Loading...
459, Addition to existing SFR of mo, ApplicationREQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROPERTY OWNER: KA .AM? 1 DO R-1-111 OWNERS ADDRESS: 4 6 '{- 'Lk (- STL Di , ' R. T ? V• TELEPHONE NO: (Z (3) -- PROPERTY ADDRESS: S • C 17a:' ,At) . 1. 64- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO ;() ASSESSORS BOOK NO PAGE PARCEL c I ti� e 1--4-k AGENT'S ADDRESS: _30 4- 1 ..,j c NJ -t `� tC'-� J V TELEPHONE NO: rZ (3 3 7 S - Z S� ********** **************#***********,tit**** ************************** NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT AGENT'S NAME: Describe in detail the nature of -the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: A ADDC1 IDS ANS I Gm t\ q- ►� L� 1✓ tL� TZE (DEKf F WH t GH I KLVat_tl S ,fit f I N, CT AS E 6i (v t) a_c T"14,4 h/ o b 1= T{ (C`r 13 L 1 C _ D (KI Or. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA, Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's `conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares -to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. t(� ADD I TID L(s A KID ) (.S A IQ --A S -- / •zb A-c Cnt,-t rP- 4T1 f3c.- zE__ S AGAS Tb KI I6,-H Bh1 J (JE-1 Site Plan Review Application -9- B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) ? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. X i ST/ ►`1 C� COkrro c_(Z, S U N !h += FE_.C:T� �-� PTZ b 7->b S 7 C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. Ki arD► tit , s � � t� I D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, -integrates landscaping and creates buffers. LAKID SpalPf► iC- IS IPANJr`l�7, Site Plan Review. Application -10- E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the•:1ot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. Z_ 4 zY0o — c u (L_DA3tE -PAD A. ,4 15 Peo-Pa. f U D`r?-f-.S ( f! .4 . F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. Tu-5 i`�R�p T ADDi m tytiS -DO til OT C2 oA C{-I lr.(� Si r.-(. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimentalto convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. "P-2.6Vi F-.oM. Site Plan Review Application '-11- H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. VE-6 I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. J L-r k 36. I! ' Date: Site Plan Review Application -12- Signature For: KAAC ( 1C-L(714 Applicant OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 ` Executed at t_D S VG_2��ES r A (E= S , California, this F12S t day of r_Y_, , 1991 404 -47 M IRA ter: L >2 2,P,\f Ca 9O274 (address) NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to thebest of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriateacknowledgment here. APPLICANT: MARdoc..( IZL4114. DATE FILED Tf Z/G%/ REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: i � (rot') r COMPANY NAME: So, SAY 4- RECEIPT N0° 4g76 COMPANY ADDRESS: 3 C> 4 1 J 6 NJ BY: A c S C.A. ZONING CASE NO 6� 4P7 1 COMPANY, PHONE NO. (Z (31 37,s--Z55 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: % 6 /91 PROJECT ADDRESS: `#S D,Xfl J >EQ s-- j- V c_L i -ICE- 4-4 1 L-1____S , CA Site Plan Review Application -13- OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City")' and by private deed restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at -VA this 'i— day of.-- ( LE t-Y By: A 7/ a --sr: Fie /'/,4--o/D A) AU l / Address 0,R,/ r�, 9az7q- City , California , 19_ Site Plan Review Application -14- CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, ss s G c j T-- Lc vl nl �`t ��� , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of propertylegally described as: this Executed at f��4t�b� �,GD���S`7r�S ,California, ,-19-q/• day of cj U L.`' Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change Site Plan Review Application -15- i COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17y, Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis court swimming pools, service yards (enclose.d or unenclosed) , stables, an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cove; more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further tl! in addition to the above described improvements, the areas includ within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asph- or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by t: Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 45J R el b sq. ft. 48, A 1 b sq.ft. 48, f5 c lasq. ft. RESIDENCE 7._,3 S7 sq. ft. Z,o2 5rsq. ft. 4, 4-I ZZ sq. ft. GARAGE 5 5 C' sq. ft. $ f; sq. ft. !v bg sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL 5-'75- sq.ft. — sq.ft. - U sq.ft. STABLE 4-S7) sq.ft. 4- Sb sq. ft. 4-5 ? sq.ft. TENNIS COURT —C2- sq.ft. —C-) - sq.ft. — 0 - sq.ft. SERVICE YARD — 7 sq.ft. 1 4 sq.ft. 1 k sq.ft. OTHER (Sz -ZEwhi) 5--7 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. = b - sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4/f” sq.ft. 7Z-7 sq.ft. S 4,L sq.ft. % STRUCTURE COVERAGE % Site Plan Review Application -6- DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE 3, 7 45 sq. ft. 987 sq. ft. lc, 980 sq. ft. Z-70 sq.ft. C - sq.ft. — J sq.ft. S 5- 7 sq. ft. -=-- 0 ~ sq. ft. — 0 sq. ft. ¢, 72 sq.ft. p(/ 12367 sq. ft. , yge) sq.ft. Site Plan Review Application -7- /4:z COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF, A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed *and/or developed on said "buildable area". For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS, TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA ql%13. G sq.ft. RESIDENCE 44Z sq.ft. GARAGE ('8 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 4-50 sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. OTHER (1;4z.viGC- VAST) 9 6 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD 54-70 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE Z-4- % Site Plan Review Application -8- � i. !% 4 f &'`9'" 4 / COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 171 Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis court swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not coy;; more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further tli in addition to the above described improvements, the areas incluc) within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asph or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by t: Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 4-8JFT 1 sq.ft. 48;, t 6 sq.ft. 48)h I & sq.ft. RESIDENCE Z, 3 07 sq. ft. Z, o L 5-sq. ft. 4, ¢ I Z_ sq. ft. GARAGE SSC sq. ft. S�f` sq. ft. G sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL 5'7 sq.ft. — sq.ft. O sq.ft. STABLE . 45.7) sq. ft. • 4 SL' sq. ft. 4-5t) sq. ft. TENNIS COURT —C%- sq.ft. —C - sq.ft. — C - sq.ft. SERVICE YARD — G'- , sq. ft. 1 sq.ft. '"7 sq. ft. OTHER (e+ Y ) 857 sq. ft. C= - sq. ft. -- sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4-ir 1 sq.ft. 72_7 sq.ft. S.S °( sq.ft. % STRUCTURE COVERAGE Site Plan Review Application -6- 1• % 11. • DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA POOL DECKING 4-5—sq. ft. 1: 7) sq.ft. 7 sq.ft. G, 9 •c7 sq. ft. lc, 9,5C sq. ft. sq. ft. — Lam' sq. ft. C' ` sq. ft. — sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 4, S72 sq. ft. ', gc 2sq. ft. 6j /Re) sq. ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE % : 1 ¢. Z5 % 14, Z & % TOTAL COVERAGE Site Plan Review Application -7- Is.7 COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA 2— ' `% D'. sq. ft . RESIDENCE 4-, 41Z sq.ft. GARAGE 4,t45 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 450 sq.ft. POOL O ' sq.ft. OTHER Cs5zvi GE YA D 9 6 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD 54-70 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE Z-4- % Site Plan Review Application -8-