Loading...
193, Construct a pool & spa, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of Mr. Philip Kelly Lot 29B-EF ZONING CASE NO. 193 FINDINGS AND REPORT The application of Mr. Philip Kelly, Lot 29B-EF, Eastfield Tract, for a conditional use permit under ARTICLE III, Section 3.06, Front Yard Requirements, Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 29th day of June, 1977 in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California. I. The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Philip Kelly, is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 29B-EF, located at 8 Hackamore Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as, required by Sections.8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further, that no comment, written or verbal, was received in opposition to the request, and that a letter signed by Bert Balch, Verna Balch, 6 Hacka- more Road and Joyce Grubs, 1 Hackamore Road, stated that as owners of property adjacent to the Kelly residence they had no objection to construction of a pool in the front yard. II. The Commission finds that the applicant was granted a conditinal use permit on' February 15, 1977 for construction of a swimming pool in a legal location in the rear yard, under Ordinance No. 112, but the locations had to be changed because of a geology problem on the property, and the application has requested a conditional use permit for location of the pool in the front yard. The applicant has stated that the front. • • yard location would not be visible from any neighboring residence, since hhis house is 30' below grade, and is completely screened by trees. The Commission finds that a conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. III. From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use per- mit should be granted for construction of a swimming pool in the front yard to Mr. Philip Kelly, Lot 29B-EF, 8 Hackamore Road, and it is, there- fore, so ordered. /s/ Forrest Riegel Chairman, Planning Commission ake. P4retary, Plannin)Commission