Loading...
731, An addition of 265 sq, ft, & a, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRELLIS ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW, DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION APPROVED PREVIOUSLY AND WHERE A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 731 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section'1. ` An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Donald Martin with respect to real property located at 22 Crest Road East, Lot 194-MS, Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit construction of a 265 square foot attached trellis. Section 2. In 2004 the Planning Commission approved an application for a new single family residence and a condition was included in the approval that the Planning Commission review any further development or grading on the property. Due to this condition the Site Plan Review is required. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on September 19, 2006. Due to the minor nature of the proposal and familiarity with the site the Planning Commission did not conduct a field trip to the site. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearing. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.040 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the Planning Commission act to approve, conditionally approve or deny any application. The Commission may impose such conditions on an approval, as it deems necessary to assure compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the Commission may condition approval to require Site Plan Review for any future construction on the lot, regardless of whether Site Plan 'Review would ordinarily be applicable to such construction. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the trellis, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: 07 0557138 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the. foregoing Resolution No. 2006-14 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TRELLIS ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW, DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION APPROVED PREVIOUSLY AND WHERE A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 731 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 17, 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Henke, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 onr_F DEPUTY CITY CLERK 07 055'7138 • • A. A condition was imposed by the Planning Commission on a previous approval for the development of the single family residence that any future construction requires a Site Plan Review. Therefore, the proposed 265 square foot trellis requires Planning Commission review and approval of a Site Plan review. Without this condition, the trellis would be allowed with an administrative approval. B. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. C. The development substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property and will utilize the existing building pad. D. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. E. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 731 for an attached trellis as shown on the Development Plan dated August 16, 2006, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 PA(,P 7 07 0557138 • • D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated August 16, 2006, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. No grading is required for this project. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 12,437 square feet or 6.9%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 26,937 square feet or 14.7% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 64,909 square feet or 35.4% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. The proposed trellis shall be located on an already disturbed area. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 57,088 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 11,762 square feet or 20.6%, as previously approved in Zoning Case No. 674. The proposed trellis is not counted against the building pad coverage. K. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. L. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water pollution prevention. M. Any proposed pilasters, gates, landscaping and water features shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. N. All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 2004-08 shall remain in full force and effect. O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would .constitute additional structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. P. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, the approval shall not be effective. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 Pal,P 07 0557138 • Q. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF OCTOBER 2006. ARVEi:WITT , CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYNKE DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2006-14 PA(_F d 07 0557138 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 1I/I'I/II/IIII!i/iiiii T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 731 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT XX I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 22 CREST ROAD EAST, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 194-MS) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 731 I (We) certify (o,, clare) unde SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE LOT LINE ADJUSTME N nalty of perjury that the foregoin.ri Signature 1,.Mar ►� Nay�igd or,prin,d d E5-h City/State J Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. A Ksa ,t2$A cj94A State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On II1/1 /O(P before me, personally appeared n a.Qd I (cl?_,vt.QL- tA XX .eneQ \'\aarite#N Name typed or printed (� d gIC.r«t AS1- Add 10 II 1 n e4 I4.1 k, C- A_ City/State t21/ (s.,,,a 4ti-2 liG1 1m 0.,r-h h ii personally known to me cy :.le:, ) to be the person(s) whose name(s)-iaYare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ho/ohe/they executed the same in I4e41er/their authorized capacitgies) and that by I is4kier/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary / SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of L'"' On t /1',000( v , before t ( Date personally appeared me, i lejaRsUA ei1/1 c 4 Nail* Pac , Name and Title of fficer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary ubl d') Dwuka Ou►Q,e_ tars !'.7r :3 Cc :Cy t t"7Camm.C.,�..72. f 1Z 1 , Comma :an 0 1644144 Notary Public - CWfomlO t los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Feb 12, 2010 Place Notary Seal Above Name(s) of Signer(s) L�personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public---' OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of AttachedDgclinda't , /� AcC�Ce FQrm Title or Type of Document: aVr pal" Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here Number of Pages: Signer's Name: O Individual 0 Corporate Officer — Title(s): O Partner — 0 Limited 0 General O Attorney in Fact O Trustee O Guardian or Conservator O Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here © 2004 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6827 07 0557138 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING CASE NO. 674 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Donald Martin with respect to real property located at 22 Crest Road East, Lot 194-MS, Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading and construction of a new 10,367 square foot single family residence with 1,234 square foot garage and a 65 square foot spa. A 1,600 square foot basement is also proposed. A 675 square foot stable exists on the property and will remain. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on November 18, 2003, December 16, 2003, January 20, 2004 and February 17, 2004, and at a field trip visit on December 13, 2003. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. During the proceedings the Planning Commission expressed concerns over the size of the originally proposed development, and as a result, the applicants revised and scaled down their plans. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the new house, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with • sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 183,360 square feet. The proposed residence (10,367 sq.ft.), garage (1,234 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.), spa (65 sq.ft.) and the existing 675 square foot stable will have 12,437 square feet of structures, which constitutes 6.8% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. A 1,600 square foot basement is proposed for this development The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 26,277 square feet, which constitutes 14.4% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is located more than 100 from the roadway easement so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot will be 35.4%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the stable pad. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The existing native vegetation and trees in the rear of the property will remain and will screen the residence from the neighbors. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the new house will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs which at maturity will not exceed the ridge height of the structure, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves dense brush and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 1,858 cubic yards of cut and 1,858 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the existing driveway approach at Crest Road. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 2 • • Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 674 for grading and for construction of a new residence as shown on the Development Plan dated February 10, 2004, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated February 10, 2004, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed 1,858 cubic yards of cut and 1,858 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 12,437 square feet or 6.8%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 26,277 square feet or 14.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 64,909 square feet or 35.4% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 57,088 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 11,762 square feet or 20.6%; coverage on the existing 3,040 square foot stable pad shall not exceed 675 square feet or 22.2 %. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 3 • • K. The proposed basement shall not exceed 1,600 square feet and shall meet all requirements of the Los Angeles County Building Code and City Zoning Ordinance for basements. L. Ridge heights of the dwelling unit shall vary between 12 feet and 23 feet above finished grade, with only 4.11% of the structure at 23 feet in height, to be located at the middle and front of the development. The average ridge height from finished grade shall not exceed 18'2". M. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. N. A landscaping plan for the graded and disturbed areas must be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to issuing grading or building permits. To the maximum extend practicable, native trees and other native plants shall be utilized. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed the ridge height of the residence, and shrubs shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties, but to obscure the residential structure on site. A security deposit in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a drainage, grading and building permits and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained security will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. O. The existing driveway apron shall serve the new residence. P. Any proposed pilasters and gates shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. Q. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. R. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. S. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 4 • • T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. X. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. Y. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, roofing material requirements, basement construction requirements and all other applicable provisions of the City and County codes. Z. A drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and County District Engineer, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and shall ensure that all drainage from the site is conveyed in an approved manner. AA. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails. All drainage systems shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drain system. AB. All utility lines shall be placed underground. AC. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. AD. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 5 • • AE. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review .ommittee prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including, but not be limited to school fees and Parks and Recreation Fees for new a residence. AG. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, the approval shall not be effective. AH. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPP y THIS 16th DAY OF MARCH 2004. ARVEL V'V-T CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KEIN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-08 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING CASE NO. 674 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 16, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. )( -Vu,---J DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08 PAGE 7