Loading...
468, Construct a stable and permit , Application• REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The undersigned fRf4NZ E , r /sG R, Name ;46 z PALOS ►II M$ J, . N .., /I/NG H/i. S, ei4 S4/ - z / / 2 Street Address ' Telephone Number (1) is4neg the owner pc is/y( in lawful possession of Legal description of property situated at 2 28 / 4 6 • Lot Tract 286 2 7,4-cos veg.AEs Jj R. N,, /ZDi6/mf gize.s R G4 . Street Address Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. SEE H£HFVr of OP AVER. l..ETrtR /0/8111 A-14 11A4DE 7A Rr fieQEof Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the 'same vicinity and zone. s EE Ali E/46Ar # z /Oh 6oWR 1 rrt,€ ,D717 d 10 /gI9 / f-ND l`M&e 7A-Rr HERE o/ Such change will not be :materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or imr-movements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because 4EE A-7-77fi tl6-NT J113 ,¢JSCD_ 60 /t 7r6 e d A rto t of 8/9I ANC littoe 2Agr f(e oFF FILING FEE A filing fee . oust accompany the application. Hake check payable to: //�� /0 .'/.. no .A/1 / / //,I'/� .(I,,,C ATTACHMENT #1 TO REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARTAINCR CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project will require a variance. Two additional variances are needed based on our engineer's discussion with the city staff. The two variances relate to the barn side yard setback and the grading as built, or in particular, to the slope of the grading where it exceeds the 2:1 ratio. 1. The concrete pad for the stable/barn is an existing pad placed on the property many years ago. The area was especially graded for this barn but the actual barn structure was never built. Various building permits, going back to the 1960s, had been granted for the construction of a stable/barn but had never been carried through. In order to utilize the existing concrete pad and foundation a side yard variance appears to be needed, as the concrete pad is within 16.9 feet of the property line at its closest dimension. It is now my understanding, based on city staff, that even though the barn is located in the "rear yard" a 25' set back is required. The original building permit for the structure was issued August 8, 1972. The existing concrete pad has an, at least, 24" by 12" steel reinforced footing and the steel reinforcing is connected to the steel matting in the concrete pad. Original drawings, permit and approvals are available for review. Copies are enclosed. 2. As built, the grading with filled top soil in the front yard area slope slightly exceeds 2:1 ratio in some selected areas. The slope does not exceed 1.5:1. The soil was imported prior to Ordinance #232. The added top soil area will be used as a front yard area, as no other yard area exists at the property. No rear yard exists at this property. 1 ATTACHMENT #2 TO REOUFST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIAN_CR CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Criteria to be satisfied for grant of variance. The proposed changes are based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The following factors apply to both variance requests: A. The property is at 1.04 acres, one of the smallest properties in the area. Virtually all other properties, except possibly one, have a larger acreage than the subject property with many being more than twice the acreage of the subject. B. The slope of the property has been such that, except for the small building pad and the graded stable/barn pad, very little land has been usable. No front yard, side yard or rear yard was usable on this property. C. The shape of the property is essentially a rectangle, with a triangle attached on the northern portion of the building pad areas. This layout made it possible to construct the residence only at the extreme south border and providing for a stable pad to the east of the home at a lower elevation. This only allows for a front yard north of the residence. No rear yard exists, as the south side of the property is entirely taken up by a slope and a property easement. 1. The variance for the stable/barn side yard is sought for the reason that the stable/barn location had been graded approximately 20 years ago and a concrete pad had been put in place for a stable/barn in approximately 1972. This location is the only location on the property that would lend itself to the location of a barn, because of the above mentioned size, slope and shape characteristics of the subject property. The barn would, in every other respect, conform with the setback requirement as apparently barns are allowed within the 50 foot rear yard setback requirement. No structures on the subject property or on the neighbors' properties, are within 35 feet of the proposed barn structure or within 35 feet of the nearest property 2 0 line near the proposed barn structure. Because of the terrain difference to the rest of the property, the proposed barn area for the barn is the only site relatively easily accessible from the driveway area. This location provides for a reasonable access and the ability for deliveries and horse trailer storage, out of view from the home and adjacent properties. Adjacent properties in the area, mainly because of their larger size, afford easy access to stable/barn locations and this location, slightly within the side yard requirement, would be the only suitable location on the subject property. 2. The top soil filled area is mainly located in the front of the residence. This is the only area that can be utilized for a childrens' play area, garden and family yard on this property. It has been improved to provide a relatively flat yard area. All of the adjacent properties, without exception, have either a larger rear or front yard, ,usable for family oriented activities. This property, without the filled area, virtually had no usable outside yard and garden area. No rear yard and only minimal side yards exist. All properties in the surrounding area have yard and garden areas, while the subject property, because of the above size, slope and shape conditions, does not afford the residents the benefits of an outside area. The steeper than 2:1 slope, not exceeding 1.5:1 is not uncommon even on the applicant's lot where steeper than 2:1 slope is present immediately behind the applicant's house. A similar slope is also present on the adjacent property to the south, above the applicant's property. There the slope also appears to exceed 30', giving the neighbors a largerear yard for family use. A 1.5:1 slope is also present on the south site of the Fred Calhoun property, to the northeast and east. There the slope is comparable in height to the applicant's slope. The total distance of the slope at 1.5:1 on the Calhoun property exceed in length the slope on the applicant's property by more than double. The slope there made it possible for the Fred Calhouns to have a large rear yard with a large circular drive and a large pad area for construction of a future barn/stable structure. This area is currently used a parking area for trailers. 3 • 3. The above limitations of the property, imposed by the relatively small size, irregularly shape and steep topography pose a hardship on the property owner unless the two variances are granted. The top soil, as added, enhanced the usability of the property to some degree even though the subject property is still moderate in its outside yard size when compared to adjacent properties. The variances will substantially enhance the usability and the enjoyment of the property and bring it near the standard enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. 4 • • ATTACHMENT #3 TO REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The proposed changes will. not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or Injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone where the subject property is located because: • The property owner has retained a professional engineering company, David Breiholz and Company Inc. Mr. Breiholz is one of the foremost authorities in Souther California as to earthquake safety. He and his firm have provided engineering assistance to many residential property owners and to the City of Palos Verdes Estates, as their professional plan checker for many years. Mr. Gary Winn, P.E. is the project manager. Mr. Winn is the former city engineer for the City of Palos Verdes Estates. A geotechnical engineer, Mr. Keith D. Tucker, P.E., was retained to analyze, verify and certify the soil, slope and compaction of the filled area. Kugler Surveying and Mapping, a licensed California surveying firm, was retained to provide detailed data as to the slope at the property in the as built stage. A 32 inch high retaining wall was constructed along the westerly driveway border and along the north westerly property line. This retaining wall was constructed with a 2' x 2' concrete, steel reinforced foundation. The block wall is fully grouted and steel reinforced every 32 inches. This block wall and the substantial compaction achieved during the top soil placement, assures that none of the people utilizing the driveway or the easement area, adjacent to the filled area, in any possible danger. All slopes and filled top soil areas will be planted as soon as approval is given. Appropriate bushes and trees are planned so that a fully landscaped property, with excellent drainage and stability, will result. Numerous discussions, consultations and visits have been had with the down slope neighbors to the north. They are Mr. and Mrs. Fred Calhoun and Mr. and Mrs. Steve Calhoun. Both have been fully informed as to the plans for the subject property and have assisted the property owners with their advice, have provided them with the adjacent property survey map and have voiced their support for the property , owners' plans and as built improvements. Mr. Steve Calhoun, on various occasions, has expressed his agreement with the upgrading and re —landscaping of the subject property as it will then be more harmonious with the planned improvement for his own property and the existing property improvements at his parents, Mr. and Mr. Fred Calhoun's property. Both of these properties are 5 • immediately adjacent to the subject property and are the only neighbors to the west, north and east. As the slope does not exceed 15' in height and as there is a total of approximately 25' separating the bottom of the slope to any future improvement on the adjacent property, no health or safety is impaired by the slope where it exceeds the 2:1 ratio. The less than 25' distance of the proposed barn/stable from the property line should not interfere with the enjoyment of the adjacent property by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Calhoun, as their property is fully improved and the only potential structure that could be constructed anywhere nearby could also only be a barn/stable. The concrete foundation was installed under a building permit and approved. Any removal of this foundation would serve as a hardship to the property owner. It is not possible to just build on a smaller area of the foundation, as the footings are on the perimeter only. RHIIsVR3.LTR 6 COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA 11 Z SO sq.ft. RESIDENCE UP sq.ft. GARAGE R44, sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) (, 0OD sq. ft. POOL G40 sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE Site Plan Review Application -8- (0l sq.ft. M PROPERTY OWNER: OWNERS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Fi i F' S c - R P. v. t) . „ • 541 - 2.1►2 (w) 54t-35 33 (Lf) 2 5(02 P - v- P- LOT NO 2_ I aA-CT 9\4lQ ASSESSORS BOOK NO?S11 PAGE 09 a PARCEL 030 VeilY ALA! / c3 2e tip- (2_ � C© . I852 LrM.v-A 0.)JL). L in r4 15' 0 50 ********************************************************************** NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: GA-11- 4 G-S 1+00 i TL one e c. `€ 40 S (` , tCLCkP i Ao 0t-n o� . b F 1 s`ip S , F ( L o X6S7-- 01 &- g-o-c5 r 5TPre,L, P ODcTiv1 &F p0a; S-t_ l61-NP vcr- 611 Pour— ff \.? • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. T� L Q g tc lS m ATI vI c T 1 CKf56ULt -, D\s — u .woi 1G-- \. MR o f2- i Env t(- S 4 \M-12—c r4-14. C E. Site Plan Review Application -9- B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. QvT po5 LEND PANAc`f OF tT4 -nrrE ()v‘t .zr fr)(2_ oba.s Q.e.,E41-1-e: A-- -Fg_o \-priw Pizg-P. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existingdrainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. e_ QQ>QO ChoNG- Pb - ALT — t r_ N( At) Q-Prom ao +ru4,s Lv� 7-1-I- A FHA_ , V P TO I r rT . IQ RA c.ry A^cf l S 14.b`Tr _itzes L\-1 D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. l\l0 \(EG LTATro ►4 t 5 ?(-A-wrc106- TO C(L E_Ou+-F�tS cp:)- p0,0c(t t� Cd1�./-9, �l.- I,S PDs �D . Site Plan Review Application -10- M E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. Mope i Apo r(op 5 ID R EAsrn(06- AesweirofE t D ��.��Q►� .-�` F E g7 ALE 1Cows csrA-Ki \XJ rak C TOE_ g A.Pro r G- Ci 2 -i F5 A-- FI20 n-r- `%D . F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. \AG - FE EL- / -T .PR( .o Pivt c T 15 C-o 44, AT -a; 14 t n4 '1 E S u �.2.cv Kr O u nr&-, G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation .for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. T l S (N&-LFk v uL' l 9 i ORANI -zc,U /4-ki C o ti c Gv ( i t CA-,"r 6 F Site Plan Review Application -11- H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. -THE2e Ik NLc St6kit aacA-MT IMPAct5 Exc P T 2 rT" ( pc L -� ( v 2, c--5 Pc95oc,ifrrFZ I TA GRO t kc 6- . I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information present, d are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 41 - 2i - q1,( Si Applic Site Plan Review Application -12- OWNERS DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (n� Executed at Vie LL-t kr6-- , California, this 221 -5-k da T vv1. , 1991 2 VAL ? : s Ups gr. Art ( 04Trss, NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: iLA Ara- DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: lam- GVV G /i'J FEE: COMPANY NAME: DA-,4 t (O 6 Q.,el t taako RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: (R Z L o M.trA- BY: %oiM'r'h 1cl 91 2.7 j�91 ZONING CASE NO: COMPANY PHONE NO. 2t d -10 O TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: 2- g(0Z e04 , 0. 9-Ag- Hw,S Site Plan Review Application -13- COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17) Main buildings, .accessory buildings,' structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 31,$)13Dsq.ft. — sq.ft. 31,0$0sq.ft. RESIDENCE 3 56 a sq. ft. t 5 Co sq. ft. 31 1 sq. ft. GARAGE sq. ft. 64o sq. ft. 04 O sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL (pL)-D sq.ft. sq.ft. (.040 sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. tX) sq.ft. [Qv() sq.ft. TENNIS COURT sq.ft. "— sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. -- sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL. SQUARE FEET 42-0 O sq.ft. t eiq to sq. ft. (o I ' co sq. ft. % STRUCTURE COVERAGE 1t,3 % Application DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 6,216 sq.ft. sq. ft. (o 21(0 sq. ft. 21c0 sq. ft. sq. ft. 6, s e sq.ft. sq.ft. 6768 sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.•ft.. toe) S sq. ft. (o R sq. ft. TOTAL COVERAGE 2 13 % Application C1iy ol Rolling J�P? INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377.1521 TO: Franz Fischer Assoc., 608 Silver Spur Road, Suite 360, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 FROM: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The plan for new stable & addition/remodel to Siu residence. Applicant: Franz Fischer Address: 2862 Palos Verdes Drive North, Rolling Hills (a) X Complies with City Zoning requirements (b) Needs Variance (- Application attached. (c) Needs Conditional Use Permit Application attached. (d) Other (see below) Date: May 24, 1988 jetA4b6C 0l City Manager /% •• in, Wile 1pgEN OCT - 9 1991 COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17) cay ROLLING HILLS Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUILDING AREAS EXISTING NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL STABLE TENNIS COURT SERVICE YARD OTHER CoGuEer 3Jt080sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (04-0 sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 35iaD TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4 Z o o % STRUCTURE COVERAGE th Site Plan Review Application sq. ft. -6- PROPOSED 15 to Bg'o load 5 do 255(9 ( . sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL Y ? O %Osq. ft. 3 -7 < (o sq. ft. 40 64o loon Svo sq.ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (o -1siA sq.ft. 18:2, % DRIVEWAY 6'41 G sq. ft. — S56 sq. ft. 4?2t7 sq. ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (erg S sq.ft. 8"8 sq.ft. (v2`1(0 sq.ft. - g sq.ft. 5 4o R sq.ft. !&il % -- 2,3 % 144 % 18,Z % Site Plan Review Application -7- COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF, A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS, TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL OTHER Po a --re- 6 064 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE Site Plan Review Application 11 126o 31 B 4o loop (QC 5(00 sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST . AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1, PAAA, 2- F. ss , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: £,e'4 1 2.-& 1140 Executedat P-64/6,cd this day of Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change Site Plan Review Application -15- , California, 19�f. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and.informati• presented are true and correct o the best of my knowledge a beli S igr ture ft Legal Owner Date Si ature licant Date • sr Date Filed C•ey � � ll.•..S Jd.Ff, INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 Zoning Case No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant, address and telephone no. F2A k► 2 F45C'14 E �. '2.' iv 2r C7A L o s V i�12-0 rs �-- �[ o �.rti-� R H , 5'4 (- '3 5 3 ' 2. Legal Owner, address and telephone no'. (if different from above) SR ►4 re- 3. Address of project 'L b (a2- ©'k.I Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. 7 S' 1 — (90 1 — 030 Lot No. 2- Ac-r✓ 1 •2E t4 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required. by city, regional, state and federal agencies: G aptki,Cr Pe/2.mI►— 5. Existingzoning district S 6. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed): RE (OPAT-LA-L AOOtnIfin.r ST�+3LE 0 0tT't �-%_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size. '371 6 8D 8. Net lot area. 3 -71 6 50 -C- - 9. Total square footage of structures. 10. Basement square footage. 1 VLF__ 11. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage . 5-.4 /0- 12. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? A T G. Ara- 6 IBC i rcrt a xi 13. Will any interior walls be rem ved or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will the entire building structure require a newroof? p 15. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 25% added? y ES 16. Will cut and fill be balanced?. )L10 Amount cut Amount fill 4-20 17. Attach plans. 18. Proposed scheduling. \ IfF A PQ(zoii- ,5 f{-iu . (As 3 u t L ) 19. If residential, inclu the unit si z e, approximate sale rice and household size expected. ' uLAA, � slut, SQ'T, J0 S IES 1'g1eE 1 20. If commercial, ,indicate thetyyppe Lestimated vemployment per shift and loading facilities. j /k 21. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shifts, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. IQ [4 22. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or. rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. VA21 f}i1/4.lC 6724_40 n9 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 23. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 1 S ! ea.o Qo5 s=- 24. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 25. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. (S' ftm kiT •M ILO 26. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter, 27. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. 28. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground wat quality or quantity, or alteration of existi draining patterns. f1LL ti1/41c41- ALTe4. 0 0.40 N+•G-a7. (UT /40V arP_ L 29. Substantial change in existing nbise.or vibrati+ levels in the vicinity. ti 30. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent oz more. 31. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives ./-- 32. Substantial change in demand for municipal service: (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). ✓ 33. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 34. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 35. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. A4 4 iSflNG S It1 GCE ec,tD ruc - t S Loc., ED ilitE 5 l , _ Nth( (c4 tS eRogosfo 'ib ISE iCPR-Al41FC, At-$ rri+E tz,T enL F- fr..k&tE (9 oPOsC TH c5 A-9 Q Gt c ri e ,tis k-So Fb-e- ct, U._ t NG- 36. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. -r - StTa tS Q-RovloOev G! SAJ ' PriAk .(3-4 A G-s t D Er`G.r(e'L ( 5 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,and informatio presented are true and correct o the best of my knowledge apW beli Sig Legal Owner Date Signature y'-Z7--/ licant Date • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition s completely understood. Executed at _ �C. this 7 -f day of �i '� , 19 By: By: Site Plan Review Application -14- r V� , California �z PVM. Addre V� Al; 91ty s