Loading...
607, Lot line adjustment to merge 2, ApplicationC'ity 4R.iii.9 JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION ZONING CASE NO. e 0 % The following information is necessary for the review of ALL applications. delay action. Attach extra sheets if necessary. RECORD OWNER(S): APPLICANT: E.-.VA-4-4L,Avlo' DoRo"riH`( .N/Ar/ I—• Al -No Dc'n-'c'rH-/ JP-1-1 es. s -V Name Name Z1 G t-4 0C.► WP‘Caoa l 2,D. Address Address i2.c) 1,1 G 14�..`S CA City c ©`L1 L (3%0) .S'tf (- % 19 City ( ) Zip Phone Zip Phone NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Failure to furnish information will APPLICANT'S AGENT: (Engineer, Licensed Surveyor, Other) 13at-ra1.1 51.14ttitCert,, cl CQRP, Name tR.,ss 101 S t,..Nfect_ SPL st.. 5,Jt r c Za I Address j��sL�te•tG� %41kS �STI C City �a2i Lf (310) S `-I 4 , c, to Zip Phone (Attach a separate sheet if necessary, including names and addresses of members of partnerships, joint ventures and directors of corporations.) CONSENT: SIGNED I consent to the submission of the application accompanying this request. (Property Owner) SIGNED CPa.-c:.a/ 040 (Property Owner) DATE _ 3 - G es DATE Z. /S /2•00cd / CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGNED /� ,f4 ��.�"'_t DATE: A.t-t 1. `1 z_ (Applicant or Applicant's Agent) Zo.ss N• t �_Tor� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 4 Ar,! Pe>z to.J 7) 1Z../S 7 3✓ 12— l ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO 7 Sid 7 PAGE G i PARCELS 4 �) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS LOCATION: Z i C:- o ,-( 12.a,.,D (Street address or distance from nearest cross street) Between: E P, ST F d_J f and C. N- Es-i"212_. F‘ R D . @Printed on Recycled Paper, • • In Land Use Zone . iZ s -- i General Plan Category Present Use of Site 12 s Proposed Use of Parcel(s) shown on Tentative Map �Z s Surrounding Zoning: North 2- i S — East 1Z P' S —1 Domestic Water Source C. A ` k^/P. District Method of Sewage Disposal _c��i' r ,C_ �Pr►-k District L� c 1+ S= A. 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lot(s)/project.) If petitioning for a zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to change: it 1 P A 'pc, -1- i Oi f u Lo q e-cc . c c j '7 3 T' Oss 1 Z 1 Li • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: 1. Lots Existing (Gross each): 2. Total Gross Acres: 3. Lots Proposed: (Gross & Net each) D c q'T., -' - South TZp.5--1 West ' N,s — 1_ o r C.A; CJa 3Coi351 \ t1_ Vt) 31.7-. 5'S, a,Gc>3 G3 55 (,(...3 Nc-c 3 ?zc 4. Grading of Lot(s) by Applicant? YES NO x (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tentative map. All grading must be balanced cut/fill.) Amount Cut N Amount Fill Q A 5. Pad sizes for tack lot: L , -1" A, 1 1 .52 ® SG t= v 6. Area of disturbance on each lot: (Square Feet) •t•••l ►.t 4 Percentage of net lot (40% Maximum • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at z iz.-P this O-4.-ilC, day of f--t t �.. L.� E S r .) California, F.32(-.)A , ~( ..,^ice Q4;;D By: By: f��e C G o Address Cam. NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: COMPANY PHONE NO: ( PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE FILED `v 13 (7-o FEE: 17 01 RECEIPT NO: 70 1 7 /(4/4( i ZONING CASE NO: 607 BY: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: �1,1 /-z9 • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at Z c . 10-4 4 1--� this 3 L day of V� 5 Address 2. c I ,.j 4 I-r- \ BL S California • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at , California, this day of , 19 SIGNATURE Date Filed • • C14 ol�r� ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com 44.-/C1)Zoning Case No. D GENERAL INFORMATION t yA`N t-- • AND Dc212.e, F-; `% 1. Applicant(s) Address Z 1 �s� �K w�a� cD M �D (Z 1-1- • VA.r ( 2. Legal Owner(s) rr-t s `TR-v s--t- Tel. (3 tc)) `-1 a — 1 c)1 9 Address Z1 G 1k�ckCw U e/ TL.D, TZ-r (4 - 3. Project Address Z-1 C. R4)») 1Z- , 1-4 - I �, Assessor's Book No. -7 Ski - - F' I Lot No. Li t 17c tz- • 7 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Tel. (3t D) 5Lf (_ l cric 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site 1:7-s e s >. 0 N PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size A 3G,)35'1 SQF-T, B l(l )31Z- S rz. 8. Net lot area 381 Z�'G' Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 3 I `l 3 k 10. Number of floors of construction le -sr 11. Basement square footage k-( o N € I-1 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form Printed on Recycled P:jpc i • • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage ice_ ( f0( F-C` 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? `+=S 17. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut Lam` , . Amount fill ki , A . . (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet N-to +Mc . Percentage of Net Lot Area , 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. - A,12-\4— t s 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form 1-2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 26. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. L.c' L( i--A-s i (Ze--s !Da p-e MD r.Srp.aL a- y-1 s`r-/ tilC, IS iS ��I-ate io rLesJ c T Go 1-1. & / A./ es i ( Sex , 27. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. S..sRRt r[Di#(!, 1' P rt-,es F''-,Its Ao.tD A"T"YPi 28. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 29. Have any of the following studies been submitted? Geology Report to Hydrology Report �.10 Soils Report Traffic Study 1 6 Noise Study 1\1 a Biological Study u.l ® Native Vegetation Preservation Plan i`1oSolid Waste Generation Report 0 0 Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-3 Yes ›c No WA 140 Historical Report t-4 Archaeological Report t Paleontological Study ({�.,o Line of Sight Exhibits 0. Visual Analysis trio Slope Map NI 0 Fiscal Impact Analysis kla Air Quality Report t.._ic,Hazardous Materials/ Waste June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside afault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form 1-4 Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 0, not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 ❑ 0 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 0 0 X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 ,a,' resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 )4 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 0 which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY —Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 0 applicable air quality plan? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-5 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ 0 ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 ❑ ❑ number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 ❑ ❑ ,13( or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 ❑ 0 protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with / established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 ❑ biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ 0 ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 0 0 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-6 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 ❑ of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ❑ 0 yl resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 ❑ 0 14 outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 ❑ ❑ on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ X- iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 0 ❑ 0 liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ❑ 0 0 J2( or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- ❑ 0 ❑ 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-7 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 0 0 use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VI1. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 ❑ ❑ f environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 ❑ ❑( or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 0 0 TB( would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 11\ adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-8 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 0 "I requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ ❑ ❑ P interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IL LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ 0 0 A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 X. ❑ 0 0 i- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-9 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES-- Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE— Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 ❑ ❑ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? CI 0 0 0 0 P ❑ 0 0 Xl- ❑ 0 0 A ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ In ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-10 Pot nbaftji` Sf iiifiCaiit wftli .:. Les Thai Signifloatit Mitigafiaii:;:`Significant' Impact':' I'ncbrporatkiii. Impact •'IrYipaict:; . XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 )24 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 0 PC necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 0 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ J2( Police protection? 0 0 0 Schools? 0 0 0 Parks? 0 0 ❑ Other public facilities? 0 0 0 XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 0 ❑ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ❑ 0 ❑ June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? 0 0 0 b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 j service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 X an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ 0 0 AC (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 ❑ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Item XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 .6 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 0 0 X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 K project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-12 nificaint., Mitigation 010h e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 0 provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0 0 0 * to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? )CVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 0 O ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-13 • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: vft t k r-1 D pc) 2. Address: -H- 21 C.. PvGK�.LJta Cz tea*-( . - c <., ► ,-(G 14-1 L. S I C P• G't d �-'7 3. Phone Number: C3 % �' ,S L(+ IO7 9 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): C_I-tu4®c./ 12-D 5. Local Agency (city/county): 2-c �L- r ( C, 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall), 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date ir^•►—( 6 ©U' Signature For C4• f f•-t eiZ►/ 1Ct Applicant 1-14 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date =c%-P3 3 '2_0,0 co 'Pori B Signature Esc-1U, Co R P , For Cv,a,—a P-,OD --Dot r.{-k' 3 Applicant 1-15 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form II itlll 1 I L 2 e 6,a7 FEE FEE $19 RR DAF $2 C-20 5 CODE 20 CODE 19 CODE 9 01-C: 100078 RECORDED/FILED IN ^O OFFICIAL EC_ FFICIAL RECORDS ' LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE CALIFORNIA 3:2.1 PM JAN 13 2001 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE TITLE(S) (.&'u I f\ tce.� .cam ,) D.T.T. Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED • • OH 100078 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO a / r CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO.607 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT L Recorder's Use Only I (We) the undersigned state: alr (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOTS 4-CF & A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF), ROLLING HILLS, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. arr(We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 607 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT U(We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Do 0-0T/4V A. -1-2(ISTCb Signature L9 Q -a.J Name typed 6, r printed z/ cuc,Kw!r6aN RP - Address' 20 c.c.s N G if / (- L S GA 96 27 t/ City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On //-/6 -U L) before me, personally appeared 27 ,Q6 t/••7S" A , JA/71.77_S Signature Name typed or printed Address City/State L '4,1. I.i y,i.'IIIIW w00.,4,i.'' 4iill, ''',,c, •oLo, 4411°"°"17111u personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the erson(s) acted, executed t e i r, st Pen MC HATTIE Cc:. t 1125501 Notary F; • Oalifomla Los Anrc::s County My Comm. Expires Feb 2, 2001 Witness b -1 and and official seal. :13://11 Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND AN ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Evan L. James and Mrs. Dorothy James for the James Trust with respect to real property located at 21 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 4-CF) that is 0.835 acres gross and an adjacent vacant lot to the northeast (a portion of Lot 7-CF) that is 1.28 acres gross, requesting a Certificate of Compliance for. a Lot Line Adjustment to remove the common side/rear lot line dividing the two parcels so that one 1.28 acre gross irregular lot is created . by the merger of the two existing lots. Section 2. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: (A) the lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; (B) a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; (C) the lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and (D) the lot line adjustment isapproved by the City. The City may impose conditions on the Lot Line Adjustment in order to make the lot conform to local zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property taxes prior to the approval of the Lot Line Adjustment, or to facilitate the relocation of existing infrastructure or easements. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application at a regular meeting on September 19, 2000, and October 17, 2000. The Planning Commission did not • find it necessary to conduct a field inspection of the property. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to. a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 1 OF 4 Section 5. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(A) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that each lot in any subdivision in the RA-S-1 Zone shall have a net area of not less forty-three thousand, five hundred sixty square feet (1.0 acre). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in the combined new lot being 0.88 net acres exclusive of: (a) any and all perimeter easements measured to a minimum lineal distance of ten feet perpendicular to the property lines; (b) any portion of the lot or parcel of land used for roadway purposes; and (c) any private drive or driveway which provides access to any other lot or parcel of land. Although the minimum net lot size in the RA-S-1 Zone is required to be 1 acre net, the existing lots and .the lots in the vicinity are less than 1 acre net, and the merged lot will be 0.88 acres net which is larger than the two lots before the merger. B. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(B)(3) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The existing sidelines of Lot 4-CF is approximately at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road while the portion of 7- CF is perpendicular to the rear of that lot. The proposed adjustment will allow the northerly side lot line of the combined Lot 4-CF and the rear lot line of the portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road. The proposed adjustment will allow the southerly side lot line of the combined Lots 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road. C. Section 16.20.230 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that ten (10) foot wide easements be dedicated for bridle trail and utility purposes over the strips and portions of land within and abutting upon the sidelines and rear lines of each lot. The proposed lot line adjustment to combine Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF, an irregular lot, shall continue a twenty-five (25) foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet and the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road at the north. A new ten (10) foot easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided. D. Conditions have been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. Section 6. In accordance with the foregoing findings, a Conditional Certificate of Compliance for lot line adjustment sought in Zoning Case No 607 as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved as a Conditional Certificate of Compliance subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 2 OF 4 ,y A. There shall continue to be a twenty-five (25) foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet, the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road at the north, and a new ten (10) foot, easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided within the adjusted boundary of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. The map attached to the Conditional Certificate of Compliance, referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any way constitute any representation that the adjusted combined Lot 4-CF. and a portion of Lot 7-CF can be developed in compliance with current zoning and building ordinance standards. No developmentshall occur on the property without first complying with all applicable City Building and Zoning requirements and other applicable rules and regulations. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No 221, 1988) to the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF at such time as an application is made for development. D. The Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment and the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 6 are submitted to, and approved by the City. Upon the City's approval of the legal description, the Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be issued by the City, shall be recorded by the property owner in the offices of the Los Angeles County Recorder, and evidence of the recordation shall be returned to the City. E. The applicants shall record the deeds effectuating the transfer concurrently with the Certificate of Compliance for the Lot Line Adjustment and shall submit proof of such recordation to the City of Rolling Hills. F. The applicants shall submit proof of payment of current property taxes. G. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot ..Line Adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17T `OCTOBER, 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 3 OF 4 ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ). §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-23 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE - OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND AN ADJACENT _ VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. was approved and adopted at 'a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 17, .2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN : None. Commissioners Hankins, Margeta,-Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: . Administrative Offices DE UTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 4 OF 4 • This is a true and certified copy of the record ff it bears the seal, imprinted in purple ink, of the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk JAN 18 2001 4)#'49`t--e-4— REGISTRAR•RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA • 1101 111 010 II IIIIIIYIII IIIIIIII 111 � IIIR LEAD SHEET O1-c 100077 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDERS OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 3:21 PM JAN 18 2001 VETf CIS LINE FOR i< Lur ERS USE TITLE(S) tee T(4 FEE 1FREE CODE 20, CODE 19 CODE 9 D.T.T. Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED When recorded mail to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS City Manager 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, Ca 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX • O1.--C 100077 Soace above for Recorder s use CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE in connection with the approval of a LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT California Government Code Sections 66412 (d) and 66499.35 SUBJECT LOTS: (2 Lots) OWNER (S): Parcel 1 in the City of Rolling Hills, Lot No. 4-CF as recorded in Book 73, pages 12 through 14 Assessors Parcel No. 7567-006-004 Street Address: 21 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 AND Parcel 2 in the City of Rolling Hills, a portion of Lot No. 7-CF as recorded in Book 73, pages 12 through 14 Assessors Parcel No. 7567-006-010 Street Address: Vacant lot Rolling Hills, California 90274 Evan L. James & Dorothy James Trust Evan L. James & Dorothy James Trust I, Craig Nealis, am the City Manager of the City of Rolling Hills, a California Municipal Corporation, and am authorized to act on behalf of the City of Rolling Hills in the issuance of this Certificate. am in receipt of a request for a certificate of Compliance from the above -mentioned owners, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". I do hereby certify as follows: (a) The boundary line dividing the two Tots listed above is hereby removed so as to merge the two (2) parcels to create one 1.28 acre irregular lot as described in Exhibit "B" attached to this Certificate. This lot line adjustment is made pursuant to, and in conformance with, a request made on September 19, 2000 by the owners of the subject Tots, the Evan L. James and Dorothy James Trust. (b) The parcel created by this lot line adjustment complies with the lot line adjustment requirements of the Subdivision Map Act [California Government Code Section 66412(d)], and the creation of the merged parcel is exempt from the Parcel Map requirements of the California Subdivision Map Act. (c) This Certificate relates only to the issue of compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and City ordinances enacted pursuant thereto. The parcel .described herein may be sold, leased, or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant thereto. Development of the parcels may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants of approval. (d) The common side lot line dividing the two parcels and accompanying easements on each side of the common side lot line shall be removed. Nothing in this Certificate: (i) abrogates or eliminates remaining existing easements recorded against the above listed lots; (ii) exempts these parcels from requirements of all existing permits and other grants of approval from the City of Rolling Hills and other public entities, including but not limited to, Rolling Hills City Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-23 adopted on October 17, 2000; or (iii) eliminates the requirement to obtain all required permits and other grants of approval from the City of Rolling Hills and other public entities, that have not already been issued or granted for additional development or redevelopment of the subject parcels. (e) This Certificate of Compliance is subject to the conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-23 attached hereto as Exhibit C and expressly incorporated herein by this reference. Approved and Certified, this LP` day of , 200/1. Craig'. Nealis, City Manager City of Rolling Hills State of California County of Los Angeles) On JA t‘) 4 . 2 O O f before me, D O U C4 L.-/I M (-/A ! T 16. , a Notary Public personally appeared C RA /6 /', /‘/E/I L / personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. 41, (seal) DOUGLAS K. MC HATIIE Commission # 1125501 Notary Public — California .11 Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Feb 2, 2001 Signature of Notary Public EXHIBIT A Request for Certificate of Compliance We, the undersigned owners of record of real property within the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, hereby request the City of Rolling Hills to determine if said real property described below on (Exhibit "B" to the Certificate) complies with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code, Section 66410 et seq.), and the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 16 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). 0 Signature L % Signature pd g • • -)-\ Name typed or printed Name typed or printed ZI C/-IVGIk wJtG,OkJ iZto. Address Address KZ0LLI &)( /) /LU C.,A • Signature Name typed or printed Address State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On DEC.22. 2006 before me, Do0674. A 6 K,-/-1/-I i He , a Notary Public personally appeared ' D d /2 U 'T / / ;J 4 : �J/-I ("f C personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the perlon10 cted, executed the instrument. .OUGLAS K. MC ss Commisalon # 112 Notary Public — California Los Angeles Coen` - My Comm. Expires Feb 2, 2001 State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) hand amt. official seal. (//; c , ,/ ///)' c 'l - i/ Signature of Notary Public On • before me, , a Notary Public personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. - - Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public (seal) • • EXHIBIT "B" Legal Description of the One Parcel created by a Lot Line Adjustment merger of Parcels 1 and 2 in the City of Rolling Hills as recorded in Book 73, pages 12 through 14, as adjusted by Certificate of Compliance and Lot line Adjustment dated 2000. Lot 4 and that portion of Lot 7 in the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Record of Survey as recorded in Book 73, pages 12 to 14, inclusive, in th office of the County Recorder of said County more particularly described as: Starting at the most westerly corner of said Lot 4, thence North 62 degrees 57 minutes 25 seconds East 200.00 feet, thence South 81 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds East 20.00 feet, thence North 01 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East 202.18 feet to the centerline of Chesterfield Road, thence along said centerline South 79 segrees 14 minutes 38 seconds East 85.13 feet, thence South 10 degrees 45 minutes 25 seconds West 15.00 feet, thence departing from said centerline South 00 degrees 00 minutes 23 seconds West 210.63 feet, thence South 24 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 100.00 feet, thence South 74 degrees 09 minutes 25 seconds West 300.00 feet, to a point on the centerline of Chuckwagon Road (50 feet wide) which point is on a non -tangent curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 537.15 feet with a radial to said point bearing South 74 degrees 09 minutes 25 seconds, thence northwest along saidcurve. through a central angle of 11 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds an arc distance of 105.00 feet to the point of beggining. Containing 55,663 square feet. Prepared by Bolton Engineering Corporation Ross N. Bolton, R.C.E. 26120 January, 28, 2000 • • EXHIBIT "C" RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE • ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF), AND A N ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Evan L. James and Mrs. Dorothy James for the James Trust with respect to real property located at 21 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 4-CF) that is 0.835 acres gross and an adjacent vacant lot to the northeast (a portion of Lot 7-CF) that is 1.28 acres gross, requesting a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment to remove the common side/rear lot line dividing the two parcels so that one 1.28 acre gross irregular lot is created by the merger of the two existing lots. Section 2. California Government Code Subsection, 66412(d) authorizes lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: (A) the lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; (B) a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; (C) the lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and (D) the lot line adjustment is approved by the City. The City may impose conditions on the Lot Line Adjustment in order to make the lot conform to local zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property taxes prior to the approval of the Lot Line Adjustment, or to facilitate the relocation of existing infrastructure or easements. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application at a regular meeting on September 19, 2000, and October 17, 2000. The Planning Commission did not find it necessary to conduct a field inspection of the property. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 1 OF 4 • Section 5. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision. Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(A) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that each lot in any subdivision in the RA-S-1 Zone shall have a net area of not less forty-three thousand, five hundred sixty square feet (1.0 acre). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in the combined new lot being 0.88 net acres exclusive of: (a) any and all perimeter easements measured to a minimum lineal distance of ten feet perpendicular to the property lines; (b) any portion of the lot or parcel of land used for roadway purposes; and (c) any private drive or driveway which provides access to any other lot or parcel of land. Although the minimum net lot size in the RA-S-1 Zone is required to be 1 acre net, the existing lots and the lots in the vicinity are less than 1 acre net, and the merged lot will be 0.88 acres net which is larger than the two lots before the merger. B. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(B)(3) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The existing sidelines of, Lot 4-CF is approximately at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road .while the portion of 7- CF is perpendicular to the rear of that lot. The proposed adjustment will allow the northerly side lot line of the combined Lot 4-CF and the rear lot line of the portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road.. The proposed adjustment will allow the southerly side lot line of the combined Lots 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road. C. Section 16.20.230 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that ten (10) foot wide easements be dedicated for bridle trail and utility purposes over the strips and portions of land within and abutting upon the sidelines and rear lines of each lot. The proposed lot line adjustment to combine Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF, an irregular lot, shall continue a twenty-five (25) foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet and the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road at the north. A new ten (10) foot easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided. D. Conditions have been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. Section 6. In accordance with the foregoing findings, . a Conditional Certificate of Compliance for lot line adjustment sought in Zoning Case No 607 as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved as a Conditional Certificate of Compliance subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 2 OF 4 A. There shall continue to be a twenty-five (25) • foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet, the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road .at the north, and a new ten (10) foot easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided within the adjusted boundary of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. The map attached to the Conditional Certificate of Compliance, referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any way constitute any representation that the adjusted combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF can be developed in compliance with current zoning and building ordinance standards. No development shall occur on the property without first complying with all applicable City Building and Zoning requirements and other applicable rules and regulations. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No 221, 1988) to the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF at such time as an application is made for development. D. The Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment and the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 6 are submitted to, and approved by the City. Upon the City's approval of the legal description, the Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be issued by the City, shall be recorded by the property owner in the offices of the Los Angeles County Recorder, and evidence of the recordation shall be returned to the City. E. The applicants shall record the deeds effectuating the transfer concurrently with the Certificate of Compliance for the Lot Line Adjustment and shall submit proof of such recordation to the City of Rolling Hills. F. The applicants shall submit proof of payment of current property taxes. G. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17T . DA 4 O OCTOBER, 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 3OF 4 • ATTEST: MARILYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-23 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND AN ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 17, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN : None . and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at -the following: Administrative Offices J DE UTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 4 OF 4 This Is, a true and certified copy of the record If it bears the seal, imprinted in purple ink, of the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk JAN 18 2001 41° REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1