901, Construct a tennis court in fr, CorrespondenceTree Lane. Attached to this letter as "Exhibit A" is a diagram of the property located at 5 Pine Tree Lane.
This diagram serves to clarify condition J by depicting those portions of the existing driveway located on
5 Pine Tree Lane which are to remain, and those which are to be removed on the property, in order to
allow for access onto 3 Pine Tree Lane.
If you agree with the above, please sign one copy of this letter and return it to the City at the
above address no later than October 20, 2016. Upon receipt of both homeowners' signatures, City staff
will cause this letter to be filed along with the Resolution for reference purposes.
e ly,
olanta Schwartz, Plan Kn g Director
Date
Lauren Sharng
Owner of the Property Located at
5 Pine Tree Lane
cc: John Resich
Date
Keith urphy
OwryE{r of the Property Loc
3 Pine Tree Lane
October 11, 2016
Mrs. Lauren Sharng
5 Pine Tree Lane,
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Mr. Keith Murphy
3 Pine Tree Lane,
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
41111
City O leollifv INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
P�.
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
itr.)
OCT 1 S 2016
City of Fioliing Mills
By
Re: Condition J of City Council Resolution No. 1188 in Zoning Case No. 901 (Sharng)
Dear Mrs. Sharng and Mr. Murphy:
Following approval of Zoning Case No. 901 on August 22, 2016 by the City Council, Mrs. Sharng
requested clarification of City Council Resolution No. 1188 (hereinafter referred to as the "Resolution");
specifically, clarification of the language contained in condition J of the Resolution. This letter serves to
memorialize staff's clarification and interpretation of condition J.
Condition J of the Resolution states as follows:
A new driveway shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and
the apron of the driveway shall be subject to review and approval by the Traffic
Commission.
Further, the portion of the existing shared driveway with 3 Pine Tree Lane that
is located on the property at 5 Pine Tree Lane shall be abandoned and the
concrete removed once the new driveway off Pine Tree Lane is completed. At
no time shall vehicular access to 3 Pine Tree Lane be impacted by construction
activities at 5 Pine Tree Lane. The driveway apron serving 3 Pine Tree Lane, but
located on 5 Pine Tree Lane, shall be unaffected by this development and shall
be available at all times for egress and ingress to 3 Pine Tree Lane.
Photographic evidence of the condition of the shared driveway and apron with
3 Pine Tree Lane shall be submitted to the Planning Department before any
construction or demolition. Any damage caused to the apron, easements or
curbs by construction activities shall be restored at the expense of the applicant.
It is the interpretation of City staff that the intent behind condition J is to ensure that access
onto the property located at 3 Pine Tree Lane (which is shared and located on 5 Pine Tree Lane) remains
unaffected following the development of a new driveway, residence, and accessory structures at 5 Pine
•
•
Printed on Recycled Paper
MURPHY
r3 PINE TREE LANE
gproLLING H1LLS, CA 90274
..0 fLL = EL€S
2
FOREVER
!JO- 2 , Qo r-v&uPsE (205AtO
1"Z cl.-L 1 k 1--11 L1.6 , CA- O 2'h1
90: =r-- .:•i02 lilll;,111zh11„ l,J I. I1,ji1,ni h1ihh,ll,ilal1inhhIll„hi,lhl
• •
City oiling ✓�6LL4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
v
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
August 9, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: 5 Pine Tree Lane - New Driveway Apron
Dear Ms. Sharng:
At its meeting of July 28, 2016, the Traffic Commission supported your request for a
new driveway apron at 5 Pine Tree Lane subject to the following conditions:
1. Rolling Hills Community Association review and approval is required.
2. The new driveway apron shall be in compliance with the submitted plan.
3. The first 20 feet of the driveway apron shall have a maximum slope of 7%.
4. The driveway apron shall be roughened.
The City Council will consider the Traffic Commission's recommendation in
conjunction with appeal that was filed and at the same time it considers the Resolution
requested to uphold the Planning Commission's decision at its next meeting on
Monday, August 22, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. Please maintain the staking of the proposed
driveway apron until after the City Council considers the matter and takes final action.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call the City at 310-377-1521.
Sincerely,
(--7)
Raymond R. Cruz
City Manager
RC:h1
08-09-16 Driveway5PineTreeLane _TC.docx
c: Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
Printed on Recycled Paper
• ORECEll‘a)
City Council Members,
JUL 0 6 2016
My name is Lauren Sharng. My husband Chris and I purchased 5
Pine Tree in December 2015, with the intent of building a new home.
Currently, we are renting a house at 25 Caballeros Road with our 3
children and 2 horses. We recognize that the building process takes a
substantial amount of time and we retained an architect, an engineer
and a soil expert even before we closed escrow in order to efficiently
pursue the project, even if saving only a few weeks. Our horses are
living in very cramped conditions and we are anxious about moving
them and our family into our new home.
We submitted our preliminary plans to the Planning Director in
February of 2016 and were placed on the April Planning Commission
Agenda for our first hearing. At the April Planning Commission Public
Hearing we received immediate feedback from the Commission
relating to the size and scale of the development. The design team
then revised the plans and re -submitted to the City Planning Director
prior to the May 17th meeting. The site staking for the May 17th field
trip was based on the updated plans, which incorporated the Planning
Commission's input including substantially decreasing the size of the
house, the covered porches, and the swimming pool, along with
eliminating the tennis court.
At the May 17 meeting, Mr. Keith Murphy, a prospective buyer of 3
Pine Tree Lane, emailed the City seven hours before the scheduled
meeting. The email categorically objects to every aspect of our
proposed project and practically our right to build a residence on our
property. Mr. Murphy did not attend the meeting but Mr. Anthony
Podell, the legal owner of 3 Pine Tree, was in attendance and he
endorsed our project, at which time the Planning Commission
directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval by a 4-0 vote of the
Planning Commission.
On June 21 st, Mr Murphy, by now the owner of 3 Pine Tree, emailed
the city four hours before the scheduled Planning Commission
meeting. This time he asked that the Planning Commission delay
their vote so that he could "undertake further review of our plan(s)" for
5 Pine Tree. Again, Mr. Murphy was not in attendance for the
meeting. The Planning Commission voted to accept the Resolution of
Approval, as presented by City Staff, with a 4-0 vote.
•
Mr. Murphy's second email dated June 21 was especially
disappointing because I had just met the Murphys' in the RHCA's
offices the week before. We exchanged phone numbers and I offered
to go over the plans with them. In this neighborly exchange, I also
learned that Mr. Podell had taken the Murphy's over to our staked
property at 5 Pine Tree and showed them the scope and size of the
project.
I learned that an inquiry about the appeal process has been made by
Mr. Murphy. As of now, I do not know if he has or will file an
appeal. I have offered to meet with Mr. Murphy to explain our plans
that the Planning Commission already approved. As of the time of
this email, we have been in contact but unable to arrange a date.
Mr. Murphy's emails from May 17 shows that he was apparently
aware of our project at least as of that time and that he has already
had weeks if not months to "undertake further review of the plan." I
reckon that he must have closed the escrow on or about June 13. I
would like to think that his escrow allowed him plenty of time to
conduct his due diligence. Due diligence isn't something to be done
after the fact, nor at my expense. I have followed the rules. My plans
have been on file, in plain view, with the City for months. This is an
open and transparent process that has well -established integrity. I
believe in and invested in the process. Delaying our project will set us
back both time -wise and financially.
Furthermore, I don't believe the appeal process applies in this case.
Mr. Murphy has nothing to appeal because he never formally
submitted any specific objections to the project in accordance with
the City's rules and regulations and he was therefore never turned
down for anything.
I think the Planning Commission has done a professional and
thorough job on reviewing and approving my proposed plan. If Mr.
Murphy submits an appeal, I think it should be denied.
Thanks for your consideration,
My best,
Lauren Sharng
RECE 11V N
.,JUL 0 6 2016
City of Rolling
By
•
e aRo fL',.y.JJiPI
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
June 22, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 901 - Site Plan Review/ CUP/ VR
Dear Ms. Sharng:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution on June 21, 2016, granting a request in Zoning Case No. 901. That
action accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will
be reported to the City Council on Monday, July 11, 2016 beginning at 7:00 PM.
You or your representative must be present to answer any questions the Council
may have.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty
days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal
has been filed within that thirty (301 day appeal period or the City Council takes
the case under their jurisdiction within 45 days of adoption of the Resolution.
(Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an
appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its
proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Please submit 6 copies of the site and grading plans, including the landscaping
plans by June 30, 2016 for submission to the City Council. The Traffic
Commission will review your revised driveway on July 28, 2016.
A copy of the resolution was provided to you before. Please familiarize yourself
with the conditions of approval.
If no appeals are filed within the specified time frame, including City Council,
the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to
cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject
Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action
takes effect. Instructions for recordation will be forwarded to you after the
Council's proceedings.
Printed on Recycled Paper
• . •
Please note the attached Tips for New Homeowners in Rolling Hills information
sheet. We encourage you to review the information. Specifically, it is important
for you to take dated photographic evidence of views from your residence. See
the attached information sheet and contact the planning department if you have
further questions.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerel
Wy Stark�AICP
Associate Pl er
Enclosed: Tips for New Homeowners in Rolling Hills (information sheet)
cc: Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
• •
City of Rolling gaffs INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, (310) 377-1521, www.rolling-hills.org
Tips for New Homeowners in Rolling Hills
Are you considering purchasing a house or property in Rolling Hills, or have you recently done so? If so,
there are a few things you should keep in mind and some helpful tips to consider.
Construction/Remodel
No construction may commence, no matter how small, until you have approvals from 3 entities: City of
Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Community Association, and Building and Safety Department.
Septic Tanks
Renovation of an existing building that entails expansions beyond the current footprint of the permitted
structures, room, and/or plumbing fixture additions that will increase the design flow or demand a greater
capacity than the capacity indicated on the previous approval may require a new septic system. At a
minimum the Los Angeles County's Department of Public Health will require a Feasibility Study Report and
Plan Submittal with regards to existing septic tank capacity. It is important for residents to contact the LA
County's Department of Public Health at (310) 338-3226 to discuss prior to commencement of work.
Utility Lines
If you are planning to upgrade, relocate, or increase your electrical panel, construct a new house, addition,
or accessory structure, or lengthen or add electrical lines to your home or accessory structure, you are
required to underground all utility lines to that structure. It is important for residents to have their electrician
or general contractor contact City Hall at (310) 377-1521 to discuss City requirements prior to
commencement of work.
View Preservation Ordinance
The City of Rolling Hills recently amended its View Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 17.26). It is important
that you take dated photographic evidence of views from your residence and deck/patios in order to
document what views existed on the day you acquired your home.
"View" means a view from a principal residence, but not including from garages or closets, and any
immediately adjoining patio or deck area at the same elevation as the residence which consists of a visually
impressive scene or vista not located in the immediate vicinity of the residence, such as a scene of the
Pacific Ocean, off -shore islands, city lights of the Los Angeles basin, the Palos Verdes Hills or Los Angeles
Harbor.
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance
An important goal of the City of Rolling Hills is to maintain a rural character, which includes preserving
natural darkness. Please refer to Section 17.16.190E for specific requirements for light type and wattage
(e.g., pedestrian walkways, security lighting at entrances, address sign, pilaster or entry post, porches, and
exterior walls). In general, lights are to cast downwards and not spill onto the roadway or adjacent
properties.
•
Tuesday, J my 12, 20 3:05:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Subject: Re: In Re: Zoning Case No. 901
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 8:46:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Yolanta Schwartz <ys@cityofrh.net>
To: Keith Murphy <KMurphy@organovo.com>
Mr. Murphy;
Last night the Planning Commission considered your email but adopted a Resolution approving the project at 5
Pine Tree Lane. I'm attaching the resolution for your information. (Section 8 describes what the project entails and
the conditions of approval).
This application together with the Resolution is scheduled to be placed on the City Council's agenda at their July
11, 2016 meeting as an information item. It is not a public hearing. At that meeting the City Council may "receive
and file" the information or take the case under jurisdiction. If they take the case under jurisdiction a public
hearing will be scheduled and the review process would start anew before the City Council. Normally, when there
is an unanimous decision by the Planning Commission, the City Council respects their review, deliberation and
decision and does not take cases under jurisdiction. But one never knows for sure what the City Council will
decide. All the information provided to the Planning Commission during their deliberation period will be provided
to the City Council at their July 11 meeting, which means your emails will be included.
If after reviewing the plans on Friday, you feel you would like to challenge the Planning Commission's decision,
you could appeal it to the City Council. You have 30-days from today to submit a request to appeal. The fee for an
appeal is 2/3 of the original application fee that the applicant paid (in this case 2/3 would be $1,833). Your appeal
needs to be specific. The City Council would then schedule a public hearing and the review process would start
anew before the City Council.
I will not be in on Friday, but you're welcome to look at the plans and the entire file.
Yolanta
Yolanta Schwartz
Planning Director
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
310 377-1521 F: 310-377-7288
This is a transmission from the City of Rolling Hills. The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The CITY OF ROLLING HILLS accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-
mail.
From: Keith Murphy <KMurohvPoreanovo.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 5:37 PM
To: Yolanta Schwartz <vsPcitvofrh.net>
Subject: RE: In Re: Zoning Case No. 901
Thank you!
From: Yolanta Schwartz fmailto:vs(Wcitvofrh.netj
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Keith Murphy <KMurohv(Woreanovo.com>
Cc: cari corbalis (caricorbalisPamail.com) <caricorbalisPemail.com>
Subject: Re: In Re: Zoning Case No. 901
Mr. Murphy,
Thank you for your email. I will provide it to the Planning Commission at tonight's meeting.
Yolanta
Yolanta Schwartz
Page 1 of 3
Planning Director
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
310 377-1521 F: 310-377-7288
This is a transmission from the City of Rolling Hills. The information contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The CITY OF ROLLING HILLS accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-
mail.
From: Keith Murphy <KMurphvPorRanovo.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Yolanta Schwartz <vstZDcitvofrh.net>
Cc: "cari corbalis (caricorbalisPamail.com)" <caricorbalisP2mail.com>
Subject: RE: In Re: Zoning Case No. 901
To whom it may concern,
I understand that the project at 5 Pine Tree Lane, Zoning Case No. 901, is to be visited this evening. I
would like to request that a vote on approval of the project be deferred to the next meeting. Mr. Tony
Podell, the former owner, let me know that my objections were not considered at the previous meeting
due to my lack of standing as not yet being the owner of 3 Pine Tree. Now that I have taken possession
(only in the past few business days), I request that sufficient time be allowed for me to undertake further
review of the plan prior to any vote on approval.
Thanks and best regards,
Keith Murphy
3 Pine Tree Lane
From: Keith Murphy
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:53 AM
To: 'vsPcitvofrh.net' <vsPcitvofrh.net>
Cc: cari corbalis (caricorbalis( mail.com) <caricorbalisPemail.com>
Subject: In Re: Zoning Case No. 901
To whom it may concern,
Regarding Zoning Case No. 901, a proposal for construction at 5 Pine Tree Lane, I wish to state some
objections. First, I object to each detail in the current proposal as submitted. Secondly, I further explicitly
object to each detail in the current proposal that requires an easement, allowance, or variance. In
addition, I specifically object to the size of the residence, the size of the basement, the presence of and
size of detached garages, the retaining walls, the required excavation, the required grading, the required
re -compaction, the size of the stable and loft. I object to the issuance of a variance to exceed the
maximum permitted height of retaining walls, and to the issuance of a variance to exceed the maximum
permitted disturbed area. I object on the environmental impact, the impact on the stability of the hillside,
the impact on the watershed, and the impact on view rights.
Please acknowledge receipt of these objections. Thank you.
Keith Murphy
Page 2 of 3
./
•
•
Chief Executive Officer
Organovo, Inc.
6275 Nancy Ridge Dr.
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 550-9993
kmurohvOoraanovo. com
Page 3 of 3
•
City 0 / leollin9
May 27, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: 5 Pine Tree Lane - New Driveway Apron
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Dear Ms. Sharng:
At its meeting of May 26, 2016, the Traffic Commission supported your request for a
new driveway apron at 5 Pine Tree Lane subject to the following conditions:
1. Rolling Hills Community Association review and approval is required.
2. The new driveway apron shall be in compliance with the submitted plan.
3. The first 20 feet of the driveway apron shall have a maximum slope of 7%.
4. The driveway apron shall be roughened.
The City Council will consider the matter in conjunction with the Planning
Commission's action relative to the proposed development You will be informed of
that date after the Planning Commission takes action. Please maintain the staking of the
proposed driveway apron until after the City Council considers the matter and takes
final action.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call the City at 310-377-1521.
Sincerely,
q-01,44
Raymond R. Cruz
City Manager
RC:hl
05-27-16 Driveway5PineTreeLane _TC.docx
c: Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
Printed on Recycled Paper
•
£'ttCity O Rolling iclillo INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
May 18, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 901 - Site Plan Review/ CUP/ VR
Dear Ms. Sharng:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their
regular meeting on May 17, 2016 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve
your request in Zoning Case No. 901. The Planning Commission will review and
consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an
upcoming meeting on June 21, 2016 and make its final decision on your
application at that meeting. The draft resolution and conditions of approval will
be forwarded to you before the Planning Commission meeting.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed to City Council or the
City Council takes jurisdiction of the case, (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision
will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the
provisions of the Municipal Code.
As stated above, the Planning Commission's action taken by resolution is
scheduled for Tuesday, June 21, 2016. That action, accompanied by the record of
the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as
a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on
July 11, 2016. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions
regarding this matter.
Sincerly,
Wendy St#ks, Associate Planner
cc: Tavis a Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
AI
Printed on Recycled Paper
LLDAN
Engineering
emorand
TO: Raymond R. Cruz, City Manager
FROM: Vanessa Munoz, City Traffic Engineer
DATE: May 17, 2016
SUBJECT: 5 Pine Tree Lane Driveway
This memorandum is in response to the request by the City to review and provide input to
the proposed driveway on 5 Pine Tree Lane. The proposed driveway aisle width is 20-feet
and the approach width is 30-feet.
The required stopping sight distance for 25 mph is 155-feet. The proposed driveway
location provides at least 155-feet of stopping sight distance in the northbound and
southbound direction as you exit the driveway. Based on my field visit on May 15, 2016,
the layout and location of the proposed driveway is acceptable and it meets the minimum
sight visibility requirements. Therefore, the driveway is recommended as proposed.
•
y
City !r% oiling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
May 6, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: 5 Pine Tree Lane - New Driveway Apron
Dear Ms. Sharng:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
At it's meeting on May 26, 2016, the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission is
scheduled to consider your application for a new driveway apron at 5 Pine Tree
Lane.
It is requested that by May 11, 2016, the proposed driveway apron be staked to
adequately illustrate its location and size. Please maintain the stakes through the
Traffic Commission's meeting in case a field trip is desired and thereafter until
the City Council hears the application.
If you have any questions in regard to the review process, please do not hesitate
to call Ray Cruz, City Manager, or myself at 310-37'7-1521.
Sincerely
endy Star AICP
Associate / er
cc: Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
Printed on Recycled Paper
C1t 0/ lefL',.y 44/i
April 20, 2016
Ms. Lauren Sharng
25 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 901 - Site Plan Review/CUP/VR
Dear Mrs. Sharng:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310)377.1521
FAX: (310)377.7288
This letter shall serve to memorialize the Planning Commission's discussion
about your proposed project. They have several concerns including, but not
limited to:
- The Tennis Court in the front yard;
- The long driveway;
- The appearance of crowding on the lot;
- The amount of walls proposed;
- The amount of grading on the lot; and
The disturbance on the lot.
All four Planning Commissioners present at their meeting on April 19, 2016
expressed concerns with your proposal and have requested that you restudy and
resubmit the project, and provide information on your planned action by April
27, 2016 to be placed on the next Planning Commission meeting on May 17, 2016.
You will then be required to submit revised plans showing the revised scope of
the project.
Just as a placeholder, the Planning Commission tentatively scheduled a field trip
to view the proposed project on Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at approximately 9:45
AM. Should you decide to proceed with this field trip, we will provide you with
information and details about how to silhouette and stake the proposed project.
Feel free to call us at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
Sincer
/
W-ndy Start , Associate Planner
cc: Tavi ' a Nicholson, Bolton Engineering
Printed on Recycled Paper