597, Addition to SFR, Application•
City aMo ll..g Jd,•!G
REOUEST FOR HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
PROPERTY OWNER: I"1 Q K t C 5 5 4�
OWNER'S ADDRESS: a k e_Q1 ,
TELEPHONE NO: C3 ► 0) 4 4- k l 8 2
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: `-1 co ()- 13 O \)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.
Z(o
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.75 67 PAGE 0 I Q, PARCEL 0 2 (o
AGENT'S NAME: l3 Q L ' i CD C-, . (2 1
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 0 7 S t 1_..\) 1Z S P ,) R IZ .1-1.1=
TELEPHONE NO: (3 1 O) cO44- - Cp v 1 o
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance
the conditional use is permitted in the zone.
11.1G. 2 t c , 2,
®Panted on Recycled Pane,.
•
Will the proposed use be tikpatible with the uses in the surraing area, and if so, why?
///6. PPC l-1 R L= MAl n) yJ S0 CM' S 1 ''2,'/ Cr ! !'R L,-s /4 //-/G
Sri/2 o v.) D /.Jc7 A/2G'A
Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public
health safety and general welfare?
/ i /-/4,5 A) !' CF/= L` G %
FILING FEE
A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS.
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
l"t Qa.K esst,)
8 A % c A
(31o) $44.- 1 1552
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: a,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2. !o
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.150 PAGE .01 B
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PARCEL 0 2.4p
701 Snt..vi:.R SPoR R1-1E.90274i
(3to 544-CoO1Q
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require
a Site Plan Review:
RC Ln)T14r_. AD/Dr-riot.) PLO5 F50,R0
G�>��►D r‘C, ILL (31
1�1 c . EE. , E rJ
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
clDOl toc`1
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
RC\ C� S t-k C L"- LI) 40 t ; t-,C (S r ( C-7
C., v i O U t2 c
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and 'extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots. •
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
1—O �' ‘S C-1LGtCcaa� L/�c�rJSC�1c�C.r�
• •
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
F. Is the site development plan hannonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties.
tl-1` \' WC.LL \t11-111J Ti LE SCTC3f\C1&S ' \ LL
"D t AtJ GeLT) P6Za Pk -VI A E. Etc-tlACooRs,
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
T t= S t T Ia I S la L REc\ U E. \1 E L O P E D
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
• .
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: <o - 7 - Q g
Signature
For: M A Q
Applicant
DATE ZONING CASE NO. 3?7 ADDRESS •
BUILDING AREAS
NET LOT AREA
BUILDING PAD(S)
RESIDENCE
GARAGE • $6
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 640
STABLE
RECREATION COURT
( )
SERVICE YARD
OTHER ,/er". gm
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING
7/0 320 sq.ft.
2;70
sq.ft.
.3246 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
9 6 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
4846 sq.ft.
4.40 %
2 3, 3
6800 sq.ft.
1840 sq.ft.
72 0 sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK 93 60 sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE g , 4 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE 14,206 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 12, 8 A %
PROPOSED TOTAL
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
224 0 sq.ft.
sq.ft. 865
sq.ft. 640
/375- sq.ft. I3 75'
sq.ft.
57c sq.ft.
5 485 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft. sq.ft.
sq.ft. 9 (o sq.ft.
8 0 0 sq.ft. 8 00 sq.ft.
4415
4..0
sq.ft. 2101 sq.ft.
S. 4_ %
.4-% 2.3 %
800 sq.ft. "76 00 sq.ft.
sq.ft. /8 10 sq.ft.
sq.ft. 72 0 sq.ft.
800 sq.ft. J O 1 6 0 sq.ft.
,73 % 9.21, %
5 2 I sq.ft.
4.1 . %
1 4-21 sq.ft.
1 1. 6 %
/1/21 4 or LOT D/5 / e/R/3A A)C T - 3Z I
DATE
•
ZONING CASE NO. S47 ADDRESS
APPLICANT
_CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
J'AD NO.
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 2 4 G 9 O sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 5485 sq.ft.
GARAGE 8 lv 5 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL l' 4 O sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
(
OTHER - C rb Ac 4 S . tc) c12 c-
sq.ft.
9 <o sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO, 1 7 88 6 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 3 (. 9 %
26.D NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
STABLE (BARN)
POOL
RECREATION COURT
3680 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
1 3 -7 5 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 (3 -15 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 37,3 %
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at 'Q O L L l AGI 1-1 t_L S L S TA i C:_5 , California,
this 3 rd day of J O 0E. , 19 c3 9
By:
By:
8 /IAV ,4'fC/4 LA%
Address
ROLL /NC7 /-//LL5
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California.
If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before
a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that
State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property
described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best
of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: V\ /a C2, K CD E. SS 4) DATE FILED 6 6. / 19
REPRESENTATIVE: 0 o u c-, M s tAA n 4 FEE: 3 ZQp
COMPANY NAME: TB 0 C. tJ
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
10 7 S /LvER 5 Pd R R D ZONING CASE NO: 4-9
POLL//•-?6_7 f/ALL$ EST 90274
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310) 544-6O/o
PROJECT ADDRESS:
RECEIPT NO: 6 932 G 939
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING
HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely
independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and
the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the
RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read
and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at i2 LL/A)Cy /-//GL5 E5 7/I i 7 5 , California
this rd • day of c,/0Al , 19 G 9 .
By:
By:
"tvz,,d 7 a,
8 1/g,' /c,( L,J.
Address
R, --1, Ca 90 2 74
City
//1 ZCONG CASE NO. rg 7 ADDRES•
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
TAD NO. 1 276
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 2 4 O sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 5 4 P, 5 sq.ft.
GARAGE 8 G 6 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL 67 4 O sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER- CA1c1sc1 4S, nao Bg6 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 7 88 G sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE __ % 2 < 5
PAD NO. 2
287c
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 3-6sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 13 -7 5 sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
1315 sq.ft.
' -o4-7T8
4
Ci1y J4/h
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Date Filed Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) (QQK. V) 5 S 1-1) Tel. (31 O) 5 4-4 -
Address M Aa E t c. k. L n. Qc LL s r G (-1 l
2. Legal Owner(s) , 4ttr5 r ( Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address S het A o G. R- 1 C. . L r . R . 14 .
Assessor's Book No. 15(a ? - O 1 a - 0 Z (o
Lot No. 2. (o
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing zoning district R ,
6. Proposed project/use of site Re 5 t t7 EAce. ikDD 1-; .I ) (3 4124, CAt" QtZ/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size Z • $ 5 9 P c.
8. Net lot area 1 1 .3..3 2.0 S... "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot
lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway
easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway
easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any
private drive or driveway thatprovides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip
portion of a flag lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 9901
10. Number of floors of construction
11. Basement square footage t O t,tEr
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?
PA( i (AL- orz. ill
5-05-98
-1-
-.'
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, 'with Tess than 200 square feet added? v
17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut 151 0 ate{ . Amount fill 1510 C .
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities.)
18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or
are proposed to be added. Square feet '� �J 1 Percentage of Net Lot Area 37.7 % .
19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet (O 1 2 5 S .,
20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
23. Attach plans.
24. Proposed scheduling. /A ' ,A P
25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
1 'i C! 17 L A t i 1 Z..1„r:.. �1 t \‘) G R ID
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach
additional sheets as necessary).
YES !IQ
0 lSk 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or
substantial alteration of ground contours.
❑ 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
O 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
-2-
YES N
❑ 151 29. Significant amounts of solid waste pr litter.
❑ i. 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
❑ Lq 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing draining patterns.
❑ ISt 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
15/ 0 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
❑ SI. 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives.
❑ �t 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage,
etc.).
❑ 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
❑ 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
GE. Kt 9 T f.) L.G. C ,t� Kt t t..� C�? G 5 c n GA c c vs) i; na
I... L o c tom. i GI hl /- (4 l Lt.. $ t D
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
tclfI L.C. (=As,tit [�..Q) Onitr SToetc- (1)3 E-4ocet
(a l_. t.., o ' (4 1 L L 5' I o L. 'a S v 10.. 2U o n) 0 *5 c) t+3 J Gi
P f2 o P o s-f L. o e l 0 N t ►^ n r:, t2 A c. �.
-3-
• •
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No
Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply
does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No
Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific
screening analysis).
VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
VIII. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,
an EIR is required.
IX. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, "Earlier Analysis," above may be
cross-referenced).
X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above.
XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be
cited in the discussion.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑
polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑
vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0
established community (including a low-income
or minority community)?
I I . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0
population projections?
0
0
0
0
0
0
-4-
• •
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0
housing?
Ili. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0Pt
b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 A
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 074
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 ❑`
e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 It
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 ❑ 0 'C(
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0PIC
h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 P
i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 ❑ • 0 IX
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ❑ ❑ 0 l�
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related ❑ ❑ 0
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 i
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0
water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial Toss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 ik
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 Xt
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 'f
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
❑ ❑ ❑
-5-
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 ❑i
c) After air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ❑ 0 0 / _
cause any change in climate?
d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0A
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 /
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 X
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 K
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? ❑ 0 0
Nfiet
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 ❑.
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 Pt
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 X
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 ❑ 0
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage ❑ 0 0PI
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 0 1,itt
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 X
VI II. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ❑ 0 ❑ g
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 ❑ 0
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the Toss of availability of a known 0 0 0 X
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 Olt
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
-6-
• •
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0
brush, grass, or trees?
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 lj
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 ilk -
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0114
b) Police protection? 0 0 0it
c) Schools? 0 0 0 1p
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 f
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 014
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) . Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 X
b) Communications systems? ❑ 0 0 14
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 )1'
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 IX-
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0rit
g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 [X.
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ❑ 0 0 X
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 014
c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0 Ifl-
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ 0 0
b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 kr
c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 01
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ❑ 0 ❑
the potential impact area?
-7-
• •
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0
regional parks or other recreations facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 ❑
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 ❑ 0
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important example of the
major period of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0
individually limited, but cumulatively,
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have, environmental effects 0 0 0
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the
tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this
case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets.
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses ❑ 0 0 0
and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which
effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 0 0
than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site -
specific conditions for the project.
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8-
•
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the
lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed' statement
indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list,
and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is
required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number:
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Hall),
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List: JULY 1992
Date
For
Signature
Applicant
- 9 -
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5'of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
these lists.
Date i- la - qq
C)'`AA,K•
�- d1
Signature `
For MASK I=.SS�
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date " et qq
Signature
For 1 ' lAQV.. cL'b Y
Applicant
forms\environm. 1998app
- 10 -