31, Decrease front yard setback fr, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
1 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of the Application
of
JOHN M. BENNETT
Lot 58, Eastfield
ZONING CASE
NO. 31
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of John M. Bennett, Lot 58, Eastfield,
to establish a, front yard setback in accordance with Section
3.06 of Ordinance 33, came on for hearing on eht 8th day
of April, 1963, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., at the City Hall
of the City of Rolling Hills, California, and the
applicant having submitted evidence in support of his
application and the Planning Commission being advised,
now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by
the Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
The Commission finds that the applicant, John M. Bennett,
is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lot 58, Eastfield, located in the City of Rolling Hills,
California, and that notice of the public hearing in connection
with said application was given as required by
Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
That no person appeared at said public hearing in
opposition to theapplication for a variance.;-2..a t*.L
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9.•
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
III.
The Commission further finds that said proposed
residence is to be located 23 feet from the road instead
of the 30 feet front yard setback as required by the
Zoning Ordinance, due to the existing garage which
already encroaches upon the setback, and further finds
that by reason of the. terrain of said Lot 58,
the variance should be granted to applicant in order to
preserve substantial property rights possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the
granting of such variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property
or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
applicant's property is located, and that there are
exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
by reason of physical location and terrain of said Lot 58,
which do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should
be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling
Hills to John M. Bennett, Lot 58, Eastfield, in accordance
with the Plot Plan marked Exhibit 1 on file in these
proceedings and, it is therefore, so ordered.
Dated: April 18, 1963
/s/ Phyllis Stockdale
Secretary, Planning Commission
/sf Manley Natland
Chairman, Planning Commission
-2-