396, Construct a new SFR, Application• •
REQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The
undersigned MAP /O /v PO
Name
T/4-
Name
Street Address
3 -14 8 9�
Telephone No.
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at RO
Lot Tract
5" Da efleed
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review.
eons >rvC//Or7 1-714.1 . / /7 3 /� 7 / /C.}
reS iWe.-7 Gl e.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
yl= 5 , A 5/Al / -) /--/6
4,00014) -7 /J,4/lC-41 5 - /
zoning
sizes,
/ TS
7a. /A/ , 056-75
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
5 - /S Td 73 �72C/7
AJ 6 S v d3 5 7/ 7 ) 7 0 /A/ T 74 c--
5
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
Ye-5
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with
the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
A/C (%L �l /V Al D V tL C P /t % L �cl r
// t) /0 Q _
6
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
P 2 o u cep c)kA) A I t o c- i O oT2 L o e4J
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATE: �`l 629
4/ .
a SIGffATUR
FOR /,� ,nif�•rs—, LJ %l
APPLICANT
7
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
Executed at
, California,
this day of ��.. 19 zP9
9%14_.__ ,&
4-O 4-5- // f2 A /7,(,
Address)
A/c/f / D S ///�ck2/9
9DZ7g
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME FILED
ORGANIZATION FEE
JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO.
H.N.M. BY:
19
8
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
z
C r e Ck-15-7 7 ZP75eI') , declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names
and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within
the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,,000) feet.
from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Co?- ‘--/O
Executed at Pdlo5 i/e.r-e's Si`cc'c 5- ,California, this
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
day of /‘'72 cv,
1909.
--e rL
Signature
9
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
I,
,l
6-ret y, C / i-i5 �'f Q115�' /) declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names
and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within
the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet
from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Executed at /2ct/t's tcz-71c's- ,California, this
-
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
‹:-.__Site Plan Review
Zone Change
day of /�Q cam, , 19 g9.
Signature
9
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the
and correct.
Executed at f .r (A,P4.0
•^d
this 73 day of wJ�
4 0 4- A L
Address)
9oz74
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
foregoing is true
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME
ORGANIZATION
JOB ADDRESS
H.N.M.
FILED
FEE
RECEIPT NO.
BY:
, California,
19P9
19
8
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
m (' c C ( U Cc �, �` P 0 C-1
f2 F ov intA)A(7) r oc i TRIO
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
A
% ` r
DATE: e �/� 3 9/L 4:7 t
s i G ATU
FOR !! 1 Tl
APPLICANT
7
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
A/C t c> L ,Q . (/.) J (:2 P AJ ( / S G'L JV ".)
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with
:he site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
;hall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
Lmposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
;xplain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
:etbacks of neighboring properties.
/ Q AJ AI cr') 7 C v tL Q P AiL=A) T 7E5
ep j4.,7 tiCL0 ,2-C A -f /"( l C) fr/ e)hC_.
6
•
REOU$ST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The
undersigned M A P i r <() T
Name
4-6
Street Address
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at fn'O R 5. S8/6-/O
Lot Tract
#5" Oo�ri<%r /t nrrd
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Telephone No.
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review.
o741-7,/C7‘-i0r? o-{ rrr7cw s/ i /c
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes,
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
, ,A 5//i/67 r= `./ 4) %/en 4_.'54--: /TS
/4/J%'U)A? Tr AJ is/r�= -� /A x4/C/ ,4 5 - /
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
7 L/ 2 /-'5 / i S 7?' /. 3 v67.0
/ 5 L' f > T / -7-() T C 0 /A/ /4 &-"
21 /4-7 X--)A 1 c
5
L