493, Addition to SFR with small por, Resolutions & Approval Conditionse3 600642
•
RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
4MIN. 8
PAST A A.M. MAR 31 1993
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL^TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
"OPT)
APR ;70 moi
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road *OW
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. 4441 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
x
x
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows:
1 Hackamore Road (Lot 30-EF), Rolling Hills
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO.
dQ4
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
x
x
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner��VC C
Name ..
Signature
Address����� J�
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
-al/Address
City/State L 4 ;h1;e4 / r� City/State
•
V
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
)(1
ef/f
act_ck2,4---t-cre-
State of
County of
err
SS.
on this the day of
•
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
❑ personally known to me
0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
within instrument, and acknowledged that
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
19_, before me,
subscribed to the
executed it.
r
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
STATE OF CALIFORNIA93 600642
COUNTY OF LOS
ANul�• ! c S Capacity Claimed By Signer:
On 03/17/93 before me *AMY PERRETT ;
personally appeared *PAUL GRUBS & fJ 7 CE GRUBS*
OFFICIAL SEAT
AMY PERRE1T
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
PRIP4CtPAL OFFICE IN
LOS ANGFI FS COUNTY
My Commission Exp. Apr. 5, 1994
Official Notarial Seal
This certificate must be
attached to the document
described at right.
Title or Type of Document
Number of Pages
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
mh TY ' m `t6u
, notary public,
-or-
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
Signature of
Notary:
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEP i CE FORM
Date of Document 03/ 1.7/ n3
t8th.
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
LE 76 tW91)
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT PORTIONS OF A
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
AND APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 493.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Paul
Grubs with respect to real property, located at 1 Hackamore Road,
Rolling Hills (Lot 30-EF) requesting a Variance to permit the
encroachment of portions of a residential structure into the front
yard setback and requesting Site Plan Review for the reconstruction
of a single family residence. The existing residential structure
had been destroyed by fire on December 25, 1992.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the applications for the Variance and
Site Plan Review on February 16, 1993 and individual field trip
visits to the site were made by the Planning Commissioners.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project is
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 3 exemption provided
by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Section 4. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct portions of a residential structure in the fifty (50)
foot front yard setback. The applicant is requesting construction
that will encroach a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet into the
front yard setback. The Planning Commission finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is. necessary because the existing legal
nonconforming residence was built within the front yard setback
and the building pad is located'close to the street and adjacent
residences.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 2
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
building pad and topography of the rest of the lot preclude the
requested residential structure from being built into the rear
yard.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to construct portions of a residential structure to a
maximum of 25 feet as indicated on the Development Plan attached
hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section
9.
Section 6. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan to
be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition,
alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which
involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period. The applicant has proposed to reconstruct
a single family residence on the existing foundation on the subject
site.
Section 7. The Planning Commission makes the following
findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of
low profile, low density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to
Zoning Code setback and lot coverage, requirements. The lot has a
net square foot area of 51,818 square feet. The proposed residence
of 2,579 square feet, garage of 620 square feet, a 680 square foot
swimming pool, a 282 square foot storage building, a 450 square
foot future stable, and a 100 square foot service yard will have
4,711 square feet which constitutes 9.1% of the lot which is within
the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot
coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 10,096 square
feet which equals 19.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum
overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project replaces
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 3
the -existing house in the same location on a relatively large lot
which provides adequate open space. The proposed structure
conforms with the natural topographic features of the lot. The
area will not be graded and provides a pad that conforms with the
existing pad located on the site. The project is similar and
compatible with scale of several neighboring developments.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into
the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms because
no grading will take place and, subject to conditions attached to
this approval, most of the mature trees will not be removed,
thereby retaining the current drainage pattern and landscape
screening for the site.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the
site and drainage courses will continue naturally away from the
building pad.
D. The development plan, subject to conditions attached to
this approval, incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and supplements it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural
character of the community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural
and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage
because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Significant portions of the lot will
be left undeveloped.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences
because as indicated in Paragraph A, lot coverage maximum will not
be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with
the neighborhood. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot
coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the
vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not
detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize
the existing vehicular access, thereby having no further impact on
the roadway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 4
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review for a proposed new
residence at 1 Hackamoree Road in accordance with the Development
Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions
contained in Section 9.
Section 9. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in
Section 5 and the Site Plan Review approval for a proposed new
residence as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A as approved in Section 8 is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code and the Site Plan Review approval shall
expire within one year from the effective date of approval as
defined in Section 17.34.080.A.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and
Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are
violated, these approvals shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has
been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to
do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the approvals, or shown otherwise on
an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the Development Plan on file marked Exhibit A
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 20.8%.
F. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
G. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
H. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review, pursuant
to Section 17.32.087, or the approval shall not be effective.
I. Conditions A, C, D, E, F, G, and H must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the
County of Los Angeles.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 93-12 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT PORTIONS OF A
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
AND APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 493.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on February 16, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay, Raine and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
LJ
d 0,.1m���,,,�
DEPUTY CITY CLERK