493, Addition to SFR with small por, CorrespondenceTO: Mr. Craig Nealis, City Manager
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
AGREEMENT REGARDING THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF A LARGE STORAGE
CONTAINER AT 1 HACKAMORE ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA
This Agreement relates to the location and removal of a large storage co t iner
at 1 Hackamore Road, Rolling Hills, CA, and is entered into as of the ` t day
of July, 1993 by and among Paul Grubs and Joyce Grubs.
We the undersigned are the owners of 1 Hackamore Road in Rolling Hills, CA.
We have requested the City's concurrence in the placement of a large storage
container on our property during construction of our new residence at the same
address.
We agree to the following provisions for the siting and removal of the storage
container:
1. The storage container shall be located in front of the existing garage.
2. The storage container shall be removed from the property within 10 days of
the anticipated removal date which is SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 or after the
Building Official issues the final building permit inspection of the
garage structure.
3. No toxic materials shall be stored in the container.
4. The storage container shall be a neutral color, preferably brown or green,
and without advertising signage on its sides.
5. The storage container shall not block pedestrian, equestrian or vehicular
traffic.
6. The storage container shall be locked and secured to prevent unauthorized
entry.
7. The City and adjacent neighbors shall be notified of the location,
proportions, and length of time the storage container will be located on
the property.
8. The City reserves the right to rescind this agree -men any time and
require that the storage container be removed '
6 6, /93
DATE( (
PL GRUBS
JOYCE GRUBS
• •
City a/ R/i4 Jhf/.
June 29, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Paul Grubs
1 Hackamore Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 493
STORAGE CONTAINER LOCATION
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grubs:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Thank you for your letter expressing your need to place a large storage container
in front of your garage for the storage of household materials during the
construction of your new residence.
Because your request is unusual and not something the City would ordinarily
approve, we ask that you agree to a few requirements listed on the attached
agreement. Please review, sign and return the attached agreement for the siting
and removal of a large storage container on your property during the construction
of your new home. We request the signed agreement be returned to the City by
July 10, 1993.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Z z
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Craig Nealis, City Manager
Ms. Peggy Minor, Rolling Hills Community Association Manager
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
O /Offiflg „With INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
CERTIFIED MAIL
March 4, 1993
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Grubs
1 Hackamore Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO.493. 1 Hackamore Road (Lot 30-EF1
APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Grubs:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 493 was APPROVED
by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was approved on February 16, 1993
at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission's decision was reported to the City Council
at their regular meeting on February 22, 1993.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Twenty days after the receipt of this letter if no appeals are filed within that
time period (Section 17.42.140 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject Resolution must be filed
by you with the County Recorder (Section 17.32.087).
We have enclosed a. copy of RESOLUTION NO. 93-12, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development
Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the
enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and
forward to: County Recorder. Room 15. 227 North Broadway. Los Angeles. CA 90012 with
a check in the amount of $ 5.00 for the first page and $ 3.00 for each additional page.
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
Mr. & Mrs. Grubs
March 4, 1993
Page 2
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only
when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution
required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA UNG
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO. 93-12, EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, AND APPEAL SECTION
OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE.
cc: Mr.. Roger North
Mr. Grubs' office
CERTIF.gru
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT PORTIONS OF A
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
AND APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 493.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Paul
Grubs with respect to real property, located at 1 Hackamore Road,
Rolling Hills (Lot 30-EF) requesting a Variance to permit the
encroachment of portions of a residential structure into the front
yard setback and requesting Site Plan Review for the reconstruction
of a single family residence. The existing residential structure
had been destroyed by fire on December 25, 1992.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the applications for the Variance and
Site Plan Review on February 16, 1993 and individual field trip
visits to the site were made by the Planning Commissioners.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project is
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 3 exemption'provided
by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Section 4. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property, and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct portions of a residential structure in the fifty (50)
foot front yard setback. The applicant is requesting construction
that will encroach a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet into the
front yard setback. The Planning Commission finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the existing legal
nonconforming residence was built within the front yard setback
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent
residences.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 2
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
building pad and topography of the rest of the lot preclude the
requested residential structure from being built into the rear
yard.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to construct portions of a residential structure to a
maximum of 25 feet as indicated on the Development Plan attached
hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section
9.
Section 6. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan to
be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition,
alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which
involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period. The applicant has proposed to reconstruct
a single family residence on the existing foundation on the subject
site.
Section 7. The Planning Commission makes the following
findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of
low profile, low density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to
Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a
net square foot area of 51,818 square feet. The proposed residence
of 2,579 square feet, garage of 620 square feet, a 680 square foot
swimming pool, a 282 square foot storage building, a 450 square
foot future stable, and a 100 square foot service yard will have
4,711 square feet which constitutes 9.1% of the lot which is within
the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot
coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 10,096 square
feet which equals 19.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum
overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project replaces
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 3
the existing house in the same location on a relatively large lot
which provides adequate open space. The proposed structure
conforms with the natural topographic features of the lot. The
area will not be graded and provides a pad that conforms with the
existing pad located on the site. The project is similar and
compatible with scale of several neighboring developments.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into
the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms because
no grading will take place and, subject to conditions attached to
this approval, most of the mature trees will not be removed,
thereby retaining the current drainage pattern and landscape
screening for the site.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the
site and drainage courses will continue naturally away from the
building pad.
D. The development plan, subject to conditions attached to
this approval, incorporates, existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and supplements it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural
character of the community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural
and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage
because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Significant portions of the lot will
be left undeveloped.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences
because as indicated in Paragraph A, lot coverage maximum will not
be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with
the neighborhood. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot
coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the
vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not
detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize
the existing vehicular access, thereby having no further impact on
the roadway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of .the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 4
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review for a proposed new
residence at 1 Hackamoree Road in accordance with the Development
Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions
contained in Section 9.
Section 9. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in
Section 5 and the Site Plan Review approval for a proposed new
residence as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A as approved in Section 8 is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code and the Site Plan Review approval shall
expire within one year from the effective date of approval as
defined in Section 17.34.080.A.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and
Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are
violated, these approvals shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has
been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to
do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the approvals, or shown otherwise on
an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the Development Plan on file marked Exhibit A
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The building pad coverage. shall not exceed 20.8%.
F. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
G. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building 'and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
H. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review, pursuant
to Section 17.32.087, or the approval shall not be effective.
I. Conditions A, C, D, E, F, G, and H must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the
County , of Los Angeles.
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 93-12
PAGE 5
•
t
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TIpAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
g MARILYN KRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 93-12 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT PORTIONS OF A
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
AND APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 493.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on February 16, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay, Raine and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
h'-%\41-
DEPUTY C TY CLERK
17. »2.1t0-•1 ).1? . l4.
•
17.32.140 Appeal -•Persons authorised. The actiow by
the Planning Commission in matters described in this e .
chapter shall be by majority vote and shall be final,
elusive and effective twenty calendar days after the fauna "r`
of notice, as provided in Section 17.32.090, unless within
said twenty -day period an appeal in writing is filed wag*
the City Clerk by any of the following:
A. The applicant:
S. Any person who protested, either orally or in
writing, as a matter of record, prior to the final vote
of the Planning Commission on the matter and who, in
addition, received or was entitled to receive the written
notice specified in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Sectipo
17.40.060: or
C. The City Council, upon the affirmative vote of
three members of the Council. (Ord. 188.(part), 1981: 13rd. '
155 $4, 1971: Ord. 33 S6.14, 1960) .
17.32.150 Appeal--Contents--fee. An appeal from aft,
order, requirement, decision, or determination ender the
title must set forth specifically wherein it is claimed
there vas an error or abuse of discretion by the Planning
Commission or wherein the decision of the Planning Comuniesioal
is not supported by the evidence in the matter. In •
addition, any person appealing the decision of the Plannieyg
Commission must pay to the City Clerk, at the time of films
the written notice of appeal, the required fee specified by
resolution as hereafter adopted and from tine to time
changed by the City Council. (Ord. 188 (part), 1981: Ord.
33 S6.1S, 1960).
17.32.160 Appeal--Recordkeeping. Upon receipt of e
written appeal and the payment of the fee required, the
City Clerk shall advise the Secretary of the Planning
Commission to transmit' forthwith the complete record of
the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. The
Secretary of the Planning Commission shall be charged with
the duty and responsibility of maintaining a complete file
and record on each application processed pursuant to this
chapter which shall contain the original application
processed pursuant to this chapter, all correepondonce •ann
reports pertaining thereto, all affidavits of pnblicatimes
posting and sailing, as required by law, minutes of ,all
meetings of the Planning Commission pertaining to this
mattes, advisory reports of technical agents, the report,
findings and decision of the Planning Commission, and an
affidavit of the mailing and the giving of said notice, as
required by this chapter. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord.
33 56.16, 1960) .
21S (Rolling Hills 8/*3)
•
410 17.32.170-•17.32.206
17.32.170 City Council to be Board of toning
A�d )usta►ent and Appeal . For the purpose of this chapterwild in conformity with Article 2 of Chapter 4, Title 7 of
the Government Code of the State of California, the City
Council appoints and creates each and every member of the
City Council, sitting as a whole, as the Board of Zoning
Adjustment and Zoning Appeal for the City. The City Council
shall meet as a Board of Zoning Adjustment and Zoning Appeal
in connection with other City business and, in so meeting,
shall be governed by all the rules and regulations now
adopted or hereafter adopted governing the procedure of
the City Council. (Ord. 188(part), 1991: Ord. 33 56.17,
1960) .
17.32.180 Appeal--Rearing--Notice--Basis for decision.a. �y
The City Cierx shall set a nearing before the City Council
as Zoning Adjustment and Zoning Appeal not less
th after the receipt of said appeal or request
for wrier. The hearing shall be on at least tan days prior
written notice to the appiieaft, the appellant, and to any
other persons who received or should have received, under
Section 17.40.060, notice of the hearing before the Planning
Commission. At such a hearing no new matter nor nest
evidence shall be received or considered by the Board of
Zoning Adjustment and Appeal, and the Board shall make its
determination on the basis of the record brought before it
on appeal or review. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 33 $6.18,
1960).
17.32.190 Appeal --New hearing --Authorized when. Notwitb-
standing_the provisions of Section.17.32.180, the Board of
Zoning Adjustment and Appeal may, by majority action at any
tine during the course of the review 'of a decision of the
Planning Commission under this chapter brought before it by
appeal, determine that a new hearing shall be set by the
Board of Zoning Adjustment and Appeal, at which time the
public will be entitled to appear to present new or additional
evidence for or against said application. (Ord. 188(part),
1911: Ord. 33 $6.10, 1960) .
17.32.200 Appeal- -New hearing --Copy of records. The
action of the Board of Zoning Adjustment and Appeal shall be
by majority vote and shall be final and conclusive. The
decision of the Board under this chapter shall be set forth
in full in the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Zoning
Adjustment and Appeal. A certified copy of the excerpts of
said minutes shall be delivered by the City Clerk to the
City Council, the Secretary of the Planning Commission and
the Planning Commission for their use and records, as well
as to the applicant or the appellant, if they are different
parties. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 33 S6.20, 1960).
216 (Rolling Hills 8/83)
•
• 17.32.110-17.36.010
17.32.210 Appeal -•Notice. Upon the filing of such
an appeal, the City Clerk shall give notice of th• filing of
said notice to:
A. Applicant;
S. Appellant; and
C. Any person who protested, either orally or in
writing, as a matter of record, prior to the final vote of
the Planning Commission on the :natter and who, in addition,
received or was entitled to receive the written notice
specified in subdivision 2 of subsection s of Section
7.40.060. (Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 1SS $6, 19 78: Ord.
33 $6.21, 1960).
17.32.220 Appeal--Nearing--Multiple appeals. In the
event more than one appeal is filed purusart to Section
17.32.140 then all appeals shall be heard at the same time.
(Ord. 188(part), 1981: Ord. 1SS $6, 1971: Ord. 33 $6.22,
1960) .
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. 4.41 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the.undersigned state:
x
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows:
1 Hackamore Road (Lot 30-EF), Rolling Hills
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO. eon
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE x
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
ie�.GC.r •'r
SS.
On this the day of 19_, before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
O personally known to me
0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
within instrument, and acknowledged that
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
�!i-G�C�s!e-r�!'1'<s-CCe`1G'Gti:s-.".+-1 ••Gltfs•�•!j►
subscribed to the
executed it.
turf.►«.��w�j
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
1dI333H Nan
Bak I. ,
S.
¢�n Y
led §l`s • VI
co
x• palsanbe 1! AluO) Ss 1P(p s 9 sAiP V '8
0
-« ')UaA+laa lo'alea 'L
0
1
y
m
0
co
CD
C�
CD
rt
N
CD
0
es!pueyoJa'N
m1 ld!aoaE1 wn;aa ❑
000 ❑ pa!1!l�a
painsul ❑ paJals!6aa ❑
adA1 ao!Alas
!lelyl ssaldx3 ❑
lagwnN a10 lJy •e17
'no; .io1 lalsewlsod llnsuo3
AJanlla0 pala!llsabl ❑ 'Z
ssalppy s,aassaJppy ❑ • L
:(aa1
eJlxa ue J01) saOlnlas 6u!mo!lo1
eq anlaMMJ of yslM ow 1
0ce-r0e-Z661 •o•d•o•s•n 2a 1.66 L Jagwao00 ' 6 L8E wlod Sd
AL ro6
(lue6y) alnleu6 ^
V7
(eassaJppy
.9
!S '9
(s.), (-/4 Sif/trod
Gra
:ol passeippb' alollJV 'E
•paianllap
alep ay1 pue peienllap sem able sap woyM of mous Illm ldlaoeu ulniay ayl .
•Jogwnu elope mg mow{ eoaldliew ayl uo „pelsenbad idlaoey wnlay„ a111M •
•11wJad lou seop
coeds ;l loeq ayl uo Jo 'eoeldpew ayl;o luol} Big 01 two} sly; goelly .
noA of pie° slyl wnlal
ueo OM win OS w101 slyl;o 0S10A01 0111 uo sselppe pue aweu 1noA lulld •
•q'8 eb pue 'E swell eleidwo0 •
•saalnlas leuolllppe 101 Z Jo/pue L swell eleldwoa •
1:13aN3S
L.
a1ee 4 iewjvod
��a pue abe 0A§ViOl
AJAR 1r ssalp b pu a1e4
'woyM o1_; teRv_. nlald
palanrlap„ag} pue woyM o1
6uIMoys idlaoad ulnlald
aad Alanilaa pa10u2sau
aad Alangaa lepodS
sod Pallluaa
S86l. aunr `0085 WJoj
8b ^ abelsodd
/i4,-06 Ll/ W
apoa dIZ pue 01e1S
'oN pue 1aa11S
s9 V &LW/
o) was
(asienaa eas) Z-bh •Cy 7'Z
11tlW 1YNOI1YNN31NI 11Od ION
0301A0Fid 3Otl113A03 33Ntl811SNI ON
IImW a3ldlla33 HOd 1d133 H
29h-29L-_2S-L d.
t
O
rn
c
Z
m
cn
0
0
O
3
CD
O.
0
7
CO
CO
fo
f
m
•V
•
o/ R0ffi JUL
February 23, 1993
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Grubs
1 Hackamore Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 493. 1 Hackamore Road (Lot 30-EF1
Request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of portions
of a residential structure into the front yard setback, and a
request for Site Plan Review for the reconstruction of a single
family residence.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Grubs:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 493 was APPROVED by
the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on February 16, 1993.
The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after they are
signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The Planning Commission's decision was reported to the City Council at their regular
meeting on February 22, 1993. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning
Commission may be appealed within twenty days s after you receive the final Resolution,
(Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Please be advised that Mr. Brogdon, 5 Maverick Lane, testified that in his opinion, trees on
your property constitute a fire hazard. Members of the City Council requested that you be
informed of his testimony in the event that you and he wish to discuss this on a private
basis.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
LMU.mjs
approval.grubs
cc: Mr. Roger North
Mr. Grubs' Office
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
GARTH R. MOORE
57 EASTFIELD DRIVE
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
City of Rolling Hills
Planning Commission
Re: Paul and Joyce Grubs rebuilding plans
1 Haxkamore Rd.
Rolling Hills, CA. 90274
This is to state that Garth and Florence Moore
have no objections to the plans submitted to
the Planning Commission. We understand it's
being rebuilt on the original foundation with
the exception of minor expansion in the bath
and bedroom areas. What the Planning Commiss-
ion approves is agreeable with us.
Yours truly,
D igggalQlj
F E B 161993
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
•
2/15/93
Planning Commission
City of Rolling Hills
Re: Zoning Case No. 493
Dear Members
FEB s iss3
D
CRY PE 13OLL1M HILL
As long time neighbors of Paul and Joyce Grubs, we take this opportunity to
express our support for prompt approval of their requests for permission to
rebuild their house more or Tess along the lines of the former structure,
with the slight alterations they are seeking to uphold architectural and
aesthetic standards in Rolling Hills. The lot is a splendid one and certainly
merits a house in the form they plan to rebuild it.
We, of course, are anxious also to see the area restored quickly, and we
want to see the Grubs family happily reinstalled in their home after the
heartrending event that took it away from them.
Sincerely,
6 Hackamore Road
FEB 1119g3
OE MUM HILLS
February 10, 1993
Dear Members of the Planning Comm.,
Joyce and Paul`•:Grubbs are starting the long road to build a new home in
Rolling Hills.
As residents of our community for over 20 years, they have shown a sincere
desire to keep Rolling Hills the unique and beautiful community that we love.
In designing a new home Paul tells me that they are only going to add'.a small
amount of footage and that the, house will be basically the same as it was
prior to the fire.
Their home is totally secluded from Eastfield and so their house will not
be a nuisance or an eyesore while under construction.
Hopefully you and the other boards that they must appear before will do your
best to make the trama of the fire fade as quickly as possible so they can
return to thier home and get on with their lives.
Sincerely,
William P. Corette
35 Eastfield
•
O/ /eO/fLfl ...JI//� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NOTIFICATION LETTER
February 4, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Paul Grubs
1 Hackamore Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 493, a request for a Variance to permit
the encroachment of portions of a residential structure
into the front yard setback and a request for Site Plan
Review for the reconstruction of a single family
residence for property at 1 Hackamore Road, Rolling
Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 30-EF.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grubs:
Your application for Zoning Case No. 493 has been set for public
hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting
on Tuesday, February 16, 1993.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling
Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road,
Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend
to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City
Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, February 12, 1993. Please arrange to
pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Roger North
•
it
Printed on Recycled Paper.