597, Addition to SFR, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-16, APPROVING AN EXTENSION
TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GUEST HOUSE,
A STABLE WITH LOFT AND ADJACENT CORRAL, AND
SUBSTANTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE GRADING
AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE
NO. 597.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. Mark Dessy with respect to real
property located at 8 Maverick Lane (Lot 26-A-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting an
extension to a previously approved (1) a Conditional Use Permit to construct a guest
house and (2) Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a new guest house, a stable
with loft and adjacent corral and substantial residential additions that require grading
at an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 597 that was approved by the
Planning Commission on September 21,1999 by Resolution No. 99-16.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on September
19, 2000 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time
is necessary in order to comply with the County requirements in order to acquire
necessary permits to complete the work.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 8 of Resolution No. 99-16, dated
September 21,1999, to read as follows:
"A. The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire
within two years of the approval of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 99-16
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19
ATTEST:
F SEPTEMBER, 2000.
1LSLI
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
/ ► AA D, �, l< �v►-�
MARILYN TERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA•
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-21 entitled:
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-16, APPROVING AN EXTENSION
TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GUEST HOUSE,
A STABLE WITH LOFT AND ADJACENT CORRAL, AND
SUBSTANTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE GRADING
AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE
NO. 597.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
September 19, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: Commissioner Sommer.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
11!111f111111111111ppill
'FEE
CODE
20
CODE
19
CODE
9
:ErVi
111XR 1 7 2000.
CITY OF ROLLIN314P-LS
1FEE$ ,54.0 SSI0
•
00 0211624
. . . _
RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
1:01 PM FEB 10 2000
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
TITLE(S)
DA. FEE Code 20 $ 2.00
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN)
To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink
D.T.T.
Number of Parcels Shown
THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
ikv
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. 597
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
00 0211624
I (We) the .undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
8 Maverick Lane (Lot 26-A-SK), Rolling Hills, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 597 SITE PLAN REVIEW
Re olttifen 44 97-4 VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) unjr the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
'rn4e4 —
Signaturxiar1 tes.sv Signature
Name typed oririntecL ue(; g L Name typed or printed
Address /�D //,N� �' / /S' �, A 90.27 U Address
City/State / �l / City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
L
L
L
L
T Recorder's Use Only
State of California �
County of Los Angeles) SC N0 4"Cul y i-az / t
On IVWWitA2..I'�'#01lf efore me, V V - 1/4-1-P ,2.(.4Pg2� JJ
personally appeared P2l r
personally known to me $or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf
of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
OFFICIAL SEAL I&lit r by han a o ial seal.
V. K. VALENZUELA
1'ARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA "- ���
LOS MANGEOLES COUNTY r+ ,
My Commission Exp. June 5, Signature of Noi ry /
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
411
00 0211624
E,6i6/T g u
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN
REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
GUEST HOUSE, A STABLE WITH LOFT AND ADJACENT CORRAL,
AND SUBSTANTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE
GRADING AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 597.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Mark Dessy with respect to real
property located at 8 Maverick Lane (Lot 26-A-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting the
following: (1) a Conditional Use Permit to construct a recreation room and (2) Site
Plan Review to permit the construction of a new guest house, a stable with loft and
adjacent corral and substantial residential additions that require grading at an
existing single family residence. During the hearing process, the request for a
recreation room was changed to a request for a guest house.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on July 20, 1999 and August 17, 1999 and at a
field trip visit on July 27, 1999. The applicant was notified of the public hearing in
writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, from all persons
protesting the same, and from members of the City staff and the Planning
Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant
was in attendance at the hearing.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.16.210(A)(5) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
permits approval of a guest house under certain conditions. The applicants are
requesting to construct an 800 square foot guest house at the eastern portion of the
lot. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a
guest house would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 1 of 8
•
1 •
00 0211624
welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the
area proposed for the guest house would be located in an area on the property where
such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings,
and structures have been considered, and the construction of a guest house will not
adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or
structures because the proposed guest house will be constructed on a portion of the
residential building pad and is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that
the guest house will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural
terrain, and surrounding residences because the guest house will comply with the
low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a
2.859 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to
accommodate such use.
D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable
development standards of the zone district because the 800 square foot size of the
guest house equals the 800 square foot maximum permitted and the guest house
does not encroach into any setback areas.
E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los
Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting
criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the
current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17
of the Zoning Code because a stable structure and adjacent corral will be located at
the northeastern portion of the lot.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an 800 square foot
guest house in accordance with the development plan dated August 13, 1999 and
marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 597 subject to the conditions contained in
Section 8 of this resolution.
Section 6. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a
development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any
grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed
or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six
month period. The applicants request Site Plan Review to permit the construction
of a new guest house, a stable with loft and adjacent corral, and substantial
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 2 of 8
•
•
00 0211624
residential additions that require grading at an existing single family residence.
With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes
the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply
with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The
project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements with the
Conditional Use Permit for a guest house approved in Section 5. The lot has a net
square foot area of 110,320 square feet. The residence (5,485 sq.ft.), attached garage
(865 sq.ft.), proposed guest house (800 sq.ft.), pool (640 sq.ft.), stable (1,375 sq.ft.),
service yard (96 sq.ft.) will have 9,261 square feet which constitutes 8.4% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total
lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 19,421 square feet which
equals 17.6% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the
proposed structures located below a hill that is away from the road so as to reduce
the visual impact of the development. The building pad coverage proposed for the
27,680 square foot residential building pad is 28.5%, building pad coverage proposed
for the 2,875 square foot stable pad will be 47.8%, and the total building pad coverage
will be 30.3%.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings,
and structures have.' been considered, and the construction of a guest house, a stable
with loft and adjacent corral, and substantial residential additions that require
grading would not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures because the proposed new structures would be constructed
close to the hillside and are a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the
structures would not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated
in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed
project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this
irregular -shaped lot. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of
the property.
D. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existingnatural topographic features of the
lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and
land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is
proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away
from the residence, new structures, and existing neighboring residences.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 3 of 8
•
•
00 0211624
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The
structures proposed will not be visible from Maverick Lane. Significant portions of
the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across portions of the
property.
F. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at
the north side (rear) of this lot.
G. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan
preserves several mature trees and shrubs.
H. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles • because the
proposed project will utilize the same driveway to Maverick Lane for access.
I. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 597 for a
proposed construction of a guest house, a stable with loft and adjacent corral, and
substantial residential additions that require grading at an existing single family
residence in accordance with the development plan dated August 13, 1999 and
marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 597 subject to the conditions contained in
Section 8 of this resolution.
Section 8. The Conditional Use Permit for a guest house approved in
Section 5 and the Site Plan Review approved in Section 7 of this Resolution are
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals shall
expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections
17.42.070(A) and 17.46.080(A) unless otherwise extended pursuant to the
requirements of those sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit and
Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this
approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse;
provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation,
the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held,
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 4 of 8
•
•
00 0211624
and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty
(30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these
conditions.
E. Any retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 5 feet
in height, averaging no more than 2-1/2 feet.
F. The floor area of the guest house shall not exceed 800 square feet.
G. No kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided within the
guest house.
H. No vehicular access or paved parking area shall be developed within 50
feet of the guest house.
I. Occupancy of the guest house shall be limited to persons employed on
the premises and their immediate family or by the temporary guest of the occupants
of the main residence. No guest may remain in occupancy for more than 30 days in
any six month period.
J.
Renting of the guest house is prohibited.
K. The loft area of the stable shall have no glazed windows.
L. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural
features to the greatest extent possible.
M. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 28.5%, the stable pad
coverage shall not exceed 47.8%. The total building pad coverage shall not exceed
30.3%.
N. Grading for the proposed project shall not exceed 1,560 cubic yards of
cut soil and 1,560 cubic yards of fill soil.
O. Disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 38.9% of the net lot area.
P. Landscaping shall be provided to obscure the residence and guest house
from neighboring residences to the maximum extent feasible.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 5 of 8
•
•
00 0211624
Q. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the residential building pad.
R. The landscape plan shall include water efficient irrigation, to the
maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system,
utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones,"
considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to
reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section
17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
S. Two copies of a landscape plan must be submitted for review by the
Planning Department and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not
disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with
the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing
mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character
of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the' implementation of the landscaping
plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and
buildingpermit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after
landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after
the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the
landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and
in good condition.
T. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality
management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices,
county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are
not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence.
U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
V. All parking, during and after construction, shall take, place on the
project site.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 6 of 8
00 0211624
W . The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the
installation and maintenance of septic tanks.
X. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the
installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best
Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
Z. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section
7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater
pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
AA. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
BB. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
CC. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by
the Planning Commission.
DD. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to
Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective.
EE. All conditions of these Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review
approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading
permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1999.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 7 of 8
01
ATTEST:
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ef)
MARILYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
00 0211624
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-16 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN
REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
GUEST HOUSE, A STABLE WITH LOFT AND ADJACENT CORRAL,
AND SUBSTANTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE
GRADING AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 597.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on September 21, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
c P _ P hlr )
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
Page 8 of 8
•
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Naga
00 0211624
State of Z . /.,Q9 r-Pi i iC../
County of
O
Date
ss.
D-/ffjbefore me, - /' _- K
Name and Title of Ofllcer (e.9 Jane Doe, Notary Publlb )
persally appeared
OFFICIAL SEAL
V. K. VALENZUELA
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA P.
COMMISSION el 1185884 C
LOS ANGELES COUNTY -'
My Commission Exp. June 5, 2002
Place Notary Seal Above
Name(s) of 81p r(s)
0 pe y {iown to me
P.M1roved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their .
signature(s) on the Instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
OPTIONAL
and official se
Signature of Notary Public
Though the Informatloh below Is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of thls form to another document.
Description of Attached Document f�
Title or Type of Document: Y`?5o (�.t ` d�'1 / 9 - f,i
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s):
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited 0 General
❑ Attorney In Fact
❑ Trustee
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
m 1997 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402
Number of Pages:
Prod. No. 5907
Top of thumb here
31
Reorder. CaII Toll -Free 1.800-878-6827