613, Modification to previously app, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14,
APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT
YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION
TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 613.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. John Resich with
respect to real property located at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF), Rolling Hills,
requesting a one year time extension for a previously approved Variance to
encroach into the front yard setback to permit the construction of additions at a
single family residence that was approved by the Planning Commission by
Resolution No. 2000-14 on May 16, 2000. .
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on May
15, 2001, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension
of time is necessary because due to family matters and illnesses, the applicant
was unable to devote adequate time to the project.
Section 3. Based on information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 5 of Resolution No. 2000-
14, dated May 15, 2000, to read as follows:
"The Variance approval shall expire within two years from the effective
date of approval, as defined in Sections 17.38.070 (A), unless construction on the
applicable portions of the structure have commenced within that time period."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No.
2000-14 shall continue to be in full force and effect
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2001.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
Jx-1 CT' -
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-10 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14, APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO
A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL
ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 613.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
May 15, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: N6ne .
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
ti'Y.et \`�
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
OR181NA6)
NAME
I.u;uua
ADDnESS
CtTT, STATE
ZIP CODE .
ftEconDIUC t1EOUEST nY
�Yf�EN Iltb0F1DED MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 Portuguese;Bend Road,
Rolling Hills, CA .90274
OO-ii5i 81
�o on - f�f
SPACE ABOVE T1IIS LINE T1ESEf1VED FOfl flECOFlDET1'S USE
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
.CI (310) 377-7288 FAX
00 1151081
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.613
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(We) the undersigned state:
am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
8 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 72-B-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 613 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
ertif . o fare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
_� Signature
re
JO�.l l Jr ie.fic ( rr,/
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of Califomia
County of Los Angeles) /
On Jt�6dD before me, _1j�lfl ��. /t Fief /(4<144(3-g- /
per o
p Y
appeared
je-/t., _res✓c -✓t �.
T Recorder's Use Only
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person 'whose
name( is/ a subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sue/tl)fy executed the same
in his/ /thir authorized capacity( and that by his/r/tfir signature() on the instrument the person or
t • ,�d• ,� ..� aaawe � w wok ^-f son(y) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
ignature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•zfX6",SIT ex,.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 Q n 1151081
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION
OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN ZONING CASE
NO. 613.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. John Resich with respect to
real property located at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF),. Rolling Hills, requesting a
Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit the expansion of the front
entrance at an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on April 18, 2000 and May 16, 2000, and at a field
trip visit on May 6, 2000. The applicant was notified of the public hearing in writing
by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and
presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of
the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied
said proposal. The applicant was in attendance at the hearing.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard of fifty feet (50') from the front easement line.
The applicant is requesting to add 80 square feet for the expansion of the front
entrance at the west which will encroach a maximum of twenty-two feet (22') into
the fifty foot (50') front yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
s applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
•
use in the same zone because the residence is located close to the street and adjacent
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14
PAGE 1 OF 5
• 09 1151081
residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion
precludes continued expansion of the residence on the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
the development and use of the subject property in a similar manner consistent
with the shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies
this additional small incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any
greater incursion into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 613 to permit the proposed
project to encroach a maximum of twenty-two feet (22') into the fifty foot (50') front
yard setback, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approval shall expire: within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) unless otherwise extended
pursuant to the requirements of that section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given
written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been
provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct
the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's
determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the . site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated April 10, 2000, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of
sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a stable and corral
with vehicular access thereto in conformance with site plan review limitations.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14
PAGE 2 OF 5
F. There shall be no grading for the project.
•
00 1151081
G. Landscaping shall be designed using native plants or other drought -
tolerant mature trees and shrubs so as not to exceed the ridge height of the residence
nor obstruct views from neighboring properties.
H. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes
automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones,"
considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to
reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in, accordance with Section
17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
I. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize
the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by
construction activities in , accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
J. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
K. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local
ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to
undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion,
or land subsidence shall be required.
L. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and
landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface
water to the rear of the lot at the east.
M. During construction, an approved Erosion Control Plan containing the
elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform
Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and
channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
N. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby
roadway easements.
O. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14
PAGE 3 OF 5
At
1151081
P. The drainage plan system shall be modified and approved by the
Planning Department and City Engineer, to include any water from any site
irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an
approved manner to the rear or east of the lot.
Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the
installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best
Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
S. A detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted- to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for .their review.
T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any drainage, building or grading permit.
U. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check reviewshall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
V. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related' geology, soils
and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department
staff for their review.
W. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Variance approval, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval
shall not be effective.
X. All conditions of this Variance approval must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY ( Y. 2
1
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILY�` V 'TERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14
PAGE 4OF, 5
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
•
00 1151081
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-14 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION
OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN ZONING CASE
NO. 613.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
May 16, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins,, Margeta, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: Nbne .
ABSENT: Commissioner Sommer.
ABSTAIN: None .
'and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
_Ik_
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14
PAGE 5 OF 5
440 1151081
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of 44 A /
On ,//1 e o?aDa before me( i(GLytic� 1<J, /�L�°*'&I.Lait5 --
pers•� ally appeared
[ ] personally known to me or [ ]proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
J m) 9 'yl Alta-,
SIGNATURE bF NOTARY
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
c,, ...M.. s
Cortmi:slan A 1125800
Nokny Pub",!c—Canton*
Los
Angclm Courdy t
My Co mT . E;:Yires Feb 5.2001
-[ ] INDIVIDUAL [ ] ATTORNEY -IN -FACT [ ] TRUSTEE(S)
] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [ ] PARTNER(S) [ ] LIMITED (GENERAL)
[ ] CORPORATE OFFICER(S) [ ] OTHER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: [name. of person(s) or entity(ies)]