Loading...
393, Addition of 500 SF to SFR and , Resolutions & Approval Conditionsr Recorder's use • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the return to: City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office before recordation.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) R 31 _._._. �. 58@202 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA MIN. gam APR 2� 1991 PAST. 'Es \9•00.1h requires that the form be notarized Acceptance Form CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. VARIANCE CASE NO. SITE PLAN REVIEU CASE NO. 3 ?3 C/Llodcz-r'ca I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s). of the real property described as follows: (Zo--t 60 -F,) 4 This property is the subject of the above numbered I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the Conditional Use Permit Case No. Variance Case No. cases. stated conditions Site Plan Review Case No. 3 93 ((lc V I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (Where the owner and applicant. are not the same, both must sign.) Type or print Charles E. Haueisen 28879 Crestridge Rd. in said Applicant Name Address City, State Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca. 90274 Signature Owner Name Address City, State Signature This signature must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach appropriate acknowledgement. Margaret A. Haueisen 28879 Crestridge Rd. Rancho Palos Verdes, . 90274 INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT r f f f • ! THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: State of ___C44-4.-rAle7/44-1-,Z;012 County of 1. v5 dICte-6. Z1t_5 SS. 91. 588202 OFFICIAL SEAL EARL F. KELSO JR. NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY Illy Commission Exp. Sept. 22, 1992 NO.201 y,�.��.• .• ! On this the 23 day of J 9"?..r G 19 9 ( , before me, ! ! ! r Notary's Signature Q i J J J Number of Pages !7 Date of Document 1"7.01Z c .cF 5, ! ?? Signer(s) Other Than Named Above ..8J 44/ 12 4 saws' '` traqtarAr 50147,401 © NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave. • P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91304-7184 1 0'2 . P. • kj:74S0 'ram/? the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared G Ns/iee. eF s04- A2A02 c•rt 1. /personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) .9?4Cr subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that 7 t' 7 executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ‘• v.:74.4 ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to another document. Title or Type of Document SZTaet ,✓74 ¢Atl /2 C.d1 S4 ? 73 A RESOLUTION NO. 91-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A SECOND MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBTERRANEAN GARAGE AND AMENDING THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 393 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Charles Haueisen with respect to real property located at 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot No. 62-EF) requesting a second modification to the previously approved site plan to allow for the construction of a subterranean garage instead of a detached above -grade garage. Section 2. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the original application for site plan review on July 8, 1989 pursuant to Resolution No. 89-15. The first modification to the site plan was approved by the Commission on November 3, 1990 as Resolution No. 90-34 along with a variance to the twenty percent (20%) side yard requirement for construction of a driveway in the side yard. This second modification is to allow for the construction of a subterranean garage and the deletion of a previously approved detached above -grade garage. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a second modification to the site plan on January 15, 1991 and February 19, 1991, and conducted a field trip on February 16, 1991. Section 4. Section 17.34.070 provides for a subsequent modification after a site plan review application has been approved. Modification of the approved plans and/or any conditions imposed including additions or deletions, may be considered. The decision on the modification of plans and/or conditions shall be in the same manner as set forth in Sec- tions 17.32.030 and 17.34.040 of the Municipal -Code. 91 588202 4 of fact: Section 5. The Commission makes the following findings A. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density resi- dential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project con- forms to the Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 45,798 square feet. The proposed residential structure and garages will have 9,146 square feet which constitutes approximately 19% of the lot, which is within the maximum 20% lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and stable will be 15,951 square feet which equals 34.8% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum structural lot coverage requirement. The total pad coverage will be approximately 37%. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feas- ible, the natural topographical features of the lot by being constructed on the existing building pad. The construction of the subterranean garage will be less visibly intrusive when the project is viewed from Eastfield Drive than the previously approved above -grade detached garage. C. The project follows the natural contours of the site described in paragraph B, above. Grading and excavation is limited to the existing building pad area and soil displacement caused by construction of the subterranean garage will be placed back against and above the structure so as to integrate the structure into the natural contours of the site. D. To the maximum extent possible, native vegetation will be preserved and enhanced by conditions attached hereto requiring mature native plants to be planted soas to screen the project. from Eastfield Drive. E. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot in that the reconstruction will occur within the existing building pad area. F. Although the Development Plan specifies a rela- tively large residential structure, the project is harmonious in scale and mass for the site and in 910306 lj 1680436 (1) - 2 - 91 588202 relation to neighboring residential structures. The proposed structure is 60 feet from the nearest residence. G. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles in that the driveway remains in its existing location. H. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing Section, the Planning Commission hereby approves the request for a second modification to the approved site plan in Zoning Case No. 393 to permit an attached subterranean garage with vehicular access, as indicated on the development plan attached hereto and incorpor- ated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. No further structures shall be permitted to be constructed on the site and no further addition to those structures shall be permitted once construc- tion of the improvements specified on Exhibit A is complete. B. The subterranean garage shall abut, but not pro- vide access to the residential structure on the site by way of a doorway or other passageway. C. The proposed building plan must be approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee before the applicant receives a grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. D. Prior to the submittal of a final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles, the grading plan shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review, along with related geology, soils and hydrology reports. This grading plan must conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. E. A landscape plan must be submitted to the Landscape Committee of the Rolling Hills Community Association, which shall forward its recommenda- tions for approval or revision to the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for approval prior to the issuance of any grading and 910306 tj 1680436 (1) - 3 - 91 588202 building permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consis- tent with the rural character of the community. The landscape plan shall provide that mature native shrubs or shrubs that are compatible with the rural character of the community be planted between Eastfield Drive and the proposed garage, which shrubs shall be maintained at a height sufficient to, but not any higher than necessary to, screen the top of the garage when viewed from Eastfield Drive. F. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the landscaping plus 15% shall be required to be posted with the City prior to the issuance of a grading and building permit, and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bondwill be released by the City after the City Manager (or the Landscape Committee of the Rolling Hills Community Association, if appointed to act for this purpose in the place of the City Manager) determines that the landscaping was installed pur- suant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. G. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check must conform to the development plan approved with this site plan review. H. Any further modification to the development plans approved by the Planning Commission shall require the filing of an application for modification of the development plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.43.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. I. The applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of all conditions pursuant to Sec- tion 17.32.087 or this site plan review approval shall not be effective. J. All conditions of this modification must be com- plied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. 910306 lj 1680436 (1) - 4 - 91 588202 Section 7. The terms and conditions of Resolution No. 89-15, adopted on July 8, 1989, and Resolution No. 90-34, adopted on November 3, 1990, along with the approved variance to the twenty percent (20%) side yard coverage requirement shall remain and be in full force and effect except for any provision therein which conflicts with the provisions of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1991. ATTEST: Dianeasawyer, Ld AI De uty City Clerk 910306 tj 1680436 (1) -5 - Allan Roberts, Chairman 91588202 • • The foregoing Resolution No. 91-2 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING.;A SECOND MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBTERRANEAN GARAGE AND AMENDING THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 393 was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 9, 1991 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay and Raine; Chairman Roberts. NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None akki Deputy C ty Clerk 91 588202 • �6IIBV�� MAY 31 1991 CITY. OF ROLLING MILLS For Recorder's use • 90-19 4026 110 This signature must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach appropriate acknowledgement. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the return to: City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires before recordation.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS~ RECORDERS OFFICE LOS ANGELESCALIFORNIA COUNTY E+�Ifa WO d 1' PJA.NOY PAST. Registrar -Recorder's Office and r„ 1 FEE $ I that the form be notarized Acceptance Form CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. VARIANCE CASE NO. 393 (Resolution #90-34) 'SITE PLAN a.EVIEW CASE NO. 393 (Resolution #90-34) I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s). of the real property described as follows: 6 E,astfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (Lot 62-EF) This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said Conditional Use Permit Case No. Variance Case No. 393 (Resolution #90-34) Site Plan Review Case No. -4q1 (Resn1utiQr 90-34 ) I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct:. (Where the owner .and applicant.are not the same, both must sign.) Applicant Name Address City, State Signature Type or print CHARLES E. HAUEISEN MARGARET A. HAUEISEN 28879 CRESTRIDGE RD. RANC PALOS VE , CHARLES E. HAUEISEN S, CA. 90274 Owner Name MARGARFT A_ HATTRTR1 T Address 28879 CRESTRIDGE RD. Cit State RANCH9 PALOS V RDES, CA. 90274 Y� Signature e///I O ,G • 1 0 +101 CU OF. ROLUNG HILLS GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of _ CALIFORNIA County of a LOS ANGELES OFFICIAL SEAL EARL F. KELSO JR. NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commizsion Exp. Sept 22, 1992 On this the 26TIliay of NOVEMBER 19 90 , before me, EARL F. KELSO, JR. 90-1964026 the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared CHARLES E. HAUEISEN AND MARGARET A. HAUEISEN 01 personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names) ARE subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that _ THEY executed it. WITNESS my hand official seal. Notary's Signature 7110 122 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364 32.087--17.32.111 17.32.087 Affidavit of acceptance. No conditional use permit or variance shall be effective for any purpose until the applicant executes an affidavit provided by the City declaring that the applicant is aware of and accepts the conditions that have been imposed upon the permit or variance. Each conditional use permit and variance granted shall con- tain a condition to this effect. The executed affidavit shall be recorded with the County Recorder. (Ord. 207 §1, 1985). 17.32.090 Application--Decision--Notice mailing. Not later than ten calendar days following the rendering of a decision that a variance or conditional use permit be granted or denied, a copy of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant at the address shown on the application filed with the Planning Commission, as well as to all persons who appear of record in opposition to the decision, as well as to the City Clerk, City Manager and each member of the City Council. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 155 §2, 1978: Ord. 33 S6.09, 1960). 17.32.100 .Application--Hearing--Recordkeeping. The formal hearing on the application for a variance or condi- tional use permit shall be numbered consecutively in order of its filing and shall become a permanent record in the files of the Commission. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 155 S1, 1978: Ord. 33 §6.08, 1960). 17.32.110 Expiration. A. Any variance or conditional use permit which is not used within the time specified on the grant of approval, or, if no time is specified, within one year of the effective date of such approval, becomes null and void and of no effect except that where a written application requesting an extension is received by the City prior to such expiration date, the Commission at its sole option may extend such approval for a period of not to exceed one year. B. For the purpose of this section, "used" means the commencement of construction or any activity authorized by the grant where no construction is proposed. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 33 §6.11, 1960). 17.32.111 Completion. All construction provided for in this chapter shall be completed within one year of the grant of any building or grading permit unless a greater construction period has been specifically provided for in the conditions of grant, or unless the Planning Commission at its sole option extends the construction period for a period of time not to exceed six months. (Ord. 188(part), 1981). 90-1964026 213 (Rolling Hills 5/85) • • RESOLUTION NO. 90-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE TWENTY PERCENT (20%) COVERAGE OF THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A DRIVEWAY AND APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE AND AMENDING THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ACCORDINGLY IN ZONING CASE NO. 393. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Charles Haueisen with respect to real property located at 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 62-EF) requesting a variance to exceed the twenty percent (20%) permitted driveway coverage of the side yard to construct a driveway and a modification to the previously approved site plan to construct a detached garage and amending the Resolution of Approval for Site Plan Review accordingly. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on October 16, 1990 and November 3, 1990. Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of the property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties. Section 17.28.022 paragraph (2) allows driveways leading to a garage or other parking area to be permitted in a required yard provided the driveway and parking area do not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the area of the yard in which they are located. The applicant is requesting that a driveway be constructed to cover 37% of the southerly side yard. Pursuant to these Sections, the Planning Commission finds that: A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone because there exists topographical constraints and lot shape irregularities that justify the proposed driveway within the side yard setback, and due to the current development pattern of the southerly easement, use of the existing vehicular access is available. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because other properties with proportional size in the vicinity and zone have driveways and other paved areas within yard setbacks which are utilized for vehicular access, parking area, and recreational uses. 90-1964026 • • C. The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed driveway provides additional drainage improvements on the site and permits vehicular access to a proposed garage structure that is compatible with the community's development pattern and an area for a future stable site has been provided. Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 393 to permit the construction of a driveway exceeding the twenty percent (20%) coverage of the southerly side yard, as indicated in the Development Plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 9 of this Resolution. Section 5. Section 17.34.070 provides for a subsequent modification after a site plan review application has been approved. Modification of the approved plans and/or any conditions imposed, including additions or deletions, may be considered. The decision on the modification of plans and/or conditions shall be in the same manner as set forth in Sections 17.32.030 and 17.34.040 of the Municipal Code. Section 6. Pursuant to the foregoing Section, the Planning Commission makes the finding that previous findings contained within the approved Resolution No. 89-15, dated July 8, 1989, can be restated as amended in Section 7 of this Resolution. Section 7. Based upon the Commission hereby approves the Case No. 393 to permit a 1,400 vehicular access, as indicated hereto and incorporated herein previously approved Resolution foregoing Section, the Planning request for modification for Zoning square foot detached garage with on the development plan attached as Exhibit A. Section 4 (A) of the is hereby amended to read as follows: A. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 45,798 square feet. The proposed residential structure attached garage and detached garage and future stable will have 8,551 square feet which constitutes approximately 18.6% of the lot, which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas, will be 14,906 square feet which equals 32.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is similar and compatible with neighboring development patterns. 90-1964026 • • Section 8. Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 89-15, adopted on July 8, 1989 as amended by this Resolution adopted on November 3, 1990, shall be in full force and effect. Section 9. The Planning Commission imposes the following conditions of approval: A. The variance approval shall expire if not used within one year from the effective date of approval as defined and specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code. B. The proposed building plan must be approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee before the applicant receives a grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. C. Prior to the submittal of a final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles, the grading plan shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review, along.with related geology, soils and hydrology reports. This grading plan must conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. D. A landscape plan must be submitted to the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for approval. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. The landscaping plan shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the landscaping plus 15% shall be required to be posted and retained with the City of not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City after the City Manager (or the Landscape Committee of the Rolling Hills Community Association, if appointed to act for this purpose in the place of the City Manager) determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is property established and in good condition. Landscaping shall be planted to substantially reduce any visual impact from Eastfield Drive. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check must conform to the development plan approved with this site plan review. F. Any modification to the development plans approved by the Planning Commission shall require the filing of a application for modification of the development plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.43.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 90-1964026 • • • G. The applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of all Conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or this variance and site plan review approval shall not be effective. H. All conditions of this Variance and Modification must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lra day of November 1990. ATTEST: i) Deputy City 1erk Allan Roberts, Chairman 90-1964026 For Recorde. Use RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 90- 1683185 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 31 A T. 1 MOOT 2 MO Pleaserecord this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills [) 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requivs before 'recordation.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS OCTEllOWIfl'071 251990 [FEE $il �+ 4 City Of Rolling Hill that the,orm be notarized • Acceptance Form CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO:. .Charles Haueisen 6 Eastfield Drive VARIANCE CASE NO. SITE PLAN REVIEW'CASE NO. 393 I (We) the undersigned state: I am'(We are) the owner(s). of the real property described as follows: #6 EASTFIELD DRIVE ROLLING HILLS, ,1A. 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware o'f, and accept, all the stated conditions in said Conditional Use Permit Case No. Variance Case No. SITE PLAN REVIEW CASE H0. 393 I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of 'perjury that the foregoing is true'and correct: - (Where the owner"and applicant. are not the same, both must sign.) Applicant Name Address City, State Signature Owner Name Address City, State Signature This signature must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach appropriate acknowledgement. Type or print CHARLES E. HAUEISEN MARGARET A. J-ATJFTSF.N #6 EASTFIELD DRIVE ROLLING HILLS, j CA. 90274 SAME AS ABOVE 1 r •ESOLUTION NO. 90-22 ti A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN AND AMENDING THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ACCORDINGLY IN ZONING CASE NO. 393 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. & Mrs. Charles Haueisen with respect to real property located at 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 62-EF) requesting a modification to the previously approved site plan to include an additional 480 square feet of floor area to the residential structure and amending the Resolution of Approval accordingly. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 19, 1990 and July 17, 1990, and conducted a field site review on June 30, 1990. Section 3. Section 17.34.070 provides for a subsequent modification after a site plan review application has been approved. Modification of the approved plans and/or any conditions imposed, including additions or deletions, may be considered. The decision on the modification of plans and/or conditions shall be in the same manner as set forth in Section 17.34.040 of the Municipal Code. Section 4. Pursuant to the foregoing Section,:the Planning Commission makes the finding that previous findings determined with the approved Resolution No. 89-15, dated July 8, 1989, can be restated. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing Section, the Planning Commission hereby approves the request for modification for Zoning Case No. 393 to permit an additional 480 square feet to the proposed residential structure, as indicated on the development plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Section 4 (A) of the previously approved Resolution shall hereby read now as follows: A. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to the Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 45, 798 square feet. The proposed residential structure, garage, and future stable will have 7,638 square feet which constitutes approximately 16.7% of the lot, which is within the maximum 20% lot coverage requirement. 90 1683185 • The total lot coverage including paved areas Will be 13,544 square feet which equals 29.6% of the lot, which is' within the 35% maximum structural lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is similar and compatible with neighboring development patterns. Section 6. Except as herein amended, the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 89-15, adopted on July 8, 1989, as extended and amended by this Resolution adopted on August 4, 1990, shall be in full force and effect. ATTEST: PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1990. ,A7L4ILA-1 /9/2::4;V City Clerk 4th day of August Allan Roberts, Chairman 90 1683185 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA SS. County of LOS ANGELES 90 1683185 OFFICIAL S'AL EARL F. KELSO JR. NOTARY PU3LtC - CALIFORNtA ' LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Exp. Sept. 22, 1992 ►?r +..��.�,,....-,-<-�-�e-i...-is-cccs� 7110 122 to be the person(s) whose name(s) within instrument, and acknowledged that _ WITNESS my ha .ci and official seal. 07-7 Notary's Signature`' NO. 201 On this the 2ND day of OCTOBER FART. P KFT,cn_T JR_ _ 1910_, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared CHARLES E. HAUEISEN AND MARGARET A. HAUEISEN N personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ARE subscribed to the THEY executed it. NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364 • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 89-1466695 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA iq$q 31 PAST.. 1 P. M.SEP 12 MSS For Recorderfi,^, Use Please record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's return to: City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's before recordation.) • Office and FEE $7 Office requires that the form be notarized • Acceptance Form STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE N0: VARIANCE CASE NO. SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 393 I (We) the undersigned state: • I am.(We are) the owner(s). of'the real property described as follows: 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, California This property is the subject of the above numbered I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated cases. conditions in said Conditional Use PermitCase No. Variance Case No. SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 393 I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of "perjury that the foregoing is true' and correct: - (Where the owner 'and applicant. are not 'the same, both must sign.) Applicant Name Address City, State Signature Type or print CHARLES E. AND MARGARET A. HAUEISFN 28879 CRESTRIDGE RD. RANCH" PALOS V RDES, CA. 90274 Owner Name CHARLES E. AND MARGARET A. HAUELSEN Address City, State Signature This signature must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach appropriate acknowledgement. 28879 CRESTRIDGE RD. RANCH PALOS VERDES, CA. 90274 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT u State of _ CALIFORNIA County of SS. LOS ANGELES 513. 1466695 EASEL F= :(_LSO JR. t�3TA Y S= t1 L•:C CALIFORNIA L03 ANCELE3 COUNIY My Cornr;,i=ioa Exp. Sept 22, 1492 On this the bTH day of SEPTEMBER EARL F. KELSO, JR. the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared 19 89 , before me, NO. 201 CHARLES E. HAUEISEN AND MARGARET A. HAUEIS N Rwersonally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ARE subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that _ THEY executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary's Signature t 7110 122 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364 r RESOLUTION No.89-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 393 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Charles E. Haueisen with respect to real property located at 6 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 62-EF) requesting site plan review approval for a proposed residential reconstruction on the site. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on May 16, 1989 and June 20, 1989, and conducted a field site review on June 6, 1989. Section 3. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five (25%) percent in any thirty-six (36) month period. of fact: Section 4. The Commission makes the following findings A. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project con- forms to the Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 45,798 square feet. The proposed residential structure and garage will have 6,158 square feet which constitutes.approximately 13% of the lot, which is within the maximum 20% lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas, and stable will be 12,540 square feet which equals 27.3% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum structural lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is similar and compatible with neighboring development patterns. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, the natural topographic features of the lot by being constructed on the existing building pad. C. The project follows the natural contours of the site described in paragraph B, above. Grading and excavation is limited to the existing building pad area. All drainage flow will be channeled into existing drainage courses. D. To the maximum extent possible, native vegetation will be preserved. E. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot in that the reconstruction will occur within the existing building pad area. F. Although the Development Plan specifies a relatively large residential structure, the project is harmonious in scale and mass for the site and in relation to neighboring residential structures. The proposed structure is 60 feet from the nearest residence. G. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles in that the driveway remains in its existing location. H. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based on the foregoing findings, the Commission hereby approves the site plan review application for a proposed residential project to the property located at 6 Eastfield Drive subject to following conditions: A. Any modifications to the project which would constitute a modification to the Development Plan as approved by the Planning Commission, shall require the filing of an application for modification of the Development Plan pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. B. A landscaping plan must be submitted to the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for approval. The plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. The landscaping plan shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation. A -2- 890707 lj 1680024 (2) bond in the amount of the cost estimate for the landscaping plus 15% shall be posted and retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City after the City Manager deter- mines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. C. Prior to the submittal of a final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the Development Plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. D. The proposed building plan must be approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee before any grading permit is issued. E. The working drawing submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the Development Plan approved with the site plan review. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of July , 1989. ATTEST: -3- 890707 lj 1680024 (2) /s/ Allan Roberts Chairman