582, Construct pool with encroachme, Staff Reports• •
City 0/ Affin9. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Agenda Item No.: 4.A.
Mtg. Date: 8/24/98
DATE: AUGUST 24, 1998
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 98-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A
VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SWIMMING
POOL THAT WILL ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK
AND GRANTING A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AN
APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A N E W
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 582.
Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman, 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF)
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission adopted the attached Resolution No. 98-17 on
August 18, 1998 at their regular meeting denying a Variance to permit the
construction of a swimming pool that will encroach into the side yard setback
and granting a request for modifications to an approved site plan for the
construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single
family residence. The vote was 5-0."
2. Dr. and Mrs. Lanman requested a Variance to encroach into the side yard
setback to permit the construction of a pool, requested a Variance to exceed
the maximum disturbed area permitted, and requested Site Plan Review
modification to permit the relocation of the pool at an approved single family
residential development. During the hearing process, the applicants
proposed the reduction of the height of the residence, reduction of the area of
disturbance, omission of a retaining wall behind the residence, and a minor
grading increase which thereby allowed the applicants to withdraw their
request for a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area requirement.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 1
41.4
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
3. On March 17, 1998, by Resolution No. 98-5, the Planning Commission
approved a site plan for the construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence,
1,007 square foot garage, and 648 square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot
residence and 690 square foot garage. The approved structures did not
encroach into any setback. The residence and garage will be located in the
general area of the existing residence at the southwest of this pie -shaped lot.
The pool will be located behind the residence. A proposed 822 square foot
basement (to be used as an equipment room) will be located at the southern
section of the residence. The existing residence and garage will be
demolished. The 470 square foot stable constructed in 1952 will remain.
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet
south of the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a
24 foot wide roadway access.
5. Access to the existing stable off Packsaddle Road will remain.
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,861 square feet or 17.47% (20%
permitted). The total lot coverage proposed is 17,833 square feet or 31.59%
(35% permitted).
7. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
9,861 square feet or 26.65%.
8. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 98-17.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 2
4-
•
•
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that
do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question;
and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege;
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 3
•
•
.10
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the
size of the structure by more than 25% in
a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD
COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that is
more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced
on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building pad
area, any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and
building pad areas, and any nongraded
area where impervious surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL).
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 4
APPROVED II PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches
30 feet into 50 foot front
yard setback
Residence
Garage
SwimPool/Spa
Service Yard
Stable
Total
17.5%
31.6%
7,634 sq.ft.
1,007 sq.ft.
648 sq.ft.
120 sq.ft.
470 sa.ft.
9,879 sq.ft.
No change
Residence
Garage
SwimPool/Spa
Service Yard
Stable
Total
No change
No change
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad No change
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
7,634 sq.ft.
1,007 sq.ft.
630 sq.ft.
120 sq.ft.
470 sa.ft.
9,861 sq.ft.
537 cubic yards of cut soil
537 cubic yards of fill soil
39.55% or 22,327 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable No change
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
reviewed 1/29/98.
No change
No change
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
1
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SWIMMING POOL THAT WILL ENCROACH
INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A REQUEST
FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO
REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 582.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman
with respect to real property located at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF) requesting
a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to permit the construction of a
swimming pool, requesting a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area
requirement, and requesting Site Plan Review modification of a previously
approved single family residential development. During the hearing process, the
applicants proposed the reduction of the height of the residence, reduction of the
area of disturbance, omission of a retaining wall behind the residence, and a minor
grading increase which thereby allowed the applicants to withdraw their request for
a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area requirement.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on June 16, 1998 and July 21, 1998, and at a field
trip visit on July 13, 1998.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 2 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15302] and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.120(A) requires a side yard setback for every residential parcel in the
RA-S-1 zone to be twenty (20) feet. The applicant is requesting to construct a 630
square foot swimming pool which will encroach a maximum of four (4) feet into
the side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 1 OF 6
• •
I
A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is not
necessary because there are other locations on the lot for the swimming pool. In
addition, the maximum disturbed area for this property would be 39.55% of the net
lot area which the Commission finds excessive and exceeds the maximum disturbed
area of most properties in the vicinity so that the proposed expansion of the
building pad for the swimming pool is not appropriate for the property.
B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question because a new residence is being
constructed and there are other locations on this relatively flat lot for the swimming
pool.
C. The granting of the Variance will be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and
zone in which the property is located because the construction of a swimming pool
that encroaches into setbacks does not minimize structural coverage on the pad,
leaves little open space between property lines and would result in overexpansion
of the building pad on this relatively flat lot.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby denies the request for a Variance approval for the construction of a
swimming pool that will encroach into the side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 582.
Section 6. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted
for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be
constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or
structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the
building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the
size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review
application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses
because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low
profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between
surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot
coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 56,455 square feet. The
proposed residence (7,634 sq. ft.), garage (1,007 sq. ft.), stable (470 sq.ft.), swimming
pool ,030 sq.ft.), and service yard (120 sq.ft.) will have 9,861 square feet which
constitutes 17.47% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot
coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 2 OF 6
• •
will be 17,833 square feet which equals 31.59% of the lot, which is within the 35%
maximum overall lot coverage requirement.
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible,
existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
follows natural contours of the relatively flat site to minimize grading. The natural
drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the
northwestern side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with., the
conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a residential and
total buildable pad of 37,005 square feet with a 26.65% pad coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a relatively flat lot that is also
consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood. Grading
will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The
ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found o n
several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of
approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation
for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer
driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act. and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 582 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 3 OF 6
• •
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be . developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated July 27, 1998, and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application.
F. The finished floor elevation of the residential building pad shall not
exceed 1112.5 feet.
G. The swimming pool shall not encroach into any required setbacks.
H. Grading for the project shall not exceed 537 cubic yards of cut soil and
537 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
I. The proposed basement (to be used as an equipment room) shall not
exceed 822 square feet.
J. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed
26.65%.
K. The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 39.55% of the net lot
area.
L. The new driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width.
M. No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will
obstruct either a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the
property from the roadway.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 4 OF 6
• •
N. The applicants may modify the new driveway location no more than 5
feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its existing location) if
the applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old
driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition.
O. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible
with the surrounding vegetation of the community.
P. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the developmentplan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
R. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
S. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
T. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED Tl$S 18
A \,,,F AUGUST, 1998.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
�� -- g , V ,..{,tom
MARILYN K RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 5 OF 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SWIMMING POOL THAT WILL ENCROACH
INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A REQUEST
FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO
REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 582.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
August 18, 1998 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-17
PAGE 6 OF 6
k.0,,..)
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•
C1tyoyie0ii4 Jh//
HEARING DATE: JULY 21,1998
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 582
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.78 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JUNE 6, 1998
Request for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to permit the construction
of a pool, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area permitted, and
request for Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation of the pool at an
approved single family residential development.
BACKGROUND
1. Since the Planning Commission viewed a staking of the proposed project on
Monday, July 13, 1998, the applicants have revised their plans to:
• Drop the finished floor elevation of the residence by 6 inches from 1113.0 to
1112.5, which also will reduce the height of the residence by 6 inches to
1134 (21.5 feet in height),
• Reduce the area of disturbance by 1.1% from 40.65% to 39.55% by not
changing the grade in a portion of the area behind the residence,
• Increase grading by 59 cubic yards of cut and fill from 478 cubic yards of cut
and fill to 537 cubic yards of cut and fill, and
• Increase the size of the swimming pool by 92 square feet from 648 square
feet to 740 square feet.
2. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting a Variance to encroach 4.
feet into the 20 foot side yard setback to permit the• relocation of a 740 square foot
pool 16 feet from the western property line.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 1
Pririted on Recycled Paper.
• •
A Variance request to exceed the maximum disturbed area will not be necessary as
plans show that the maximum disturbed area will be 22,327 square feet or 39.55%
of the lot will be disturbed (40% maximum permitted).
The applicants also request Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation
of the pool to be moved 4 feet west and 30 feet from the residence. The previously
approved pool was 26 feet from the residence.
3. On March 17,1998, by Resolution No. 98-5, the Planning Commission approved a
site plan for the construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot
garage, and 648 square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690
square foot garage. The approved structures did not encroach into any setback.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located behind
the residence. A proposed 822 square foot basement (to be used as an equipment
room) will be located at the southern section of the residence. The existing 2,728
square foot dwelling and 690 square foot garage will be demolished. The 470
square foot stable constructed in 1952 will remain.
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access.
5. Access to the existing stable off Packsaddle Road will remain.
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,971 square feet or 17.66% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,943 square feet or 31.78% (35% permitted).
7. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is 9.880
square feet or 26.95%.
8. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 2
• •
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and
zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity
which is denied the property in question; and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental
welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege;
of substantial
and zone b u t
to the public
observed; and
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling
Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 3
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
APPROVED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
reviewed 1/29/98.
PROPOSED
Pool to encroach 4 ft. into
the 20 ft. side yard setback.
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 740 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,971 sq.ft.
17.66%
31.78%
26.95% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
537 cubic yards of cut soil
537 cubic yards of fill soil
39.55% or 22,327 sq.ft.
No change
No change
No change
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 4
•
Cry Rolling Jh//J
HEARING DATE: JULY 13, 1998
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 582
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.78 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JUNE 6, 1998
Request for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to permit the construction
of a pool, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area permitted, and
request for Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation of the pool at an
approved single family residential development.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission will view a staking of the proposed project on Monday,
July 13, 1998 following a visit to 19 Caballeros Road beginning at 6 PM.
2. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting a Variance to encroach 4
feet into the 20 foot side yard setback to permit the relocation of a 648 square foot
pool 16 feet from the western property line.
The applicants request a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area
permitted. Plans show that 22,952.96 square feet or 40.65% of the lot will be
disturbed (40% maximum permitted). Previous disturbed area was 22,459 square
feet or 39.7%.
The applicants also request Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation
of the previously approved pool to be moved 4 feet west and 30 feet from the
residence. The previously approved pool was 26 feet from the residence.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
3. Grading for the entire project will increase from 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478
cubic yards of fill soil to 485 cubic yards of cut soil and 485 cubic yards of fill soil.
4. On March 17, 1998, by Resolution No. 98-5, the Planning Commission approved a
site plan for the construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot
garage, and 648 square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690
square foot garage. The approved structures did not encroach into any setback.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located behind
the residence. A proposed 822 square foot basement (to be used as an equipment
room) will be located at the southern section of the residence. The existing 2,728
square foot dwelling and 690 square foot garage will be demolished. The 470
square foot stable constructed in 1952 will remain.
5. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access.
6. Access to the existing stable off Packsaddle Road will remain.
7. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35% permitted).
8. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is 9.880
square feet or 26.7%.
9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the e Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 2
f •
•
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS.
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and
zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone b u t
which is denied the property in question; and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and
1E. That the variance does not grant special privilege;
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling
Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 3
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
APPROVED I PROPOSED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
to review 1/29/98.
Pool to encroach 4 ft. into
the 20 ft. side yard setback.
No change
No change
No change
No change
485 cubic yards of cut soil
485 cubic yards of fill soil
40.65% or 22,952.96 sq.ft.
No change
No change
No change
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
ZONING CASE NO. 582
PAGE 4
t
00 Hlll f �9
0
I' ram- i
•
Ci4 0/ leo �e.�na �re�
HEARING DATE: JUNE 16, 1998
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 582
1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF)
RA-S-1, 1.78 ACRES
DR. AND MRS. TODD H. LANMAN
MR. MILES PRITZKAT, AIA, EDWARD CARSON BEALL, AIA,
AND ASSOCIATES
JUNE 6, 1998
Request for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to permit the construction
of a pool, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area permitted, and
request for Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation of the pool at an
approved single family residential development.
BACKGROUND
1. Dr. Todd Lanman and Mrs. Gina Lanman are requesting a Variance to encroach 4
feet into the 20 foot side yard setback to permit the relocation of a 648 square foot
pool 16 feet from the western property line.
The applicants request a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed area
permitted. Plans show that 22,952.96 square feet or 40.65% of the lot will be
disturbed (40% maximum permitted). Previous disturbed area was 22,459 square
feet or 39.7%.
The applicants also request Site Plan Review modification to permit the relocation
of the previously approved pool to be moved 4 feet west and 30 feet from the
residence. The previously approved pool was 26 feet from the residence.
2. Grading for the entire project will, increase from 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478
cubic yards of fill soil to 485 cubic yards of cut soil and 485 cubic yards of fill soil.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 1
CP
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
3. On March 17,1998, by Resolution No. 98-5, the Planning Commission approved a
site plan for the construction of a new 7,634 square foot residence, 1,007 square foot
garage, and 648 square foot pool to replace a 2,728 square foot residence and 690
square foot garage. The approved structures did not encroach into any setback.
The residence and garage will be located in the general area of the existing
residence at the southwest of this pie -shaped lot. The pool will be located behind
the residence. A proposed 822 square foot basement (to be used as an equipment
room) will be located at the southern section of the residence. The existing 2,728
square foot dwelling and 690 square foot garage will be demolished. The 470
square foot stable constructed in 1952 will remain.
4. The existing driveway access area off Packsaddle Road is currently in line with
Southfield Drive. The Lanmans propose to relocate the driveway 52 feet south of
the existing driveway. The new driveway will be 12 feet wide with a 24 foot wide
roadway access.
5. Access to the existing stable off Packsaddle Road will remain.
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 9,879 square feet or 17.5% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 17,851 square feet or 31.6% (35% permitted).
7. The 37,005 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is 9.880
square feet or 26.7%.
8. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 2
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity an d
zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone b u t
which is denied the property in question; and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege;
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling
Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 3
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING
PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that
is more than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and
any nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT.
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL)
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
APPROVED
Existing stable encroaches 30
feet into 50 foot front yard
setback
Residence 7,634 sq.ft.
Garage 1,007 sq.ft.
SwimPool/Spa 648 sq.ft.
Service Yard 120 sq.ft.
Stable 470 sq.ft.
Total 9,879 sq.ft.
17.5%
31.6%
26.7% of 37,005 sq.ft. pad
478 cubic yards of cut soil
478 cubic yards of fill soil
39.7% or 22,459 sq.ft.
Existing 470 sq.ft. stable
Existing >550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Packsaddle
Road
Proposed to be moved 52
feet south off Packsaddle
Road. Traffic Commission
to review 1/29/98.
PROPOSED
Pool to encroach 4 ft. into
the 20 ft. side yard setback.
No change
No change
No change
No change
485 cubic yards of cut soil
485 cubic yards of fill soil
40.65% or 22,952.96 sq.ft.
No change
No change
No change
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 4
• •
ZONING CASE NO. 572
PAGE 5