738, Relocate existing garage adjac, Correspondence•
IO 14 2, � *' INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
50TH ANNIVERSARY
1957 - 2007
March 13, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
Dr. and Mrs. R. Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 738. Request for a Variance to permit construction of
a garage, which would encroach into the side yard setback.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Ullrich:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the City Council at their regular meeting on
March 12, 2007 received and filed the Planning Commission's resolution granting your
request in Zoning Case No. 738.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the
Planning Commission, unless an appeal has been filed to the City Council within that
thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Before this case takes effect you are required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance Form
together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder.
However. prior to recordation, please obtain approval from the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Committee for the garage.
I have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Development Plan to
keep for your files. Please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE
FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward, (or hand deliver), the completed
form and a copy of the Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional
page.
Printed on Recycled Pope!
•
Please assure that during construction the contractor adheres to the conditions of the
resolution. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only after the Affidavit of Acceptance ad the Resolution are recorded and
received by the City and after any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance
of building permits are met.
The approval of this project is valid for two years. Therefore, construction must
commence within that two year period, unless an extension is requested and approved
by the Planning Commission prior to expiration of this approval.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/ILA 51./j3
/Yolanta Schwartz
lanning Director
cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering (first class mail —cover letter only)
Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
tkkCITY OF ROLLING HILLS
o _*+ 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
Us ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 738
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE X X
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
5 PINE TREE LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 94-RH) CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 738 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE X X
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.,
State of California
County of Los Angeles )
On before me,
personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
• . , • ExBiiA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A
VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A TWO CAR GARAGE THAT
WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE SETBACK AT AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
738 AT 5 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 94-RH), (ULLRICH).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. Reinhold Ullrich. with
respect to real property located at 5 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 94-RH)
requesting a Variance to construct a 484 square foot attached garage that would
encroach up to five feet into the south side yard setback at an existing single
family residence.
Section 2 The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on January 16, 2007. The applicant was
notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from
members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant's representative was in
attendance at the hearing.
Section 3. There is an existing attached garage, which encroaches into
the side yard setback and the side yard easement. The applicant processed a A
tentative parcel map application for subdivision of this property. Pursuant to -
City of Rolling Hills Subdivision requirements and condition of approval for the
subdivision from the Rolling Hills Community Association, the garage must be
removed out of the easement. The proposal therefore, is to relocate the garage
closer to the residence.
Section 4. Previously the applicant applied for and was granted a Site
Plan Review, Variance and a Conditional Use Permit approvals in Zoning Case
No. 668 to construct a 484 square foot detached garage, which would encroach
between five (5) to seven (7) feet into the required side yard setback. The existing
garage was to be demolished. The garage was not constructed and the approval
expired in November 2006. In order to proceed with finaling of the subdivision
application, the existing garage must be moved out of the easement.
Section 5. The property is currently developed with a 5,346 square foot
residence, a 462 square foot attached garage, 800 square foot swimming pool,
and a 96 square foot service yard.
• •
Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as
a Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 7. Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every
residential parcel in the RA-S-2 Zone to be thirty-five (35) feet from the side
property line. The applicant is requesting to construct an attached garage, which
will encroach five feet into the side yard setback. With respect to this request for
a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
property or class of use in the same zone. The Variance request is to replace a
structure, which already encroaches into the side yard setback, with a new legal
attached garage. The topography of the lot together with the fact that the existing
residence is located very close to the setbacks on the lot creates a difficulty in
constructing the garage elsewhere on the property. In addition, as a condition of
a lot split it is required that the existing garage be relocated.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary
because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in
placing the garage elsewhere on the property. The proposed detached garage
will minimize the need to grade, as the existing access to the proposed garage
will be utilized.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed garage will
encroach less into the side yard setback than the existing garage, which will be
demolished.
D. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the
record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case
No. 738 to permit the relocated attached garage to encroach five feet into the side
yard setback, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approval shall expire within two years from the
effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section
17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the
requirements of this section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
• •
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has
been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the
City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Codes, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on
an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of
the Lighting Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance, Undergrounding of utilities
Ordinance and others.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated January 10,
2007, except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,224 square feet or 8.2% in
conformance with structural lot coverage limitations.
F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed
19,756 square feet or 22.5% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations.
G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 22,700 square feet or
25.8% in conformance with disturbed area limitations.
H. Residential building pad coverage on the 16,145 square foot
existing residential building pad shall not exceed 6,774 square feet or 41.9%;
coverage on the proposed stable pad of 1,125 square feet shall not exceed 40.0%.
I. No grading is required for this construction.
J. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for the proposed garage, the
existing attached garage, which encroaches into the side yard setback and the
easement shall be demolished. Further, the construction of the proposed garage
and removal of the existing garage shall be completed prior to applying for a
Final Map for the subdivision with the City. (Vested Tentative Parcel Map No.
22333).
K. All utility lines to the residence and garage shall be placed
underground.
L. The roof for the garage shall meet City and RHCA requirements of
Class "A" material and Class "A" construction and shall be approved by the
RHCA. If the roof on the residential structure does not meet City and RHCA
requirements, then the entire roof shall be replaced.
• •
M. The property on which the project is located shall contain a set
aside area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access
thereto.
N. Perimeter easements shall remain free and clear of any
improvements including, but not be limited to, fences -including construction
fences, grading (both cut and fill), landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices,
play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment,
unless otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association.
O. No irrigation or drainage device may be located on a property in
such a manner as to contribute to erosion orin any way adversely affect an
easement or a trail.
P. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as
not to impede views of neighboring properties but to screen the structure. Any
new trees and shrubs planned to be planted in conjunction with this project shall,
at maturity, not be higher than the ridge height of the residence.
Q. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, that
incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers,
incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors
and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray.
R. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to
stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors
generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering
practices.
S. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
U. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed
in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. Any drainage system
shall not discharge water onto 'a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors,
including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and
neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the
function of the drain system.
• •
V. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department
requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage
facilities.
W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department
Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
X. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance
of any permit.
Y. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
Z. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicants shall execute
and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance approval,
or the approval shall not be effective.
AA. All conditions of this Variance approval, which apply, must be
complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007.
7.1
ARVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KEEN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2007-04 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS . GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A
VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A TWO CAR GARAGE THAT
WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE SETBACK AT AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
738 AT 5 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 94-RH), (ULLRICH).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
February 20, 2007 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, DeRoy, Sommer and Chairman Witte.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Henke.
ABSTAIN: None
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
" DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Date g'12°/1)7
EASEMENT TO THE ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION FOR ROADS,BRIOLE TRAILS AND
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
PRIVATE STREET ACCESS fiAURANTEEiD BY:
DF_CtARATION NO, 150 OF ESTABLISHMENT
of
Easlc protective restrictions,Condit ons,Covenants,
Reservations,Ltens, Charges and Certain Local
Resricttons Affecting the Reel Property known as
ROLLING HILLS - RANCHO PALOS VE..RDES
Recorded May 14, 1936 tl4.5 fit"1811M'D
Book 740035, Pale
Bluef t Line Stream --� • 1 0 2007
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
By
Dote: Sept. 4. 2002
Scale: 1• . Jo'
Drown: DUM
Checked: DKM
Job: 98209
sn..t
1
or / Sheol.
•
•
tgaigiggitithavatii i
A. Signature
X
B. Received by (Printed Name)
■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can retum the card to you.
' • Attach thls card to the back of the mallplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Dr. and Mrs. Reinhold Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
7005 1820 0008 3440 6075
(Ih
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
II C. Date of Dellvery
•
I D. Is delivery address different from Item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
3.,Service type
)11Wertllled Mall ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered 'Return Recelpt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mall 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Exaa Fee) ❑ Yes
Z.L.t..10
S PAP TNPzLt,..w.-
10250202•M-1540
• •
7005 1820 0008 3440 6075
9. (1).
-0
_
eeA pogia
() CZ
----
x
0 1;
cm ci
Ct4 a,
.-3 O' m
r- 0
. 0 0
a, • F W, Ti
g..
P m 3:3
1.) o
0 r-
ill
. 0
I
r
r
(1)
R4.09 OhhE 9000 0291 SOU.
PS Form 3811, February 2004
O Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Sig
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. . Agent
O Print your name and address on the reverse X ; A1 ssee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Pill, d Name) C. pyfe ogsilvery
® Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, I/or on the front if space permits.F.
{?�
1. Article Addressed to:
D. Is delivery address different from item? f ❑''es
If YES, enter delivery address below, ❑ No
Dr. and Mrs. Reinhold Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
3..Service Type
Certified Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Insured Mail
❑ Express Mali
'Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
❑ Yes
2. Ad.. -.•Z .
7005 1,820 0008 3440 6075 °� ']�
S Pi'A e T
Domestic Return Receipt , 102595-02-M-1540
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No.G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
i w
City of Rolling Hills '�;�
2 Portuguese Bend Road t1AR 1
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Jv
{I` I1 11 I' {ti Ili1 II " i 11 1
!{!t {i11fi i I!t 11111!{} i}!f 1}il! } I!{11111! tll Ifk
50TH ANNIVERSARY
1957 - 2007
February 22, 2007
Dr. R. Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hilis, CA 90274
•
bit S✓�+ �n
�"' �� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24. 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 738. Request for a Variance to permit construction of
a garage, which would encroach into the side yard setback.
Dear Dr. Ullrich:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission at their regular meeting
on February 20, 2007 adopted the enclosed Resolution grating your request in Zoning
Case No. 738. That action, accompanied by -the record of the proceedings before the
Commission will be reported to the City Council on March 12. 2007 at their regular
meeting beginning at 7:30 PM. You or your representative must be present to
answer any questions the Council may have.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days
after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless a appeal has been filed or
the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period.
(Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hilis Municipal Code). Should there be a appeal or
Council takes jurisdiction of this case, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the
Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal
Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final.
A copy of the staff report to the City Council will be forwarded to you on Friday, March 9,
2007. Following the City Council's action, I will mail to you instructions for recordation of
the Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the Resolution.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
r
Yolapta Schwartz
Planning Director
cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering (cover letter only)
Printed on Recvckri (Alpo
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A
VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A TWO CAR GARAGE THAT
WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE SETBACK AT AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
738 AT 5 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 94-RH), (ULLRICH).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. Reinhold Ullrich. with
respect to real property located at 5 Pine Tree Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 94-RH)
requesting a Variance to construct a 484 square foot attached garage that would
encroach up to five feet into the south side yard setback at an existing single
family residence.
Section 2 The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on January 16, 2007. The applicant was
notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from
members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant's representative was in
attendance at the hearing.
Section 3. There is an existing attached garage, which encroaches into
the side yard setback and the side yard easement. The applicant processed a A
tentative parcel -map application for subdivision of this property. Pursuant to
City of Rolling Hills Subdivision requirements and condition of approval for the
subdivision from the Rolling Hills Community Association, the garage must be
removed out of the easement. The proposal therefore, is to relocate the garage
closer to the residence.
Section 4. Previously the applicant applied for and was granted a Site
Plan Review, Variance and a Conditional Use Permit approvals in Zoning Case
No. 668 to construct a 484 square foot detached garage, which would encroach
between five (5) to seven (7) feet into the required side yard setback. The existing
garage was to be demolished. The garage was not constructed and the approval
expired in November 2006. In order to proceed with finaling of the subdivision
application, the existing garage must be moved out of the easement.
Section 5. The property is currently developed with a 5,346 square foot
residence, a 462 square foot attached garage, 800 square foot swimming pool,
and a 96 square foot service yard.
• •
City On e°fling jilt/3INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
January 22, 2007
Dr. ad Mrs. R. Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 738. Request for a Variance to permit construction of a
garage, which would encroach into the side yard setback at a existing single
family residence at 5 Pine Tree Lane (Lot 94-RH), Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. ad Mrs. Ullrich:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting
on January 16, 2007 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request in Zoning Case
No. 738 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning
Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval,
at an upcoming meeting on February 20. 2007 beginning at 6:30 PM.. and make its final decision
on your application at that meeting.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before
the Planning Commission meeting.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within
that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes
its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
As stated above, the Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the
development application is scheduled for Tuesday, February 20, 2007. That action, accompanied
by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as
a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Monday, March
12, 2007.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
it
i ltvf �'
Yolhbta Schwartz, Planning Director
cc: Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering
sa
Pri, Ui•rl rip flor.yr,lrrd
• ti
c 0/Ie0ffi4 Jh#.3
STATUS OF APPLICATION
& NOTIFICATION OF MEETING
January 5, 2007
Dr. ad Mrs. R. Ullrich
5 Pine Tree Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 28, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 738. Request for a Variance to permit
construction of a garage, which would encroach into the side yard
setback at an existing single family residence at 5 Pine Tree Lane
(Lot 94-RH), Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. ad Mrs. Ullrich:
Your application for Zoning Case No. 738 has been set for public hearing
consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday.
JANUARY 16, 2007.
However, to date, I did not received the required fee of $1,250 and the
application has not been signed by the property owner. In addition, 15 sets of
plans must be submitted to the Planning Department no later than January 10,
2007. On the plans please delineate the front 50-foot setback from the
easement line to ascertain that the proposed garage will not encroach into
the front setback.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify,
amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires
such information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information
promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application.
The meeting will begin at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City
Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your
designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer
questions.
®F'ririU d n N,;c:‘r.;lod
•
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on
the Friday before the meeting. We will forward the report to you and your
representative.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincer ly,
JJL,"),
Ponta Schwartz
PI nning Director
cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering