Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
625, Construct an outdoor fireplace, Application
•. tY CODE 31:JN . . .111 t ,WI IIoIu III ID IDI II II IUIII DII 0 UI 0 III LEAD SH'El {T:.� 01 0681501 RECORD RFC ECORDRECODERS OFES r;,if N • 9PL'I '' :�`':>:.. � .:1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CAUFORNIA 1 1 8:04 AM APR 23 2001 i SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE TITLE(S) s Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED 4 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVID O F ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO.625 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 01 C 6815O1 I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 37 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 19-CF) ROLLING HILLS, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 625 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IWe) certify r declare) unde a penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tr and correct \ / X1 G.) Signature Aft I • Name typed or printe Address } ` >_l —S S02-711* City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. Ire V\VD)VI Na e yped or printed Gvity/State State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On 2.1Marrh2(101 beforeme, Joyce F. Liu, Notary Public, personally appeared Mark A. Elliott and Katie Elliott* �j Recorder's Use Only * * * * * .* * * * * personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) i subscribed to the within instrument a acknowledged to me that I the executed the same imhtsibe capacity(ies) and that by bi§4 signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon beha person(s) acted, executed the ins ment. z JOYCE F. LIU Commission # 1208675 Notary Public - California r- vj In . Witness by hand and official ( s/e� Z Signatuil -ef Notary authorized of which the Comm.Exp's sFeb16,20 1 SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF RESOLUTION NO.2001-0201 06S1501 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING; HILLS APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 37 CHUCKWAGON ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 625 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Mark Elliott, with respect to real property located at 37 Chuckwagon Road; (Lot 19=CF), Rolling Hills, requesting.a Variance to encroach into the'west side yard to construct an addition. at an existing single family residence. Section 2. A. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on November 21, 2000, on December 19, 2000 and January 16, 2001, and at a field trip on December 16, 2000. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard from members of the. City staff, the applicant's representative, and all persons interested in affecting the proposal. The Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied the project. B. At the same time, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit to construct 800 square foot guest house. At the December 19, 2000 meeting, the Commission expressed concerns pertaining to the size of the guest house, the total pad coverage and the general compatibility of the proposed' guest house with the adjacent properties. The Commission continued the public hearing to January 16; 2001 to allow the applicant to revise his application. Subsequent to the December 19, 2000 public hearing, the applicant submitted a revised site plan and withdrew the Conditional Use Permit application. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption [The State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.01.0 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar .properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar. properties in the vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.120(A) is required • * 0A 0681501 because it states that every lot shall have a side yard of not less than 20 feet. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach 4 feet into the west side yard to construct 224 square feet addition at an existing single family residential development. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular. shape of the lot. The existing legal nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 8.5 feet into the west side yard setback. This addition will not create any further encroachment than already exists; as the addition is proposed to be located under the existing roof line. The existing residence and proposed addition are modest in size. No other feasible location exists on the site forthe proposed addition. Due to the severity of slope on the property, the existing building pad cannot be increased in size. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the,. same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyedby similarly situated properties in the same vicinity and zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the .property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located, Development on the pad will allow the remaining portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The disturbed area of the lot is proposed at 32%, whereas 40% is permitted. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the guidelines of the City. The. residential building pad coverage exceeds the City's guidelines of 30%. • Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 625 to encroach into the west side yard setback to construct a 224 square foot addition at.an existing single family. residential development as indicated on the development plan dated January 4, 2001, submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. This Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.38.070, or otherwise been extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. 01 0681501 B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located shall be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit or approved by variance. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan dated January 4, 2001, and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. The structural lot coverage shallnot exceed 8.1% and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 17.2%. G. The residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 39.9%. Total building pad coverage shall not exceed 44.2%. H. The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 32% of the net lot area. Z: The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent feasible. • J. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. K. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan. containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. L. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site .and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. M. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential .environment of the City of Rolling Hills. N. The project shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. O. The project shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. P. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building permit. Q. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to this Variance which would 'constitute additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. R. The approval shall not be effective until the applicant executes an Affidavit of Acceptance consenting to all of the Conditions of the Variance approval and filed said affidavit with the City Clerk. S. All conditions of the Variance approval that apply must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 20th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2001 ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILY ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §14 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) 01 0681501 I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 37 CHUCKWAGON ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 625 was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 20, 2001by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • City a/ /E'0fiL 1 ihfild INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER: MA /2 /Z EGG 1 D l OWNER'S ADDRESS: 3 7 CA/UCK/4246 D/V /'o TELEPHONE NO: (31 O) Z (p C - p s, q.- gg PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: a 13d LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. / 9 -- Q, Sd 73 // 2 - / 4 ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7 `j k 7 PAGE DO(, PARCEL D 2 Z AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS:' TELEPHONE NO: Tic) G �070 Z10 //i) E-6 / 767 55z_VZ-2 5'�//2 £// 9d 2-74 �3r0) 54-4-- LC/ NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted. in the zone. C-7 /JCS l /-/d U 5�.- �r Printed on Recycled Paper. Will the proposed use be compatible with the uses in the surroundingarea,and if p p pso, why? ARC /VA -A 5 clC/ 0 5C5 /7) 7/c ,4 Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? i A 4) v r,Gcc7 FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the. application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. •City 0/ • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 VARIANCE NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD REOUEST FOR HEARING ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 PROPERTY OWNER: l l FAX (310) 377-7288 OWNER'S ADDRESS: .07 cv/�?1I/�,/J� r��i%'D TELEPHONE NO.: i3 l O 1 2 (;) (3- O S¢43 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3 7 CA/0C c2,4 70A /131• LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. / 9 .- A .5, 73/ /2 - /4 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO.75-- 7 PAGE 006 PARCEL 0 22. AGENTS NAME: 20 _ 7 &/L? /A) L--2,—R/4C7 AGENT'S ADDRESS: -7o 7 Sri ' .. QM . TELEPHONE. NO.: 3 / D) 4—4, - 6.o / C) Describe in ' detail the nature of the proposed use, includingwhat aspects of the project require a Variance. 9 sc 4iS/o4 /5 /A) ,72YL' Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based ' upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. • 71/4.— , L7 7/7 ») /S k2/i,-//AA %4 70-12C 7"2'/A /Ze /-G- Gd/7,4//4%/� Ste% /A9C < trrinto4 ^n Rc'•yc'nd paper. <,•�= • • Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious" to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because / % / /A / %,4 /A) G `7) Pc- -eG f "1/-7/z_-- % �i 5 i i/2C- l/o a G' FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. DATE 40 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT • CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA SS, 4-S 6 sq.ft. 95 e,45 G sq.ft. 5 E, 4-6-8 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) /4, g02 sq.ft. sq.ft. /4 80,3 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 28B3 sq.ft. 2 24 sq.ft. .3 1 0 7sq.ft. GARAGE T 2 �' sq.ft. sq.ft. 57 z-8 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 528 sq.ft. sq.ft. 5 2 sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. 4 i sq.ft. 5-0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. , sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 969 sq.ft. sq.ft. 9 6 sq.ft. OTHER C7oe- T /-/ausc sq.ft. . e 0 a sq.ft. e 0Q sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES 4t sq.ft. %STRUCTURAL 9 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 2 3 e O sq.ft. 9 z1-6 sq.ft. L 38Z sq.ft. 53 10 sq.ft. % /4-74- sq.ft. 2, (=I % sq.ft.' 9 4 % % 37..2 % sq.ft. �2?8a sq.ft. sq.ft. 114E sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 3 8 Z sq.ft. sq.ft. 7 3 ! 0 sq.ft. % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 9 349 sq.ft. sq.ft. lb) a (9 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 15 :o 9 9 % % • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA / 0, 8 0 3 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. 3 (0 7 GARAGE 6 2 g sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL 5-at sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER SE1ZVECG 7)A-P 0 9 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 `� ` sq.ft.Z ✓�, % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE - % 3 ?, /° PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 4'O 3 2 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 4-cT 0 sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. • RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER 6d g 0 o sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 Z 2 6-0 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 3 1.1 % • REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPERTY OWNER: V1 n a. K. L OWNER'S ADDRESS: 3 1 C t4 u c V-1\t. n G 0 6) TELEPHONE NO: (-31 O2_ , - 02).4e PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: r1 n PS U V E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1`Z % S . 13 / 1 2- - 14 ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7 5 fa 7. PAGE 00 Co PARCEL U 2 2 - AGENT'S NAME: d i-- i t5 t 4 L, A C, t tJ c GR 1 N C-t AGENT'S ADDRESS: 70 7 `b t t--v eta_ S P u ca asp. . C24,t .' 3 o 2 74 TELEPHONE NO: C3 ► 0) 4 4 - Grp 0 10 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detailthe nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: . 00t~ttnrl or ( 0V 1 r 0o(2, tAc_t.:. t. c 5 k.%) .rjt Li C Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: • • • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. T[ar FACC._ l5 (\ \le-aN) C„(tcaolt ct2..(? O E 1-1ea�G tS tZ c' (oMt5o1.) B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. 1 o Ci can ttJCi Rc0 0 tcz.�.tD D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. �t7tr.S hi©T (PCJLL • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain. how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. 1 tl-r, i :7_, cPca L.act i F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties: \ht l= L_L \\ l "t' t-1 I h.) tr; .' i ray f =1 r' t!. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. o �l�lt7(-le'i • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: �r', � / 6 , 24 O / ii�� ter, i< l� frZe- Signature' For: /2k GL (U r i Applicant DATE ZONING CAPNO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 8 4 8 sq.ft. sq.ft. `a B. 459, sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) I O & 6 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. t v, (off 0 sq.ft. RESIDENCE '3 1 U % sq.ft. sq.ft. 31D 7 sq.ft. GARAGE 5 2 B sq.ft. sq.ft. `) 2.8 ' sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 5 2 Z sq.ft. sq.ft. 5 2.`2i sq.ft. STABLE 4h 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4 0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 9 (o sq.ft. sq.ft. (o sq.ft. OTHER r--- t P.C. P L to C t;. sq.ft. 2. 6 sq.ft. 2- ea, sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 4.10 c sq.ft. $.l % 44. 2 DRIVEWAY 2'3'60 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING. 154 6 sq.ft. l 3 Q, 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4137 sq.ft. % 8.1. % 44-."6 % sq.ft. 2. 3 $ C) sq.ft. sq.ft. 15 4€, sq.ft. sq.ft. 13 v 2 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK S 3 OD sq.ft. sq.ft. S 31 O sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 9 • l % % . 1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE I O. 0 1 GJ sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE % 2 % % 1 O. 0 41 sq.ft. I1.2 % • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 8 `t ©4 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 3 k sq.ft. GARAGE. 5 Z- 2 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL ri 2 8 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER 14 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 4 2 ) sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4•c3 2.1:5 % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 4' (' sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 41:3 0 sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE Gt-'7D 0 sq.ft. 2 % OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at R. o t-(, i &t t-- -1-7..\G: S , California, this I day of O c i cD C3 t,. , 20 o By: � JC -- By: 37 C oc.v.. P% orl Address 1201-1ts NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) . knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: N. t_ L L t o T T DM. FILED REPRESENTATIVE:D. MC1.1 A Tit Cr'. PEE: COMPANY NAME:13v G. T 0 AC.-t t 4 s eR( AG7 RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: l 0 7 S t LV & & 5 mom R.D • ZONING CASE NO: EL C'a.. G) 0 Z '7 4 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (3 (0) c- 44 -.6 O l 0 PROJECT ADDRESS: 3 7 G(-1 0 c kba Aciok) fZ, t4, C? 9d z74 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at (2,0 LL r rJ 67 (4 C L: t_ .� C s < <1 i t^ . California this ! +h day of 0 C. r d c3.(Z. Q. By: 3`7 C ck.a)Ac-zdn) Address R. O t_ L t LL G-L I t City .2001 . • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA .to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval bythe other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this 7 RDGG/rc2C7 day of 5 BYnALL4L5,72 By: , California . .2000 . 3 7 C7-��6/-4,),47C-7,-)/k) RD Address koL.-L/7Q /I/ 6-L5 Ca„ City • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Rd - L /A).i c- this 7 day of By: By: �! /I(ANkibL_V17,,t GG-5 , California, ,20©0 1 ,77 66/-&C' D/i% Address - Lc/A?6/ //ems Ca Q 174. NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary • Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized . .• by its laws . to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property . described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to thebest of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: /VA RA L= �G / C7 7 7- REPRESENTATIVE: 1/D/67'L4��C: / f Il —7 - COMPANY NAME: GZ L;71))7/gLL:=/ /? 2G7 COMPANY ADDRESS: • BY: OUi% / Lfr • 707 $/GI/C/� .5"; • ZONING CASE CVO: �42y� 5r Ca 9 C9 2-7 TENTATIVE HEARING DA1'h: COMPANY PHONE NO. (i/Ul • 44 `‘0 /0 /4146° PROJECT ADDRESS: 37 (��l/C4"A)407Oft) C 9 Y 2 74 DATE FILED I/'ti/ FEE: " 1,e5-o-b, v RECEIPT NO: 726 7 CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1, Jane L. Thomas declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of property within a distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as follows: Property address: 37 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills APN #: 7567-006-022 Legal description: Lot 19, in Record of Survey as per Book 73, Pages 12 - 14. Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder Date: September 27, 2000 Signed: Subscribe and sworn to before me this /7l GP/- n Notary Public 27th day of Sept., 2000 FRANCENE D. URALMAN Comm. # 1157312 NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA Lev.* „ Los .Angeles County u' My Comm. Expires Oct, 2, 2i AV 0 oiTY OF ROLLusie,Hs. .. LETTER OF CONSENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME Government Code Section 65957 Date: 2. -- 2'13 -0 0 Application: Zoning Case No. 625 Department of Planning City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Attn: Yolanta Schwartz Dear Ms. Schwartz: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65957, Mr. Mark Elliott hereby requests and consents to a ninety (90) day extension to the time periods specified in Government Code Sections 65950, 65950.1 and 65952 for the City of Rolling Hills to take action on the above referenced application. • • The applicant also requests and consents to a continuance of this application from the December 19, 2000 Planning Commission meeting to the January 16, 2001 Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant tvise his plans. SinorApplicarit Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Representative or Applicant's Representative I‘A e.-IP-‘ 114 e a Printed Name of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Received by: Printed Name of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Date Filed City ojRolling Jd.'Pf ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com /O7-1/1/74,0 Zoning Case No. 6 yS GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) Tel. (`3 (0) 2 G 5- 0 8 4--p, Address 3 7 Ci/UG,�i.A)A& A) 7eD 2. Legal Owner(s) Tel. ( ) Address 3. Project Address 3 7 C7/vGAs/i,)>�.7 iy,A% Assessor's Book No. 7 5 7 - D - D 2 2 Lot No. / 9 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: d / P/AA)CC din 67a „ /-J/LIJ/n% 5. Existing zoning district , 7,(e-JS- 6. Proposed project/use of site S//9%/)72�Z- PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 1,5(0 t A C Rcs 8. Net lot area 5 8) 45 , . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 4D 3 10. Number of floors of construction GO/\)L 11. Basement square footage 1-1 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form Pririted on Recycled Paper. • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage `D, 443 .5, -1. 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? Ve 5/, /Vaa �H�gsi r�n� s% 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? WE, 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: A , a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? �y v (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? /0A% Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width ofdriveway(s) Existing? 12 / Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? /VO Proposed? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? % Proposed? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. g. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? A/ 7 Explain ..2Er%o/7�G. i'7oE5— "Jo7 .Pei'/Y.X-P/-- Pa.C' SZ/ Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? /V Explain h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? /3 n Explain Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum sloe of 25% or less? /i=5 Stable and corral average vehicular access slope '-S" P. j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? V5 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut . Amount fill (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet . Percentage of Net Lot Area 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 3 l 315 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-2 21. ff commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. ff the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. 7C /,5 9 . �. a -1 4 -79 7 9) /) 2 ,2/, �/ir= ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-3 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs photos will be accepted. 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report ' _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-4 on plants and animals and any cultural, (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity .) and scale of development (height, of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid Yes No 7 7 Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers, that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside afault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-5 Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 )4' not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 0 0 ` � would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the / area? AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 0 0 Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ 0 0 which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Ill. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 ❑ 0 applicable air quality plan? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-6 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0 substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0 any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 ❑ 0 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 0 0 number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ 0 0 through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat ❑ 0 0 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 0 ❑ /( protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ❑ ❑ ❑ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-7 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ )8:1 VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 0 on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 0 0 0 ll liquefaction? iv) Landslides? CI 0 CI 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? 0 0 0 321 14 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0 or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 ❑ 0Ye 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 0 0 fr use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-8 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ‘d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ , ❑ fX ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-9 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ . 0 ❑ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the ' course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as ' a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (0, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ,i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 Z1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-10 Lc LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 • 0 01 natural community conservation plan? X.,. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important ❑ 0 0 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan pr other land use plan? 0 0 �j. NOJS� — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ 0 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ 0 0 0 groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ 0 0 • 0 levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ❑ 0 0 where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of.a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 0 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form • III. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Kffi. PUBLIC SERVICES 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ �1 0 o *0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 Police protection? 0 0 0 Schools? 0 0 0 l Parks? 0 ❑ 0 Other public facilities? 0 0 ❑ XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and. regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-12 ZC_V. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? 0 b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 0 an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 V (e.g., sharp curves or dartgerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 5 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 Ig g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Item XVI, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0PI applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 0 0 X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ 0 0.35 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form I-13 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected .demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0 0 0 to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal ' V needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0 0 0 regulations related to solid waste? gVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 ❑, 0 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animalor eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 0 will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form 1-14 NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date -6-t1D For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and • in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date / ' to - 00 For /i/ARP- 5/2/ o Applicant 1-16 March 20, 2000 Environmental Information Form