195, Construct a paddle/tennis cour, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter
of the Application
of
Dr. S. Edward Tucker
Lot 16A-17SF
ZONING CASE NO. 195
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Dr. S. Edward Tucker, Lot 16A-17 SF,
Southfield Tract, for a conditional Use Permit under Section 3.01 (D),
Paragraph 3(a) of Ordinance No. 150 for construction of a paddle
tennis court came on for hearing on the 19th day of July, 1977 in
the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese
Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having
submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning
Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as
required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. S. Edward
Tucker, is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lots 16A and 17SF, located at 3 West Packsaddle Road in the City
of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connec-
tion with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06
and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, Cali-
fornia. The Commission finds that no communication, written or
verbal, in favor of or in opposition to the request was received.
The Commission finds further that it was determined at a field
trip that the court would not be visible from residences on
Packsaddle Road West, and would have little impact on immediate
neighbors, but would be visible from Crest Road East and from
other properties which did not receive notice of the application.
II.
The Commission finds notices were sent to twenty two
residents who own property within 500 feet of the exterior boundary
of the property as required by law, and the public hearing was
continued to give the Planning Commission an opportunity to make
a field trip to the site. The Commission finds, further, that
• •
although the paddle tennis court would be visible from properties
beyond the 500 foot limit, the appearance could be mitigated by
requiring landscaping and a low fence. The Commission finds that
the conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve
substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the
same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional
use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit for construction of a paddle tennis court should be granted to
Dr. S. Edward Tucker subject to the follow conditions:
1. Fence not to exceed eight feet in height.
2. Landscape plan must be approved by the Landscape
Committee and Planning Commission. The plan was
approved by the Landscape Committee on June 22, 1977
and by the Planning Commission on October 18, 1977.
3. A deposit amounting to 75% of the estimate submitted
by a nursery or landscape architect, to remain with
the City of Rolling Hills for a minimum of two years.
An estimate of $4,901 was presented to the City of
Rolling Hills on November 8, 1977 and funds in the
amount of $3,675.75 were deposited with the City on
that date.
and it is, therefore, so ordered.
gh
reetary,C
anning
mission
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Dr. S. Edward Tucker
Lot 16A-17SF
ZONING CASE NO. 195
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Dr. S. Edward Tucker, Lot 16A-17 SF,
Southfield Tract, for a conditional Use Permit under Section 3.01 (D),
Paragraph 3(a) of Ordinance No. 150 for construction of a paddle
tennis court came on for hearing on the 19th day of July, 1977 in
the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese
Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having
submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning
Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as
required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. S. Edward
Tucker, is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lots 16A and 17SF, located at 3 West Packsaddle Road in the City
of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connec-
tion with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06
and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, Cali-
fornia. The Commission finds that no communication, written or
verbal, in favor of or in opposition to the request was received.
The Commission finds further that it was determined at a field
trip that the court would not be visible from residences on
Packsaddle Road West, and would have little impact on immediate
neighbors, but would be visible from Crest Road East and from
other properties which did not receive notice of the application.
II.
The Commission finds notices were sent to twenty two
residents who own property within 500 feet of the exterior boundary
of the property as required by law, and the public hearing was
continued to give the Planning Commission an opportunity to make
a field trip to the site. The Commission finds, further, that
• •
although the paddle tennis court would be visible from properties
beyond the 500 foot limit, the appearance could be mitigated by
requiring landscaping and a low fence. The Commission finds that
the conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve
substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the
same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional
use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit for construcEion of a paddle tennis court should be granted to
Dr. S. Edward Tucker subject to the follow conditions:
1. Fence not to exceed eight feet in height.
2. Landscape plan must be approved by the Landscape
Committee and Planning Commission. The plan was
approved by the Landscape Committee on June 22, 1977
and by the Planning Commission on October 18, 1977.
3. A deposit amounting to 75% of the estimate submitted
by a nursery or landscape architect, to remain with
the City of Rolling Hills for a minimum of two years.
An estimate of $4,901 was presented to the City of
Rolling Hills on November 8, 1977 and funds in the
amount of $3,675.75 were deposited with the City on
that date.
and it is, therefore, so ordered.
if • Os ,1.1--10. A 41-;14.-..,
I.
cretary, anning mmission
•
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission