Loading...
638, Construct a detached recreatio, ApplicationCITY OF ROLLING HILLS ;v FEE CODE 20 CODE 19 CODE 9 !FEE �0 D.A. FEE Code 20 • 02-1089721 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 3:21 PM MAY 10 2002 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE TITLE(S) D.T.T. Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED • 02-1089721 9-" RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. + Recorders Use Only AFFIDAVIT 0 F ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 638 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 11 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CRB), ROLLING HILLS, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 638 I (W "pertify (or decla Si4—f Lt z 101 0.L 4, Name ty ed or prl ted /� Adel r s G,�toicr ,J G'�Q tbl Ite City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California County of Los Angeles ) L'61-72 IOn l'MO 1 before me, I �.1.f�i& -6'`at lA G personally appeared SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT under the penalty of perjury that the fore g is true and correc XX XX XX XX Signatu Name typed or printed I CD,,,,Ar �C,buCc.. Address ( t ( (S j))Ce„ G12 / 6)2_ City/State [p % 7 � personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfact r evi nce) to be the person(s whose ame(s) subscribed to the within inst u ent acknowledged to me that ,s /t ey xecuted the same in �/ el autlforized capacity(ies) and that by hi I /t eir signatures) on the instrument the rson(s), or the entity upon beh If/of which the son persexec uted t e instrument. !AMA MAYEl - - - iwirtrrt9e:ait>;"='122/1f aJ: . ,,,_.. WirOrarm.D.--,11.1123,2034 IT Its Arigz' Count' SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Witness icial seal. Signature df Notary ockow+ 024089721 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED RECREATION ROOM AND RECREATION GAME COURT AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A RECREATION ROOM AND A RECREATION GAME COURT AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 11 CHUCKWAGON ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 638. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Allan Delman with respect to real property located at 11 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 4-CRB) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to permit the construction of a 612 square foot recreation roam, requesting a Conditional Use Permit to permit the construction of a 2,210 square foot recreational game court, and requesting Site Plan Review to permit the construction of the recreation game court and recreation room. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider these applications on July 17, 2001, August 21, 2001, September 18, 2001 and at a field trip visit on August 6, 2001. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants were in attendance at the hearing. Section 3. Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval for a detached recreation room under certain conditions provided a Conditional Use Permit for such use is approved by the Planning Commission. The applicants are requesting to construct a 612 square foot detached recreation room. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a detached recreation room would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed for the recreation room would be located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of a detached recreation room will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed use will be constructed at the central portion of the lot and is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the recreation room will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. 3 • • C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the recreation room will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 1.55 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to 'accommodate such use. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zoning district in which it is located. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because an adequate area has been set -aside for a future stable structure and.adjacent corral on the lot. Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 612 square foot detached recreation room in accordance with the development plan dated October 4, 2001 and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 638 subject to the conditions contained in Section 9 of this resolution. Section 5. Section 17.16.210(A)(7) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code allows for the construction of a recreational game court with certain conditions provided a Conditional Use Permit for such use is approved by the Planning Commission. The applicants are requesting to construct a 2,210 square foot recreational game court east of the recreation room. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a recreation game court would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar and appropriately located uses in the community, and the area proposed for the recreational game court would be located in an area on the property that is on a second pad below the residential building pad. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of a 2,210 square foot recreational game court will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed recreational game court will be constructed on a portion of the secondary building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the recreational game court will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, will accommodate recreation for the owners and their children, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 2 02 08972. . • • C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the recreational game court will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 1.55 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use. D. The proposed conditional use complies with. all applicable development standards of the zone district because the graded area will not exceed a maximum graded area of 10,000 square feet and does not exceed total maximum cubic yardage of 750 cubic yards. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because adequate area for a future stable structure and adjacent corral has been set aside to be located on the southern portion of the lot, west of the recreational game court Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings and theevidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the request for a Conditional Use Permit in Zoning Case No. 638 for a proposed 2,210 square foot recreational game court, as shown on the Development Plan dated, October 4, 2001 marked Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 9 of this resolution. Section 7. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or, structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the detached recreation room and recreational game court, at an existing single family residence, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 46,627 square feet. The proposed detached recreation room (612 sq.ft.), recreational game court (2,210 sq.ft.), and the existing single family residence (2,960 sq.ft.), garage (462 sq.ft.), service yard (100 sq.ft.),.pool (390 sq.ft.), and future stable (450 sq.ft.) will have 7,180 square feet which constitutes 15.4% of the net lot, which is within the 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 9,249 square feet or 19.8% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 3 02-1089721 coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot which has a gentle slope have been considered, and the construction of a 612 square foot detached recreation room, and a 2,210 square foot recreational game court will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed uses will be constructed on a portion of a secondary building pad, located below the residence and will not be visible from the street, will be least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, are of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the project will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, will accommodate recreation for the owners, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this long, narrow sloping lot. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain canyon vistas across portions of the property. Although the proposed structures are located in the rear yard, they will not effect a change to the existing residence.. The structures proposed will not be visible from Chuckwagon Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain canyon vistas across portions of the property. F. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue at the east side (rear) of this lot. G. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. H. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize an existing driveway at the northwestern portion of the property off Chuckwagon Road for access. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 4 02-1089721 • I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt from its requirements. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 638 for proposed detached recreation room and recreational game court as shown on the Development Plan dated October 4, 2001 and marked Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 9 of this Resolution. Section 9. The Conditional Use Permits regarding 612 square feet recreation room and 2,210 square feet recreational game court approved in Sections 4 and 6 and the Site .Plan Review approved in Section 8 of this Resolution are subject to the following conditions: A. The Conditional Use Permits and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval, unless construction commences, as defined in Sections 17.42.070(A), and 17.46.080(A) or unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permits and Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated October 4, 2001, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of sufficient size to also provide an area meeting allstandards for a stable and corral with vehicular access thereto in conformance with site plan review and recreation court' and recreation room limitations. F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,180 square feet or 15.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in Section 7. G. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 9,249 square feet or 19.8 % in conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in Section 7. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 5 02-1089721 • H. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 16,070 square feet or 34.5% in conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in Section 7. I. Residential building pad coverage on the 9,220 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 3,908 square feet or 42.4%, coverage, which is pre- existing; structural coverage on the 3,522 square foot proposed pad shall not exceed 2,822 square feet or 80.1%, and coverage on the 1,560 square foot future stable and corral pad shall not exceed 450 square feet or 28.8%. Coverage on the combined pads shall not exceed 50.2%. J. The detached recreation room shall not exceed 612 square feet and the recreational game court shall not exceed 2,210 square feet in area. The location of the recreation room and recreational game court shall be as depicted on the Development Plan dated October 4, 2001 and marked Exhibit A. K. Grading shall not exceed 365 cubic yards of cut soil and 365 cubic yards of fill soil, (730 cubic yards maximum). Any soil preparation for the project shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. L. Any walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 3 feet in height. M. No sleeping quarters or kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided in the recreation room. N. Game court lighting shall not be permitted. O. The game court shall be screened on all sides with drought -resistant mature trees and shrubs such as Toyon and Lemonadeberry. Landscape screening shall not include Eucalyptus or Pine trees. P. Noise from the sport court use shall not create a nuisance to owners of surrounding properties. Q. The landscape plan shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. R. Two copies of a preliminary landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Department for the recreation room and game court and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of the community. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 6 02-1089721 • A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a drainage, grading and building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. S. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. T. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or properties are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. U. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. V. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. W. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. A detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. The Department of Building and Safety shall approve the drainage plan system, to include any water from any site irrigation systems as well as game court 'runoff, and all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner to the rear or east of the lot. Z. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. O2 1O89721 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 7 • • AA. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste pollution control. AB. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. AC. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project, which would constitute additional grading or structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AD. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. AE. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approvals shall not be effective. AF. All conditions of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals, that apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit by the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16t DAY OF OCTOBER 2001. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KEI T, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 8 02-1089721 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-18 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION. OF A DETACHED RECREATION ROOM AND RECREATION GAME COURT AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A RECREATION ROOM AND A RECREATION GAME COURT AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 11 CHUCKWAGON ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 638. was approved ; and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 16, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: Commissioner Sommer. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None . and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLLRK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-18 Page 9 02-1089721 l� •City 0/ leolling • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER: I1 L L A& D L L r? i n) OWNER'S ADDRESS: / Cl-/!JCKWAG,Uni TELEPHONE NO: G 4 4- 3351 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1/ C 1-/CJ C K 14) 4 C7 OA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 4 TP. 2 3 I 0 3 ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7' b 7 PAGE CO 7 PARCEL CO 6 AGENT'S NAME: T3 O LT' r. E. C-f t k‘N AGENT'S ADDRESS: -7 S i 12. R i TELEPHONE NO: CB I O) c 4 4- Co 0 IC) NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. CE: t,Ac 1.4i torZ f--)aOM 11 1lo.040.2. Printed on Recycled Paper. Will the proposed use be'tmpatible with the uses in the surrding area, and if so, why? t- . tXG. O-r 14 c2.5 l rl 17-1 Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare?. 1. t..L IAA vc too FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the. RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statementhas been fully read :and its admonition is completely understood.. Executed at d LC— l A/ C.-7 /-' L.- — . California fGi this 2 7 day of Jv(V6 .200 l By: Q By: Address City OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at 0 6-c /n7 Cv /-1 (LL S this day of LID By: By: Address . California, . 20 0/ NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if thisapplication is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge ;before a Notary., Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized. by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true tothe best of his (its) knowledge and , belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. . APPLICANT: n L L A n) U G L r1 A N DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE:P o och M` 1-IA i i t (: FEE: COMPANY NAME: Th0c. orl EtJc-itrlLERte Ci RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 0 7 l 1, C R. 5 P() ( 20 ZONING CASE NO: R, 14 , C `DO Z 7 4- TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (3(0) `j 4-4 - ! OO l o PROJECT ADDRESS: 11 C. I I U C tw.i A C-10 tJ �olliri I-lilks • • REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPERTY OWNER: I L L A N OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 1 G 1-1 ti C44-v0 Ga 0 t) TELEPHONE NO: `z 4 4 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: t1 n E LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 4 R 2 3 1 C.)3 ASSESSORS BOOK NO./ 51°7 PAGE U 01 PARCEL 0 0 to AGENT'S NAME: Q L TO r t ra t_ G czt rl G AGENT'S ADDRESS: `7 O 1 S i u) E a SPUR [z) 'R,1-1. C 90 2 7 4 TELEPHONE NO: (3 t o l b 4 4- Co 0 t O NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: RC2E.--PI IcDL_ �uc�n - Cir 0t�lc-i T h.0 r) Re.C.2G.-(A itc, C2..0Qr-% - C. P. Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: d ti-) Cr. • • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. GJttJciL FAr't<t_Q P.e- tQGACL., Sti-fitN �alzc n i"�lC N1.E(C-iLAC3P.t-0vn B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. O N L A S r-ft. Cl c-L. 1A- 2 L P t 1 i �� �; C n tcD dz too C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. T1.4c A 2€. ria C:.. Ci (z/a DS l4L2E-AOy/ O Ll1)L A i r f5 Ct(')C7 £.t (5 1�CL.ATtVAL‘,% LPqc D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. t T tLL l4pvC KN. O. CFr--cc As it-tcr.�.c� 0 C3 is Sc L l i i L C(-kAt CiEl. • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. •I14at lS So Lt 7 t C IE. I i t5 C o M eARAr3LC o C-t t4 f'' F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties: S 63 (5%/ i G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. i t L.c.._ C3 . 0 CAA A t•? C-t (_ H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. /cs, -ic=RG ')t(Q IMC7ACi • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: !o - 2 ? - 0 I For: /-1 L L A h) D I i /a Applicant DATE ZONING C. NO. '3 " ADDRESS I I 016-644/1:114,- APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 9 (0LZ7 sq.ft. sq.ft. y G (0 2- 7 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) q 2 2- 0 sq.ft. 94 2— sq.ft. /g 3 0 Z sq.ft. RESIDENCE `igi6 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 29 G 0 sq.ft. GARAGE 146 2— sq.ft. sq.ft. Li (o Z sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA $ci 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 3 q a . sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. LI COsq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. 22 21 1) sq.ft. SERVICE YARD q fv sq.ft. sq.ft. Gl le sq.ft. OTHER i?tC. f IA sq.ft. sq.ft. `v / sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES 3� o S sq.ft. sq.ft. -21 8-0 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL S7`• 4/ % % is-, 4 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE ti 2.4 % % SO. 2- % DRIVEWAY q �O sq.ft. sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 1 Z g %l sq.ft. sq.ft. 1289 sq.ft. POOL DECKING q 4 O sq.ft. �U sq.ft. c a sq.ft. d2.0 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK '7f� ? sq.ft. sq.ft. Z0' 1 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE '4 • % % 4.1f % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 5-q 77 sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE f 2 •'(, % % 9 Vt' sq.ft. C sq.ft. 4 /0//,,, DATE ZONING CASE NO. 6 22 ✓‘ ADDRESS / ( — Oa S v APPLICANT D2- (at a'lk CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( 1 OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PADNO.2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT Z j q ( ) s .ft. OTHER vv\ 6 1 2 sq.ft. /c&0 5D 50 2g. 1` C m �1G l.0l I- S 2- 2_ sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 ni .S 2 Z sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE rU , I % Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION • City 0/ leolling _Alla ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com 1. Applicant(s) /1LL,r�t) 0CU-1AfJ Tel. (tO )'6 44- 3351 Address 11 C1-1UcACaOn1 2. Legal Owner(s) (- eb o thE Tel. ( ) Address 3. Project Address •1 1 C. t-1 o c t-L tA) A C-1 O t. Assessor's Book No. 14a (o % - 0 0 7 - Lot No. 4 e. 2.103 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Qt1.C.A, LA, coo.rql3Lnc-tz.�# Sn1=(TTJ 5. Existing zoning district R Cl S — I 6. Proposed project/use of site CiOE.S i W ova C REcrz-Cr-v rt o nrzCA _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 1.l551 Ac. Co 7, Co 1 g.P. 8. Net lot area 46,, (2 ? . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 7 c3 37 10. Number of floors of construction 0 N L. 11. Basement square footage T t U tJ t I-1 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form Pririted on Recycled Paper. ► 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage t d, 0 0 Co 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? N A 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? yc= S 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? %: S 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? N 0 (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 0 p c= Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 1 to 1 Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? Proposed? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 4 °lo Proposed? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? t- o Explain "r 2G©0 t c.e_m g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? N O Explain h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? t`1 0 Explain Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or Tess? Stable and corral average vehicular access slope j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? 2. With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 0 ua . Amount fill 1 4 O (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). U 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet 1 2,8 2 0 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 2..1.S . 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet Z G c , 0 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-2 • • 21: If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N n 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. tom) A 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. t^_t' t . 0 © l 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. �J t i 1_ �E`1k — C'tRlatJtC-c tr2. D ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. i ►O c, L. E E V t 5 ON) , u..d P,Ac.- I-1 kt_` S i ro c_ Sn t C2c:r-ot . 1-1 as r3trt_PRr=rAtIC.17 -' L0 r tS 7 ��t3t.l March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-3 • • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. GJt,�iROuNI) (�cz�A is (7041.-Y 'DE -VC -to P D) ALL— r i A S o rif f._., ; w 14o R. S (= 4 C. t I -I < < �.. •F, . 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? ✓ Geology Report _ Hydrology Report .7 Soils Report Traffic Study _ Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-4 Yes No .aL —17 Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based o n project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, Tess than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a Tess than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-5 Issues: 1 AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 ❑ 0 would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 0 0 0 IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 ❑ resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 (Er Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 .❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in.the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ❑ ❑ ❑ III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a). Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 ❑ applicable air quality plan? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-6 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Ly. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 0 0 �8( through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? • b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 ❑ or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effecton federally 0 0 0 protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 ❑ 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 ❑ 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form I -7 V CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 0 of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ 0 ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0 14 resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 0 ai outside of formal cemeteries? 121 VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 ❑ . ❑ 1;$1 on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? • 0 0 0 01 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ 0 ❑ 0 liquefaction? iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 ,Ei b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? 0 0 0 Fr c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 . ❑ 0 VI or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- ❑ 0 0 01 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 0 ❑ 10 use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form I-8 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0 or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 0 0 rg would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing orworking in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 1-9 cfs March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 ❑ requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 ❑ I,Qj interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 . ❑ site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 ❑ l the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation • map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 0A which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 0 0 injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 ❑ 01 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1 -1 0 J..AND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? 0 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ 0 regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X, MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 0 ❑ ❑174 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑I XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 0 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 0 levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 G§ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ❑ I1 I March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ 0 0 necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ 0 0 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XII[. PUBLIC SERVICES 0 0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ 0 0 0 Police protection? 0 0 0 rEl Schools? ❑ 0 0 VI Parks? 0 0 0 Other public facilities? 0 ❑ 0 0 XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 0 0 neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b), Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 ❑ ❑ require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form I-12 XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of.vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? El 0 b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 ti service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 ❑ an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due.to a design feature 0 0 0 . (e.g., sharp curves or dar><gerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 cil f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 Vi g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 Pi supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Item XVI. • UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or , 0 ❑ 0 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 0 0 drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 . l project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-13 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider whichserves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 0 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0 to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? • El 0 ❑ ❑ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ 0 0 regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ 0 0 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 ❑ 0 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 ❑ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form I-14 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall 8. Regulatory identification number: 9: Date of List: JULY 1992 Date For Signature Applicant 1-15 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date Ju hlr= 41 'ZOOt Signature For 4 L t. A t. o EL tek A to Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Jul4)C 4, 2001 Signature For I\ LLet\ 6.\ DL Lti'A J Applicant 1-16 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form