Loading...
627, An addition of 2020 sq ft to e, Correspondence• • City .1) leollinf CERTIFIED MAIL March 22, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Gabor Korody 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 627, 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (LOT 990-RH) RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Korody: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on March 20, 2001 granting a request for Site Plan Review for the construction of an addition to an existing single family residence at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 627. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on March 26, 2001. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Pririted on Recycled r'H E r. • • Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please note that a condition of approval has been included requiring that, during construction,no building materials deliveries be made during peak traffic hours, (item "0") of the resolution. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, iblanta Schwartz rincipal Planner ENC: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN cc: Roger North, Architect, (w/out enclosure) Douglas McHattie, Engineer (w/out enclosure) RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT 0 F ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 627 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North, (Lot 990-RH), ROLLING HILLS, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 627 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Signature Name typed or printed Name typed or printed Address Address City/State City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, personally appeared T Recorder's Use Only personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their Authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • Eirk;log .,A RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 2724 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH IN ZONING CASE NO. 627. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Gabor Korody with respect to real property located at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (Lot 990-RH), Rolling Hills, requesting Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a substantial addition to an existing single family residence for total of 5,572 square feet. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on January 16, 2001, February 20, 2001 and at a field trip visit on February 3, 2001. The applicant was notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 102,140 square feet. The proposed residence (5,572 sq.ft.), garage (858 sq.ft.), swimming pool (800 sq.ft.), service area (96 sq.ft.) and stable (488 sq.ft) will have 7,814 square feet which constitutes 7.7% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 20,142 square feet which equals 19.8% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The residential building RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Page 1 • • pad coverage will not exceed 19.3%, the stable pad will not exceed 24.4%, and total building pad coverage will not exceed 16.1% of the 48,580 square feet pads. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). The lot is relatively flat and most of the mature trees will not be removed. C. The proposed development, as conditioned,. is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum, will not be exceeded and the proposed. project is consistent with the scale of residences in the neighborhood when compared to the large size of this irregular -shaped lot. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on other properties in the City. D. • The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading. This project requires small amount of grading, not to exceed 21 cubic yards, which will be balanced on site. E. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. F. The development plan incorporates grading that will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing.drainage course. G. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building .coverage because the new structure will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The proposed addition will not be visible from the right of way, as this is a flag lot with a 70- foot long driveway of off Palos Verdes Drive North. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the property. H. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize existing driveways at the northwestern portion of the property. I. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 627 for proposed residential addition as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, dated January 11, 2001, and is subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Page 2 • • A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. • D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with .the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated January 11, 2001, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development .plan approved with this application. F. Any retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 3 feet in height. G. The residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 19.3%, the stable pad coverage shall not exceed 24.4%, and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 16.1% of the 48,580 square feet pads. H. Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 32% of the net lot area. I. Grading shall not exceed 21 cubic yards of cut soil and 21 cubic yards of fill soil and shall be balanced on site. J. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. K. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the proposed building pad. L. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Page 3 site. M. The propertyowners shall be required to conform with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. N. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. O. During construction, delivery of construction materials shall be limited to off peak hours only, and no deliveries shall be made between the hours of 7 AM and 9 AM and 4:30 PM to 6:30 PM Monday through Friday. There shall be no deliveries made before 7 AM or after 6 PM on Saturdays and, all day on Sunday. P. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. S. . The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. T. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. U. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related reports, if required by the County, that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. RESOLUTION NO, 2001-06 Page 4 • • V. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. W. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review or the approval shall not be effective. X. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF MRCW 2(3p1. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ORIL6-1;NlEWDEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Page 5 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-06 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 2724 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH IN ZONING CASE NO. 627 was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 20, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta,.Sommer, Witte and Chairman. Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITkLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-06 Page 6 • • 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development • application, the City Clerk shallI place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the PIanning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall' be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. ROLLING HILLS ZONING 76 MAY u, 1993 • • 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the completerecord of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed. for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • 1754.060 C. Action ' The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 Postage ICertified Fee !Special Delivery Fee Z 138 110 599 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for Intemational Mail (See reverse) Sent to //-� %�/�.- .u��J "- Ste�aNumber n/C a 4!P4k5Ye, `Dr./� Po Offic State, & ZIP o��,, >r @/rs i$ [.ic I /.9© IRestricted Delivery Fee l rn IRetum Receipt Showing to Whom & Date Delivered �� J �I Retum Receipt Showing to Whom, I ccg O I TOTAL Postage & Fees I $ 9 , 5'25, `Postmark or Date cn o_ ▪ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. o Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. U Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permit. 1. Article Addressed to: mes • kare 2 7,2y i% /03 Pe Tr. %I/ori 7,C. /t.ki6? 7 MAR 2 2 2g0i C!TY QF J30L.,i !N .f„;I.;.LS' A. Received by (P)se Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery C. Signature X D. Is If Y very address different from item 1? , enter delivery address below: 3. Service Type ( f , ( t �' `' ‘ ❑ Certified Mail !; "OiExpr,SssrMail M' ❑ Registered i{; .D IReturp et; eipt,for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C:O r 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee):? s'., : 0 Yes ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Article Number (Copy from service label) Z.. /32 /JO 599 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789 03/13/01 13:52 FAA 310 377 44138 t \ CITY UN R.H.H. ->->-> R H 10.001 STEVEN ZUCKERMAN Mayor SUSAN SEAMANS Mayor Pro Tem JOHN C. ADDLEMAN Council Member JUDY MITCHELL Council Member BARBARA RAUCH Council Member DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD City Manager Incorporated Sept. 18 1957 March 13, 2001 Ms. Yolanta Schwartz City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 40 THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 4045 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH • ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274 TELEPHONE---(310) 377-1577 FAX (3L0) 377-4468 Re: ZC No. 627 — 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North Dear Ms. Schwartz: The purpose of this letter is to request that you include a condition of approval prohibiting truck deliveries from 7:00-9:00 am and 4:00-6:30 pm Monday through Fridays, and excluding work on Sundays, for the above -referenced case Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at City Hall. Sincerely, Planning Director OWO:hj Misc schwartz Itr • ()ay ofie elin s .�✓�er February 22, 2001 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. Gabor Korody 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 627, Request for a Site Plan Review to construct residential additions that require small quantities of grading at an existing single family residence at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North ,Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. Korody: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on February 20, 2001 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for a Site Plan Review to construct residential additions that require small quantities of grading at an existing single family residence at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 627 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that subsequent meeting. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. - The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. March 20.2001. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Monday. March 26. 2001. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sinrely, Yanta Schwartz Principal Planner cc: Mr. Roger North, Architect Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering ►3 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • et•1cy 0/ Rolling Jdf� FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION January 18, 2001 Mr. Gabor Korody 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 627, Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (Lot 990-RH), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. Korody We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, February 3, 2001 and on Thursday, February 15, 2001. We were informed by your representative that the silhouette will not be ready for viewing by the originally scheduled field trip date of 1/27/01. Due to the unavailability of several of the Commissioners to meet on 2/3/01, additional field trip was scheduled for 2/15/01. The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 8:00 AM on 2/3/01 at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North. On 2/15/01 the remaining Commissioners will meet at 2724 Palos Verdes North at 9:00 AM. The site shall be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements: • A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls; • Stake the limits of the building pad; • Stake the side property lines; and • Stake the side yard setback lines. After the field trips, the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will take place on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 at 7:30 PM at City Hall. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincely, gfanta Schwartz nnclpal Planner Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corporation Printed on Recycled f'uper. Ci1y oi leoeene INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 8:00 AM SATURDAY, JANUARY 27, 2001 MEET AT 2724 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 NOTICE: THIS MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED. A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER THE ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA WILL BE HELD ON SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2001 BEGINNING AT 8:00 A.M. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. FIELD TRIP TO THE FOLLOWING Sl1ES: A. ZONING CASE NO. 627 Mr. Gabor Korody, 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (Lot 990-RH). Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires 21 cubic yards of grading. B. ZONING CASE NO. 626 Mr. and Mrs. Hwung-Hsiang Hwung (Lot 52-RH). Request for a Variance to encroach with a garage addition into the front yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions, including a basement, that require grading of 1,772 cubic yards at an existing single family residence. 4. ADJOURNMENT Printed on Recycled Pape/. ei4 Rolling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 8:00 AM SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2001 MEET AT 2724 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. FIELD TRIP TO THE FOLLOWING SITES: A. ZONING CASE NO. 627 Mr. Gabor Korody, 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (Lot 990-RH). Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires 21 cubic yards of grading. B. ZONING CASE NO. 626 Mr. and Mrs. Hwung-Hsiang Hwung (Lot 52-RH). Request for a Variance to encroach with a garage addition into the front yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions, including a basement, that require grading of 1,772 cubic yards at an existing single family residence. 4. ADTOURNMENT ®Printed on Recycled Panel. 1 Ci1y led/6ng.Aee STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING January 8, 2001 Mr. Gabor Korody 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 627, Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence at 2724 Palos Verdes Drive North (Lot 990-RH), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. Korody Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 627 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. January 16. 2001. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, January 12, 2001. We will forward the report to you. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Yolta Schwartz Principal Planner cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Printed on Recycled Paper.