30, Construct new school district , Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
/941".C`>604,6644-ew
February 26, 1963
The Chairman asked if there was anyone present who
wished to speak against the proposed variance. There were none.
Mrs. Carolyn Brink, Architect, for Dr. Zimmerman, appeared
before the Commission and stated that the required 30' setback
would not allow sufficient room for the residence and future
pool due to the severe slope of the lot.
Thereafter, it was moved by Mr. Mahan, seconded by Mr. Good
and unanimously parried that a field trip be held for the,
purpose of inspecting the property prior to making a decision,
on Sunday, March 3, 1963 at 4:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING CASE NO, 29
K. E. GRAHAM, OWNER
APPL FOR VARIANCE FROM SIDE. YARD SETBACK
The Chairman presented a plot plan of a proposed residence
to be constructed at 27 Eastfield, on Lot 46, Eastfield,
owned by Mr. and Mrs, K. E. Graham, also an application dated
February 13, 1963 requesting a Variance on a side yard setback
as required by Ordinance No. 33, Section 3.07.
Upon questioning, by members of the Commission on the placing
of the residence farther back on the lot, Mrs. Graham stated
that she had been advised by a Geologist that no permanent
structure should be built within 30' of the drop off to Georgeff
Canyon.- The Commissioners agreed that a physical inspection
should be made.
r
Thereafter, it was moved by Mr. Good, seconded by
Mr. Blakey and unanimously carried that a Field Trip be held
onSunday, March 3, 1963 following. the inspection of the
Zimmerman property.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ZONING CASE NO. 30
PALOS VERDES.PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
It was moved by Mr. Gray that the Commission consider the
granting bf a Conditional Use Permit to the Palos Verdes Peninsula
Unified School District for the construction of certain buildings
at 38 Crest Road under Section 6.13 of Ordinance No. 33. The
giotion was seconded by Mr. Mahan and unanimously carried.
Mr. Robert Lueck, Planning Coordinator, for the school district,
appeared before the Commission and submitted evidence showing the
elimination of the vehicle maintenance building, which was included
in the plans considered by the Commission in Zoning Case No. 24,
and stated that the following uses:. forthe property were requested:
-2-
February 26, 1963
a) That the point outlined inred, marked "I" on Exhibit A,
represents the location of the "Administration Building" which
will be used exclusively to provide space for the general
offices for . the School District.
b) That the point marked "II" in red on Exhibit A, represents
the. location of the "Educational Material and Library Facility"
building, which building will be used exclusively for the
storage, maintenance and issuance of books, audio - visual
materials, stuffed animals, birds and pictures used by the
School District.
c) .That the point marked "III" in red on Exhibit B,
represents the location of a warehouse, rectangular in shape,
approximately 80 by 200-feet square in which will be stored,
for the use of the School District, construction materials,
cafeteria supplies, paper, pencils and other school supplies.
d) That the point marked "IV" in red on Exhibit B,
represents "District Maintenance Building" which building is
to be used exclusively for the housing of electrical,
carpenter, and poumbing shops and facilities for the repair
and maintenance and issuance of plumbing equipment, audio-
visual equipment; gardening equipment, typewriters, desks,
radios, lawn mowers, small tractors, and the storage of
seeds and plants.
e) That the point marked "V"'in red on Exhibit C, represents
the location of the Elementary School Building which is to be constructed on the premises and of which preliminary drawings
have been made, and all additional and final plans as developed
by the School District are to be approved by the Planning
Commission prior to construction.
f) That the warehouse described in subparagraph (c)
above, isto be constructed of a metal material, with white
sides and tan roof, in accordance with samples designated as
No. 7:Polar White and No. 1 Mocha Tan, as per Dudly Steel
Samples Nos. 4 and 5, admitted in evidence as applicant's
Exhibit D.
Thereafter, it was moved by Mr. Gray, that the Conditional
Use Permit requested by Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School
District be approved in accordance with foregoing conditions
as outlined in subparagraphs a,b,c,d,e,f, and that all other
uses, other than those specified are inconsistent with
the objectives of Ordinance No. 33 and that a waiver of the
fee for -the Conditional Use Permit requested by the School
District be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Mahan'
and carried by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Gray, Mahan, Natland, Good
NOES: None
NOT VOTING: Mr. Blakey
ABSENT: None
-3-
February 26, 1963
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 33
The matter was ordered tabled.
PROPOSED NEW EASTFIELD GATE ENTRANCE
The City Manager presented a drawing of tentative plans for
the redesign of the Eastfield Gate Entrance.
After studying the plans it was moved by Mr. Good, seconded
by Mr. Gray and unanimously carried that the plan be approved
as submitted, provided that provision be made for residents
cars to display a small decal on the left hand side of the
windshield to enable the guard in an island gatehouse to
recognize it, and further that the gatehouse be located at
least 50 feet from the intersection of Eastfield Drive and
Palos Verdes Drive East.
J. B. MERRITT - RE SUBDIVISION NO. 12
LOT 240B,MS, 41 CREST ROAD WEST
Mr. John B. Merritt appeared before the Commission and
stated that after studying the feasibility of re -zoning of his
property, Lot 240B,MS, 41 Crest Road West, it was not his.
desire to pursue the matter and therefore requested that the
tentative map and fee be held in abeyance until he is ready
to submit a new plan.
ADJOURNMENT
C
There being no further business to come before the Commissioners,
the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
Phyll S'tockdaallr„ Secretary
Manley lkatlAnd, Chairman