18, Construct a cabana in side yar, Resolutions & Approval Conditions1
2
3
4
5.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
ROBERT P. McCORMICK, M.D.
Lot 71, Eastfield(R.& S. 58-9)
ZONING CASE NO. 18
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Robert P. MCCormick, Lot 71,
Eastfield, for a side yard variance, came on for hearing on the
10th day of May, 1962, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., at the City
Hall of the City of Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant
having submitted evidence in support of his application, and the
Planning Conuiiission being advised, now makes its Findings and
Formal Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling
Hills, California.
.I.
The Connnission finds that the applicant, Robert P.
McCormick, is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lot 71 of Eastfield, located in the City of Rolling Hills,
California, and that notice of the public hearing in connection
with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and
8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
That no person appeared at said public hearing in
opposition to the application for a variance and that no evidence
was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
• •
1
The Commission further finds that the proposed cabana
2
of applicant is to be located within a foot of the easement line,
3
4 instead of the twenty foot side yard setback as required by said
5 Zoning Ordinance, and further finds that by reason of the twenty-
6 five (25) foot width of said easement and by reason of the terrain
7 of said Lot 20, the variance should be granted to the applicant
8 in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by
9
other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the
10
granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to
11
12 the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in
13 such vicinity and zone in which applicant's property is located,
14 and that there are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
15 and conditions by reason of physical location and terrain of said
16 Lot 71, which do not apply generally to other property in the same
17
vicinity and zone.
18
IV.
19
20 From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance
21 should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of
22 Rolling Hills to Robert P. MCCormick on Lot 71 of Eastfield in
23 accordance with the Plot Plan marked Exhibit I on file in these
24
proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
25
Dated: May 18, 1962
26
27
28
29 Wte.1c-cl cz-,c-444_c
Secretary, Planning Commission
30
31
32
Fiairman, Plann g'Commission