Loading...
607, Lot line adjustment to merge 2, Staff Reportsei WA/linu. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4.A. Mtg. Date: 10/23/2000 DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND AN ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. Mr. Evan L. James and Mrs. Dorothy James for the James Trust, 21 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 4-CF) BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2000-23 that is attached on October 17, 2000 at their regular meeting authorizing the issuance of A Conditional Certificate of Compliance for a _Lot Line Adjustment to merge two existing lots into one lot for property at 21 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 4-CF) and an adjacent vacant lot to the northeast (a portion of Lot 7-CF) in Zoning Case No. 607. The vote was 5-0. 2. The applicants are requesting to merge two legal lots both of which are substandard in size (minimum 1 acre net required in the RA-S-1 Zone). Lot 4-CF (Lot A) is a long narrow lot that faces Chuckwagon Road and the portion of Lot 7-CF (Lot B) is a long narrower lot that faces Chesterfield Road. These lots are somewhat perpendicular to one another. The applicants request that the lot line between Lot A and Lot B be merged thereby enlarging the lot. The area of existing Lot A is 0.835 acres gross and existing portion of Lot B is 0.443 acres gross. The proposed acreage for the merged lot is 1.28 acres gross and 0.88 acres net which is still substandard in size. Although the minimum net lot sizein the RA-S-1 Zone is required to be 1 acre net, the existing lots and the lots in the vicinity are less than 1 acre net, and the merged lot will be 0.88 acres net which is larger than the two lots before the merger. Printed on Recycled Paper. 3. Currently, an existing 2,800 square foot residence, 640 square foot attached garage and 440 square foot stable that was constructed in 1959 is located on Lot A. Lot B is a vacant lot. One story single-family residences exist on properties located in this area of the RA-S-1 Zone and vary from 0.69 to 2.60 gross acres to the north, south, east, and west. 4. According to the Subdivision Map Act, the Planning Commission may not impose conditions or exactions on its approval of a lot line adjustment except to conform to local zoning and building ordinances. Attached is Section 17.16.060 of the Zoning Ordinance describing lot area and dimensions. Referring to Section 17.16.060(A) Minimum Lot Area: The proposed lot is not greater than the minimum 43,560 square feet or one acre net as required in the RA-S-1 Zone. The merged lot will still be substandard in size at 0.88 acres net. Referring to Section 17.16.060(B) Minimum Dimensions: (1) The width of the merged lot along the street easement line on Chuckwagon Road is 110 feet and is less than the minimum 150 feet required and less than the lot depth divided by two and one-half required (Depth 292 feet _ 2.5 = 116.8). (2) The merged lot will be less than 150 feet in width as required; Parcel A varies from 110 feet to 143 feet in width and Parcel B varies from 82 feet in width to 89 feet in width. (3) (Corner lots not applicable). (4) The merged lot will not front the turnaround end of a cul-de-sac. (5) The depth of the merged lot will be greater than the lot width abutting the front street easement. 4. The merged lot will not require grading. 5. The merged lot will have a structural lot coverage of 3,931 square feet or 10.3% (20% permitted) and a total lot coverage of 10,649 square feet or 27.8% (35% permitted). 6. The merged lot will have a building pad size of 11,500 square feet and coverage of 43.6% (Planning Commission Guideline of 30%). 7. The merged lot will have a disturbed area that will be 10,649 square feet or 27.8% (40% maximum). 8. Plans also show a 10 foot easement proposed at the east side or rear of the merged lot to the Community Association for access, bridle trail, drainage and utility purposes. 9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 2000-23. • RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE .TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND A N ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Evan L. James and Mrs. Dorothy James for the James Trust with respect to real property located at 21 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 4-CF) that is 0.835 acres gross and an adjacent vacant lot to the northeast (a portion of Lot 7-CF) that is 1.28 acres gross, requesting a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment to remove the common side/rear lot line dividing the two parcels so that one 1.28 acre gross irregular lot is created by the merger of the two existing lots. Section 2. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: (A) the lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; (B) a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; (C) the lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and (D) the lot line adjustment is approved by the City. The City may impose conditions on the Lot Line Adjustment in order to make the lot conform to local zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property taxes prior to the approval of the Lot Line Adjustment, or to facilitate the. relocation of existing infrastructure or easements. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application at a regular meeting on September 19, 2000, and October 17, 2000. The Planning Commission did not find it necessary to conduct a field inspection of the property. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 1 OF 4 Section 5. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(A) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that each lot in any subdivision in the RA-S-1 Zone shall have a net area of not less forty-three thousand, five hundred sixty square feet (1.0 acre). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in the combined new lot being 0.88 net acres exclusive of: (a) any and all perimeter easements measured to a minimum lineal distance of ten feet perpendicular to the property lines; (b) any portion of the lot or parcel of land used for roadway purposes; and (c) any private drive or driveway which provides access to any other lot or parcel of land. Although the minimum net lot size in the RA-S-1 Zone is required to be 1 acre net, the existing lots and the lots in the vicinity are less than 1 acre net, and the merged lot will be 0.88 acres net which is larger than the two lots before the merger. B. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(B)(3) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The existing sidelines of Lot 4-CF is approximately at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road while the portion of 7- CF is perpendicular to the rear of that lot. The proposed adjustment will allow the northerly side lot line of the combined Lot 4-CF and the rear lot line of the portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road. The proposed adjustment will allow the southerly side lot line of the combined Lots 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF to be at right angles or radial to Chuckwagon Road. C. Section 16.20.230 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that ten (10) foot wide easements be dedicated for bridle trail and utility purposes over the strips and portions of land within and abutting upon the sidelines and rear lines of each lot. The proposed lot line adjustment to combine Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF, an irregular lot, shall continue a twenty-five (25) foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet and the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road at the north. A new ten (10) foot easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided. • D. Conditions have been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. Section 6. In accordance with the foregoing findings, a Conditional Certificate of Compliance for lot line adjustment sought in Zoning Case No 607 as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved as a Conditional Certificate of Compliance subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 2 OF 4 • • A: There shall continue to be a twenty-five (25) • foot easement along the westerly front lot line for 110 feet, the portion of the cul-de-sac bulb easement on Chesterfield Road at the north, and a new ten (10) foot easement along the easterly rear lot line beginning at the southerly lot line and extending north for 274 feet shall be provided within the adjusted boundary of the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF. The map attached to the Conditional Certificate of Compliance, referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any way constitute any representation that the adjusted combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF can be developed in compliance with current zoning and building ordinance standards. No development shall occur on the property without first complying with all applicable City Building and Zoning requirements and other ' applicable rules and regulations. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No 221, 1988) to the combined Lot 4-CF and a portion of Lot 7-CF at such time as an application is made for development. D. The Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment and the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 6 are submitted to, and approved by the City. Upon the City's approval of the legal description, the Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be issued by the City, shall be recorded by the property owner in the offices of the Los Angeles County Recorder, and evidence of the recordation shall be returned to the City. E. The applicants shall record the deeds effectuating the transfer concurrently with the Certificate of Compliance for the Lot Line Adjustment and shall submit proof of such recordation to the City of Rolling Hills. F. The applicants shall submit proof of payment of current property taxes. G. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17T .00TOBER, 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 3 OF 4 ATTEST: . ! <,.ei,,.) MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-23 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE TWO EXISTING LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR PROPERTY AT 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF) AND AN ADJACENT VACANT LOT TO THE NORTHEAST (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) IN ZONING CASE NO. 607. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 17, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN : None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices A �.i< DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 PAGE 4 OF 4 •City ./ leoffinf HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 TO: FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. ZONING CASES NO. 607 SITE LOCATION: 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF & A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) ZONING AND SIZE: RAS-1, 0.835 ACRES (LOT 4-CF) & 0.443 ACRES (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) APPLICANTS: JAMES TRUST, MR. EVAN L. JAMES AND MRS. DOROTHY JAMES REPRESENTATIVE: MR. ROSS BOLTON, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 9, 2000 REOUEST Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to merge two legal lots and determine compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. BACKGROUND 1. The applicants are requesting to merge two legal lots both of which are substandard in size (minimum 1 acre net required in the RA-S-1 Zone). Lot 4-CF (Lot A) is a long narrow lot that faces Chuckwagon Road and the portion of Lot 7-CF (Lot B) is a long narrower lot that faces Chesterfield Road. These lots are somewhat perpendicular to one another. The applicants request that the lot line between Lot A and Lot B be merged thereby enlarging the lot. The area of existing Lot A is 0.835 acres gross and existing portion of Lot B is 0.443 acres gross. The proposed acreage for the merged lot is 1.28 acres gross and 0.88 acres net which is still substandard in size. Although the minimum net lot size in the RA-S-1 Zone is required to be 1 acre net, the existing lots and the lots in the vicinity are less than 1 acre net, and the merged lot will be 0.88 acres net which is larger than the two lots before the merger. 2. Currently, an existing 2,800 square foot residence, 640 square foot attached garage and 440 square foot stable that was constructed in 1959 is located on Lot A. Lot B is a vacant lot. One story single-family residences exist on properties ZONING CASE NO. 607 Page 1 Pririted on Recycled Paper. located in this area of the RA-S-1 Zone and vary fro 0.69 to 2.60 gross acres to the north, south, east, and west. 3. According to the Subdivision Map Act, the Planning Commission may not impose conditions or exactions on its approval of a lot line adjustment except to conform to local zoning and building ordinances. Attached is Section 17.16.060 of the Zoning Ordinance describing lot area and dimensions. Referring to Section 17.16.060(A) Minimum Lot Area: The proposed lot is not greater than the minimum 43,560 square feet or one acre net as required in the RA-S-1 Zone. The merged lot will still be substandard in size at 0.88 acres net. Referring to Section 17.16.060(B) Minimum Dimensions: (1) The width of the merged lot along the street easement line o n Chuckwagon Road is 110 feet and is less than the minimum 150 feet required and less than the lot depth divided by two and one-half required (Depth 292 feet _ 2.5 = 116.8). (2) The merged lot will be less than 150 feet in width as required; Parcel A varies from 110 feet to 143 feet in width and Parcel B varies from 82 feet in width to 89 feet in width. (3) (Corner lots not applicable). (4) The merged lot will not front the turnaround end of a cul-de-sac. (5) The depth of the merged lot will be greater than the lot width abutting the front street easement. 4. The merged lot will not require grading. 5. The merged lot will have a structural lot coverage of 3,931 square feet or 10.3% (20% permitted) and a total lot coverage of 10,649 square feet or 27.8% (35% permitted). 6. The merged lot will have a building pad size of 11,500 square feet and coverage of 43.6% (Planning Commission Guideline of 30%). 7. The merged lot will have a disturbed area that will be 10,649 square feet or 27.8% (40% maximum). 8. Plans also show a 10 foot easement proposed at the east side or rear of the merged lot to the Community Association for access, bridle trail, drainage and utility purposes. 9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take public testimony. ZONING CASE NO. 607 Page 2 •16.050---17.16.060 5. Guest house; 6. Horseback riding ring; 7. Mixed use structure; 8. Recreational game court. B. Conditional Use As Primary Use. The following conditional uses may be permitted as a primary use on a lot: 1. Elementary school offering State -mandated cur- riculum; 2. Fire station; 3. Gate house; 4. Park and/or playground; 5. Public transportation limited uses by a joint powers transit authority on school district property which is developed as a school maintenance facility in the RA-S-2 zone; 6. Public utility building or structure, including a reservoir or tank, necessary for the provision of essen- tial utility services to permitted uses in the,City, but excluding wires, pipelines or poles;. 7. Temporary manufactured home. (Ord. 45.6 §10, 1995; Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.16.050 Site plan review required.. ::,Site ;plan : re- view ,shall be required for development in. the RA-.S specified in Chapter 17.46. '.(Ord. 239 §.11(part), 1993)'. G_._ 17.16.060 Lot area and dimensions.. Minimum=lot .area ,and dimensions shall be as follows: . A. Minimum Lot Area. 1. All lots in the RA-S-1 zone.shall.contain a minimum net lot area of forty.-three.thousand,-five hundred sixty square feet. 2. All lots in the RA-S.-2 zone shall contain a minimum net lot area of eighty-seven thousand, one hundred twenty square feet. 3. The City Council may establish a greater mini- mum net lot area as warranted by environmental conditions. Wherever a greater minimum area is required, a number ex- pressing the required acreage shall be placed upon the zoning map as a suffix to the base zone district (for exam- ple, RA-S-10 for a minimum net lot area of ten acres). 4. Lots or parcels of record which, prior to the adoption of the current standard, are smaller. than the cur- rently required lot area shall be considered to have the required area. B. Minimum Dimensions. All lots shall comply with the following width and depth requirements: • 1. The width of a lot at and along the street easement line shall be at least equal to or greater than 209 (Rolling Hills 5/96) • • 17.16.060 the lot depth divided by two and one-half. However, in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet. 2. The minimum width of a lot at any point shall be one hundred fifty feet, measured at right angles to the side lot lines. 209-1 (Rolling Hills 5/96) 17.16.060 3. For corner lots, the lot line with the smallest linear feet of lot frontage shall be considered the front lot line for the purpose of this section. In measuring the front lot width, the measurement shall not include any footage within the side street easement. SUMMARY RY OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (a ) Development Standard Zone District 1. Minimum Net Lot Area 2. Minimum Lot Dimensions •Width Along Street Easement •Width at Any Point • For Cul-de-sac Frontage •Depth 3. Maximum Lot.Coverage • By Structures •By Structures and impervious surfaces 4. Height Limitation 5. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size 6. Maximum Buildable Slope .7. Required Yards •Front *Side •Rear Notes: RA-S-1 43,560 sf RA-S-2 87,120 sf At least lot depth divided by 2-1/2, but in no case less than 150' 150' 150' Dependent upon turn -around; see Section 17.16:060..B.4.: . Must be equal to or greater than width along.front street easement, with maximum slope of 29% 20% .. .. 20% 35% 35% One story'(mezzanines; lofts, and storage areas not permitted) 1,300 sf, with 20' minimum width 2:1, with no structures allowed on sides or bottoms of canyons or natural drainage courses 50' 20' (b) 50' 50' 35' (c) 50' (a) This table summarizes development standards. For complete descrip- tions, refer to Sections 17.16.040 through 17.16.130. (b) Every lot or parcel shall have a side yard measuring no less than 20 feet from the side property line, except if a Rolling Hills Community Asso- ciation easement, located along the side property line, is improved with a roadway, then the side yard shall be no less than 10 feet from the interior edge of that easement. (c) Every lot or parcel in the RA-S-2 zone shall have a side yard mea- suring no less than 35 feet from the side property line, except if a Rolling Hills Community Association easement, located along the side property line, is improved with a roadway, then the side yard shall be no less than 25 feet from the interior edge of that easement. 210 (Rolling Hills 10/98) 1.6.070--17.16.080 4. For lots fronting at the turn -around end of a cul-de-sac, the minimum frontage width shall be a function of the required cul-de-sac radius and the number of lots fronting the turn -around. No more than two lots shall front the turn -around, and the turn -around shall have a minimum radius of thirty-two feet. 5. All lots shall have a depth with a maximum slope of twenty-nine degrees equal to or greater than the lot width abutting the front street easement. (Ord. 275 §7, 1998; Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.16.070 Maximum level of site development permit- ted. The following standards for maximum lot coverage and maximum disturbed area shall apply to all development in the RA-S zone. A. Maximum Lot Coverage. Two maximum lot coverage standards shall apply - maximum coverage by structures and, maximum coverage by impervious surfaces. 1. Coverage by Structures. All structures, on .a lot shall not cover more than twenty percent of the -net lot.; area. For the purpose of this section, "structures".:in- clude the primary residence, garages, all accessory build- ings, recreational game courts, swimming pools and similar facilities, , existing. stables, combination stable ;,and •corral, sites required• by Section 17.16.170,. and-subterrannean. structures other than basements. 2. Impervious Surface Coverage All-:s:tructures.,_. as defined in subsection '(A) (1) of this: sectiori,,._and ,all other impervious surfaces shall not ,cover, more than thirty- five percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this section, impervious surfaces shall include all driveways,. parking areas, walks, patios, decks and ;asphaltic ;.or con- crete paving not maintained by the Association. B. Maximum Disturbed Area. Disturbance shall be limited to forty percent of the net lot area. Disturbance shall include any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded areas where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. (Ord. 269 §7, 1997; Ord. 264 §7, 1996; Ord. 254 §6, 1995; Ord. 239 §11(part), 1993). 17.16.080 Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building shall have no more than one story, meaning no interior habitable space shall exist over any other interi- or habitable space. For the purposes of this section, "interior habitable space" includes lofts, mezzanines and storage areas. B. Exceptions. 1. A one-story space shall be permitted over a basement. 211 (Rolling Hills 10/98) •City ofielling HEARING DATE: MARCH 21, 2000 TO: FROM: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh©aol.com- HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANTS: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASES NO. 607 21 CHUCKWAGON ROAD (LOT 4-CF & A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) RAS-1, 0.835 ACRES (LOT 4-CF) & 0.443 ACRES (A PORTION OF LOT 7-CF) JAMES TRUST, MR. AND MRS. EVAN L. JAMES MR. ROSS BOLTON, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION MARCH 11, 2000 Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to merge two legal lots and determine compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for property at 21 Chuckwagon Road where there is an existing single family residence and an adjacent Vacant Lot (Lot 4-CF & a portion of Lot 7-CF). BACKGROUND Staff was informed on March 13, 2000 of the recent death of Mr. James. For this reason, Mr. Ross Bolton provided the attached letter requesting that the project be continued for one to two months. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission postpone the hearing for this project for one to two months. ZONING CASE NO. 607 Page 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. MAR-13-00 01:59 PM BOLTON Ensineerins Corp-. 310 544-+0458 to • P.01 Bolton Engineering Corporation 707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310) 544-0458 FAX one page March 13, 2000 City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Attention: Craig Nealis, City Manager Subject: Zoning Case No. 607 #21 Chuckwagon Road Dear. Mr. Nealis We request postponement of the Planning Commission hearing for Zoning Case No. 607 at #21 Chuckwagon. There has been a death in the family and they want to postpone the hearing for one to two months. Sincerely, Bolton Engineering Corp. Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 President C: Ms. James