Loading...
353, Convert existing garage into a, CorrespondenceC1iy 0/ 12lG..q JUL Mr. Scott Probst 33 Crest Road East Rolling Hills, CA. 90-274 RE: Zoning Case No. 353 Dear Mr. Probst: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING WILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 May 11, 1988 This letter is to serve as official notice that the Planning Commission's approval on _April 19, 1988, of your_ request for a Variance to encroach into -the established front yard for the purpose of constructing residential additions on Lot 70A-1-MS, located at 33 Crest Road East, -was reported to the City Council at their meeting on_ May 9, _1988. -At that meetingr a motion was_ made- and- seconded - that the Council take jurisdiction of Zoning Case No. 353, and hold a public hearing on this request at the next regular meeting of the City Council on Monday, May 23, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. A Copy of the Findings and Report on Zoning Case No. 353, reporting the findings_ of the_ Planning Commission and the conditions attached- to the approval of your request, -is enclosed for your information. Please do not hesitate to call this office if you have any questions. Very truly, Terrence L. Belange City Manager TLB:bv Encl. rgeLl, • • C1iy ` Rolling �re� GORDANA SWANSON Mayor JODY MURDOCK Mayor Pro Tern THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilman GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Councilwoman GODFREY PERNELL Councilman INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO, 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 January 26, 1988 Mr. and Mrs. Scott Probst 33 Crest Road East Rolling Hills, CA. 90274 RE: Zoning Case No. 353, Variance of Front Yard Setback to construct residence addition Dear Mr. and Mrs. Probst: This letter is to serve as official notice, pursuant to Section 17.32.090 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, that a request for a Variance of the front yard setback requirements to construct a residence addition on Lot 70A-1-MS, located at 33 Crest Road East, was denied by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, January 19, 1988. This decision may be appealed, pursuant to Section 17.32.140 of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission's action will be reported to the City Council at their next regular meeting on Monday, February 8, 1988, pursuant to Section 17.32.140 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly, Terrence L. Belanger City Manager TLB:bv Encls. (2) cc: Council Members City Clerk 2 663 City Council City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA. 90274 RE: Zoning Case 353 Lot 70 A-1-MS 33 Crest Road East Dear City Council: We do hereby appeal the January 19, 1988 decision of the planning commission as renards our case. We have made certain modifications to our plan which we believe will enable you to approve our variance application. We do hereby request that per section 17.32.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code the planninn commission's decision does not accurately reflect the mitigating circumstances of our application, nor does it reflect our, revised solutions. We ask that our case be reopened for review by the City Council. Respectfully yours, Scott and Gayle Probst Dec 15, 1987 To the City of Rolling Hills Re; Zoning Case 353 Probst Residence 33 Crest Road East To whom it may concern; I have reviewed with Scott and Gayle Probst the changes they plan to make to their home. As their neighbor I have no objection to these changes. The new garage will be no closer to Crest Road than my barn and I feel the new driveway and covered entrance overhang will enhance the property's appearance and asthetics. Once the old driveway is removed and the fence and landscaping con- tinued across,the garage area of the property will no longer be as visible from Crest Road. I think these changes will benefit the neighborhood and I recommend your approval of them. Sincerely, Linda Severy • • Cosimo L. Occhipinti 34 Crest Road East Rolling Hills, California 90274 (213) 377-6908 Monday Dec 14, 1987 City of Rolling Hills Re: Proposed additions and requested variances, Probst Residence 33 Crest Road East To Whom It May Concern; We have had an opportunity to review the proposed changes to the Probst residence driveway, front entrance, and the garage addition and we herein state our approval of them. We have never likedthe current driveway configuration and we support their plan to relocate the driveway as the garages will no longer be the focal point of the property from Crest Road. We have no objection to the fact that the new garage structure and the porte cochere will protrude partially into the setback area as both will be below street level and will not affect our view nor the horse trail along Crest Road. We feel the proposed changes will add beauty and appeal to the property and the neighborhood and we support your approval of them. Sincerely yours, V V Mr. and Mrs. Cosimo Occhipinti