan.
S. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for site drainage plan review must conform to the development
plan described at the beginning of this section (Section 9).
T. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of this Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall
not be effective.
U. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit approval must be
complied with prior to approval of the site drainage plan by the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 5TH - OF UGUST, 1995.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KtRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 5 OF 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
SS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95-11 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
ENCROACHMENT OF A BEDROOM ADDITION INTO THE SIDE
YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AT A SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 526.
was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on August 5, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Witte.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
r..f.k_
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
PAGE 6 OF 6
•City oi Rolling
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 1995
TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING & SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 526
4 BUCKBOARD LANE (LOT 34-A-GF)
RAS-2, 2.1 ACRES
MRS. FRANCES A. JOHNSON
MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
MAY 27, 1995
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a bedroom addition into the
west side yard setback and request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a hard -
surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
DISCUSSION
1. The Planning Commission viewed stakings of the proposed project on July 8,
1995.
2. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit the encroachment of a 387
square foot bedroom addition 15 feet into the west side yard setback. The
applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 5,361 square
foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
Two tables that summarize the Code Requirements for the existing and
proposed projects and Criteria & Major Impacts are attached.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
ZONING CASE NO. 526
PAGE 2
3. The existing house and garage was constructed in 1965 along with retaining
walls and a swimming pool. In 1979, a remodel of a master bedroom and bath
included an addition of 150 square feet.
4. Grading will not be required for the residential addition. Grading for the hard -
surfaced area will not be required as it is a relatively flat sand -covered pad.
5. The total lot disturbance will be 33.1%. (40% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 18.1% (20% maximum permitted) and
the total lot coverage proposed is 33.1% (35% maximum permitted). Staff
included the hard -surfaced area in structural lot coverage calculations.
7. The existing building pad coverage for the residential pad is 68.4% and the
proposed building pad coverage will be 72.7%. Coverage on the second
building pad will be 93.6% for the future stable. Total building pad coverage
for both building pads will be 83.5%.
Staff included the hard -surfaced area in building pad coverage calculations.
The City has a policy that addresses coverage of an identified "Existing
Buildable Area" as coverage that is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other
accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area."
8. Other issues that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss are:
the retention of existing topography, plants and -animals, natural features;
landscape screening, views, and the imposition of conditions when necessary
to ensure that noise does not constitute a nuisance to surrounding properties.
9. Staff has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, staff prepared
the attached Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
TQpg
t > i ' o lE;US
FQRRECREATTONA: PURPOSES
a. Requires minimum 450 square foot
stable and minimum 550 square foot
corral area
b. Prohibited in front yard
c. Prohibited within 50 feet of any paved
road or street easements
d. Retaining walls shall not exceed 4 feet
nor be exposed to the exterior Existing
e. Conform to lot coverage limitations
(maximum 20% structural lot
coverage and maximum 35% total lot
coverage)
f. Prohibited on slopes exceeding 2:1
and on the sides or bottoms of
canyons or natural drainage courses
Area proposed for 450 sq.ft. stable and
550 sq.ft. corral
Not proposed for front yard
Not within 50 feet of any paved road or
street easements
None proposed
9.0% structural lot coverage 18.1% structural lot coverage
23.98% total lot coverage 33.1% total lot coverage
Sand covered relatively flat area 5,361 sq.ft. hard -surfaced area
g. Requires balanced cut and fill not to
exceed 750 cubic yards. No grading proposed
h. Requires that graded area not to
exceed 10,000 square feet.
i. Requires retention of existing
topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent
possible
No grading proposed and area to be
hard -surfaced will be less than 10,000
sq.ft.
Sand covered play area
j. Requires City/County approved
drainage system Required condition
k Requires screening on all four sides
1. Requires that landscape screening not
interfere with viewscape of
surrounding properties or easements
m. Prohibits court lighting
n. Allows the imposition of conditions
when necessary to ensure that noise
does not constitute a nuisance to
surrounding properties.
Screened by landscaping
Screened by landscaping
Required condition
Discretion of Planning Commission
4
RAS-2 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 35 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
Grading
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30 to 35% recommended)
Second Building Pad Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
Access to Stable and Corral
(Accessibility and maximum 4:1 slope
required ONLY for new residence or
additions that require Site Plan Review).
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
Garage encroaches 31 feet into front
setback
Residence encroaches 4 feet into side
yard on west side
Residence encroaches 7 feet into east side
yard
Variety of garden walls encroach into
east side yard setback
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool
Service Yard
TOTAL
N/A
Residence will encroach 15 feet into side
yard on west side
Retaining wall will encroach 13 feet into
side yard on east side
4,123 Residence 4,510
1,154 Garage 1,154
744 Swimming Pool 744
96 Service Yard 96
Recreational Court 5,361
Future Stable (min.) 450
Future Corral (min.550)
6,117 sq.ft.
23.98%
9.0% (6,117 sq.ft.)
23.98%(16,303 sq.ft.)
68.4%( of 8,943 sq.ft. building pad),
Vacant, sand covered (of 5,800 sq.ft.
building pad)
41.5%
Existing driveway from south side of
property at Buckboard Lane
TOTAL 12,315 sq.ft.
None
33.1%
18.1%(12,315 sq.ft.)
33.1%(22,511 sq.ft.)
72.7% (with bedroom addition)
93.6% (with future stable)
83.5%
Existing driveway from south side of
property at Buckboard Lane
Not required but, does not exceed
maximum.
Discretion of Planning Commission
Discretion of Planning Commission
•
Cuy ol R0fA
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 526
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Application has been filed with the City of Rolling Hills for approval of the project
known as Zoning Case No. 526 to be located at Lot 34-A-GF and currently, 4
Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills, CA and to be implemented by Mrs. Frances A.
Johnson.
The request is briefly described as:
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a bedroom addition into the
west side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of
retaining walls in the east side yard setback, and request for a Conditional Use
Permit to construct a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes for
property at Lot 34-A-GF and currently, 4 Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills.
Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines of the City of Rolling Hills, the Lead
Agency has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Lead Agency
prepared this NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
BASED ON THE ATTACHED INITIAL STUDY, AND CONDITION(S) (IF
APPLICABLE), IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
A period of at least 21 days from the date of publication of the notice of this
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project
specifications, the Initial Study and this document prior to the final adoption of the
NEGATIVE DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. A copy of the project specifications
is on file in the offices of The City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling
Hills, CA 90274.
Date: May 24,1995 By:
Lola Ungar, PrinciPlanner
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Date Filed
•
Ci1y ol R0fiL J1 Pf,
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Mav 15. 1995
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s)
Address
2. Legal Owner(s)
Address
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Zoning Case No. 526
Frances Johnson Tel. (310) 544-3557
4 Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Same as above. Tel. ( )
Same as above.
3. Project Address Same as above.
Assessor's Book No. 7567 015 - 016
Lot No.
34-A-GF
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing zoning district
6. Proposed project/use of site Construct. Res idential Addition, retaining
wall, and hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 2.1 acres
8. Net lot area 1.56 acres (67,966 square feet )
9. Total square footage of structures 12,315 square feet
10. Number of floors of construction one
11. Basement square footage - 0 -
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 22,501 square feet
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? Westerly residence wall.
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? No
Printed on RacycI' d Papr,r
• •
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? No
17. Will cut and fill be balanced? Amount cut N/A Amount fill N/A
18. Area of disturbance. Square feet 5 , 7 4 8 Percentage of lot 8. 5 $
19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4 ,12 3 square feet
20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
N/A
21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
N /A
23. Attach plans.
24. Proposed scheduling. When permits are approved.
25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and
indicate clearly why the application is required.
Variance to west side yard setback for bedroom addition,
Variance to east side yard setback for retaining wall, and
Conditional Use Permit for a hard —surfaced area to be used
for recreational purposes.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach
additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
X 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial
alteration of ground contours.
27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
X 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
-2-
• •
YES LIQ
X 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
X 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
X 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration
of existing draining patterns.
X 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
X 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
X 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable
or explosives.
X 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
_X_ 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and' any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or
polaroid photos will be accepted.
See Initial Study attached.
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land
use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear
yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
See Initial Study attached.
-3-
g•
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Please explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers on separate sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
40. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the
channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay, inlet or lake? _ X
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or
similar hazards?
X
-
41. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally or regionally?
42. Water. Will the proposal result in:
X
X
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
-4-
• •
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g•
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards
such as flooding or tidal waves?
l•
Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
43. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species
of plants (including tress, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora
and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
44. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species
or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
45. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
46. Linht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?
47. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
YES • MAYBE NO
.— _X.
-5-
• •
YES MAYBE NO
48. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
49. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or
radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan? X
50. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?
51. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a
demand for additional housing?
52. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new
parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ X
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? X
53. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in
a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following
areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools? _ _ X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? — _ X
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _ X
f. Other governmental services? _ — X_
-6-
• •
YES MAYBE NO
54. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?
55. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
56. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard
excluding mental health? X
X
X
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X
57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
58. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
59. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological
site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure,
or object?
X
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact area? X
-7-
• •
YES MAYBE NO
60. Mandatory Findines of Sienificance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.)
X
X
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or
more separate resources where the impact is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.) X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
X
-8-
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists
prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether
the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled
pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit
a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number:
4. Address of Site (street name and number if vailable, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book, page, a d parcel number:
7. Specify any list purant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall).
8. Regulatory dentification number:
9. Date of ist: JULY 1992
Date
Signature
For
Applicant
-9-
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed 'on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that
the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists.
Date Mav 2 4 . 19 9 5
For City of Rolling Hills
Lead Agency
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date Mav 2 4 . 19 9 5
forms\environm.app
LOLA UNGAR, Princi . ' Tanner
For City of Rolling Hills
Lead Agency
-10-
•
C14 o/ ie0m �Pe
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
AND CHECKLIST FORM (INITIAL STUDY)
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
DATE: MAY 24, 1995
APPLICANT: MRS. FRANCES A. JOHNSON
REPRESENTATIVE: MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4 BUCKBOARD LANE (LOT 34-A-GF)
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
ZONING AND AREA: RAS-2, 2.1 ACRES, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT
CASE NO.: ZONING CASE NO. 526
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
ENCROACHMENT OF A 387 SQUARE FOOT BEDROOM
ADDITION INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK,
REQUEST FOR A . VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE EAST SIDE YARD
SETBACK FOR A RETAINING WALL, AND REQUEST
FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A
5,361 SQUARE FOOT HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Item 38. Description of project site.
The project site is a large 2.1 acre hillside parcel that contains a residence, detached
garage and pool on a flat pad. There is also an existing sand covered pad on the
hillside 15 feet below the residence that is relatively flat. The existing residence is
located near the south side of the property. Native brush grows on the steep slope
at the rear of the lot. Landscaped lawns, shrubs and trees surround the existing
residence, with native plants, grasses, shrubs, and trees beyond the residential area.
Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows, raccoons,
possum, skunks, gophers and an occasional fox.
s:
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
Page 2
Item 39. Description of surrounding properties.
The site is located within a one unit per 2-acre designation and is surrounded by
similar development of the one-story ranch style with agricultural outbuildings. As
described in Paragraph 38, native birds and animals frequent the area.
000
The following analysis is a description of the findings contained in the
Environmental Information and Checklist Form which preceded this page. A
detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" or "Maybe"
is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Item 40. Earth.
a-d. Although approval of the project will not result in unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic substructures, it should be noted that portions of the
City exhibit unstable earth conditions, including active landslides and soil
creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide
Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This
property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading, excessive
irrigation, and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger
additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active
southern California, additional development will be exposed to potential
groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The Palos Verdes fault,
considered potentially active, is located approximately one mile northeast of
the City.
Although approval of the project will result in disruptions, displacements,
compaction, or overcovering of the soil during future construction, these will
occur in order to prepare a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes. Any displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to
conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced
cut and fill and should not cause a significant environmental impact.
e-g. Also, during future construction, there will be removal of natural vegetative
cover and sand surface, potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind
action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and porous sand
surface and the increased runoff associated with development of a hard -
surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes may cause a slight increase
in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As
development is limited to a residential addition of 387 square feet and a
• •
Page 3
5,361 square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes,
related erosion impacts will be less than significant.
Item 41. Air
a-c. The proposed project will not increase residential development. While the
development will generate slight increases in vehicle trips and objectionable
odors during construction, the resultant impact on air quality will be less than
significant.
Item 42. Water
a. Future development of a bedroom addition and a hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes on the 2.1 acre parcel will not alter fresh or
marine water currents.
b. The proposed project may alter drainage patterns, increase runoff and reduce
water absorption by the placement of structures, the introduction of
impervious surface materials and irrigation systems. However, due to the
nominal increase in development proposed and permitted by the General
Plan, the impacts are not expected to be substantial.
c. No major floodplains exist in the City. Flood waters generally flow through
the canyon areas. The General Plan does not permit development in the
canyons, and so changes in the course or flow of floodwaters is not anticipated.
d. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development in the
project area is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water
bodies located in the vicinity.
1•
No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in
the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of
water occur within the City, thus no such hazard exists. The project is located
high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do
not exist.
Some additional discharge into surface waters downstream may occur due to
sheet water flow from the proposed hard -surfaced area to be used for
recreational purposes.
Item 43. Plant Life
a-d. Any additional development within the City will reduce the amount of native
vegetation which will be replaced, in some instances, by non-native species.
• •
Page 4
But, due to the limited growth proposed, this impact will be less than
significant. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies
which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation
in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the
City.
Item 45. Noise
a. Future development of a bedroom addition will be less than significant.
Future development of a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes may cause an increase in existing noise levels as children and/or
adults play ball, skate, and engage in recreational activities on the surface.
b. Future development of a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes will not expose people to severe noise levels.
Item 44. Animal Life
a. As further development occurs in Rolling Hills, the natural habitat of the area
will be slightly reduced. But, the impact of the current proposal is expected to
be less than significant.
b. Large lot, estate density development along with a bedroom addition, and a
hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes for this project
provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. The
only animal listed by the Federal Government is the Palos Verdes Blue, a
butterfly which had not been seen in the Rolling Hills area since May, 1986. In
1994, the Palos Verdes Blue was seen at the nearby San Pedro Fuel Depot
Station where its habitat is being restored. Several other animals do occur,
however, that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal
Government or the State Government. Recently, the California gnatcatcher
was added to the list of endangered species and, in a recent census, pairs were
located in the adjacent City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Other target species for the
Rancho Palos Verdes Peninsula Area that are being studied by the State of
California Department of Fish and Game are the Cactus Wren and the Coast
Horned Lizard. The impact of the proposed future development of a bedroom
addition and a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes will be
less than significant.
Item 46. Light and Glare
Residential building materials are carefully regulated by Zoning Ordinance and the
Community Association. Buildings are limited to one story in height. Light and glare
impacts therefore are expected to be less than significant.
• •
Page 5
Item 52. Transportation/Circulation
a. The incremental increase of a bedroom addition and a hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes will not generate more daily vehicle trips. This
is considered less than significant.
Item 59. Cultural Resources
a. While prior tilling and dry farming disrupted potential remains, the applicant
does not propose to do any grading.
*0
On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one)
® I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.
I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Mav 24.1995 By:
gvek
LOLA M. UNGAR, PRII IPAL PLANNER
For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency)
i
City oil2?f..y JUL
HEARING DATE: JULY 8, 1995
TO:
FROM:
1
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING & SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REQUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 526
4 BUCKBOARD LANE (LOT 34-A-GF)
RAS-2, 2.1 ACRES
MRS. FRANCES A. JOHNSON
MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
MAY 27, 1995
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a bedroom addition into the
west side yard setback and request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a hard -
surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
DISCUSSION
In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 17 (Zoning), staff would identify the
following issues for evaluation:
1. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit the encroachment of a 387
square 'foot bedroom addition 15 feet into the west side yard setback. The
applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 5,361 square
foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
Two matrixes that summarize the Code Requirements for the existing and
proposed projects and Criteria & Major Impacts are attached.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
ZONING CASE NO. 526
PAGE 2
2. The existing house and garage was constructed in 1965 along with retaining
walls and a swimming pool. In 1979, a remodel of a master bedroom and bath
included an addition of 150 square feet.
3. Grading will not be required for the residential addition. Grading for the hard -
surfaced area will not be required as it is a relatively flat sand -covered pad.
4. The total lot disturbance will be 33.1%. (40% maximum permitted).
5. The structural lot coverage proposed is 18.1% (20% maximum permitted) and
the total lot coverage proposed is 33.1% (35% maximum permitted). Staff
included the hard -surfaced area in structural lot coverage calculations.
6. The existing building pad coverage for the residential pad is 68.4% and the
proposed building pad coverage will be 72.7%. Coverage on the second
building pad will be 93.6% for the future stable. Total building pad coverage
for both building pads will be 83.5%.
Staff included the hard -surfaced area in building pad coverage calculations.
The City has a policy that addresses coverage of an identified "Existing
Buildable Area" as coverage that is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other
accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area."
7. Other issues that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss are:
the retention of existing topography, plants and animals, natural features;
landscape screening, views, and the imposition of conditions when necessary
to ensure that noise does not constitute a nuisance to surrounding properties.
8. Staff has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, staff prepared
the attached Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
(
• •
CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE USED
FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES EXISTING PROPOSED
a. Requires minimum 450 square foot
stable and minimum 550 square foot
corral area
Area proposed for 450 sq.ft. stable and
550 sq.ft. corral
b. Prohibited in front yard Not proposed for front yard
c. Prohibited within 50 feet of any paved Not within 50 feet of any paved road or
road or street easements street easements
d. Retaining walls shall not exceed 4 feet
nor be exposed to the exterior Existing
e. Conform to lot coverage limitations
(maximum 20% structural lot
coverage and maximum 35% total lot
coverage)
f. Prohibited on slopes exceeding 2:1
and on the sides or bottoms of
canyons or natural drainage courses
None proposed
9.0% structural lot coverage 18.1% structural lot coverage
23.98% total lot coverage 33.1% total lot coverage
Sand covered relatively flat area 5,361 sq.ft. hard -surfaced area
g. Requires balanced cut and fill not to
exceed 750 cubic yards. No grading proposed
h. Requires that graded area not to
exceed 10,000 square feet.
i. Requires retention of existing
topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent
possible
j. Requires City/County approved
drainage system
k Requires screening on all four sides
1. Requires that landscape screening not
interfere with viewscape of
surrounding properties or easements
m. Prohibits court lighting
n. Allows the imposition of conditions
when necessary to ensure that noise
does not constitute a nuisance to
surrounding properties.
No grading proposed and area to be
hard -surfaced will be less than 10,000
sq.ft.
Planning Commission will field trip
Required condition
Planning Commission will field trip
Planning Commission will field trip
Required condition
Planning Commission will field trip
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-2 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 35 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
Grading
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30 to 35% recommended)
Second Building Pad Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
Access to Stable and Corral
(Accessibility and maximum 4:1 slope
required ONLY for new residence or
additions that require Site Plan Review).
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
EXISTING
Garage encroaches 31 feet into front
setback
Residence encroaches 4 feet into side
yard on west side
Residence encroaches 7 feet into east side
yard
Variety of garden walls encroach into
east side yard setback
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool
Service Yard
4,123
1,154
744
96
TOTAL 6,117 sq.ft.
N/A
23.98%
9.0% (6,117 sq.ft.)
23.98%(16,303 sq.ft.)
68.4%( of 8,943 sq.ft. building pad))
Vacant, sand covered (of 5,800 sq.ft.
building pad
41.5%
Existing driveway from south side of
property at Buckboard Lane
PROPOSED
Residence will encroach 15 feet into side
yard on west side
Retaining wall will encroach 13 feet into
side yard on east side
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool
Service Yard
Recreational Court
Future Stable (min.)
Future Corral (min.550)
4,510
1,154
744
96
5,361
450
TOTAL 12,315 sq.ft.
None
33.1%
18.1%(12,315 sq.ft.)
33.1%(22,511 sq.ft.)
72.7% (with bedroom addition)
93.6% (with future stable)
83.5%
Existing driveway from south side of
property at Buckboard Lane
Not required but, does not exceed
maximum.
Planning Commission will field trip.
Planning Commission will field trip.
•City 4a/tiny
HEARING DATE: JUNE 20, 1995
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING & SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REQUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 526
4 BUCKBOARD LANE (LOT 34-A-GF)
RAS-2, 2.1 ACRES
MRS. FRANCES A. JOHNSON
MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
MAY 27, 1995
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a bedroom addition into the
west side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit encroachment into the east
side yard setback for a retaining wall, and request for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
DISCUSSION
In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 17 (Zoning), staff would identify the
following issues for evaluation:
1. The. applicant is requesting a Variance to permit the encroachment of a 387
square foot bedroom addition 15 feet into the west side yard setback. The
applicant requests a Variance to permit the construction of a retaining wall
that will not exceed 4 feet to encroach up to 13 feet into the .east side yard
setback. The applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a
5,361 square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes.
Recently, Mayor Pernell requested that in future cases we prepare a matrix that
summarizes existing and proposed projects. Therefore, in keeping with that
request, we have attached one for this case that summarizes Criteria & Major
Impacts and Code Requirements for a hard -surfaced area.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
ZONING CASE NO. 526
PAGE 2
2. The existing house and garage was constructed in 1965 along with retaining
walls and a swimming pool. In 1979, a remodel of a master bedroom and bath
included an addition of 150 square feet.
3. Grading will not be required for the residential addition. Grading for the hard -
surfaced area will not be required as it is a relatively flat sand -covered pad.
4. The total lot disturbance will be 33.1%. (40% maximum permitted).
5. The structural lot coverage proposed is 18.1% (20% maximum permitted) and
the total lot coverage proposed is 33.1% (35% maximum permitted). Staff
included the hard -surfaced area in structural lot coverage calculations.
6. The existing building pad coverage for the residential pad is 68.4% and the
proposed building pad coverage will be 72.7%. Coverage on the second
building pad will be 7.75% for the future stable. Total building pad coverage
for both building pads will be 47.2%.
Staff did not include the hard -surfaced area in building pad coverage
calculations. The City has a policy that addresses coverage of an identified
"Existing Buildable Area" as coverage that is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other
accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area."
8. Other issues that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss are:
the retention of existing topography, plants and animals, natural features;
landscape screening, views, and the imposition of conditions when necessary
to ensure that noise does not constitute a nuisance to surrounding properties.
9. Staff has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, staff prepared
the attached Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
c
•
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-2 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
Grading
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum) -
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30 to 35% recommended)
Second Building Pad Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
Access to Stable and Corral
(Accessibility and maximum 4:1 slope
required for Site Plan Review)
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
11 EXISTING
Garage encroaches 31 feet into front
setback
Residence encroaches 4 feet into side
yard on west side
Residence encroaches 7 feet into east
side yard
Variety of garden walls encroach
into east side yard setback
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool
Service Yard
PROPOSED
Residence will encroach 15 feet into
side yard on west side
Retaining wall will encroach 13 feet
into side yard on east side
4,123 Residence 4,510
1,154 Garage 1,154
744 Swimming Pool 744
96 Service Yard 96
Recreational Court 5,361
Future Stable (min.) 450
Future Corral (min.550)
TOTAL 6,117 sq.ft.
N/A
23.98%
9.0% (6,117 sq.ft.)
23.98% (16,303 sq.ft.)
TOTAL 12,315 sq.ft.
None
33.1%
18.1%(12,315 sq.ft.)
33.1% (22,511 sq.ft.)
68.4%( of 8,943 sq.ft. building pad)) 72.7% (with bedroom addition)
Vacant, sand covered (of 5,800 sq.ft. 7.75% (with future stable)
building pad
41.5%
47.2%
Existing driveway from south side of Existing driveway from south side of
property at Buckboard Lane property at Buckboard Lane
5.71:1 slope to future stable & corral
through west side yard
Planning Commission will field trip.
Planning Commission will field trip.
•
•
CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL
PURPOSES
a. Requires minimum 450 square foot
stable and minimum 550 square foot
corral area
b. Prohibited in front yard
c. Prohibited within 50 feet of any paved
road or street easements
d. Retaining walls shall not exceed 4 feet
nor be exposed to the exterior
e. Conform to lot coverage limitations
(maximum 20% structural lot
coverage and maximum 35% total lot
coverage)
f. Prohibited on slopes
exceeding 2:1 and on the sides or
bottoms of canyons or natural
drainage courses
g. Requires balanced cut and fill not to
exceed 750 cubic yards.
h. Requires that graded area not to
exceed 10,000 square feet.
i. Requires retention of existing
topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent
possible
j. Requires City/County approved
drainage system
lc. Requires screening on all four sides
1. Requires that landscape screening not
interfere with viewscape of
surrounding properties or easements
m. Prohibits court lighting
n. Allows the imposition of conditions
when necessary to ensure that noise
does not constitute a nuisance to
surrounding properties.
EXISTING
9.0% structural lot coverage
23.98% total lot coverage
PROPOSED
Area proposed for 450 sq.ft. stable and
550 sq.ft. corral
Not proposed for front yard
Not within 50 feet of road or street
easements
Up to 4 foot retaining wall proposed
18.1 % structural lot coverage
33.1 % total lot coverage
Area proposed is a sand covered
relatively flat area
No grading proposed
No grading proposed and area to be
hard -surfaced will be 5,361 sq.ft.
Planning Commission will field trip
Required condition
Planning Commission will field trip
Planning Commission will field trip
Required condition
Planning Commission will field trip
•
City O/ /O/fLfl INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 526
Application has been filed with the City of Rolling Hills for approval of the project
known as Zoning Case No. 526 to be located at Lot 34-A-GF and currently, 4
Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills, CA and to be implemented by Mrs. Frances A.
Johnson.
The request is briefly described as:
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a bedroom addition into the
west side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of
retaining walls in the east side yard setback, and request for a Conditional Use
Permit to construct a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes for
property at Lot 34-A-GF and currently, 4 Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills.
Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines of the City of Rolling Hills, the Lead
Agency has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Lead Agency
prepared this NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:
BASED ON THE ATTACHED INITIAL STUDY, AND CONDITION(S) (IF
APPLICABLE), IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
A period of at least 21 days from the date of publication of the notice of this
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project
specifications, the Initial Study and this document prior to the final adoption of the
NEGATIVE DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. A copy of the project specifications
is on file in the offices of The City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling
Hills, CA 90274.
Date: May 24,1995 By:
Lola Ungar, Princiy ij1 Planner
I
it
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
C1iy a� Ro ie.�n9 JUL
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed Mav 15 , 1995
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s)
Address
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Zoning Case No. 526
Frances Johnson Tel. (310) 544-3557
4 Buckboard Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
2. Legal Owner(s) Same as above. Tel. ( )
Address Same as above.
3. Project Address Same as above.
Assessor's Book No. 7567 015 - 016 Lot No. 3 4 —A—GF
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing zoning district
6. Proposed project/use of site Construct Residential Addition, retaining
wall, and hard —surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 2.1 acres
8. Net lot area 1.56 acres (67,966 square feet)
9. Total square footage of structures 12,315 square feet
10. Number of floors of construction one
11. Basement square footage — 0 —
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 22, 501 square feet
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? Westerly residence wall.
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? No
® Printed on Rom/clod Pan.•r
• •
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? No
17. Will cut and fill be balanced? Amount cut N/A
18. Area of disturbance. Square feet 5 , 7 4 8
19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet
Amount fill N/A
. Percentage of lot
4,123 square feet
8 . 5 %
20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
N/A
21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
N /A
23. Attach plans.
24. Proposed scheduling.
When permits are approved.
25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and
indicate clearly why the application is required.
Variance to west side yard
Variance to east side yard
Conditional Use Permit for
for recreational purposes.
setback for bedroom addition,
setback for retaining wall, and
a hard —surfaced area to be used
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach
additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
x 26.
Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial
alteration of ground contours.
27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
X 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
-2-
• •
YES N�
X 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
X 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
X 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration
of existing draining patterns.
X 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
X 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
X 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable
or explosives.
_ X 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
X 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
X 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and' any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or
polaroid photos will be accepted.
See Initial Study attached.
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land
use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear
yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
See Initial Study attached.
-3-
ID !
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Please explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers on separate sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
40. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? _ _ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering
of the soil? X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? — X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? _ X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? _ _ X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the
channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay, inlet or lake? _. X
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or
similar hazards? X
g•
41. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally or regionally?
42. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
-4-
• •
YES_ MAYBE NO
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g.
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
i Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards
such as flooding or tidal waves?
J•
Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
43. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species
of plants (including tress, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora
and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
44. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species
or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
45. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
46. Liuht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?
47. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
-5-
• •
YES MAYBE NO
48. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
49. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or
radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan? X
50. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X
51. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a
demand for additional housing? X
52. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new
parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? _ X
53. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in
a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following
areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
X
-6-
• •
YES MAYBE NO
54. EnerQy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X
55. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X
b. Communications systems? X
c. Water? X
d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ X
e. Storm water drainage? — X
f. Solid waste and disposal?
56. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard
excluding mental health? X
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X
57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
58. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
59. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological
site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure,
or object?
X
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact area? X
-7-
• •
60. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or
more separate resources where the impact is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
X
X
-8-
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists
prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether
the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled
pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit
a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number:
iP
4. Address of Site (street name and number if .vailable, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book, page, d parcel number:
7. Specify any list pur : ant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS ASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall).
8. Regulatory dentification number:
9. Date of ist: TULY 1992
Date
Signature
For
Applicant
-9-
• i
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that
the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists.
Date Mav 2 4 . 19 9 5
For City of Rolling Hills
Lead Agency
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date Mav 24 . 1995
forms\environm.app
LOLA UNGAR, Princi._ •fanner
For City of Rolling Hills
Lead Agency
-10-
•
City 0/Roiling Jh//J
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
AND CHECKLIST FORM (INITIAL STUDY)
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
DATE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
ZONING AND AREA:
CASE NO.:
SUBJECT:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
MAY 24, 1995
MRS. FRANCES A. JOHNSON
MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
4 BUCKBOARD LANE (LOT 34-A-GF)
RAS-2, 2.1 ACRES, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT
ZONING CASE NO. 526
REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
ENCROACHMENT OF A 387 SQUARE FOOT BEDROOM
ADDITION INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK,
REQUEST FOR A . VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE EAST SIDE YARD
SETBACK FOR A RETAINING WALL, AND REQUEST
FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A
5,361 SQUARE FOOT HARD -SURFACED AREA TO BE
USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Item 38. Description of project site.
The project site is a large 2.1 acre hillside parcel that contains a residence, detached
garage and pool on a flat pad. There is also an existing sand covered pad on the
hillside 15 feet below the residence that is relatively flat. The existing residence is
located near the south side of the property. Native brush grows on the steep slope
at the rear of the lot. Landscaped lawns, shrubs and trees surround the existing
residence, with native plants, grasses, shrubs, and trees beyond the residential area.
Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows, raccoons,
possum, skunks, gophers and an occasional fox.
Panted on Recycled Paper.
•
Page 2
Item 39. Description of surrounding properties.
The site is located within a one unit per 2-acre designation and is surrounded by
similar development of the one-story ranch style with agricultural outbuildings. As
described in Paragraph 38, native birds and animals frequent the area.
000
The following analysis is a description of the findings contained in the
Environmental Information and Checklist Form which preceded this page. A
detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" or "Maybe"
is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Item 40. Earth.
a-d. Although approval of the project will not result in unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic substructures, it should be noted that portions of the
City exhibit unstable earth conditions, including active landslides and soil
creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide
Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This
property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading, excessive
irrigation, and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger
additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active
southern California, additional development will be exposed to potential
groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The Palos Verdes fault,
considered potentially active, is located approximately one mile northeast of
the City.
Although approval of the project will result in disruptions, displacements,
compaction, or overcovering of the soil during future construction, these will
occur in order to prepare a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes. Any displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to
conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced
cut and fill and should not cause a significant environmental impact.
e-g. Also, during future construction, there will be removal of natural vegetative
cover and sand surface, potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind
action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and porous sand
surface and the increased runoff associated with development of a hard -
surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes may cause a slight increase
in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As
development is limited to a residential addition of 387 square feet and a
Page 3
5,361 square foot hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes,
related erosion impacts will be less than significant.
Item 41. Air
a-c. The proposed project will not increase residential development. While the
development will generate slight increases in vehicle trips and objectionable
odors during construction, the resultant impact on air quality will be less than
significant.
Item 42. Water
a. Future development of a bedroom addition and a hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes on the 2.1 acre parcel will not alter fresh or
marine water currents.
b. The proposed project may alter drainage patterns, increase runoff and reduce
water absorption by the placement of structures, the introduction of
impervious surface materials and irrigation systems. However, due to the
nominal increase in development proposed and permitted by the General
Plan, the impacts are not expected to be substantial.
c. No major floodplains exist in the City. Flood waters generally flow through
the canyon areas. The General Plan does not permit development in the
canyons, and so changes in the course or flow of floodwaters is not anticipated.
d. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development in the
project area is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water
bodies located in the vicinity.
l•
No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in
the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of
water occur within the City, thus no such hazard exists. The project is located
high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do
not exist.
Some additional discharge into surface waters downstream may occur due to
sheet water flow from the proposed hard -surfaced area to be used for
recreational purposes.
Item 43. Plant Life
a-d. Any additional development within the City will reduce the amount of native
vegetation which will be replaced, in some instances, by non-native species.
• • •
Page 4
But, due to the limited growth proposed, this impact will be less than
significant. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies
which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation
in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the
City.
Item 45. Noise
a. Future development of a bedroom addition will be less than significant.
Future development of a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes may cause an increase in existing noise levels as children and/or
adults play ball, skate, and engage in recreational activities on the surface.
b. Future development of a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational
purposes will not expose people to severe noise levels.
Item 44. Animal Life
a. As further development occurs in Rolling Hills, the natural habitat of the area
will be slightly reduced. But, the impact of the current proposal is expected to
be less than significant.
b. Large lot, estate density development along with a bedroom addition, and a
hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes for this project
provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. The
only animal listed by the Federal Government is the Palos Verdes Blue, a
butterfly which had not been seen in the Rolling Hills area since May, 1986. In
1994, the Palos Verdes Blue was seen at the nearby San Pedro Fuel Depot
Station where its habitat is being restored. Several other animals do occur,
however, that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal
Government or the State Government. Recently, the California gnatcatcher
was added to the list of endangered species and, in a recent census, pairs were
located in the adjacent City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Other target species for the
Rancho Palos Verdes Peninsula Area that are being studied by the State of
California Department of Fish and Game are the Cactus Wren and the Coast
Horned Lizard. The impact of the proposed future development of a bedroom
addition and a hard -surfaced area to be used for recreational purposes will be
less than significant.
Item 46. Light and Glare
Residential building materials are carefully regulated by Zoning Ordinance and the
Community Association. Buildings are limited to one story in height. Light and glare
impacts therefore are expected to be less than significant.
• •
Page 5
Item 52. Transportation/Circulation
a. The incremental increase of a bedroom addition and a hard -surfaced area to be
used for recreational purposes will not generate more daily vehicle trips. This
is considered less than significant.
Item 59. Cultural Resources
a. While prior tilling and dry farming disrupted potential remains, the applicant
does not propose to do any grading.
000
On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one)
• I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.
I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Mav 24,1995 By:
LOLA M. UNGAR, PRIIPAL PLANNER
For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency)