687, Addition to SFR & and enlarge , Resolutions & Approval ConditionsTITLE(S) :
FEE
CODE
20
CODE
19
CODE
9
This page is part of your document- DO NOT DISCARD
FEE $22
DAF $2
C-20
LL
05 0341711
ECORRI RIFII-i=.R IN 9FFI�IAI-REDDRDS
R�Dt?RR�Fi"� AFFIDE
LOS CAIFORNIADRTy
3:41 Pm FEB 14 2005
LEA ) S H= E T
D.T.T
n
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN)
To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. Number of AIN's Shown
n
THIS FORM NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
• •
05 0341711
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT O F ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
ZONING CASE NO. 687
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
11 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 54-EF) CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 687
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is
/74/t,Z,,,V z,20,1„
Signature
M/cgi ,97
Name typed or printed
1/ 15Tri&5 ,14/f/�
/ZDec/ti6 / Lt 9o27S�
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles )
On CSalf>. t/ .30c before me,
personally appeared %nlC;i4-e-% \ %: & i (,C L.
1-,4%. P A Z. . X./A-A.4 rR
Address
Fue and
ect.
XX
XX
SignCurel_4 4_
Name typed or printed
1, / F/C[I) /1),2_t UO
Address
/ze9La/06- /74/ccs ro z7/
T Recorders Use Only
City/State
BRUNO J. SARTINI JR. - NOTARY PUBLIC
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) *fare
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thatbefslbs/they executed the same in his/har/their authorized
capacity(bbl and that by I sMtg./their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
BRUNO J. SARTINI JR Witness by hand and offic'al eal.
COMM. #1341037 gj
NOTARY PUBUC - CALIFORNIA ...
LOS ANGELES COUNTY — `• 3
*comm.ExpieFgb.21,2 ( Signature of ary
Y v Y w e r 1Y V' d` r, ar��
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
!)cf-i I PST
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION THAT WOULD ENCROACH INTO
THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 687, AT 11 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT
54-EF), (WALLACE).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Michael Wallace with
respect to real property located at 11 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 54-EF)
requesting a 579 square foot addition along the northern portion of the existing
residence, of which 188 square feet would encroach into the setback. An addition to the
garage along the southern portion of the residence is also proposed for a total of 3,175
square foot residence and 925 square foot garage.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on May 18, 2004, June 15, 2004, and at a field trip visit on
June 15, 2004. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first
class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting
said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having
reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant and his representative
were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption, Existing Facilities, and is therefore categorically exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property
and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from
making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in
the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.120 is required because it states that every
lot in the RAS-1 zone shall have a side yard of not less than 20 feet from the side
property line. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach between 4.5 feet to 7.5
feet into the required 20-foot north side yard setback, for a total of 188 square feet
encroachment. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission
finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone because the t addition is proposed is small in size in comparison to
the average lots in the vicinity. The lot size and configuration, together with the existing
development on the lot creates a difficulty in meeting the side yard setback Code
requirement. The existing legal nonconforming residence was built with the residence
05 0341711
• .
encroaching up to 8 feet into the side yard setback. The existing residence and proposed
additions are modest in size.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning
Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by
similarly situated properties in the same vicinity and zone. The encroachment permits
the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance
will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development
patterns on surrounding properties and will square off already existing encroachment.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located. Development in the side yard will allow the remaining
portion of the lot to remain undeveloped, would minimize grading and would follow
the existing line of encroachment. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious
lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. The residential building pad
coverage is also within the City's guidelines of 30%.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 687 to encroach 188 square feet into
the north side yard setback with an addition, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date
of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the
requirements of this section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance that if any conditions
thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to
cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested,
has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period
of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated July 13, 2004, except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of
minimum of 1,000 square feet to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable (450
square feet) and corral (550 square feet) with access thereto.
Reso. 2004-17
Wallace
05 0341711
2
• •
F. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of the Lighting
Requirements of the City of Rolling Hills, pertaining to lighting on said property.
G. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of Section
17.16.190 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to roof covering.
H. Utility lines serving subject residence shall be placed underground.
I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5,873 square feet or 7.35% in
conformance with lot coverage limitations.
J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 17,056
square feet or 21.3% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations.
K. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 24,767 square feet or 31.0% in
conformance with disturbed area limitations.
L. Residential building pad coverage on the 16,078 square foot residential
building pad shall not exceed 4,823 square feet or 30.0%; coverage on the 1,300 square
foot future stable pad shall not exceed 450 square feet or 34.6% and coverage on the
existing 1,820 square foot hobby shop pad shall not exceed 33.0%.
M. There shall be no grading of the site, except for the future stable, if
constructed.
N. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be
retained to the greatest extent feasible.
O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the
soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by
construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering
practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion,
or land subsidence shall be required.
Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances
and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle
trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land
subsidence shall be required.
R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of
7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical
equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
Reso. 2004-17
Wallace
05 0341711
3
• •
S. If a construction fence is erected during construction, it shall not be
located in any easement or cross over trails.
T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site
and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway
easements.
U. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
V. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape
sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an
approved manner.
W. A drainage plan, if required by the County Building and Safety
Department, shall be submitted and approved by the Planning staff and County District
Engineer. Such plan shall include all discharge from all of the site irrigation systems
and shall ensure that all drainage from the site is conveyed in an approved manner.
X. If an above ground drainage system is utilized, it shall be designed in such
a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. The drainage system(s) shall not
discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design
of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum
extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
Y. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
Z. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in
Condition D.
AA. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
this Variance and Site Plan Review approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the
approval shall not be effective.
AB. All conditions of this Variance approval, that apply, must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAYJTJLY 2204.
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso. 2004-17
Wallace
ARVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN
05 0341711
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION
THAT WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK AT AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 687, AT 11
EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 54-EF), (WALLACE).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July
20, 2004 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and
Chairman Witte.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Reso. 2004-17
Wallace
DEPUTY CITY'LERK
5
05 0341711