162, Construct a tennis court, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. Marvin Malmuth
Lot 93-RH
FINDINGS AND REPORT
ZONING CASE NO. 162
The application of Mr. Marvin Malmuth, Lot'93-RH, Rolling Hills
Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c)
of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a tennis court came on for
hearing on the 12th day of August, 1976 in the Council Chambers of
the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support
of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes
its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Marvin Malmuth, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 93-RH, located
at 3 Pine Tree Lane, in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notices of
the public hearing in connection with said application was given as
required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07.of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further, that no
communication, written or verbal, was received in favor of or in
opposition to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant requests the conditional
use permit for construction of a tennis court in a legal location on
the property which consists of 5.134 acres in the RAS-2 zone. The
Commission finds that the proposed location is virtually out of sight
from Pine Tree Lane and from the neighbors, and since there is already
a graded pad in the proposed location, there would not be an adverse
effect on surrounding properties, therefore the Commission finds that
a conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve
substantial property rights possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional use permit
would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious
to property in the same vicinity and zone. As a condition of approval,
the Commission requires that the fence surrounding the tennis court be
no more than ten feet high, and of a dark color to be less visible.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use permit
subject to conditions imposed should be granted under Section 3.01,
Paragraph 3 (c) of Ordinance No. 112 for construction 'ofa':tennis
court
to Mr. Marvin Malmuty, Lot 93-RH, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
c.
etary, Planning sion