27, Decrease setback to less than , Resolutions & Approval Conditions1
2
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
3 In the matter of the Application
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CITY OF
OF CALIFORNIA
of ) ZONING CASE
).
Lot 52B,MS,Decl.No 150-R, Book 21312,Pg.157).
ARTHUR H. HADLEY
NO. 27
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Arthur H. Hadley, Lot 52B,
Miscellaneous Parcels, for a side yard variance, came.. on for
hearing on the 22nd day of January, 1963, at the hour of
8:OO.P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicants having submitted evidence in
support of their application, and the Planning Commission
being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report
as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant Arthur Hadley,
is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lot 52B, Miscellaneous Parcels, located in the City of Rolling
Hills, California, andthatnotice of the public hearing in
connection with said application was given as required by
Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
II.
That no person appeared at said public hearing in
opposition to the application for a variance and that no
evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9"
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
The Commission further finds that said proposed
residence addition of applicant is to be extended into the
side yard and that the side yard is a distance of approximately
one and one-half feet less than the twenty (20) feet as
required by said Zoning Ordinance., and further finds that by
reason of the terraine of said Lot 52B, the variance should be
granted to applicant in order to preserve substantial property
rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and,
zone, and that the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which applicant's property is located, and that there are
exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by
reason of physical location and terraine of said Lot 52B,
which do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance
should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rolling Hills to Arthur H. Hadley on Lot 52B, Miscellaneous
Parcels in accordance with the Plot Plan marked Exhibit 1
on file in these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
Dated: January 31, 1963
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission