572, , Staff Reportsr
•City 0/ leo/ling iii/L
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Agenda Item No.: 4.B.
Mtg. Date: 3/23/98
DATE: MARCH 23, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 98-5: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572.
Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman, 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF)
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-5 on March 17, 1998 at
their regular meeting granting a request for Site Plan Review for the
construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single
family residence. The vote was 4-1. Commissioner Margeta voted against the
project as he was opposed to the size of the residence as compared to those in
the surrounding area.
2. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting Site Plan Review for
the construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot garage,
and 648 square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690 square
foot garage. The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the
existing residence at the southwest or rear of this pie -shaped lot. The pool
will be located behind the residence. Site Plan Review and Nearby Properties
tables are attached. A proposed 822 square foot basement (to be used as an
equipment room) will be located at the southern section of the residence.
3. The existing 2,728 square foot dwelling, 690 square foot garage and 470 square
foot stable were constructed in 1952.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 1
t:
Printed on Recycled Pane?
• •
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet
south of the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a
24 foot wide roadway access.
5. There is existing stable access to the existing barn off Packsaddle Road.
6. On January 29, 1998, the Traffic Commission approved the proposed
relocation of the existing driveway approximately 52 feet south of the existing
driveway with the following conditions:
• The driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
• No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct
either a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting
the property from the roadway.
• The applicants are left with the discretion to modify the new driveway
location no more than 5 feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47
feet north of its existing location) if the applicant desires to salvage the
Eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old driveway shall be
abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition.
7. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20%
permitted). The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35%
permitted).
8. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
9.880 square feet or 26.7%.
9. Grading for the entire project will consist of 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478
cubic yards of fill soil.
10. Disturbed area of the lot will be 22,459 square feet or 39.7% overall (40%
maximum).
11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 98-5.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 2
1
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (1150 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 3
EXISTING
Existing stable encroaches
30 feet into 50 foot front
yard setback
Residence 2,728 sq.ft.
Garage 690 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 0 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 4,008 sq.ft.
7.1%%
17.9%
12.3% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
N/A
17.9%
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
N/A
N/A
PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
reviewed 1/29/98.
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
• •
t
ADDRESS
1 Packsaddle Road E
13 Packsaddle Road E
5 Packsaddle Road E
7 Packsaddle Road E
9 Packsaddle Road E
11 Packsaddle Road E
2 Packsaddle Road E
6 Packsaddle Road E
3Packsaddle Road W
5 Packsaddle Road W
7 Packsaddle Road W
2 Packsaddle Road W
16 Packsaddle Road W
18 Packsaddle Road W
10 Packsaddle Road W
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 4
LOT NO.
24-SF
25-SF
26-SF
27-SF
28-SF
30-SF
32-SF
31-SF
17-SF
18-SF
19-SF
23-SF
22-SF
21-SF
20-SF
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Lanman (Existing)
Ducommun
Andranigian
Straub
Beiler-Hozumi
Clark
'F
uller
Murrell
Tucker
Gales
Talbot
Nissan Real
Estate Corp.
Shu-Chiang
Decristofaro
Cafiero/Walsh
AVERAGE
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
2,728
4,137
2,885
2,119
2,933
6,485
5,417
4,271
3,680
2,758
2,044
5,112
3,422
3,952
3,110
3,670
7,634
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.78
1.39
2.95
2.12
1.89
2.69
1.38
2.06
1.38
2.10
4.61
1.57
2.63
3.20
4.60
2.43
1.78
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ,
TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 572.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Todd H. Lanman with
respect to real property located at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills,
requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence to
replace an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
to consider the application on January 20, 1998 and February 17, 1998, and at a field trip
visit on February 7, 1998. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first
class mail. The applicants and the applicants' representative was in attendance at the
hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15302 and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for
site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or
any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which
involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at
least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or
structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may
be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning
Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because
the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low
density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding
structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage
requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 56,455 square feet. The proposed
residence (7,634 sq. ft.), garage (1,007 sq. ft.), stable (470 sq.ft.), swimming pool 1648 sq.ft.),
and service yard (120 sq.ft.) will have 9,879 square feet which constitutes 17.5% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot
coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 17,851 square feet which equals
31.6% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 1
• •
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing
natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation,
mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, follows
natural contours of the largely flat site to minimize grading. The natural drainage
courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the northwestern
side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the conditions
contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that
is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot
coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a residential and total
buildable pad of 37,005 square feet with a 26.7% coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a largely flat lot that is is also
consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood. Grading will
be minor and required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the
proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in
the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 572 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated
herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 2
• i
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written
notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated January 13, 1998, and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved
with this application.
F. Grading for the project shall not exceed 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478
cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
G. The proposed basement (to be used as an equipment room) shall not
exceed 822 square feet.
H. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 26.7%.
I. The new driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
J. No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct
either a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the property
from the roadway.
K. The applicants may modify the new driveway location no more than 5 feet
from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its existing location) if the
applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old
driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition.
L. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with
the surrounding vegetation of the community.
M. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of
Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology,
soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department
staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope
ratio.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 3
to s
N. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any
building or grading permit.
O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning
Commission.
P. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
Q. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTE . THIS '1Y OF MARCH, 1998.
'CLAN RO: S, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
LYN KERN DEP. CITY CLERK
MARI ,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-5 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission an March 17, 1998 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioner Margeta.
None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
•
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CI CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 4
•
City a/ RO/A wee,
DATE: MARCH 17, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
6eJ
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 98-5: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572.
Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman, 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF)
Following the February 17, 1998 Planning Commission meeting, it came to the
attention of staff that an equipment room area that was included on the plot plan
for the project at 1 Packsaddle Road East was to be located in a basement. Mr. Miles
Pritkat, representing Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman, informed staff and sent the
attached letter explaining that the basement equipment room area was included in
the balanced cut and fill quantities. In view of these facts and if there are no
objections, staff has included the following condition in Resolution No. 98-5:
"G. The proposed basement (to be used as an equipment room) shall not
exceed 822 square feet."
Printed on Recycled Paper.
FEB-25-98 12:41 PM
EC Beall & Assoc
3759530
P.01
EDWARD CARSON BEALL, A.I.A. AND ASSOCIATES
23727 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
TORRANCE CALIFORNIA 90505
TEL: 310.378.1280
FAX: 310.375.9530
TO:
Lola Ungar
City of Rolling Hilts
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Tel: 310.377.1521
Fax: 310.377.7288
CC:
REMARKS:
Lola:
LETTER OF
TR ANSMITTAL
DATE: February 25,1998
PROJECT;
Lanman Residence
#1 Packsaddle East
Rolling Hills
just a follow up on our phone conversation regarding the basement.
We had envisioned a non -habitable basement to containing the various
mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems and equipment required for the
project. This represents 822 s.f. of area below the house. This basement is
reflected on the plot plan, sheet C-1 as "Equipment Room", and shown on cross
section A/C-2. It has also been included in the balanced cut and fill quantities.
I did not include it in the overall square footage of the house under the
"Residence " category since it is non -habitable, and since there was no line item
for basement.
Recalling the discussion of the project that proceeded ours at the meeting, I
thought I should contact your regarding the definition of " basement".
Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance.
Thank you,
BY: Miles Pritzkat, Architect
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 572.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Todd H. Lanman with
respect to real property located at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills,
requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence to
replace an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
to consider the application on January 20, 1998 and February 17, 1998, and at a field trip
visit on February 7, 1998. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first
class mail. The applicants and the applicants' representative was in attendance at the
hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15302 and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for
site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or
any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which
involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at
least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or
structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may
be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning
Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because
the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low
density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding
structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage
requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 56,455 square feet. The proposed
residence (7,634 sq. ft.), garage (1,007 sq. ft.), stable (470 sq.ft.), swimming pool 1648 sq.ft.),
and service yard (120 sq.ft.) will have 9,879 square feet which constitutes 17.5% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot
coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 17,851 square feet which equals
31.6% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE1
DRAFT
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing
natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation,
mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, follows
natural contours of the largely flat site to minimize grading. The natural drainage
courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the northwestern
side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the conditions
contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that
is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot
coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a residential and total
buildable pad of 37,005 square feet with a 26.7% coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a largely flat lot that is is also
consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood. Grading will
be minor and required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the
proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in
the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 572 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated
herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 2
• •
DRAFT
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written
notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated January 13, 1998, and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved
with this application.
F. Grading for the project shall not exceed 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478
cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
G. The proposed basement (to be used as an , equipment room) shall not
exceed 822 square feet.
H. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 26.7%.
I. The new driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
J. No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct
either a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the property
from the roadway.
K. The applicants may modify the new driveway location no more than 5 feet
from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its existing location) if the
applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old
driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition.
L. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with
the surrounding vegetation of the community.
M. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of
Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology,
soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department
staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope
ratio.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 3
• •
DRAFT
N. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any
building or grading permit.
O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning
Commission.
P. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
Q. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 1998.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-5 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 572.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 17, 1998 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 4
• •
DRAFT
N. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any
building or grading permit.
O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning
Commission.
P. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
Q. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 1998.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-5 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 17, 1998 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 98-5
PAGE 4
•aiy °Pelting
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 572
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.78 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JANUARY 15, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission viewed a silhouette of the proposed project on
Saturday, February 7, 1998 at 7:30 AM. Commissioners discussed the height of the
proposed structure.
Denn Engineers calculated the gross lot area and determined that it is actually 1.78
acres and not 1.26 acres. All other calculations are correct. Their findings are
attached.
On January 29, 1998, the Traffic Commission approved the proposed relocation of
the existing driveway approximately 52 feet south of the existing driveway with
the following conditions:
• The driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
• No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct either
a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the property
from the roadway.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
• The applicants are left with the discretion to modify the new driveway location
no more than 5 feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its
existing location) if the applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located
on the property. The old driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -
useable natural condition.
2. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting Site Plan Review for the
construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot garage, and 648
square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690 square foot garage.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest or rear of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located
behind the residence. Site Plan Review and Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing 2,728 square foot dwelling, 690 square foot garage and 470 square foot
stable were constructed in 1952.
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access. The Traffic Commission will be reviewing the new accessway o n
January 29, 1998.
5. There is existing stable access to the existing barn off Packsaddle Road.
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35% permitted).
7. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is 9.880
square feet or 26.7%.
8. Grading for the entire project will consist of 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478 cubic
yards of fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 22,459 square feet or 39.7% overall (40%
maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 2
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (L450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
EXISTING
Existing stable encroaches
30 feet into 50 foot front
yard setback
Residence 2,728 sq.ft.
Garage 690 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 0 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 4,008 sq.ft.
7.1%%
17.9%
12.3% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
N/A
17.9%
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
N/A
N/A
PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
to review 1/29/98.
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 3
1 Packsaddle Road E
3 Packsaddle Road E
5 Packsaddle Road E
7 Packsaddle Road E
9 Packsaddle Road E
11 Packsaddle Road E
12 Packsaddle Road E
16 Packsaddle Road E
13Packsaddle Road W
15 Packsaddle Road W
17 Packsaddle Road W
2 Packsaddle Road W
6 Packsaddle Road W
8 Packsaddle Road W
10 Packsaddle Road W
ADDRESS LOT NO.
24-SF
25-SF
26-SF
27-SF
28-SF
30-SF
32-SF
31-SF
17-SF
18-SF
19-SF
23-SF
22-SF
21-SF
20-SF
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Lanman (Existing) 1
Ducommun
Andranigian
Straub
Beiler-Hozumi
Clark
Fuller
Murrell
Tucker
Gales
Talbot
Nissan Real
Estate Corp.
Shu-Chiang
Decristofaro
1 Cafiero/Walsh
AVERAGE I
PROPOSED I
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
2,728
4,137
2,885
2,119
2,933
6,485
5,417
4,271
3,680
2,758
2,044
5,112
3,422
3,952
3,110
3,670
7,634
LOT SIZE
ACRES :.
(GROSS)
1.78
1.39
2.95
2.12
1.89
2.69
1.38
2.06
1.38
2.10
4.61
1.57
2.63
3.20
4.60
2.43
1.78
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 4
JAN-26-98 06:32 PM EC Beall & Assoc
se
3759530
'P.01
EDWARD CARSON BEALL, A.I.A. AND ASSOCIATES
23727 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
TELR A N E., CALIFORNIA 90505 LETTER OF
FAX; 310.375.9530 TRANSMITTAL
TO:
Lola Ungar
City of Rolling Hills
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Tel: 310.377.1521
Fax: 310.377.7288
CC:
1
REMARKS:
Lola:
DATE:
PROJECT:
January 26,1998
Lanman Residence
#1 Packsaddle East
Gross Area calc for the Lanman
properly by Denn Engineers
I had Denn Engineers, who performed the Lanman's survey, calculate the gross
area of the lot. Note that at some time, a portion of lot 23SF was annexed to the
Lanman's lot. This line is visible on sheet C-1, running to the left of the existing
stable.
The gross lot area of the Lanman's lot is 77732.4 s.f. or 1.78 acres.
The net lot area is correct, as are all other numbers, since they are based on the
actual survey as prepared by Denn. The Planning Commissioner White was
correct in questioning the net lot area of 56,455 s.f. if the lot area was 1.26 acres,
or 54,885.6 s.f.!
Therefore, the matrix on your staff report should reflect the revised number for
the Lanman's lot and I believe should reflect a decrease in the area of lot 23SF.
Thank you,
Miles Pritzkat, A.I.A.
DENN ENGR FAX 542-9491 TEL
No.310-542-9433
•
, . a .
Jan 23 , 99 9 : 41 No .003 P .01
'repared by: Denn Engineers #CGDS08930
area -Summary SR95295 1/11/98 19:54:05 Faetor: 1.0000000
3R95295.PTS:
Point Int-An
301
14 78-29-31
Bearing
S •10-09-31 E
N 68-20-00 E
Distance Point North
298.5426 74 697.3805
292.4100 9 805.1401
RAD:.175.0010 LEN: 228.5687 TAN: 133.8006 CEN.ANG; 74-50-02
CHORD: 212.6652 MO: 36.0092 EXT: 45.3382 DEGREE: 32-44-25
SEG: 5220.5 TRI: 14779.4 SEC: 19999.9
RPT.: -11
9 22-26-02
11 285-09-58
9 75-01-00
19 142-35-00
N 89-13-58 W
N 15-56-00 E
N 36-39-00 W
N 74 04-00 W
175.0010 11
175.0000 19
212.6646 19
83.3100 18
807.6836
975.9605
975.9605
998.8306
RAD: 175. 0000 LEN: 119.9298 TAN: 62.4275 CEN.ANG: 39-15-56
CHORD: 117,5967 MO: 10.1736 EXT: 10.8015 DEGRRR: 32-44-26
SEG: 802.3 TRI: 9691.5 SEC: 10493.9
RPT.: -3
18 90-00-00
3 320-44-04
18 160-22-02
301 83-32-2'1
S 15-56•-00 W
N 23-19-56 W
S 86-18-02 W
Perimeter: 1022.7611 Accum.Perimeter:
Sq.Feet: 66315.1 Acres: 1.5223
Accum. - Sq.Feet: 66315.1 Acres:
SR95295 . PTS : ROSS ARE
Point Int-An
300
301 193-10-25
14 78-29-31
9 202-26-00
Hearing
S 23-19-S6
S 10-09-31
N 68-20-00
N 89. 14-00
E
E
E
E
175.0000 3 830.5538
175.0000 301 991.2430
117.5967 301 991.2430
1022.7611
L51.
.52238
Distance
25.0000
298.5426
292.4100
25.0000
Point
301
14
9
10
North
991.2430
697.3805
805.3401
805.0056
RAD: 200.0010 LEN: 83.3418 TAN: 42.2846 CEN.ANG: 23-52-32
CHORD: 82.7401 MO: 4.3255 EXT: 4.4211 DEGREE: 28-38-52
SEG: 239.1 TRI: 8095:1 SEC: 8334.2
RPT.: -11
10 0-00-02 N 89-13-58 W
11 336-07-26 N 66-53-30 F.
10 78-03-44 N 11-20-16 W
200.0010 11
200.0000 21
82.7399 21
807.6836
886.1778
886.1778
East
848.3311
1120.0816
945.0963
993.1370
993.1370
913.0277
864.9869
795.6760
795.6760
East
795.6760
848.3311
1120.0816
1145.0793
945.0963
1129.0492
1129.0492
i
RAD: 200.0000 LEN: 177.8781 TAN: 95.3059
CEN.ANG: 50-57-30
nRnRFT: 28-18-52
,t
(DENN ENGR'FAX 542-9491 TEL No.310-542-9433
21 78-03-46
11 309-02-30
21 142-35-01
1 154-31-15
S 66-53-30 W
N 15-56-00 E
N 48-35-15 W
N 74-04-00 W
200.0000 11
200.0000 1
172.0 732 1
83.3100 2
(ill
Jan 23.98
9:41 No.003 P.02
8074836
1000/0000
1000.0000
1022.8702
RAD: 200.0000 LEN: 28.5701 TAN: 14.3094 CEN.ANG: 8-11-05
CHORD: 28.5458 M0: 0.5099 EXT: 0.5112 DEGREE: 28-38-52
SEG: 9.7 TRI: 2847.3 SEC: 2857.0
RPT.: -3
2 90-00-00 S 15-56-00 W 200.0000,
3 351-48-55 N 07-44-55 E 200.0000
2 175-54-28 N 70-09••32 W 28.5458
3 830.5538
4 1028.7276
4 1028.7276
RAD: 200.0000 LEN: 308.4926 TAN: 55.6169 CEN.ANG: 31-04-51
CHORD: 107.1.672 MO: 7.3117 EXT; 7.5891 DEGREE: 28-38-52
SEG: 524.3 TRI: 10324.9 SEC: 10849.3
RFT.: -3
4 85-- 54-27
3 328-55-09
4 160-22-02
300 74-2.7-34
Perimeter: 1222,5452 Accum.Perimeter: 2145.3063
Sq.Feet: 77732.4 Acres: 1.78449
Accum. - Sq.Feet: 144047.5 Acres: 3.30688
N 07-44-55 W
N 23-19-56 W
S 82-12-30 W
200.0000 3 830.5538
200.0000 300 1014.1966
107.1672 300 1014.1986
945.0963
1000.0000
1000.0000
919.8906
864.9869
891.9523
891.9523
864.9869
785.7745
785.7745
•City 0/
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1998
TO:
FROM:
i
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521 •
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 572
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.78 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JANUARY 15, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission will view a silhouette. of the proposed project on
Saturday, February 7, 1998 at 7:30 AM. Denn Engineers calculated the gross lot area
and determined that it is actually 1.78 acres. All other calculations are correct.
On January 29, 1998, the Traffic Commission approved the proposed relocation of
the existing driveway approximately 52 feet south of the existing driveway with
the following conditions:
• The driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
• No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct either
a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the property
from the roadway. •
• Theapplicants are left with the discretion to modify the new driveway location
no more than 5 feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its
existing location) if the applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located
on the property. The old driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -
useable natural condition.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
2. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting Site Plan Review for the
construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot garage, and 648
square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690 square foot garage.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest or rear of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located
behind the residence. Site Plan Review and Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing dwelling, garage and 470 square foot stable were constructed in 1952.
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access. The Traffic Commission will be reviewing the new accessway o n
January 29, 1998.
5. There is existing stable access to the existing barn off Packsaddle Road.
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35% permitted).
7. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is 9.880
square feet or 26.7%.
8. Grading for the entire project will consist of 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478 cubic
yards of fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 22,459 square feet or 39.7% overall (40%
maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 2
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
EXISTING
Existing stable encroaches
30 feet into 50 foot front
yard setback
Residence 2,728 sq.ft.
Garage 690 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 0 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 4,008 sq.ft.
7.1%%
17.9%
12.3% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
N/A
17.9%
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
N/A
N/A
PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
to review 1/29/98.
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 3
• •
ADDRESS
1 Packsaddle Road E
3 Packsaddle Road E
5 Packsaddle Road E
7 Packsaddle Road E
9 Packsaddle Road E
11 Packsaddle Road E
2 Packsaddle Road E
6 Packsaddle Road E
3Packsaddle Road W
5 Packsaddle Road W
7 Packsaddle Road W
2 Packsaddle Road W
6 Packsaddle Road W
8 Packsaddle Road W
10 Packsaddle Road W
LOT NO.
24-SF
25-SF
26-SF
27-SF
28-SF
30-SF
32-SF
31-SF
17-SF
18-SF
19-SF
23-SF
22-SF
21-SF
20-SF
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Lanman (Existing)
Ducommun
Andranigian
Straub
Beiler-Hozumi
Clark
Fuller
Murrell
Tucker
Gales
Talbot
Nissan Real
Estate Corp.
Shu-Chiang
Decristofaro
Cafiero/Walsh
AVERAGE
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
2,728
4,137
2,885
2,119
2,933
6,485
5,417
4,271
3,680
2,758
2,044
5,112
3,422
3,952
3,110
3,670
7,634
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.26
1.39
2.95
2.12
1.89
2.69
1.38
2.06
1.38
2.10
4.61
1.57
2.63
3.20
4.60
2.2
1.26
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 4
•
City a/ r20 erns Jh//
HEARING DATE: JANUARY 20, 1998
TO:
FROM:
6
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence.
BACKGROUND
ZONING CASE NO. 572
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.26 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JANUARY 15, 1998
1. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting Site Plan Review for the
construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot garage, and 648
square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690 square foot garage.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest or rear of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located
behind the residence. Site Plan Review and Nearby Properties tables are attached.
2. The existing dwelling, garage and 470 square foot stable were constructed in 1952.
3. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access. The Traffic Commission will be reviewing the new accessway on
January 29, 1998.
4. There is existing stable access to the existing barn off Packsaddle Road.
5. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35% permitted).
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage
square feet or 26.7%.
Grading for the entire project will consist of 478 cubic yards of cut
yards of fill soil.
proposed is 9.880
soil and 478 cubic
Disturbed area of the lot will be 22,459 square feet or 39.7%
maximum).
overall (40%
The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
EXISTING
Existing stable encroaches
30 feet into 50 foot front
yard setback
Residence 2,728 sq.ft.
Garage 690 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 0 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 4,008 sq.ft.
7.1%%
17.9%
12.3% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
N/A
PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 2
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
ADDRESS
1 Packsaddle Road E
3 Packsaddle Road E
5 Packsaddle Road E
7 Packsaddle Road E
9 Packsaddle Road E
11 Packsaddle Road E
2 Packsaddle Road E
6 Packsaddle Road E
3Packsaddle Road W
5 Packsaddle Road W
7 Packsaddle Road W
2 Packsaddle Road W
6 Packsaddle Road W
8 Packsaddle Road W
10 Packsaddle Road W
LOT NO,
24-SF
25-SF
26-SF
27-SF
28-SF
30-SF
32-SF
31-SF
17-SF
18-SF
19-SF
23-SF
22-SF
21-SF
20-SF
17.9% 39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
N/A
N/A
'NEARBY'
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Lanman (Existing)
Ducommun
Andranigian
Straub
Beiler-Hozumi
Clark
Fuller
Murrell
Tucker
Gales
Talbot
Nissan Real
Estate Corp.
Shu-Chiang
Decristofaro
Cafiero/Walsh
AVERAGE
PROPOSED
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
to review 1/29/98.
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
2,728
4,137
2,885
2,119
2,933
6,485
5,417
4,271
3,680
2,758
2,044
5,112
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.26
1.39
2.95
2.12
1.89
2.69
1.38
2.06
1.38
2.10
4.61
1.57
3,422 2.63
3,952 3.20
3,110 4.60
3,670 I 2.2
7,634 1.26
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 3