795, Relocate and enlarge existing , Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRECORDING REQUESTED BY ANC
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
63*
I/
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
ZONING CASE NO. 795
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW
I (We) the undersigned state
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
8 MAVERICK LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 26-A-SK), CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 795
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is t
A(r---(e--ei"
Signature
i %i. «) /wa k,isPz.PC—
Name typed or printed
I Lf dAsal ci—T20s PA ,
Address
�t-L)0G t4, u Get- 9b
City/State
e.and correct.
Name typed or printed
i erg-1,4.6=
Address
665 Lu r44 1-1,,,i,,s o Gf9- 5102-1A
City/State
• 3
See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 2010-23
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On C,-- . I-. 2.o I O before me,
Personally
appeared •=4. 1 encO,K L L. () rL a ka
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge to me that Ii/ sl6/ they executed the same in
1i+s/hf/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by IA/ h /their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
Seal)
SASHA JANAE SARTINI
COMM. #1797619
NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA 5
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
�•�:: � Comtmssion Fww May 6, 2012
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW TO ENLARGE AND
RELOCATE A POOL, CONSTRUCT A 5-FOOT HIGH WALL AND TWO NOT
TO EXCEED 30 INCHES HIGH WALLS, AND ENLARGE THE BUIDLING PAD
AREA IN ZONING CASE NO. 795, ON A PROPERTY WITH A CONDITION
THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL. PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 8 MAVERICK LANE,
(LOT 26-A-SK), ROLLING HILLS, CA., (KARPF). PROJECT HAS BEEN
DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Mr. Spencer Karpf duly filed an application with respect to real
property located at 8 Maverick Lane (Lot 1-MR), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan
Review to enlarge and relocate an existing pool and spa and to relocate and add several
walls, which will not exceed on the average 30 inches in height. In addition, a 5-foot
high wall for a distance of 10 feet is proposed in the side yard area. The existing pool
and spa of 616 square feet are proposed to be filled in and a new 808 square foot infinity
pool and spa constructed. As a result of moving of the walls, the building pad area will
increase by 1,789 square feet.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application at two field trip visits; September 14 and September
21, 2010 and at a regular meeting on September 21, 2010. The applicant was notified of
the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented
from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City
staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said
proposal. The applicant and his representative were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. In 2008 the Planning Commission approved a site plan review
and a variance in Zoning Case No. 758 to demolish 3,385 square feet of the then existing
5,485 square foot residence, to reconstruct that area and to add 1,618 square feet to the
residence for a total of 7,103 square foot residence with 865 square foot garage and a
Variance for previously graded areas that exceed the maximum permitted disturbed
area of the net lot. There is a 1,643 square foot basement at the residence and an 800
square foot detached recreation room.
Section 4. Resolution No. 2008-18 for Zoning Case No. 758 includes a
condition that any further development on the property, including walls, must be
submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The proposed walls,
which would contribute to an enlarged building pad area and the relocated and
enlarged pool, would not trigger exceedance of the City of Rolling Hills development
standard requirements. A site plan review application is required for the 5-foot high
wall.
Reso. 2010-23
ZC NO. 795
1
•
•
Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 6. Pursuant to Section 17.46.040 the Planning Commission may
condition an approval to require Site Plan Review for any future construction or
grading on a property, regardless of whether site plan review would ordinarily be
applicable to such construction. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, due to
the restriction placed on this property in 2008 by the Planning Commission on any
future development, the proposed project is required to be reviewed by the Planning
Commission. In regards to the 5-foot high wall, the project also requires review by the
Planning Commission. With respect to this project the Planning Commission makes the
following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, and
surrounding uses because the proposed project complies with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open
space between surrounding structures and equestrian uses. The project will not require
grading nor exceed the disturbed area of the lot, as previously approved with a
Variance. The proposed pool and walls are of no significant size and will increase the
building pad area by no more than 1,789 square feet to allow the property owner more
flat area around the residence.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of
the lot. The proposed pool will be constructed on the existing building pad and will be
192 square feet larger than the existing pool. The two long walls would not be higher
than 30 inches. A 5-foot wall in the side yard area is proposed for a distance of 10-feet,
which is insignificant and does not violate the spirit or intent of the City's General Plan
or Zoning Ordinance. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that
it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the
owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of
surrounding property owners.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of the
neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. It is located close to the
residence and will be located away from neighbors' view.
D. The project will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant
portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. The walls will
be landscaped and therefore not visible to the neighbors.
E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed
project will not change the existing circulation pattern.
F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Reso. 2010-23
ZC NO. 795
2
Section 7. Ba'sed upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 795 as shown
on the Development Plans dated September 15, 2010 subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective
date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the
Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this
section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions
thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted
hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to
cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested,
has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period
of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied
with unless otherwise set forth in this Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The working drawings, soils and geology reports if required, shall be
submitted and approved by the Department of Building and Safety and Public Works
Department.
E. There shall be no grading or further disturbance for this project, subject
to the City's definition of grading and disturbance (no more than 3 foot cut or fill and
no more than 2,000 square feet surface area disturbance). County grading permit shall
be required.
F. The building pad may be enlarged by no more than 1,789 square feet.
Residential building pad coverage on the 27,540 square foot residential building pad
shall not exceed 9,788 square feet or 35.5%, (not including 710 sq.ft. of the covered porch
and barbecue). The future stable pad is 5,261 square feet and will have coverage of 450
sq.ft., if a stable is built, or 8.5%. The future stable shall be subject to regulations and
application process in effect at time of proposal.
G. The structural coverage of the lot shall not exceed 10,948 square feet or
9.9% (excl. bbq) and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 21,325 sq.ft. or 19.3%. The
disturbed area shall remain at 57.7% of the net lot area.
H. The pool and pool equipment area shall be screened from the neighbors
with mature trees and shrubs. Plants shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of
neighboring properties but to screen the pool and, pool equipment area on site. Trees
and shrubs shall be planted in a manner, so that when mature, will not result in a
hedge like screen.
I. The project is subject to the provisions of the City's Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance, as 5,000 square feet or more of the landscaping will be removed
Reso. 2010-23
ZC NO. 795
3
• 7
and replanted and/or new landscaping introduced. Two sets of landscaping plans,
designed by a licensed designer, shall be submitted to the City with the appropriate
water efficient landscaping calculations for the irrigation system.
J. The walls along the descending slope shall be planted and screened from
the neighbors' properties.
K. All conditions of Resolution No. 2008-18 in Zoning Case No. 758 shall
continue to be in full force and effect.
L. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modification to this project or to the property, which would
constitute additional structural development, grading or addition and any deviation
from the approved plans in Zoning Case No. 758 and Zoning Case No. 795, shall
require the filing of anew application for approval by the Planning Commission.
M. The conditions of approval specified herein shall be printed on the Plans
submitted to RHCA and to Building and Safety Department for plan check review and
on all subsequent plans.
N. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, as required by the Municipal Code, the
approval shall not be effective.
O. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with
prior to the issuance of building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
P. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of
the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in
Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010.
4ILL V. SMITH, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso. 2010-23
ZC NO. 795
4
•
• 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2010-23 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW TO ENLARGE AND
RELOCATE A POOL, CONSTRUCT A 5-FOOT HIGH WALL AND TWO NOT
TO EXCEED 30 INCHES HIGH WALLS, AND ENLARGE THE BUIDLING PAD
AREA IN ZONING CASE NO. 795, ON A PROPERTY WITH A CONDITION
THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL. PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 8 MAVERICK LANE,
(LOT 26-A-SK), ROLLING HILLS, CA., (KARPF). PROJECT HAS BEEN
DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
September 21, 2010 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Chelf, Henke, Pieper and Chairperson Smith.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner DeRoy.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Reso. 2010-23
ZC NO. 795
41111tAri
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
5
•
1
L.177.1
OCT 2 8 2010
City of Rolling Hills
By