Loading...
367, Requesting to meet the side ya, Correspondencecir City Ol /e0/.4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 - NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 September 26, 1988 Dr. and Mrs. Mohan Bhasker 9 Wideloop Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 RE: Zoning Case No. 367, Request for a Variance of the side yard setback requirements for construction of residential additions at 24 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills, California Dear Dr. & Mrs. Bhasker: Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 (enclosed) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter is to serve as official notice that -a request for a Variance to the side yard setback requirements to allow for the construction of residential additions at 24 Chuckwagon Road, Lot 31-CF, was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting on September 20, 1988. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted to deny the request for a Variance. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council, as required by Sections 17.32.090 and 17.32.140 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code, at their next meeting on Tuesday, October 11, 1988, and may be appealed pursuant to Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code. A copy of Resolution No. 494, establishing the fee for filing an appeal, is also enclosed for your information. Please feel free to call this office should you have any questions. TLB:bv Encls. (2) cc: Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Very truly, Terrence L. Belanger zd. 367 Mr. J. E. Hawthorne 22 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 9027.4 August 15, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Members: RE: Variance Request for (2) Two Side Yard Set Backs at 22 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills, California For 20 years we have lived with the premise that the Zoning Code for side yard set back was established for the best interest of the Community and each lot owner -- so that each owner could make the best use and value of his or her property on a basis among neighbors. . . whether it be for residential use, enhancing value or for resale or speculation. It is generally understood in the Community that the Zoning Codes are not waived by variance unless some unusual or extenuating circumstance exists that warrants granting a use privilege to one owner and not to another either now or in the future. We understand that 24 Chuckwagon Road (next door) was recently purchased (now in escrow until October) by Dr. Bhasker, 9 Wideloop, Rolling Hills, for a residence for his mother and father. 24 Chuckwagon now consists of a master bedroom and bath, two guest bedrooms, and bath, living room, dining room, kitchen, laundry room with toilet and shower -- existing living area total 2,355 sq. ft., plus enclosed garage of 345 sq. ft. (2 cars). This request for variance is for an additional family room of 300 sq. and added master bedroom of 335 sq. ft.; a total of 635 sq. ft., or an increase of 27% in living area in space obtained by waiver of side yard setback code. Between 24 and 22 Chuckwagon exists a 29' side yard setback of which 7' x 12' walled pool and tool equipment reduces setback to 22' per the proposed 12' x 24' family room would reduce the setback another 12' to actually 10 feet. A waiver of 19 feet. In the future, if I asked for a similar set back we would be almost wall to wall. • Between 24 and 26 Chuckwagon the side yard setback is 20 feet, the proposed added master bedroom and bath will reduce set back to 10 feet. There might be some unusual or extenuating circumstance that justifies a variance. This request should be considered on the basis of whether or not it will continue for now and the future the equal enhancement in use and value to all neighbors on anequal basis. We want the privilege to extend our use of the side setback in the future if this request is granted. Thank yo I J. { E . Hawthorne