82, Construct SFR with garage, ani, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
of ZONING CASE NO. 82
Judge George R. Perkovich )
Lot 116-B Eastfield Tract )
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Judge George R. Perkovich, Lot 116-B, Eastfield
Tract, for a variance of Uses Permitted under Section 3.01C, Front Yard
Requirements under Section 3.06 and Rear Yard Requirements under Section
3.08, Article III of Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 15th of
October, 1968 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building of
the City of Rolling Hills, California 4nd the applicant, having submit-
ted evidence in support of his application, the Planning Commission,
being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by
the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
L
The Commission finds that the applicant, Judge George R. Perkovich,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 116-B, East -
field Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the
City of Rolling Hills, California.
11.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said public
hearing in opposition to the application for variances, and that no
evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
1110
The Commission further finds that the original plans submitted con-
formed to Ordinance No. 33 of the City in all respects except for rear
yard requirement of not less than 50 feet; plans submitted showed an
average 30 foot rear yard with the garage located only 16 feet from the
rear property line; however, the requirement for a 30 foot front yard was
met. Because of the unusual shape of the lot, bordered almost equally by
both Open Brand Road and Eastfield Drive, the Board of Directors of the
•
Rolling Hills Community Association. recommended that the garage be moved
seven. feet closer to the front property line, so that in the garage area
only there would be a 23 foot setback from both front and rear property
lines. The rear yard would have a minimum depth of 23 feet, a maximum
depth of 69 feet and an average depth of 30 feet; this, in addition to
the 30 foot road easement would be acceptable.
The Commission finds that an animal shelter is shown adjacent to the
garage on, the plans approximately five feet from, the garage which is 35
feet wide, and the shelter would actually be 40 feet from the living area
of the house; that said variance is granted subject to the express con-
ditions that no additional living areas shall be constructed. upon the
property nor be established. by converting the proposed. attached garage
into any type of area for habitation; and upon the further condition that
.no openable windows or doors shall be constructed or installed on the side
of the garage immediately adjacent to the proposed animal shelter..
The Commission finds that granting of variances of rear yard require-
ments under, Section 3.08, front yard. requirements under Section. 3.06 and
uses permitted under Section 3.01C of Article III, Ordinance No, 33
will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious
to property in, the same vicinity and zone and. the variance should be
granted to applicant in order to preserve substantial property rights
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that the variances should be
granted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills to Judge
George R. Perkovich, Lot 116-B, Eastfield Tract, in. accordance with the
plot plan marked Exhibit I on file in these proceedings, and it is,
therefore, so ordered.
Dated November 7, 1968
ate. a - "ecretary, Planning C mission
-2-
Chairman, Planning Commission