725, Addition to SFR with encroachm, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 2008-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-08, A RESOLUTION GRANTING
APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ADDITION, A PORTION OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT SETBACK; GRANTING A VARIANCE TO LOCATE A SERVICE
YARD IN THE FRONT SETBACK AND NOT TO EXCEED 3-FOOT
WALLS IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS AND GRANTING A
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN AREA FOR A
FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL BE SET ASIDE AT AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 725, AT 9
PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST, (LOT 6-GF), (NEGRI).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Giovanni Negri with respect to
real property located at 9 Packsaddle Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 28-EF) requesting a two
year time extension for previously approved Variances for 987 square foot addition to the
existing residence and garage, of which approximately 490 square feet would encroach into
the front setback; an encroachment with the service yard into the front setback; an
encroachment with less than 3-foot walls into the front and side yard setbacks and a Variance
from the requirement that an area (1,000 sq.ft.), for a future stable and corral be set aside with
any future application.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on April 15, 2008 at
which time information was presented indicating that additional time is needed to process the
development application.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2006-08, dated
April 15, 2006, to read as follows:
A. The Variances approvals shall expire within four years from the effective date
of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070. Except that the Variance from the
requirement that an area be set aside for a future stable and corral shall be applicable to
the property for life, except as specified in subparagraph "B" of Resolution 2006-08.
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of Resolution
No. 2006-08 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL 2008.
ATTEST:
qtal
ROGER' SOMMER, CHAIRMAN
MXt A,
MARILYN KhRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2008-07 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-08, A RESOLUTION GRANTING
APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ADDITION, A PORTION OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT SETBACK; GRANTING A VARIANCE TO LOCATE A SERVICE
YARD IN THE FRONT SETBACK AND NOT TO EXCEED 3-FOOT WALLS
IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS AND GRANTING A VARIANCE
FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE
AND CORRAL BE SET ASIDE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 725, AT 9 PACKSADDLE ROAD
EAST, (LOT 6-GF), (NEGRI).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April
15, 2008 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Witte, Vice Chairman Henke and Chairman
Sommer.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Smith.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
DEPUTY CIT CLERK
NAME
RECORDING REQUF,,;T BY
`WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
CI lY Of R6,66.4067jl!
PLAN/Q/Nat ZJc pZ•
MAILING 2. Pok TcJ U SLR 0E40 R Z7,
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE a4-4'/,'-167
ZIP CODE p Z 74
TITLE(S)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
�1 FF1 D4v I / C-CCI77-./A41CC
• i
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE NO. 725
§§
XX VARIANCES
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
9 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 6-GF) CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 725 VARIANCES XX
fy • r declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
re q0t 1 1
(grkht • t.
erkkal 44,11/41cttalq
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles )
On 12- 6'66 before me,-Do,rr-ice.4�
Signature
Name typed or printed
Address
City/State
k< l`1 `-Zl /� ! (E . I\)n rA a el
personally appeared & 10 VA 10 A) 1 P 7i t2 l
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they executed the
his/ her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the e
the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California tha
correct.
WITNESS by hand an
Signature of Notary
fficial seal.
!DcJ,(8LtC
person(s) whose name(s) is/ are subscribed to the within
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by
ntity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed
- • -••i•. •.r.•r.•histrue and
y DOUGLAS K. MCHATTIE
• Notary PubMc - Calftom►a
% t h% Los Angeles County
My Comm. EmiresFeb25. 2009
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
• ekt-1(611- A
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION, A PORTION OF WHICH
WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT SETBACK; GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO LOCATE A SERVICE YARD IN THE FRONT
SETBACK AND NOT TO EXCEED 3-FOOT WALLS IN THE FRONT
AND SIDE SETBACKS AND GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIREMENT THAT AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND
CORRAL BE SET ASIDE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 725, AT 9 PACKSADDLE
ROAD EAST, (LOT 6-GF), (NEGRI).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Application was duly filed ' by Mr. Giovanni Negri with
respect to real property located at 9 Packsaddle Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 28-
EF) requesting a-9e-square foot addition to the existing residence and garage, of
which approximately 490 square feet would encroach into the front setback.
When completed the residence would be 3,466 square feet with a 719 square foot
garage and 250 square foot attached trellis. The applicant is also requesting a
Variance to encroach with the service yard into the front setback, to encroach
with less than 3-foot walls into the front and side yard setbacks and a Variance
from the requirement that an area (1,000 sq.ft.), for a future stable and corral be
set aside with any discretionary application. During the proceedings of this
application the applicant requested to be allowed to construct in conjunction
with this project a 600 square foot swimming pool / spa that would normally be
administratively approvable.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application and at a regular meeting on April 18, 2006,
May 16, 2006 and at a field trip on May 16, 2006. The applicant was notified of
the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and
presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from
members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant and his representatives were
in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as
a Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities, and is therefore categorically exempt
from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. The Planning Commission considered the request for the
Variances and reviewed the parking situation in the neighborhood, the shape of
the existing structure and the encroachment of the residence and garage into the
setbacks and the extreme slope behind the existing building pad. The Planning
Commission, after lengthy consideration and discussion, came to the conclusion
that the configuration and the topography of the lot could not support a garage
ZC NO. 725
Recn ')flflt !1R
1
• •
addition elsewhere on the lot and could not support the construction of a stable
and corral without substantial grading and importation of soil. Further, this is
the first request for a Variance from the requirement that an area be set aside for
a stable and corral considered by the City; by granting this Variance the City is
not setting a precedent for similar requests in the future because it makes its
determination on the unique characteristics of this property and the current
circumstances. Granting the Variance so as to relieve the property owner from
the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral does not
preclude the current or futureproperty owners from applying to the City for
approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or
construction plan is later identified.
Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A
Variance to Section 17.16.110 is required because it states that every lot in the
RAS-1 zone shall have a front setback of not less than 50 feet from the roadway
easement. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach 27 feet into the
required 50-foot front setback with 198 square foot addition to the existing two -
car garage and with 292 square foot addition to the existing residence, for a total
of 490 square feet encroachment. With respect to this request for a Variance, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
properties or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. The property was
developed in 1960 on an irregularly shaped lot, when the requirement for a front
setback was 30 feet from roadway easement line. Therefore, approximately 760
square feet of the existing residence, which includes 521 square feet of the
existing garage, already encroaches into the front setback. The lot was created by
a subdivision at the end of a cul-de-sac with two other properties abutting the
cul-de sac. Pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance, currently, only two properties
would be allowed to be created along a turning radius of a cul-de-sac, which
allows for wider lots. Developments on several other properties along
Packsaddle Road East encroach into the front setbacks. Subject property, together
with the adjoining properties have small building pads and steep slopes
descending towards Rancho Palos Verdes. Further, City restricts overnight
parking on streets/roadway easements, which further creates difficulty for
parking for properties that already have lesser frontage than is required and that
are located on a cul-de-sac. The topography of the lot, the location at the end of a
cul-de-sac together with the fact that the existing residence is located in the front
setback creates a difficulty in constructing the addition elsewhere on the
property.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
ZC NO. 725
uPc„ lnn,_nR
2
• •
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The existing residence is
2,677 square feet with a 521 square foot two -car garage, which are the smallest on
the block. The variance for the addition ofthe third car garage is necessary due to
the configuration of the front setback and the driveway. The distance between
the existing garage and the street pavement is not adequate to park two cars in
tandem on the existing driveway. The Variance is necessary because the existing
terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the addition
elsewhere on the property. The portion of the addition that would encroach into
the setback is a natural extension of the interior flow of the floor plan. With the
addition of 987 square feet, of which 490 square feet is subject to this variance,
the residence would still be smaller than the homes in the vicinity.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed addition will be
constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will not require any grading, and is of sufficient distance
from nearby residences, so that it will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors. The addition of a one -car garage will be beneficial to the
neighbors as there will be one less car parked and visible in a neighborhood
where parking spaces are limited. The variance will permit the owners to enjoy
their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding
property owners.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed addition will be orderly,
attractive and will protect the architecture of the community. The proposed
-addition will not cause overdevelopment on the lot and is keeping within the
character and size of other structures in the neighborhood.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The structural lot coverage, the total
impervious lot coverage and the disturbed area of the lot are within the
requirements of the City.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
proposed development will utilize the existing driveway and parking pad
currently located next to the existing garage. The addition of a one -car garage
will be advantageous to the overall vehicular circulation in the neighborhood.
G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
ZC NO. 725
Ppen "nnf_nR
3
• •
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A
Variance to Section 17.16.190F. is required because it states that walls may not be
located in any setback and Section 17.12.190 "Setbacks" because it states that
setbacks may not be occupied or obstructed by any structures aboveground. The
applicant proposes to locate not to exceed 3-foot walls and the service yard in the
front and side setbacks.
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
properties or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. The property was
developed in 1960 on an irregularly shaped lot at the end of a cul-de-sac, when
the requirement for front setback was 30 feet from roadway easement line.
Several walls and service yard that already encroach into the setbacks were
constructed as part of the original development. The applicant is proposing to
relocate the existing walls and service yard to accommodate the addition.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary
because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in
placing the service yard elsewhere on the property. The topography of the area
in front of the residence consists of gentle slopes, which require retaining with
short walls. In order for the service yard to be accessible for trash removal, it
must be located on the side of the garage, which already encroaches into the
front setback.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed walls and
service yard will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least
intrusive to surrounding properties, will not require any grading, and are of
sufficient distance from nearby residences, so that it will not impact the view or
privacy of surrounding neighbors. A service yard is required to be provided on
each property and must be conveniently located for trash removal. The walls are
necessary to retain the gently slopes in the front of the property. The Variance
will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement
on the rights of surrounding property owners.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed walls and service yard will be
orderly, attractive and will protect the architecture of the community. The
proposed structures will not cause overdevelopment on the lot and is keeping
within the character and size of other structures in the neighborhood and the
existing development.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The proposed structures are
ZC NO.725
RPen
4
• •
necessary to meet the Zoning and Building Codes for retaining of slope and
provision of a service yard.
Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A
Variance to Section 17.16. 170 is required because it states that every lot or parcel
for which a discretionary approval is required shall have an area developed with
or set aside for a combination stable and corral of a minimum of 1,000 square
feet, and accessway thereto that does not exceed a slope of 25%. Further, Section
17.16.200 states that stable and corral shall not be located on a portion of the lot
where the slope is greater than four to one (25%). The applicant is requesting a
Variance to not to set aside an area for a stable and corral. With respect to this
request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
properties or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. The property was
developed in 1960 on an irregularly shaped lot, when there was no requirement
that an area for a stable and corral be set aside. Subject property, together with
the adjoining properties, was developed on a small building pad with steep
slopes descending towards Rancho Palos Verdes. The slopes beyond the existing
building pad descend to a canyon at a gradient of 45% to 62%, except for a small
area on the northwestern portion of the property where the slope is 31.2%. These
slopes could not support construction of a stable and corral without substantial
grading and importation of soil. In addition, a portion of the area having 31.2%
slope is located in the side yard setback, where construction would not be
allowed. These circumstances currently exist and the proposed project does not
create the inability nor contribute to these circumstances that necessitate this
Variance.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The existing residence is
the smallest on the block and consists of 2,677 square feet with a 521 square foot
garage. With the addition of 987 square feet, of which 490 square feet is subject to
this variance, the residence would still be smaller than the homes in the vicinity.
The application for the addition triggers the requirement that an area for a stable
and corral be set aside. The proposed addition is not the cause for the inability to
set aside an area for a stable and corral on the lot because the existing building
pad could not accommodate a stable and corral that would meet the Health
Department's and City's requirement that a stable and corral be located not less
than 35 feet to residential structure.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. There is no suitable area on
ZC NO.725
RPM„ )nnf_nu
5
• 1
the property to construct a stable and corral. The views and vistas from adjacent
properties will be retained, as there will be no structure placed on the slopes of
subject property. The variance will permit the owners to enjoy their property
without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that no grading is required for the addition, and
by granting the variance to not to construct or set aside an area for a stable and
corral no grading will occur in the future and the natural terrain and vistas will
be preserved.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because in order to construct a stable and corral substantial
grading would have to be undertaken and importation of soil would be required,
which is not in keeping with the goal of the General Plan.
F. The project conforms to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings in Section 5, 6 and 7, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Variances in Zoning Case No. 725 to
encroach with additions, service yard and walls into the front and side setbacks
and not to set aside an area for a future stable and corral, subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Variances approvals shall expire within two years from the
effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070, unless otherwise
extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. Except that the Variance
from the requirement that an area be set aside for a future stable and corral shall
be applicable to the property for life, except as specified in subparagraph "B"
below.
B. Granting the Variance so as to relieve the property owner from the
obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral does not
preclude the current or future property owners from applying to the City for
approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or
construction plan is later identified.
C. It is declared and made a condition of these Variances that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has
been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the
City's determination.
D. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this Permit, or shown otherwise
on an approved plan.
ZC NO. 725
RPcn ',nnA_nR
6
E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated April 11, 2006
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
F. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of the
Lighting Ordinance, pertaining to lighting on said property.
G. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of Section
17.16.190 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to roof covering.
H. Utility lines serving subject residence shall be placed underground.
I. The proposed parking pad along the northeastern property line
shall be covered with Grass Crete and shall not exceed 11 feet in width and 64
feet in length.
J. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4,531 square feet or 6.4% in
conformance with lot coverage limitations.
K. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed
8,531 square feet or 12.1% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations.
L. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 14,182 square feet or
20.2% in conformance with disturbed, area limitations.
M. Residential building pad coverage on the 6,438 square foot
residential building pad (not in setbacks) shall not exceed 4,281 square feet or
66.5%, which do not include the proposed trellis.
N. There shall be no grading for this project.
O. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall
be retained to the greatest extent feasible.
P. The existing swimming pool shall be demolished and filled in
accordance with the County of Los Angeles Building Code specifications to
accommodate the construction of the addition.
Q. If new landscaping is introduced for this project, the landscaping
shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage irrigation
system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using
"hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and
utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray.
Further, landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not
to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to screen the project. If new trees
or shrubs are planned in conjunction with this project, at maturity, they shall not
be higher than the ridge height of the residence.
R. The Service Yard, enclosed by a six-foot wall is approved in the
front setback and shall not exceed 96 square feet in size.
ZC NO. 725
Ape„ 1nnA_nQ
7
S. The proposed walls shall not exceed three feet in height from the
finished grade, except for the service yard wall, which may be 6 feet in height.
T. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to
stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors
generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering
practices.
U. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
W. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
X. If a construction fence is erected during construction, it shall not be
located in easement or cross over trails, if any.
Y. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within
nearby roadway easements.
Z. During construction all easements shall remain clear and free of
debris, vehicles, building materials, building equipment and all other
construction objects, except when it is necessary to park during working hours in
the roadway easement.
AA. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department
Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
AB. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and
landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct
surface water in an approved manner.
AC. If an above ground drainage system is required by the Drainage
Engineer such system shall be designed in such a manner as not, to cross over any
equestrian trails. The drainage system(s) (below or above ground) shall not
discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the
design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors' views to
ZC NO. 725
RPen ,fWW_nR
8
the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage
system.
AD. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition E.
AE. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code, any future grading or structural development on the
property shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission, except that not to exceed 600 square foot pool with spa,
which would normally be administratively approvable, may be constructed on
the existing building pad. Such pool approval shall not trigger any
discretionary reviews or grading.
AF. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this approval pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall
not be effective.
AG. All conditions of these Variance approvals, that apply, must be
complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from, the County of Los
Angeles.
AH. Any action challenging the final decision of the city made as a
result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time
limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code
of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JUNE 2006.
l
LOREN DEROY, CHA OMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
ZC NO.725
Rren �nnA_nR
9
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2006-08 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION
OF AN ADDITION, A PORTION OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT SETBACK; GRANTING A VARIANCE TO LOCATE A SERVICE YARD
IN THE FRONT SETBACK AND NOT TO EXCEED 3-FOOT WALLS IN THE
FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS AND GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIREMENT THAT AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL BE
SET ASIDE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 725, AT 9 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST, (LOT 6-GF), (NEGRI).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
June 20, 2006 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Sommer, Witte and Chairwoman DeRoy.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Henke.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
ZC NO. 725
Reso. 2006-08
•Qhiv`)
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
10
• •
This is a true and certified copy of the record
if it bears the seal, imprinted in purple ink,
of the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
DEC 16 2008
�ts C G RE STTRAR-RECOR�UCOU TYCtERK
LOSA LES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA