182, Construct a pool, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
)
of )
) ZONING CASE NO. 182
Mr. Philip Kelly )
)
Lot 29B-EF )
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Philip Kelly, Lot 29B-EF, Eastfield
Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c)
of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a swimming pool came on for
hearing on the 15th day of February, 1977 in the Council Chambers of
the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant., having submitted evidence in support
of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes
its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Philip Kelly,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 29B-EF,
located at 8 Hackamore Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application
was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33
of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds,
further, that no communication. written or verbal, was received in
favor of or in opposition to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant requests the
conditional use permit for construction of a swimming pool in a legal
location on the property, which consists of 2.85 acres in the RAS-1
zone. Further, the applicant advised that the location of the
proposed pool, in an area between the proposed stable and a proposed
guest house, would not be visible from other residences in the area.
The Commission finds that.a conditional use permit should be
granted in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed
4
by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting
of such conditional use permit would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and
zone.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit should be granted under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c) of
Ordinance No. 112 for construction, of a swimming pool to Mr. and Mrs.
Philip Kelly, Lot 29B-EF, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
retary, Planni': Commission