Loading...
510A, Construct an 800 sq ft guest h, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• • RESOLUTION NO. 94-17 A RESQLUTION LUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO REPLACE A STABLE STRUCTURE WITH A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A GUEST HOUSE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 510A. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. David T. Christensen with respect to real property located at 9 Open Brand Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 114-EF) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to replace a stable structure with a guest house. During the hearing process, an application was also submitted requesting Site Plan Review for a guest house. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on April 18, 1994, May 17, 1994, and June 21, 1994, and at a field trip visit on May 7, 1994. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.16.210(A)(5) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a Guest House under certain conditions. The applicant is requesting to construct a 720 square foot guest house to replace a 400 square foot stable structure. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of a stable structure with a guest house would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed for the guest house would be located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of a guest house to replace a stable will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the existing structure used as a stable is at a lower level than the residential building pad and is a sufficient distance from nearby RESOLUTION NO. 94-17 PAGE 3 • • is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 7,470 square feet which equals 6.3% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with the proposed guest house located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development and is similar and compatible with several neighboring developments. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) and grading will be minimal to minimize building coverage on the building pad itself. C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the eastern canyon at the rear of the lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to minimize the impact of development. F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences because as indicated in Paragraph A, lot coverage maximums will not be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with the neighborhood, thereby grading will be required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the existing vehicular access, thereby having no further impact on the roadway. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review for a guest house as indicated on the RESOLUTION NO. 94-17 PAGE 2 . • residences so that the guest house will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the guest house will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 2.75 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district because the 720 square foot size of the guest house is less than the 800 square foot maximum permitted and the guest house does not encroach into any setback areas. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because the guest house will be replacing an existing stable structure and there is sufficient space on the lot for future development of a stable. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of a stable structure with a guest house in accordance with the Development Plan attached hereto in Zoning Case No. 510A subject to the conditions contained in Section 9. Section 6. Section 17.46.010 Or the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. Section 7. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 117,600 square feet. The residence (2,600 sq. ft.), garage (450 sq. ft.), swimming pool (400 sq. ft.), proposed guest house (720 sq. ft.), and future stable (450 sq. ft.) will have 4,620 square feet which constitutes 3.9% of the lot which RESOLUTION NO. 94-17 • PAGE 4 Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section 9. Section 9. The Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of an existing stable with a guest house approved in Section 5 and the Site Plan Review for a guest house approved in Section 8 as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, are subject to the following conditions: A. The Conditional Use Permit and the Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.42.070(A) and 17.46.080(A). B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise approved by Variance. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. No kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided within the guest house. F. No vehicular access or paved parking area shall be developed within 50 feet of the guest house. G. Occupancy of the guest house shall be limited to persons employed on the premises and their immediate family or by the temporary guest of the occupants of the main residence. No guest may remain in occupancy for more than 30 days in any six month period. H. Renting of the guest house is prohibited. I. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. RESOLUTION NO. 94-17 • PAGE 5 J. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. K. The guest house shall not exceed 720 square feet. The guest house building pad coverage shall not exceed 30%. L. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective. M. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON T 7Tf DAY OF JULY, 1994. / ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: __C/Za_sf • MARILYN KE N, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No.94-17 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO REPLACE A STABLE STRUCTURE WITH A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A GUEST HOUSE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 510A. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 7, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: Commissioner Frost ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices MARILYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK • N:,ME MAILING ADDRESS CITY, SATE ZIP CODE RECORDING REQUEST BY QC WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Ctry DF / O Li. /RJG 1-t r LCS CITY OF ROLL;;::3 HILLS 2- /0DiZ i (iG ()Esc l3gi%� BOLL006 gf6LSI C .. 95 1:333154 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 4:01 PM AUG 15 1995 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE TITLE(S) NCPF Code 19 R428 6/94 CORDING1QUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Recorder's Use _r Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS ZONING CASE NO. 510A SITE PLAN REVIEW X VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT X I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 9 OPEN BRAND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 114-EF) This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 510A SITE PLAN REVIEW X VARIANCE _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ' X I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Print Owner 0 010 s %LUS c-'1/0 Owner Name Name SignatureSignature Address 9 CAJU 3c2 J tZ!J Address City/State 2nc_...iwc, kf ULLS 04- 4507-7 (/ City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of County of )SS 95 1333154, On this the _day of , 19_,before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ❑ personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary's Signature See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and nude a part hereof CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT • 3 personally appeared 1 1, 01 State of CAL- I - O P AJ (/fir County of LA 5 A(\ / rS On i -P R_t before me, E_-`/ M . S r f2e9/VO, itidTY)2Y fcee3U c; Date ' /1 Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public") C l ja_( / I. 5 J A)SEA/ Name(s) of Signer(s) personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name() 'are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that tshe/they executed the same inJi /her/their authorized capacity(jes), and that by 'I Cher/their signature(sron the instrument the person(61, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(A acted, executed the instrument. Mary M. Serra U y Comm.1r987374 � , NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA� LOS ANGELES COUNTY () Fov Comm.. Expires March it t99 v) WITNESS my hand and official seal. ilfvuu, , Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: / PFI0 Prt !T O i~ Document Date: 7 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Cndividual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: ete SIGNER Top of thumb here Signer's Name: Number of Pages: c- ('rtJ.es cEC/ow ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: OF SIGNER•..'G Top of thumb here 333154 ©1994 National Notary Association • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6827 • RESOLUTION NO. 749 6.(h / 6/74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COIL OF THE CITY OF /� C ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO REPLACE A STABLE STRUCTURE WITH A GUEST HOUSE AND .GRANTING SITE. PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A GUEST HOUSE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 510A. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. David T. Christensen with respect to real property located at 9 Open Brand Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 114-EF) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to replace a stable structure with a guest house. During the hearing process, an application was also submitted requesting Site Plan Review for a guest house. Section 2. On July 7, 1994, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 94-17 granting a Conditional Use Permit to replace a stable structure with a guest house and granting Site Plan Review for a guest house. Section 3. On July 11, 1994, the City Council took the applications under jurisdiction with regard to stable access. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on July 25, 1994, August 8, 1994, August 22,1994, September 12, 1994, September 26, 1994, October 24, 1994, and November 14, 1994, November 28, 1994, January 9, 1995, January 23, 1995, February 14, 1995, and March 13, 1995, and at a field trip visit on July 29, 1994. At the hearings, the City Council considered the slope available for vehicle access to a stable. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, from all persons protesting the same, and from members of the City staff and the City Council having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 4 The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.16.210(A)(5) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a Guest House under certain conditions. The applicant is requesting to construct a 720 square foot guest house to replace a 400 square foot. stable structure. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of a stable structure with a guest house would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed for the guest house would be located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered,.and the construction of a guest house to replace a stable will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the existing structure used as a stable is at a lower level than the residential building pad and is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the guest house will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the gucst house will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 2.75 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district because the 720 square foot size of the guest house is less than the 800 square foot maximum permitted and the guest house does not encroach into any setback areas. Resolution No. 749 -1- 95 1333154 E. The proposed conditionalik is consistent with the portions of the Lo ngeles County Hazardous Waste Manage1111Pht Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because the guest house will be replacing an existing stable structure and there is sufficient space on the lot for development of a stable. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of a stable structure with a guest house in accordance with the Development Plan attached hereto in Zoning Case No. 510A subject to the conditions contained in Section 10. Section 7. Section 17.46.010 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. Section 8. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 117,600 square feet. The residence (2,600 sq. ft.), garage (450 sq. ft.), swimming pool (400 sq. ft.), proposed guest house (720 sq. ft.), and stable (450 sq. ft.) will have 4,620 square feet which constitutes 3.9% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 7,470 square feet which equals 6.3% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with the proposed guest house located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development and is similar and compatible with several neighboring developments. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) and grading will be minimal to minimize building coverage on the building pad itself. C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the eastern canyon at the rear of the lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to minimize the impact of development. F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences because as indicated in Paragraph A, lot coverage maximums will not be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with the neighborhood, thereby grading will be required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. Resolution No. 749 -2- 95 1333154 G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to convergre and safety of circulation for pedestri and vehicles because the proposed project 1 utilize the existing vehicular access, th y having no further impact on the roadway. 4 H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby approves the Site Plan Review for a guest house as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section 10. Section 10. The Conditional Use Permit for the replacement of an existing stable with a guest house approved in Section 6 and the Site Plan Review for a guest house approved in Section 9 as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, are subject to the following conditions: A. The Conditional Use Permit and the Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year. from the effective 'date of approval as defined in Sections 17.42.070(A) and 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise approved by Variance. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these conditions. the guest house. E. No kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided within F. No vehicular access or paved parking area shall be developed within 50 feet of the guest house. G. Occupancy of the guest house shall be limited to persons employed on the premises and their immediate family or by the temporary guest of the occupants of the main residence. No guest may remain in occupancy for more than 30 days in any six month period. H. Renting of the guest house is prohibited. I. The applicant shall construct a stable and a four (4) foot wide path leading from the main building pad to the pad for the stable as shown on the site plan marked Exhibit A. The path shall not exceed a slope of 25% at any one point and shall be constructed with materials to assure its stability and permanency to the satisfaction of City staff. Construction of walls or other structures in any required setback will require a Variance application by the applicant. J. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the City Council must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. K The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. Resolution No. 749 -3- 95 1333154 L. The guest house shall nakxceed 720 square feet. The guest house ..ding pad coverage shall not exceed 30%. M. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective. N. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. 1995. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE FH DAY OF MARC-, ATTEST: MALYN KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS,ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SS THOM/6►5 F. HEINSHEIMER MAYOR I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 749 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO REPLACE A STABLE STRUCTURE WITH A GUEST HOUSE AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A GUEST HOUSE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 510A. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 27, 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hill, Lay, Murdock, Mayor Pro Tem Pernell and Mayor Heinsheiiner. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative. Offices MARILYN KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK 95 1333154 Resolution No. 749 -4-