Loading...
572, , CorrespondenceC1i o/ R0fiL CERTIFIED MAIL March 25, 1998 Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman 1 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 572, 1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF) RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Lanman: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on March 17, 1998 to approve your request to construct a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence for property at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 572. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission was reported to the City Council on March 23, 1998. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 98-5, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE Printed on Recycled Paper. FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. LOLA UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR ENC: RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. Miles Pratzkit, AIA RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX Recorder's Use Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGFI .FS CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE NO. 572 ) §§ SITE PLAN REVIEW • VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0 I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 1 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 24-SF), ROLLING HILLS This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 572 SITE PLAN REVIEW • VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT O I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Print Owner Owner Name Name Signature Signature Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, Address City/State personally appeared [ ] Personally known to me -OR- [ ] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Todd H. Lanman with respect to real property located at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills, requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on January 20, 1998 and February 17, 1998, and at a field trip visit on February 7, 1998. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicants and the applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15302 and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 56,455 square feet. The proposed residence (7,634 sq. ft.), garage (1,007 sq. ft.), stable (470 sq.ft.), swimming pool 1648 sq.ft.), and service yard (120 sq.ft.) will have 9,879 square feet which constitutes 17.5% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 17,851 square feet which equals 31.6% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 PAGE 1 • • B. The proposed development, as modified by. the conditions of approval, preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms. C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, follows natural contours of the largely flat site to minimize grading. The natural drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the northwestern side of this lot. D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a residential and total buildable pad of 37,005 square feet with a 26.7% coverage. F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a largely flat lot that is is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood. Grading will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer driveway accessway. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 572 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080. RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 PAGE 2 • • B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated January 13, 1998, and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading for the project shall not exceed 478 cubic yards of cut soil and 478 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted. G. The proposed basement (to be used as an equipment room) shall not exceed 822 square feet. H. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 26.7%. I. The new driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width. J. No shrubs shall be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct either a driver's view from the driveway or the view of vehicles exiting the property from the roadway. K. The applicants may modify the new driveway location no more than 5 feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north of its existing location) if the applicant desires to salvage the Eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old driveway shall be abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition. L. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. M. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 PAGE 3 • • N. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. P. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective. Q. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTE,D'THIS 3 H • Y OF MARCH, 1998. ' CLAN ROBS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KE DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-5 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 572. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Sommer, Witte and NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Margeta. None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 PAGE 4 on March 17, 1998 by the Chairman Roberts. ? . k._) DEPUTY CITYCLERK 17S4.010 ' 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commssion's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 1734.0* C. If the appeal application is found to. be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and, the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24. 1993 A • 1754.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 d 't7 N d 2.3 'a 3. Article Addressed to: v / PA 40East `2o2 y z 2,C, Nt • s7a 5. Rece By: (Print Name) g 6. Sigriatu ressee r gent, x CO PS Form' 3811, December 1994 r) P 852 865 . 248 '' RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Streey�nd Np. 1 S. sf Y—a�••-SlJ-J� C� � er 4 fir. St e and ZIP: Co e /%N / 5 Postage (Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee IRestricted Delivery Fee ' Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered tr) 2 Return Receipt showing to whom, • • Date, and Addr Deliver x‘, TOTAL P [cis ' 0 Post co E 0 u_ () 227C 35 rn a 140 SENDER: ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this card to you. •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. ■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mallpiece below the article number. •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. 3 I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra fee): 1. 0 Addressee's Address 2. 0 Restricted Delivery Consult postmaster for fee. 4a. Article Number r S'as a q k 4b. Service Type ❑ Registered ❑ Express Mall ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD 7. Date of Delivery JXCertified 0 Insured S. Addressee's Address Only If requested and fee Is pald) 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt ZI st V) 5) a! cc CC en L. 0 i` FEB-25-98 12:41 PM EC Beall & Assoc • 3759530 P.01 • EDWARD CARSON BEALL, A.I.A. AND ASSOCIATES 23727 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD TORRANCE CALIFORNIA 90505 TEL: 310.378.1280 FAX: 310.375.9530 TO: Lola Ungar City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Tel: 310.377.1521 Fax: 310.377.7288 CC: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE; February 25,1998 PROJECT; Lanman Residence #1 Packsaddle East Rolling Hills COPIES DATE SHT #'S DESCRIPTION REMARKS: Lola: Just a follow up on our phone conversation regarding the basement. We had envisioned a non -habitable basement to containing the various mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems and equipment required for the project. This represents 822 s.f. of area below the house. This basement is reflected on the plot plan, sheet C-1 as "Equipment Room", and shown on cross section A/C-2. It has also been included in the balanced cut and fill quantities. I did not include it in the overall square footage of the house under the "Residence " category since it is non -habitable, and since there was no line item for basement. Recalling the discussion of the project that proceeded ours at the meeting, I thought I should contact your regarding the definition of " basement". Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance. Thank you, BY; Miles Pritzkat, Architect C1,y oMo elin9 February 24, 1998 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman 1 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 572, Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr. and Mrs. Lanman: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on February 17, 1998 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for the construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 572. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with the conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that upcoming meeting The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's action is not final until the resolution has been approved by the Commission. The Planning Commission's decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day anneal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Commission on March 17, 1998. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on March 23, 1998. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, 44? LOLA M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECT cc: Mr. Miles Pratzkit, ALA Printed on Recycled Paper. • • City 0/ Ailing -fa B. ALLEN LAY Mayor FRANK E. HILL Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember JODY MURDOCK Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S. Councilmember January 30, 1998 Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman 1 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Lanman: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com At the meeting of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission held Thursday, January 29,1998, the Traffic Commission approved your request to relocate your existing driveway approximately 52 feet southerly of the existing driveway. Conditions of this approval include that: • The driveway apron shall be 24 feet in width. • No shrubs be planted adjacent to the driveway which will obstruct either a driver view from the driveway, or the view of vehicles exiting the property from the roadway. • The applicant is left with the discretion to -modify the new driveway location no more than 5 feet from the proposed location (a distance of 47 feet north from its existing location) if the applicant desire to salvage the eucalyptus tree located on the property. The old driveway must be abandoned and returned to a non -useable natural condition. This recommendation will be presented to the Planning Commission for inclusion in any Resolution regarding this project. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, [11 i4o Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk lanman.ltr cc: Traffic Commission Lola Ungar, Planning Director Miles Pritzcat, Edward Carson Beall Printed on Recycled Paper. City ol Rollin ..�Pl, FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION January 27, 1998 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Dr. and Mrs. Todd Lanman 1 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 572, Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr. and Mrs. Lanman: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, February 7,1998. The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 7:30 AM at 10 Pine Tree Lane and then proceed to your property at 1 Packsaddle Road East. Do not expect the Commission at 7:30 AM but, be assured that the field trip will take place before 9 AM. The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements: • A full-size silhouette must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges, bearing walls and any retaining walls; • Stake or flag the limits of the building pad, the front and side yard setbacks, and the side property lines; and • Delineate areas to be graded showing finished floor or grade elevations. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely,., LOLA M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTO cc: Mr. Miles Pritzkat, AIA Printed on Recycled Paper. • N City O 011i1Z Jilt/4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 eir yl SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1621 FAX (310) 377.7288 When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. Bracing should be provided where possible. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521. • • • • • • j ; SECTION PLAN 4 Printed on Recycled Paper. JAN-26-98 06:32 PM EC Beall & Assoc • 3759530 P.01 • EDWARD CARSON BEALL, A.I.A. AND ASSOCIATES 23727 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90505 TEL: 310.378.1280 FAX: 310.375.9530 TO: Lola Ungar City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Tel: 310.377.1521 Fax: 310.377.7288 CC: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 26,1998 PROJECT: Lanman Residence #1 Packsaddle East COPIES DATE SHT #'S DESCRIPTION 1 REMARKS: Lola: Gross Area calc for the Lanman property by Denn Engineers I had Denn Engineers, who performed the Lanman's survey, calculate the gross area of the lot. Note that at some time, a portion of lot 23SF was annexed to the Lanman's lot. This line is visible on sheet C-I, running to the left of the existing stable. The gross lot area of the T.anman's lot is 77732.4 s.f. or 1.78 acres. The net lot area is correct, as are all other numbers, since they are based on the actual survey as prepared by Denn. The Planning Commissioner White was correct in questioning the net lot area of 56,455 s.f. if the lot area was 1.26 acres, or 54,885.6 s.f.! Therefore, the matrix on your staff report should reflect the revised number for the Lanman's lot and I believe should reflect a decrease in the arca of lot 23SF. Thank you, Miles Pritzkat, A.I.A. JAN-26-98 06:32 PM EC Beall & Assoc 3739530 P.02 DENN ENGR FAX 542-9491 TEL NO.310-542-9433 411 Jane 23198 9:41 Na.003 P.01 f Prepared by: Denn Engineers ##CGDS08930 Area -Summary SR95295 1/11/98 19:54:05 Factor: 1.0000000' SR95295.PTS: NET AREA Point Int-An• 301 14 78-29-31 Searing S •10-09-31 E N 68-20-00 E Distance Point North 298.5426 34 697.3805 292.4100 9 805.3401 RAD: 175.0010 LEN: 228.5687 TAN: 133.8806 CEN.ANG: 74-50-02 CHORD; 212.6652 MO: 36.0092 EXT: 45.3382 DEGREE; 32.44-25 SEG: 5220.5 TRI: 14779,4 SEC: 19999.9 RAT.: -11 9 22-26-02 N 89-13-58 W 175.0010 11 11 285-09-58 N 15-56-00 E 175.0000 19 9 75-01-00 19 142-35-00 N 36-39-00 W N 74 04-00 W 212.6646 19 83.3100 18 807.6836 975.9605 975.9605 998.8306 RAD: 175.0000 LEN: 119.9298 TAN: 62.4275 CEN.ANG: 39-15-56 CHORD: 117.5967 MO: 10.1736 EXT: 10.8015 DEGREE: 32-44-26 SEG: 802.3 TRI: 9691.5 SEC: 10493.9 RPT.: -3 18 90-00-00 3 320-44-04 • 18 160-22-02 301 83-32-27 S 15-56-00 W N 23-19-56 W S 86-18-02 W Perimeter: 1022.7611 Accum.Perimeter: Sq.Feet: 6631.5.1 Acres: 1.5223 Accum. - Sa.Feet: 66315.1 Acre8: r, SR9S295.PTS: GROSS AREA Point Int-An ''Hearing 300 S 23-19-56 E 301 193-10-25 S 10-09-31 E 14 78-29-31 N 68-20-00 E 9 202-26-00 S 89.14-00 E 175.0000 3 175.0000 301 117.5967 301 1022.7611 kEr .52238 Distance 25.0000 298.5426 292.4100 25.0000 Point 301 14 9 10 830.5538 991.2430 991.2430 East 848.3311 1120.. 0816 945.0963 993.1370 993.1370 913 .0277 864.9869 795.6760 795.6760 North East 991.2430 795.6760 697.3805 848.3311 805.3401 1120.0816 805.0056 1145.0793 RAD: 200.001.0 LEN: 83.3418 TAN: 42.2846 CEN.ANG: 23-52-32 CHORD: 82.7401 MO: 4.3255 EXT: 4.4211 DEGREE: 28-38-52 SEG: 239.1 TRI: 80957. SEC: 8334.2 RPT.: -11 10 0-00-02 N 89-1.3-58 W 11 336-07-26 N 66-53-30 E 10 78-03-44 N 11-10-16 W 200.0010 11 807.6836 200.0000 21 886.1778 82.7399 23 886.1778 945.0963 1129.0492 1129.0492 RAD: 200.0000 LEN: 177.8781 TAN: 95.3059 CEN.ANG: 50-57-30 .-.s- . rA7• TWIZRRE: 28-38-52 JAN-26-98 06:33 PM EC Beall & Assoc 3759530 P.03 • DENN ENGR FRY, 542-9491 TEL No.310-542-9433 1 Jan 23.98 9:41 N0.003 P.02 21 78-03-46 S 66-53-30 W 200.0000 11 8074836 945.0963 11 309-02-30 N 15-56-00 E 200.0000 1 100010000 1000.0000 21 142-35-01 N 48-35-15 W 172.0732 1 1000.0000 1000.0000 1 154-31-15 N 74-04-00 W 83.3100 2 1022.8702 919.8906 RAD: 200.0000 LF.N: 28.5701 TAN: 14.3094 CEt'.ANG: 8-11-05 CHORD: 28.5458 MO: 0.5099 EXT: 0.5112 DEGREE: 28-38-52 SEG: 9.7 TRI: 2847.3 SEC: 2857.0 RPT,: -3 2 90-00-00 S 15-56-00 W 200.0000 3 830.5538 864.9869 3 351-48-55 N 07-44-55 E 200.0000 4 1028.7276 891.9523 2 175-54-28 N 78-09-•32 W 28.5458 4 1028.7276 891.9523 RAD: 200.0000 LEN: :108.4926 TAN: 55.6169 CEN.ANG: 31-04-51 CHORD: 107.1672 MO: 7.31.17 EXT; 7.5691 DEGREE; 28-38-52 SEG: 524.3 TRI: 10324.9 SEC: 10849.3 RP'T.: -3 4 8554-27 S 07-44-55 W 3 328-55-09 N 23-19-56 W 4 160-22-02 300 74-2.7-34 S 82-12-30 W 200.0000 3 830.5538 864.9869 200.0000 300 1014.1966 785.7745 107.1672 300 1014.1986 785.7745 Perimeter: 1122.5452 Accum.Perimeter: 2145.3063r' Sq. Feet : 77732.4 Acres: 1.78449 Vl� (.'`s'"'� Accum. - Sq.Feet: 144047.5 Acres: 3.30688 _l� • • C�i 0/Rolling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO, 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING Email: cityofrh@aol,com January 12, 1998 Dr, and Mrs. Todd Lanman 1 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 572, Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence at 1 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 24-SF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr, and Mrs. Lanman: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 572 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, January 20, 1998. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, January 16, 1998. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. LOLA M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECT cc: Mr. Miles E. Pritzkat, AIA Printed on Recycled Paper.