Loading...
613, Modification to previously app, Correspondence110 a/ l? P? s Jd.•PF, February 27, 2002 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. and Mrs. John Resich 8 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 613 8 Outrider Road Dear Mr. and Mrs. Resich: This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since a time extension was approved by the Planning Commission for Zoning Case No. 613. Note that the approval will expire on May 16, .2002 unless you acquire permits and commence construction prior to that date. Pursuant to Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code once the approval expires, should you wish to pursue the construction you would have to refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tanta Schwartz Planning Director \(11 4 t, . A5 6' eA 4c,-14 — Panted or Recycled Paper. • • City o/l?oi _AA May 16, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. John Resich 8 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ONE-YEAR EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 613 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Resich: This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on May 15, 2001 approved by Resolution No. 2001-10, your request for a one-year extension of Site Plan Review and Variance application in Zoning Case No. 613. The new expiration date will be on May 16.2002 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must re -file based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Under the California Planning and Zoning Law only one extension for discretionary permits may be granted, after the initial one year from the approval has expired. Upon signing of Resolution No. 2001-10 by the Commission Chair, I will forward it to you. If you have any questions, please call me at (310) 377-1521. Sinperely, olanta Schwartz Principal Planner Printed on Recycled Paper. • (;4 ol /e0/fi4 J✓'P� NOTIFICATION OF MEETING May 4, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Resich 8 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 613 8 Outrider Road, Rolling Hills, CA Request for a one-year time extension. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Resich • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Your request for a one-year time extension in Zoning Case No. 613 has been set for consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday . Mav 15. 2001. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to answer any questions. The staff report for this project and an agenda for that meeting will be forwarded to you by mail. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sin rely, SJA olanta Schwartz, Principal Planner Printed on Recycled Paper. John and Shirley Resich 8 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 310 548-9560 April 24, 2001 Dear Ms. Schwartz, C'7Y O,F POLi;.INC, ,..1o'L L.S.. This letter is to request an extension of the site approval granting a variance to encroach into the front yard setback in order to expand the front entrance at our home on 8 Outrider as well as any additional extensions necessary to complete the proposed remodel. Our family has been involved with the care and treatment of an ailing aunt who required a permanent change in her living conditions. We also needed to assist our daughter and son-in-law in Wyoming who moved in order support a family owned ranching business, which was compromised when the health of our daughter's father in law deteriorated. This gentleman had a third heart valve transplant and was unable to work. John has been a regular fixture in Wyoming helping during this time. These medical emergencies are now past the crisis stage and we can devote our attention to the Rolling Hills property. I am enclosing the requested $200 filing fee. I appreciate your attention to this matter. Thank you for considering this extension. We look forward to working with the City of Rolling Hills as we improve our new home. Sincerely, Shirley Resich N° 7380 OFFICIAL RECEIPT et t y of J?o ffi z 1 c7¢LCC. t.,,i ; ram, 1-2-, i J 7/27471 THE SUM OF Fop • CALIFORNIA RECEIVED FROt" Op v 3767/ - 3902. 7 Pay to the Order of SHIRLEY D. RESICH JOHN RESICH 8 OUTRIDER RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 DOLLARS F 00, G (9-, FUND AMOUNT .9&cr.), cc) 7-,? 7CITY CLERK 8-94 DatP 5 f i 16 j l I t 0410 IMBay Cities National Bank Your p,amle, Community Bunk RPV/San Pedro Branch - For Merchant Verification Call 800-664-0155 28902 South Western Avenue, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 For 1:L222392701:372L 002 3972770' mClarke/Lnerltan 3721 90-3927/1222 02 5 6(J T�oars 8 ;7:5°e.: la.‘utea,_ GUARDIAN®SAFETY BLUE WBL 410 City opeollinf ildro March 1, 2001 Mr. John Resich 8 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 ZONING CASE NO. 613 Dear Mr. Resich: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com We would like to remind you that your approvals in the subject zoning case will expire on May 16, 2001. Please refer to condition "A" of Section 5 of the resolution regarding the expiration of your application. You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. A reason for the request must indicated in your written statement. The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, . iT Yt ddlanta Schwartz Principal Planner Printed on Recycled Paper. •City ofieoffing CERTIFIED MAIL • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com May 23, 2000 Mr. John Resich 23 Easffield Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 613, 8 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 72-B-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 Dear Mr. Resich: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on May 16, 2000 granting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit the expansion of the front entry at a single family residence at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 613. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission was reported to the City Council on May 22, 2000. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days 'after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed :or the City Council takes jurisdiction .of the case within that thirty (30) day anneal [period. ,(Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will, be .stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal. Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period . afteradoption of the Planning ' Commission's resolution, the Planning Commissions action will become final and you will be required ' to cause . to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office, of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2000-10, specifying the conditions of 'approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. • Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerey, aeet Lola Ungar Planning Director Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM RESOLUTION NO. 2000-10 APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN Printed on Recycled Paper, • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO.613 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (We) the undersigned state: am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 8 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 72-B-EF), ROLLINGHILLS, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. am:(We are) aware of, and accept,:all the stated conditions:in said. ZONING' CASE NO.' 613 - SITE PLAN REVIEW`'. VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT , (We) certify (or:declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing `is true' and'correct Signature Signature Name typed or' printed Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of Califomia ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. L Recorder's Use Only Name typed or printed Address City/State Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF _A-61/43 ',et" RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 613. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. John Resich with respect to real property located at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF), .Rolling Hills, requesting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit the expansion of the front entrance at an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission .conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on April 18, 2000 and May:16, 2000, and at a field trip visit on May 6, 2000. The applicant was notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the' Planning Commission'. having ; reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal: The applicant was in attendance at the 'hearing: .' Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as ; a Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore. categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard of fifty feet (50') from the front easement line. The applicant is requesting to add 80 square feet for the expansion of the front entrance at the west which will encroach a maximum of twenty-two feet (22') into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback. With respect to this .request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the residence is located close to the street and adjacent RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 PAGE 1 OF 5 • • r residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the residence on the lot. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the development and use of the subject property in a similar 'manner consistent with the shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this additional small incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any greater incursion into the front yard setback than already exists. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 5: Based upon the foregoing findings, the • Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case. No. 613 to "permit the proposed project to encroach a maximum of twenty-two 'feet (22') into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback; subject to the following conditions: • A. „The Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) unless : otherwise `extended pursuant to therequirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the ;Variance 'approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the : applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within •a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated April 10, 2000, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a stable and corral with vehicular access thereto in conformance with site plan review limitations. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 PAGE 2 OF 5 F. Thereshall be no grading for the project. G. Landscaping shall be designed using native plants or other drought - tolerant mature trees and shrubs so as not to exceed the ridge height of the residence nor obstruct views from neighboring properties. H. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. I. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. J. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property r'are not exposed to landslides, mudflows; erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. K. . During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices; county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides; mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. .. L. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water to the rear of the lot at the east. M. During construction, an approved Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. N. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. O. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 PAGE 3 OF 5 P. The drainage plan system shall be modified and approved by the Planning Department and City Engineer, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner to the rear or east of the lot. Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. S. A detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any drainage, building or grading permit. U. The working drawings submitted to the :County Department of Building and Safety for plan check reviewshall-, conform to the development plan described in Condition D. V. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan ,to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage 'plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. W. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance approval, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective. X. All conditions of this Variance approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY 9P'1/``. 2 ATTEST: K MARILYN `kERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK ALLAN ROBE S, CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 PAGE 4 OF 5 1{ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-14 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 8 OUTRIDER ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 613. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission. on May 16, 2000 by the following roll call vote: Commissioners Hankins,,Margeta, Witte :and Chairman Roberts. Nbne. AYES: ABSENT: Commissioner Sommer. ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California wasposted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-14 PAGE 5 OF 5 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City. Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take. jurisdiction over the application. In the event' the :City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision .will be stayed until the City,Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions... of this Chapter. '`. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to . File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may, appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in . an. Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 17.54.030 If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), tothe appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 ;, ' Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within:'20'days of 'the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than One appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all- appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed; 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a. resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision.. shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any:; action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the ,City made as a result of a proceeding in which by a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be: taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination: of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the. City Council, .or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, roust be filed within: the time limits set, forth in the California Code, of Civil :Procedure, Section 1094.E ROLLING HILLS TONING 78 MAY u, 1993 0 z CC • 1 H w CC T a1 P 852 865 339 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Rent to Street and No72) StaSta e and Z P ode ;//s Postage Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered rn Return Receipt showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery d TOTAL Postage and Fees 0 Postmark or Date co E O LL rn a J,25- SENDER: ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. ■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. ■ Write`Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. •The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. s 4a. Article Number a esa 8'6,23- 3 3 MAY 2 3 2000 CITY OF ROLLING i LS 3. Article Addressed to: ThrSoh, /R e S i`cI /74 qo,q7Y z. a. /1/0. 6/3 5. ece'ved y:(PrintName) • -2i\ cS Rom► 6. Sign :• (Irr ssee or A, PS Form 3811,/December 1994 I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra fee): 1. El Addressee's Address 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery 4b. Service Type d. ❑ Registered Al Certified °C ❑ Express Mail 0 Insured c ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 7. Date 2e114b w° t57 8. Add(esseexs Address (Only if requested c and fee is paid) ▪ `o Domestic Return Receipt • Ci,y o/ l2 PfinS Jh/i FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION April 25, 2000 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 19'57 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. John Resich 23 Eastfield Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 613, a request for a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit the expansion of a front entry for office space at an existing single family residence at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. Resich: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed trellis on Saturday, May 6, 2000. The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 7:30 AM at the property. The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements: • A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls; and • Flag the front setback line that is 50 feet from the front easement line and stake the limits of the building pad. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mrs. Josephine Stribley Printed on Recycled PaF:,or. • • C'h oi -NA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. Bracing should be provided where possible. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521. SECTION PLAN Printed on Recycled Paper •City 0/ AM. Jidia STATUS OF APPLICATION & MEETING NOTIFICATION April 6, 2000 Mr. John Resich 23 Eastfield Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT:, ZONING CASE NO. 613, a request for a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit the expansion of a front entry for office space at an existing single family residence at 8 Outrider Road (Lot 72-B-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. Resich: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 613 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. April 18. 2000. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, April 14, 2000. We will forward a copy to you. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Lola M. Ungar Planning Director cc: Mrs. Josephine Stribley Printed on Recycled Paper.