Loading...
393, Addition of 500 SF to SFR and , Application• poj or° REUEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The undersigned MPR.G/NRET Name 2 BE:9 TRtD R D, R. P\/ ( I) CDO3 / 0/ 4 Street Address Telephone Number is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of (2) has permission of the owner Legal description of property situated at LOT Cot Lot Tract 1.4c. STFI LJ LLrrJG 1-(1LLS GAO F. Street Address Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. Z t '\ PR©Pc'..., '-I G TO C O/4 4T, LGT A D12I JE I.o/R'( 7':› '1Y F7gc.q)cei "NF UJ A-S 3t-1-DvcJ,.) Can! C 2A-b u,LJG I& A j Suomi l7"-7.) ', b -N 77/i.S APPLIC/4T reel. '77-1 S PA'OPOSi ) J),/(vG,ic✓A-Y C1 o C.D\,1 r< AGE c.D I T 1I T 6ori i i-/ Yf+/Z 3 AS /,5.S T2r 5gFCT/ c -/ /7. 2 P v CJ 2 2 -A - 2 c> F K.(S C120 u / Ai 2CE, I S V P Q l 1�r�lC� , �v f`� Q c� 1 2F ,D Tc ,_.X ` e-i) "777' 2 ©% C v C-E, Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the 'same vicinity and zone. Ceti[C `raa PAD FcR -rlii N,%.W C-WI&EE (rS Gf /1-[),E%3/ T i-fr5 fio67,24-P//Y M/ Pita t /7S .9-C74 / #I Ae-L. Din 77s DvT / / t r-/&_; S c'v i7,)s/O r9G✓'1Kfrge©A--� . /3i6 A/7M'mmc/- w/t_i_Np7--.UriLisr7z1-n� .-,.io77 7-r ' Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property•is locatAa herw»se. 14-F PW Pe1c.=) ()(Z U6%ti (W h L_ (fir- c6,>Nic-rt� a 6 Pk5 , /20u..W /c/.1 6 loin c-74,4 ,mil 0-r - k5 E S Chi:/ ,cam t - PO r3 L, 4i2 r1-5 til o /Z W r L i • 1 T / -i 4-Du01-c e-Nir P,e07,r27�Es. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: OWNER • S DE)CLARATI, I, (We), declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at OAN•le44-O 01-LOPS VE2iDF S this I�T day of , California, 69c, © C-2 19�o a2g7I �)Re, izC e , J are tL a- 9Dz79 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Not_ry Public of the State where the signature is ffixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take . acknowledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information in the accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. FORMS ISSUED TO: NAME PILED ORGANIZATION FEE $ JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO. DATE • Ea' DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION • 19 The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk by: A. The applicant; B. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the Planniry Commission on the matter and who, in addition, received or was entitled to receive the written notice specified in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060; or C. The City Council, upon the affirmative.vote of three members of the Council. In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval. r • • COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE CITY CC ROLLING RILLS LOT COVERAGE (Ordinance No. 188) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section 'net area/shall exclude all perimeter easements a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used :or roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro- vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUI'.DING AREA CALCULATIONS NET LOT AREA 45, 79 S . sq. ft.- RESIDENCE - (2 ' 2 I sq. ft. - GARAGE _ g330 sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL © .-sq. ft. STABLE CFv'1-v (L1721) Sack sq. ft. P T -i-av ) 4- O sq. ft. COVERED (MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA) DRIVEWAY COO 1 t PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA 544 ,p6OL JSEFxrtrIt Sq. TOTAL SQUARE FEET CC 15 5 / t�d(Q7 ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. -1-'oTA L TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF NET LOT AREA) 2 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4) 9 n (0 SFrii 32.74 % kS The undersigned )2EOUES'' FOR_ HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Charles E. Haueisen Name 512 E. Carlin St., P.O. Box 4789 Compton, CA.90224 Street Address Telephone No. X (1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of (2) has permission of the owner Legal description of property situated at_ 62 R.S. 58/6-10 Lot Tract 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Street Address NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT MODIFICATION TO APPROVED PROJECT CASE NO. 393 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review. Owners are requesting a modification to approved Zoning Case No. 393, which includes a additional 500 sq. ft. to the residence and a below grade garage. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance to the below criteria: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes, set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The proposed residence satisfies, in excess, all the required setbacks, and therefore is compatible with the zoning and general plan criteria. The character and size of the proposed residence is comparable to the neighboring houses. B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features o± the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The proposed design will not alter the existing pad, topography, drainage courses and mature trees. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed residence integrates with the existing pad relative to auto access, open spaces to Eastfield Drive and rear setback. 5 C. Does the .site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved? Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization measures. Grading will comply -with city ordinances .and will be :compatible with existing pad :and . slopes.. See ..attached _site. plan. D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it withlandscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The proposed site development plan retains the existing mature trees and any future landscaping will be compatible with the surrounding community. E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. The natural and undeveloped 'slopes of this site shall remain undeveloped. As indicated in the area computations, the lot coverage is substantially below maximum requirements and is compatible with neighboring lots. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The,proposed site design.:affords setbacks in excess of minimum require- ments, such as, on Eastfield Drive and the rear yard. This will provide a openness along Eastfield Drive which will contribute to a harmonious scale for the massing of the project. Front setback is greater than - neighboring sites. 6 • • G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. Site plan design will not be detrimental to pedestrians and vehicles. Driveway location satisfies topography condition (as per existing drive) on - site parking is provided for at motor court (see site plan) H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The proposed site development plan conforms with basic criteria of the state and local environmental requirements, ie there would be no significant impact as a result of the construction of this residence. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. /.2-.?&-90 DATE: VJULU,a-L- SIGNATURE l: FOR • APPLICANT 7 FET,n RICHARD M. LIIi1DE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. a. i. a. architect 2200 AMAPOLA COURT, SUITE 200 • TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90501 • (213) 320-13052 As submitted to Planning Commission on Modified Site Plan. Date: 12/28/90 Gross area of lot (1,443 Ac.) 62,860 s.f. Net area of lot 45,798 s.f. REVISED 2/18/91 62,860 s.f. 56,949 s.f. Residence - 6,621 s.f. 6,621 s.f. Detached garage 0 s.f. 1,695 s.f. Garage 830 s.f. 830 s.f. Future Stable 200 s.f. 200 s.f. TOTAL 7,651 s.f. TOTAL 9,346 s.f. %Coverage 16.7% %Coverage 16.4% Driveway 6,011 s.f. 6,011 s.f. Paved walks and patios 344,s.f. 344 s.f. TOTAL 6,355 s.f. TOTAL 6,355 s.f. V>5'3 % Coverage 13.9% %Coverage 11.2% Total % Coverage 30.6% Total %Coverage 27.6% 3 OWNER'S DECLARATION I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at PAI1cAlrn PAL-D V - 2 E S , California, this 28 TM- day of liFK'-el-,r‘\6 2 ,1990 12 , Glare-!�l S7- po 6bx 7 ltu-pT, C119 90V-724 (Address) NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. FORMS ISSUED TO: NAME FILED ORGANIZATION FEE JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO. H.N.M. BY: i; 19 8 • ,• CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) I 1 � 1 -A-vim/ S , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance• of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Lot 62 R.S. 58/6-10 Executed at 'R A-P Al2 s � 2� Conditional Use Permit Variance X Site Plan Review Zone Change ,California, this 712'1- day of ' , 197i . -7)/44 Signature 9 (rov'© 19C0) • • APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM (Initial Study) Date Submitted: No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name .and address of developer or project sponsor: Mr. and Mrs. Charles E. Haueisen 512 E. Carlin St. P.O. Box 4789 Compton, CA 90224 2. Address of project: #6 Eastfield Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Assessor's Block and Lot Number Lot 62 R.S. 58/6-10 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Richard M. Linde AIA Architect 2200 Amapola Court, Suite 200, Torrance, CA 90501 (213) 320-8052 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: N/A • 5. Existing zoning district: RAS - 1 6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Construction of a single family residence and garage PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size: 62.860 S.F. (Gross)-'45,798 S.F. (Net) 8. Square footage: 5328 S.F. 9. Number of floors of construction: one • • • 10. fount of off-street parking provided: Six 11. (Attach plans.) iq°ri 12. Proposed scheduling: Start construction -Sept. 13. Associated projects: rT/A 14. Anticipated incremental development: N/A 15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected: One single family residence 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: N/A 1, 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: N/A 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: N/A • • ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: 20. The existing site has a one story single family residence and garage constructed on a pre -graded pad. This development was initiated approximately thirty-five (35) years ago. There are no known cultural or historical landmarks. A current geological and soils report indicate that proposed project is feasable for construction. 21. The surrounding properties aredeveloped single family residences with similar landscaping and site use. The proposed project will be compatible with the neighborhood design, such as, setbacks, heights and architectural character. • iLtr9.10A 1 X 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 20. 'On a•separate page, describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. X 21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required orb attached sheets.) 22. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. -Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO X x X x x f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 23. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 24. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO • x X X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved X oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or X rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground. waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? • -4- X • '• m 9-20h° • h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? j. Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and of plants? b. A reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? • d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: A. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of .animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 27. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? -5- YES MAYBE N0 x X X X X X x X X X b. Exposure of people to severe . noise levels? 28. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 29. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alter- ation of the present or planned land use of an area? 30. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or up- set conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emer- gency evacuation plan? 32. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, 'or growth rate of the human population of an area? 33. Housing. Will the proposal af- fect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 34. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? YES MAYPE NO X X x x X X X X X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X • .' d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 35. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a." Fire protection?. b. Police protection? YES MAYBE x x c. Schools? x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 36. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use •of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 37. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? -7- x X x X MEMO lb . • r t9-23he • • 1 38. Human Health. Will the.proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to poten- tial health hazards? 39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthet- ically offensive site open to public view? 40. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 41. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthet- ic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural •values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing.religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 42. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commun- L, ity, reduce the number or restrict YES MAYBE N3 X X X X X X X X • the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate impor- tant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to. the disadvantage of long-term environ- mental goals? (a short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, defin- itive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) YES MAYBE- )O c. Does the project have impacts- which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate re- -sources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the ef- fect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause sub- stantial adverse effect on human be- ings, either directly or indirectly? _ CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required fo.r this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and 'belief. I, Date y-�c�- gC7 (Signature) For -9- (Applicant) x X X C'HEC10LIST FOR PLAP SUBMITTAL (collet) 17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the oxioting building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot within the area defined by the required Dinimun setbacks that has an average slope of ten (1 0%) percent or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) of less. COMPUTATION OF LOT COVE$AGX CITY OF ROLLING HILLS LOT COVERAGE (Title 171 ];fain buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, ©visaing pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square fest for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described iaprovements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, docks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Aaaociation, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the not lot area. For the purposes of this Section "not area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ton feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. DUILDING AREA • $XISTINQ PROPOSED CALCULATIONS NET LOT AREA sq. ft.. sq. ft. RESIDENCE 6121 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. GARAGE 83o sq. ft. 0 oq. ft. 3WIN1IING POOL 0 sq. ft. 0 eq. ft. 3TABLn 20-0 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. rcNNIS COURT 0 sq. ft. ' o sq. ft. •caVICE YARD 10 o sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. bIllint (detached garage) 1400 sQ• ft s. ft. 0 Q TOTAL SQUARE FEET 8551 $ STRUCTURE COVERAGE 18.6 % AIVE 7kT . 6011 sq. ft. ,'AVED VAL1tS AND PATIO AREA sq. ft. ►00L DNO 0 sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE FEET 6355 „ATWOR1t COVERAGE 13.9 %TOTAL COVERAGE 32.5 % 500 6011 Sq. ft. 344 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 6355 13.9$ 30.6$ 45,798. sq. ft. 6621 sq. ft. 830 sq. ft. o sq. ft. 200 eq. ft. (future) • 0 sq. ft. 10 0 sq. ft. sq. ft. 7651 16.7 $ 6011 sq. ft. 344 sq. ft. 0 eq. ft. 6355 13.9$ 30.6$ 4 • COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn) and other accessory structures, proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". A suggested coverage has been set forth by policy at 40 percent. For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, which declares existing buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDABLE PAD AREA total sq.ft.20.603 RESIDENCE sq. ft. titi21.. GARAGE sq. ft. 830 STABLE (BARN) sq. ft. OTHER sq. ft. 200 (future) BUILDING total sq.ft. 7651 PERCENT (%) COVERAGE total sq.ft. Is 37.1., (%)