56, An addition will incroach into, Resolutions & Approval Conditions.I5
327
18
1
22
13:
FORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 'CITY OF" ROLLING .HIT�LS,
COUNTY = OF.. LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.°';
n'c.the Matter.'of the'; Application'
DENNIS...E.`.,COE:A
Chesterfield Ranchos B, MB 607, 36/37).
FINDINGS
S:�ANb''FORMAL. REPORT.
ZONING:'.CASE
'NO. 56
The application of DennisE:: Coe Lot
hesterfield Ranchos B;.,.for a side yard variance, came on`.
or:. hearing. -:`on ,the ..twenty-seventh day of July, ;:;1965`,:
,he lioiir. : of -. 8:00.'.P :, '•at the ;City' _Ha1'1' , of the :
Railing Hills, California,. and the applicant. having submitted
4'
evidence in support 'of his application, ,, the Planning 'Commission,
being advised, • now makes ,' its Findings ' and Formal Report., as
I required by the ordinances of the City of;`Rolling ,Hills,.
alifornia:
e.C'o'rnmission ',finds that the applicant, ;Dennis.
Coe "is the owner' of that,:certa,in°.:real" -property. described'
Lot. '8, . Chesterfield Ranchos. B, located in the City of Rolling
Hills :,`:California,: and that notice Of the .public.".hearirig
it
24•
2
5, connection with said -application was given. as :required- by
26. Sections ..8 06: and 8 07, of 'Ordinance' No. 33': o'f the' City° of
2 Rolling `Hills California.
•
The ':Comnissi ... : .,
`onfurther , finds that no person appeared
at public hearing cin ,opposition. to the application for ' a
31
:.variance and that no evidence. was receivedby' the :commission
opposition thereto..
0
IZh.
The Commislion further finds thatthe proposed
residence addition of applicant is to be,
eet .'from: the'.
north sproPerty ' line of said Lot :8-CRB instead of twenty (20)
feet as required by said. Zoning`: Ordinance, _.an.d'. further... that
it ;;will. -extend; an :.exis:tin:g ,n'onconforming;, use as :defined
Article _'-;: Section' 5.05 .of ..Ordinance' No." 33. 'and further
finds. ;,that the variance should begranted to applicant in
orderto preserve substantial 'property rights possessed by
ro..
other property ; n the same wicnity, and zone, and that the
granting of,1 such variance will not be materially.. detrimental ..`..:
t'o the public. welfare or .injurious':.to 'property;. or improvements;.
in such vicinity .and zone in. which :applicait's property
located., and ..thatthere- areexceptional and. extraordinary
'circumstances. and conditions by reason':, of the location of the
existing, residence on.. said•..Lot 8-CRB which" ,do not 'apply;
.:generally toother •.property` in 'the, same vicinity and zone:
rom the foregoing;, :it is ,'concluded' that : a variance
should be granted by the , Planning Commission of.. ;the City.. o
Rolling ,Hills to Dennis
Coe: of Lot"'8
5 in accord•ance with th'e plot plan
•
26
.27
8
9
30
`014terfie41 Rancho's;
marked Exhibit I on file in these
roceed'ings ';and , it is therefore , Aso : ;ordered.•`
Dated:. August :`3;'; 1965
argaret Shafer,, Secretary
Planning Commission;
Raymond,;I.,Mahan, Chairman
Planning Commis s ion.