Loading...
497, Construct a 1770 sq ft barn wi, CorrespondenceCity a/ RO/A g September 28, 1995 Mr. Douglas McHattie South Bay Engineering Company 304 Tejon Place Palos Verdes, CA 90274 o INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 497 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVALS FOR A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK) Dear Mr. McHattie: Thank you for your letter regarding the expiration of approvals for the subject zoning case originally approved on September 7, 1993, and then extended for a second year by the Planning Commission to September 7, 1995. We understand that you have been working on this project for some time and that geology and soils submissions have still not been approved. Unfortunately, the Zoning Code does not leave any room for further extensions of time. As noted in the attached Section 17.46.080(B)(3) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and in our letter of August 22, 1995, you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Of course, we will make every effort to expedite the matter as quickly as possible and would not expect any delays in the planning process assuming that the proposed project is exactly the same as originally approved. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCERELY, LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLNER cc: Mr. Bernard Howroyd Mr. Criss Gunderson h y0 Printed on Rcacycled Pnpnr 17..070--17.46.080 17.46.070 Subseauent modification,. A. After a site plan review application has been approved, modification of the approved plans and/or any conditions imposed, including additions or deletions, may be considered by the City Man- ager or the Planning Commission. The City Manager or his designee shall have the authority to review and act upon minor modifications, and the Planning Commission shall have the authority to review and act upon major modifications, as prescribed in the following paragraphs. The City Manag- er shall establish criteria for minor and major modifica- tions. B. Any property owner, or his designated representa- tive, seeking to modify an approved site plan review shall notify the City Manager of the intent. The property owner shall provide the City Manager, or his designee, with two copies of the modified plans and a written description of the proposed modifications. The City Manager, or his designee, shall determine whether the proposed modifica- tions are considered minor modifications or major modifica- tions C. Minor modifications may be approved by the City Manager, or his designee, as an administrative item and shall not require a public hearing or notice. Evidence of an approved minor modification shall be provided in writing to the property owner and shall be filed with the original site plan review approval. An action of the City Manager to deny a request for minor modifications may be appealed to the Planning Commission as provided for in Chapter 17.54. D. Major modifications shall be considered a new pro- ject. As such, a new application for Site Plan Review shall be required, and the application shall be reviewed as provided for in this chapter. (Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.46.08 �;,.^,Exui.ration.�of_�aoor-..oval,l, A. Expiration. A site PlAh app"royal shall'become automatically null and void, unless extended as provided for in subsection B of this section, if either of the following occurs: 1. If within one year from the Commission's notice of decision, construction has not yet commenced, or if com- menced, such work has been suspended or abandoned at any time after commencement for a period of one hundred eighty or more days; or 2. If circumstances arise which terminate the permit pursuant to any termination provision included as a condi- tion of the permit. B. Extension. 1. The Commission, or Council on appeal, may ex- tend the date of expiration of an approval. In order for an extension to be considered, the property owner shall be required to file an application on or before the date of expiration of the approval. No public hearing to consider 218-37 (Rolling Hills 5/94) • I z 4017.46.090--17.50.010 r the extension shall be required, unless otherwise required by subdivision 3 below. 2. The Commission or Council may extend the expi- ration if findings can be made that the expiration would constitute an undue hardship upon the property owner and that the continuation of the approval would not be materi- ally detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public. ;;� ..,.r.. 3. No extension period shall be granted for a period of more than one year. No extension period shall be granted beyond the second anniversary of the original pro- ject approval unless a new public hearing is held. Any extension granted beyond the second anniversary of original approval may only be granted or denied in the same manner and based upon the same criteria as required for approval of the original project. (Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.46.090 Completion of construction. All construc- tion authorized by the approval shall be completed within two years of the granting of a grading or building permit, unless a greater construction period has been specifically authorized in the conditions of approval or as provided for in Section 17.46.080(B). (Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.46.100 Compliance required. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued, nor any authorization to connect utilities provided, until final inspection has determined that the construction complies with approved plans. (Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 218-38 (Rolling Hills 5/94) SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING COMPANY (tpkvll! (k6--iji6ir1'md: 1149:Fsm September 6, .1995 Craig Nealis City Manager City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274, Dear Mr. Nealis: g FE SEP 0'6' 1995 CITY OF ROLLINGHILLS By, I herewith respectfully request a time extension of the Planning Commissions approval for a stable with a loft at #7 Maverick Lane. Zoning case #497was first submitted for review on April 5, 1993, then subsequently revised to include a small addition to the house and a garage on June 30, 1993. The Planning Commission'approved and the City Council accepted the approval. Soils and geology reports were prepared and on March 16, 1994 the grading plan was submitted to Los Angeles County for their review: Since that time it has been in and out of Soils and Geology perattached chronology. The latest review 'sheets dated June 12, 1995 require a boring to be performed on the subject property. Mr. Howroyd has asked that the work. begin. It is my considered opinion,that the questions and answers have been flowing back and forth with regularity but there has been so many that it has been impossible,,to maintain the prescribed time line. I believe because of the foregoing; it ,would only by right 'and proper to allow the investigation to continue with absolutely no penalty to Mr. Howroyd. Very truly ,yours, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING COMPANY Douglas K. McHattie Vice -President nealis:ja/ami cc: Mr. Bernie Howroyd Mr. Criss' Gunderson ❑' 304 TEJON'PLACE • PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274 • (310) 375-2556 IN L.A. (213) 772-1555, • FAX (310) 378-3816 - ❑ :: 822 HAMPSHIRE ROAD, SUITE H • WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361 • (805) 494-4499 • FAX (805)494-4211 44,1 • A.G.I. GEOTECKNICAL., INC. 316 Tejon Place, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 • (310) 378-4146 April 24, 1995 Mr. Bernie Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Subject: Project No. 3-1332-05 RESPONSE TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW SHEETS Respectively dated May 19, 1994 and May 17, 1994 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA References: REPORT OF GEOLOGIC ASPECTS OF SLIDE AREA 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills Report by F. Beach Leighton dated October 27, 1969. PROPOSED GRADING FOR ACCESS ROAD, BUILDING PAD AND BUTTRESS FILL (Remedial Grading in Slide Area) 7 Maverick Road Rolling Hills, CA Report by Advanced Foundation Engineering, Inc. dated October 31, 1969. PROPOSED GRADING AT #7 MAVERICK ROAD Rolling Hills, CA Report by Advanced' -Foundation Engineering, Inc. dated January 7, 1970. GEOLOGIC REPORT OF LOWER FILL SITE Dr. and Mrs. Moorhead Property 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by F. Beach Leighton dated April 30, 1970. GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by Keith W. Ehlert-Consulting Engineering Geologist dated May 14, 1990. Engineering Geology • Soil Engineering Project No. 3-1332-05 Page 2 REPORT OF SOILS ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS. 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by SWN Soiltech dated May 26, 1990. REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED HORSE FACILITIES 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by A.G.I. Geotechnical dated May 3, 1993. UPDATE ADDENDUM REPORT Proposed Room Addition 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, California Report by A.G.I. Geotechnical dated April 6, 1994. REPORT OF RESPONSE TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW SHEETS DATED JUNE 13 AND JUNE 20, 1994, RESPECTIVELY 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by A.G.I. Geotechnical dated October 3, 1994. RESPONSE TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW SHEETS Respectively dated December 8, 1994 and December 7, 1994. 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA Report by A.G.I. Geotechnical dated January 5, 1995. Dear Mr. Howroyd: This report has been prepared in response to County of Los Angeles Geologic and Geotechnical Review Sheets dated May 19, 1994 and May 17, 1994 respectively. For convenience, copies of the review sheets are included in the appendix of this report. • • City O/ /0f/tfl i`LS INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 August 22,1995 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 497 FOR A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: This letter is to inform you that it has been one year since a time extension was approved by the Planning Commission for Zoning Case No. 497. Note that these approvals will expire on September 7,1995 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCERELY, LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson L'« Printed on Recycled Paper. C14 al I0f1L September 22, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 1 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 497 FOR A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA AT 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year time extension was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on September 20, 1994 for the subject case. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 94-20, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Note that this approval will expire on September 7, 1995 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCERELY, L LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER Enclosed: RESOLUTION NO. 94-20 cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson ®Pnnierl nn Pnr: ;.,��•r; Pq;�r.r • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 93-27 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd with respect to real property located at 7 Maverick Lane (Lot 28-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review for the construction of a stable with loft and corral area. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on September 20, 1994 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time is necessary due to the plan check process that requires Grading and Geology approvals and that are expected within the month. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 93-27, dated September 7, 1993, to read as follows: "A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within two years of the approval of this Resolution." Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 93-27 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF SE EM ER, 1994. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KEKN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK IP RESOLUTION NO. 94-20 PAGE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ) SS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-20 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 93-27 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on September 20, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices .i.._k__,41/)-> DEPUTY CITY ERK Chairman Roberts Rolling Hi11s Commission 2 Portuguese Bend.: Road Rolling Frills, California Regarding: Howroyd stable approval Zoning case no. '497 Irk .beh� l€, f :the . Howroyds, I respectfuLiy request, an extension for the stable 'and, 'corral approval . Uri,fortunately; ,the county c�rac�irx.g and geological departments,'have.laeen vary slow, reviewing;' ,the plans After 5 months, we expect approvals within ';tile. month. ,Thank you., Criss'Gunderson cc: Mr. And Mr"s. Howroyd 253 5th Street, Suite C, Seal Beach, 'California 90740 C1iy el R0f/L JdfP June 20, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS RESOLUTION NO. 93-27, APPROVED STABLE WITH GRADING ZONING CASE NO. 497 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: We would like to remind you that your approvals in the subject zoning case will expire on September 7. 1994. You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, et LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson Printnri r)n Rnr'yrlr?cl City ol RO/A Jh/L JODY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember •. January 12, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497 MR. AND MRS. BERNARD HOWROYD, 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28- SK) AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIED REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: At the regular City Council Meeting held Monday, January 10, 1994, City Councilmembers upheld the denial of the Planning Commission for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 497. A copy of the staff report that was presented to the City Council is enclosed for your records. Please be advised that previously approved Resolution No. 93-27 relative to the construction of a stable with a loft and corral area, requires that the existing garage which has been converted to residential living space be reconverted to a garage to the satisfaction of the Building Official and the Planning Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for the approved stable and corral from the County of Los Angeles. Please contact Principal Planner Lola Ungar at your earliest convenience to discuss the process by which to correct the building violations on your property. ®Printed on Recycled P;dn'r • • Page 2 Your cooperation has been appreciated. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /1./t04 Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\howroyd.ltr enclosure cc: Lola Ungar, Principal Planner Planning Commission Criss Gunderson, Architect Lata Thakar, Los Angeles County HEARING DATE: TO: ATTENTION: FROM: APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING & SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST Ci4 ofia ffin9 .fa INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF, 90274 AGENDA ITEM 7-B (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 JANUARY 10, 1994 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 497 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-A-SK) RAS-2, 2.91 ACRES MR. AND MRS. BERNARD HOWROYD MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING OCTOBER 16, 1993 AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIED REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. BACKGROUND 1. The City Council viewed a staking of the proposed project on December 11, 1993. 2. The Council requested that staff show the setbacks and easements and distance of the existing buildings and their distances to the adjacent property to the west (Brogden). Attached is an enlarged drawing showing that the Howroyd residence is approximately 28 feet from the property line at the front portion of the west side yard and approximately 21 feet from the property line at the rear portion of the west side yard. The wall in the Howroyd's side yard near the rear portion of the west side yard is approximately 3 feet from the rear of the garage and continues 18 feet to the property line. The Brogden house is 15 feet from the property line. The Brogden house encroaches 20 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback and is approximately 43 feet from the Howroyd residence and 37 feet from the brick wall at the Howroyd residence at the front portion of the lot. 3. A Table documenting Planning Commission Action for the 10 existing residences on Maverick Lane is attached. 4. The applicants are appealing a Planning Commission denied request for a Variance to construct a garage addition into the side yard setback as delineated on the attached appeal form. The Planning Commission did approve Site Plan Review for a new stable with loft and corral area in a separate resolution. ZONING CASE NO. 4° PAGE 2 • This action was received and filed by the City Council on September 13, 1993. 5. The Planning Commission approved attached Resolution No. 93-28 denying the Variance to construct the garage in the side yard setback on September 7, 1993. 6. The applicants requested Site Plan Review for.a.1,294 square foot stable with loft and corral area that requires grading. During the public hearing process, another application was duly filed requesting a Variance to construct a 540 square foot garage that would encroach up to 14 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback on the separate residential building pad. 7. The Planning Commission approved the stable with loft and corral area that requires grading but, denied the Variance for a garage addition in Resolution No. 93-28 for the following reasons: (1) the existing house includes a garage which has been illegally converted to residential living space, (2) the building pad coverage for this project would be 84.2% which the Planning Commission found excessive and exceeds the building pad coverage of most properties in the vicinity, (3) additional encroachments would exacerbate the amount of residential structure within setback areas, and (4) the proposed project does not minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaving little open space between property lines and would result in further overdevelopment of the building pad. 8. The Site Plan Review approving the proposed stable requires that the existing garage which has been converted to residential living space to be reconverted to a garage to the satisfaction of the Building Official and the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for the approved stable and corral from the County of Los Angeles. 9. The structural lot coverage approved is 5.9% and the total lot coverage approved is 9.6%. (The proposed structural coverage with the garage denied by the Planning Commission was 6.9% and the total lot coverage proposed was 14.7%). 10. The proposed stable pad coverage is 28% and existing residential pad coverage is 70.5% for a total pad coverage of 54.3%. (The proposed residential pad coverage with the garage denied by the Planning Commission was 84.2% for a total pad coverage of 63.5%). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the proposed plans, open the public hearing, and take public testimony. • • C1410 i D q R0// n PLANNING CCMM:SS:ON ACTION ITEMS :N THE VICINITY OF 7 MAVERICK LANE ZCN:NG CASE NO, 497 REQ. REQ. LOT BLDG. FRONTAGE SIDE FRONT SITE AREA BETWEEN ADDRESS ZONE SETBACK SETBACK ACRES SQ.?T. SE?BACKS 11 Caballeros RA-5-1 2C' 50' -.3: 3,840 165' (Barr) 4 Maverick L. RA-S-1 20' 50' 1.10 6,392 15E' (Virtue) 6 Maverick L. RA-S-1 20' 50' 1.09 3,028 128' (Salisbury) 8 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' 50' 2.8E 3,364 35' (Dessy) .9 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' 50' 4.05 3,040 50' (Cornell) 7 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' 50' 2.91 3,640 100' (!4cwroyd) 5 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' 50' 2.5S 2,617 60' (9rogde:,) 3 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' 50' 2.52 2,855 72' (Makita) ACTICN INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO 2 POPTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING MILLS. CALIF 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAx 13101 377.7299 12/8!90 Variances approved to encroach into the front yard 36', no further t?an existing encroachments which are 14' from road easements vithin 50' front yard setback, and to encroach 2' into the 20' side yard setback for residential additions. *2/21/92 Building permits obtained. Project almost coc:piete but, no call for final inspection has been made. 1.2/201 Variance approved to encroach 5' into the 20' side yard setback for residential addition. *4/1.8/62 Final Inspection. 4/6/91 Va►ia:.ces approved to encroach a 7.31:.r,:.77. of 27' int: the 50' front yard setback, ar: 11' into the 35' side yard se:back, and Site Plan Review for infill residential additions and a subterranean garage. '4/6/92 Extension granted for one year. *4/6/93 Variance and Site Plan Review ?emits EzEired. ZONING CASE N0. 497 ?AGE 2 ADDRESS REQ. REQ. LOT BLDG. FRONTAGE SIDE FRONT SIZE AREA BETWEEN ZONE SETBACK SETBACK ACRES SO.FT. SETBACKS 1 Maverick L. RA-S-2 35' -50' 2.49 3,081 (Mirsaidi) 9 Caballeros RA-S-2 35' 50' 2.26 2,390 (Armar., formerly Siu) Compiled 12/8/93 by L.M.Ongar ACTION 82' 4/7/90 Variance approved to encroach 1' ir.t: 35' side yard setback for diagonal 35' retaining vall jointly with 9 Caballeros Rcad (Siu). *4/1/91 Extension granted for one year. *4/7/92 Va►iance Permits Expired. 9/19/89 Variance approved to encroach 5' in'.: existing side yard setback, less than existing nonconforming 10' encroachment; and Varian:e denied to encroach 30' into 50' front yard setback. *9/19/90 Variance Permit Expired. 70' 4/7/90 Variance approved to encroach 4' into 35' side yard setback for addition to residence, Variance approved for diagonal 35' retaining wall which encroaches 7' within the side yard setback from the property Line jointly with 1 Maverick Lane (Mirsaidi), and Site plat Review for additions. *4/7/91 Extension granted for one year. *4/7/92 Variance and Site Plan Review Pere.:s Expired. •City ofie Min • JAHVARY 24, i $7 ATUGVESE 5E40 A040 OC t 0 61993 � LNG NIll3. CALIF 00274 121313/MS21 CITY OF ROILING HMMIS FAX (MI s»•�:ea REQUEST FOR ....... APPLICATION FILE N0. �N1 �' I7 (9W I tJ 5r )( PROPERTY ADDRESS: ''l {YKIGAK. 40 (N& OWNER: 1414. 4A,Agr2_•___5E1 '' 7 ip I hereby request appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission on the above referenced application(s) for the following reasons: SIGNED DATE: 1 .21. 113 A 33.123 (Two-thirds of original application fee) FEE: • • The Howroyd's request for a side yard building setback encroachment should be granted because of exceptional conditions to the property. Maverick lane is a very unusual road in the city of Rolling Hills in that the properties on the west side of the road are zoned RAS•1 and the properties on the east side, (the Howroyds are on this side), is zoned RAS•2. The more restrictive side yard setbacks the Howroyd's have to respect, (RAS•2 zone), are Tess for their neighbors in the RAS•1 zone, who ironically have wider properties. Therefore, the Howroyd's property is being denied rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity. It is also interesting to note that many homes built on Maverick Lane currently have encroachments into side yard setbacks. RESOLUTION NO. 93-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE N0. 497. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1., An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd with respect to real property located at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot.28-SK) requesting Site Plan Review for a stable with loft, and corral area that requires grading. During the public hearing process another application was duly filed requesting a Variance to permit the construction of an attached garage in the side yard setback to an existing single family residence and convert an existing attached garage to residential living space on an upper pad separate from the lower stable pad. Section 2.. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for Site Plan Review on May 18, 1993, and June 15, 1993. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications for Site Plan Review and Variance on July 20, 1993 and August 17, 1993, and at a field trip visit on August 10, 1993. The Planning Commission approved the Site Plan Review for a stable and corral on a lower pad pursuant to Resolution No. 93-27. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 3 exemption provided by Section.15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4., Section 17..38.010(A) permits, approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.120(8)(1) is required to construct a garage addition to the residence in the thirty-five (35) foot side yard setback. The applicant isrequesting a garage addition that will encroach up to a maximum of fourteen (14) feet into the side yard setback. The Planning Commission finds: A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The Variance is not necessary because the existing house includes a garage which has been illegally converted to residential living space and the building pad coverage for this project on the upper residential pad would be 84.2% which the Commission finds excessive and exceeds the building pad coverage of most properties • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-28 PAGE 2 in the vicinity so that the proposed expansion is not appropriate for the property. B. This Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and tone, but which is denied to the property in question because approximately two-thirds of the present house encroaches into the front and side yard setbacks and additional encroachments would exacerbate the amount of residential structure within setback areas. C. The granting of this Variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in' the vicinity or zone in which the property is located because the proposed project does not minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaves little open space between property lines and would result in further overdevelopment of the building pad. This would make the proposed garage structure more visually prominent on the building pad than appropriate for the existing development pattern of the City. Section 4._ Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies the request for a Variance approval for the construction of a new garage in Zoning Case No. 497. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. ! ) a2 ' HAIR £VIE HANKIR7S, ACTING' ATTEST: MARILYN KE , DEPUTY.CITY CLERK The foregoing Resolution No. 93-28 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. RESOLUTION NO. 93-28 PAGE 3 was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on September 7, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Frost, Raine and Acting Chairman Hankins None Commissioner Lay Commissioner Roberts M i Ci4f ol R0ff4 JdP� JODY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember December 16, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 RE: ZONING CASE NO. 497 MR AND MRS. BERNARD HOWROYD, 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK) AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIED REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: As you are no doubt aware, members of the City Council conducted a field trip to your residence for consideration of the above mentioned appeal on Saturday, December 11, 1993. Your appeal will be considered by the City Council during a continued public hearing at the regular City Council Meeting to be held Monday, January 10, 1994 in the Rolling Hills City Council Chambers, #2 Portuguese Bend Road, beginning at 7:30 p.m. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\zcfield.ltr cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect ®Printed on Rer, r,l'd Papr' • • City ol ie0ii1�..y ii7, JODY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember November 29, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 RE: ZONING CASE NO. 497 MR. AND MRS. BERNARD HOWROYD, 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK) AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIED REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 497. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: Members of the Rolling Hills City Council formally considered establishment of a new date for a field trip of the public hearing relative to the above referenced case at their regular City Council meeting held Monday, November 22. Please be advised that the City Council will conduct their field trip on Saturday, December 11, 1993, beginning at 9:30 a.m. Please be sure that all proposed improvements on the property are staked for City Council review. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 140064 Craig R. Nealis City Manger CRN:mlk corres.cm\zc497.1tr cc: Lola Ungar Criss Gunderson, Architect • • City 0/ Ailing JUL JODY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember November 10, 1993 Mr. Criss C. Gunderson Architect 1 Lower Blackwater Canyon Road INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 SUBJECT: HOWROYD AND WACHS APPEAL FIELD TRIPS Dear Mr. Gunderson: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 At the regular City Council meeting held Monday, November 8, 1993, City Councilmembers directed staff to continue the public hearings scheduled for Zoning Case No. 480 (WACHS), 6 Outrider Road and Zoning Case No. 497 (HOWROYD), 7 Maverick Lane beyond the originally scheduled field trip date of Saturday, November 13, 1993. Although technically we will still need to advertise that adjourned public hearing field trip for Saturday, November 13, 1993, a quorum of members of the City Council will not be present and, therefore, these hearings will be continued to the regular City Council meeting to be held Monday, November 22, 1993 with the intent of selecting a new field trip date at that time. Please communicate any suggestions to this office prior to November 17, 1993 as to what dates would be most acceptable following the Thanksgiving Holiday to conduct these field trips. Your cooperation has been appreciated. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\gunderson.ltr cc: Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd Dr. and Mrs. Barton Wachs Lola Ungar, Principal Planner Printed on Recycled Paper. October 27, 1993 Rolling Hills City Council City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Regarding: Scheduled field trips for Howroyd and Wachs appeals Dear Mayor Murdock, I realize that it is difficult to choose a field trip date taking into account all 5 members of the city council. Unfortunately, I have a conflict that I can not reschedule. My family has the weekend of November 13th planned to celebrate thanksgiving out of town with my sisters. It would be impossible for me to attend the field trip and be with my family. I have spoken with both the Howroyd's and the Wach's on this matter. They have no objections to rescheduling the field trip for a date after thanksgiving. May I also suggest the possibility of an early morning weekday field trip. Tha Gunderson: chitect CCG:ccg '253 5th Street, Suite C, Seal Beach, California 90740 Tel: (310) 594•9157 Fax: (310) 594.5553 • City opeoffing October 27, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroy.d 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497, an appeal of a denied request for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: We have arranged for the City Council to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturdav, November 13, 1993. The City Council will meet at 8:00 AM at 6 Outrider Road and then proceed to your project site. Do not expect the Council at 8:00 AM, but be assured that the field trip will take place before 10:00 AM. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the. proposed project showing the roof ridge and bearing walls. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering Printed on Recycled Paper. C1i 0/ /20fA4 tr- v NOTIFICATION LETTER October 12, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497, an appeal of a denied request for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: Your appeal of a denied request for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 497 has been set for public hearing consideration by the City Council at their meeting on Monday, October 25, 1993. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions.. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, October 22, 1993. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANN cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson Printed on Recycled Paper. ei1y September 15, 1993 Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • o/ l2 P? 9 Jh116 CERTIFIED MAIL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 497, 7 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 28-SK) RESOLUTION NOS. 93-27 AND 93-28 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Howroyd: This letter shall serve as official notification that the stable and corral was APPROVED in Zoning Case No. 497. The Variance for the garage in the side yard setback was DENIED by the Planning Commission. The enclosed resolutions were approved on September 7, 1993 at an adjourned regular meeting. The Planning Commission's decision was reported to the' City Council at their regular meeting on September 13, 1993. The approval for the stable and corral will become effective: (1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolutions if no appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code attached), AND (2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and Resolution No. 93-27 must be filed by you with the County Recorder. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 93-27, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of Resolution 93-27 to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $5.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. .r Printed on Recycled Paper. Page 2. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA UNG PRINCIPAL PLANNER ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO. 93-27 AND 93-28, EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, AND APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson certifid\Howroyd •City ofiellin9. _WA August 18, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 ZONING CASE NO. 497, a request for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback and request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable and corral that requires grading for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, -Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: This letter shall serve as official notification that the Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback was DENIED and Site Plan Review to construct a stable and corral that requires grading was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on August 17, 1993. The final Resolutions will be forwarded to you after they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on September 13, 1993. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty days after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson SO Printed on Recycled Paper. City `Jl,PF INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 July 22, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497, a request for a Variance to construct a garage in the side yard setback and request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable and corral that requires grading for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed garage addition on Tuesday, August 10, 1993. The Planning Commission will meet at 5:30 PM at 12 Johns Canyon Road and then proceed to your project site. Do not expect the Commission at 5:30 PM, but be assured that the field trip will take place before 8:00 PM. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the proposed project showina the roof ridge and bearina walls. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson Printed on Recycled Paper. 11441. E� o/ /0/ft3g cb[ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROA: ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (2131 377.1521 FAX: (2131 377.7288 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. SECTION ry t 1 .) 62 Gi PLAN • • City O/ /EOIfiflJUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 May 21, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497, a request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project and boundaries of the proposed area to be graded on Thursday, June 3, 1993. The Planning Commission will meet at 5:00 PM at 7 Storm Hill Lane and then proceed to your project site. Do not expect the Commission at 5:00 PM, but be assured that the field trip will take place before 8:00 PM. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the Proposed project showing the roof ridge and bearing walls. Also. show the boundaries of the area to be graded. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 16/41— LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie Printed on Recycled Paper. 4102 /f/L�/1g JhIi! INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING MILLS. CALIF. 90274 (2131 377.1521 FAX (2131 377.7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. 1 u PLAN SECTION a J City oil? P?•,.s Jd.PF NOTIFICATION LETTER May 3, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. .Bernard Howroyd 7 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills,`CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 497, a request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable for property at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 28-A-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of this date to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 497 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, May 18, 1993. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Fall after 3:00 PM on Friday, May 14, 1993. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie too Printed on Recycled Paper.